Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Testing for Toddler Q


mollianderson224

Recommended Posts

mollianderson224 Newbie

Hello! I just got the go ahead to get my 16mo old tested for Celiac. It runs in my husband’s family, and my son has had a lot of the same symptoms his aunts and uncles had when they were young prediagnosis.

Prior to the orders being put in by our doc for the labs, I took gluten out of my son’s diet for about a week in a desperate effort to help him feel better. But now I know he needs to be ingesting gluten for testing to be accurate. I’m just wondering if a week without gluten was long enough to affect the antibodies to get him tested in the next few days. I did give him some toast to snack on tonight after our doctor’s appointment. 
 

Is a week gluten free long enough to need a more strict gluten test before I get his labs drawn?

 

Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master
(edited)

Welcome to the forum, @mollianderson224! A week off of gluten is not ideal before the testing but it may not invalidate the tests. Kind of depends on the levels of the antibodies to begin with. If they are borderline then it could create a false negative.

Do you know what test or test were ordered by the doctor? Young children's immune systems are immature and often do not respond to gluten in the same way as adults when it comes to producing antibodies. Young children are often deficient in total IGA which will skew the test results toward negative. So, to include total IGA in the tests ordered is very important for this age group.

Unfortunately, many doctors are not up to speed with regard to gluten disorders and are operating on very outdated information. The most popular test ordered by most physicians is the tTG-IGA. It is relatively inexpensive, specific and sensitive - for adults, that is. Ideally for young children, total IGA should be added into the testing as well as some secondary tests such as DGP-IgA and DGP-IgG. The secondary tests often catch celiac disease in children whose immunes systems are responding atypically . A "full celiac panel" like this has considerable value when diagnosing celiac disease in children. Here is a primer for testing: 

What one test misses, another may catch.

There is also something called NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) which shares many of the same symptoms as celiac disease but for which there is no testing available yet. It is 10x more common than celiac disease and some experts feel it can be a precursor to the development of celiac disease. Celiac disease must first be ruled out to arrive at a diagnosis of NCGS. At the end of the day, however, the antidote for both is the same: lifelong total avoidance of gluten.

Keep us posted.

Edited by trents
Scott Adams Grand Master

I agree with @trents and skipping gluten for any period of time before a blood screening for celiac disease could create a false negative result. That said, I would not cancel the test if only 1 week were skipped, and would get him back on gluten daily until the blood is drawn. If he happens to test negative, be sure to look at the actual results--for example if the cut off is 5 for positive and he scores 4 it likely means he would have been positive had you not skipped a week of gluten. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,514
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kaylag
    Newest Member
    Kaylag
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Newhere19
      Thank you both. I haven't had access to the test results but will get them and post here.
    • jjiillee
      The ulcers are prepyloric ulcers. Not sure if that makes any difference. 
    • trents
      Duodenal ulcers are not uncommon either and often result from H.Pylori infections. https://www.healthdirect.gov.au/duodenal-ulcer
    • trents
    • Scott Adams
      I had what was termed "lesions," and normally ulcers are in the stomach, rather than the small intestines. I'm not sure why they would want you to have her continue to eat gluten, since she had a positive blood test, but as her doctor said, if she is uncomfortable and having symptoms why not have her go gluten-free at this point? If her symptoms improve, it would be another indicator that she has celiac disease and/or gluten sensitivity. This article has some detailed information on how to be 100% gluten-free, so it may be helpful (be sure to also read the comments section.):    
×
×
  • Create New...