Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Endoscopy on 2 year old


SarahMW
Go to solution Solved by RMJ,

Recommended Posts

SarahMW Newbie

My 2 year old had his endoscopy today. They took biopsies for celiac, sucrose and lactase. The doctor said the lining appears healthy. Does this mean it's unlikely to have celiac?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Scott Adams Grand Master

Did they take 3-4 samples and examine them under a microscope and give you a Marsh score? This is the normal approach for a celiac disease biopsy. Only your doctors can make the diagnosis, so ask them about this.

Also, did they do a blood test, which is the normal first step in the diagnostic process?

Also, he could still have non-celiac gluten sensitivity, which is ~10x more common than celiac disease, yet there is no test for it. So you may still want to try a gluten-free diet after all tests are done.

  • Solution
RMJ Mentor
On 2/28/2023 at 2:29 PM, SarahMW said:

My 2 year old had his endoscopy today. They took biopsies for celiac, sucrose and lactase. The doctor said the lining appears healthy. Does this mean it's unlikely to have celiac?

“lining appears healthy” sounds like a visual inspection, especially if you were told that on the day of the endoscopy!  Biopsy results take longer.   Celiac damage can’t always be seen with the endoscope, so you’ll need to wait and see what the biopsy results are.

  • 2 weeks later...
SarahMW Newbie
On 3/5/2023 at 6:10 PM, RMJ said:

“lining appears healthy” sounds like a visual inspection, especially if you were told that on the day of the endoscopy!  Biopsy results take longer.   Celiac damage can’t always be seen with the endoscope, so you’ll need to wait and see what the biopsy results are.

This was exactly the case. It came back with duodenitis. They said they didn't see any chronic changes yet but between the blood test being positive and the inflammation in the small intestine he likely has celiac disease.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,514
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kaylag
    Newest Member
    Kaylag
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Newhere19
      Thank you both. I haven't had access to the test results but will get them and post here.
    • jjiillee
      The ulcers are prepyloric ulcers. Not sure if that makes any difference. 
    • trents
      Duodenal ulcers are not uncommon either and often result from H.Pylori infections. https://www.healthdirect.gov.au/duodenal-ulcer
    • trents
    • Scott Adams
      I had what was termed "lesions," and normally ulcers are in the stomach, rather than the small intestines. I'm not sure why they would want you to have her continue to eat gluten, since she had a positive blood test, but as her doctor said, if she is uncomfortable and having symptoms why not have her go gluten-free at this point? If her symptoms improve, it would be another indicator that she has celiac disease and/or gluten sensitivity. This article has some detailed information on how to be 100% gluten-free, so it may be helpful (be sure to also read the comments section.):    
×
×
  • Create New...