Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Have you experienced gaslighting by doctors?


Gemz

Recommended Posts

Gemz Newbie

Hey everyone 👋 

I'm currently in the midst of investigsting celiac with my gastroenterologist. I have my scope booked in at the end of August.

It's been a long time coming... I've been trying to get to the bottom of this well over a year ago.

What prompted me was the fact my partner pointed out my excessive bloating for the last few years. So I started with getting a blood test for the antibody, I was already gluten-free for about two weeks but the doctor said it didn't matter. The blood test came back negative. I went back to eating gluten because I was like 'ah whatever' 

Fast forward this year, my GI symptoms were bothering me.. bloating, abdo pain, nausea, bowel movements 3+ daily - which were like slop and the smell was pretty bad.

So I went on a strict gluten-free diet for 10 weeks and everything disappeared. I felt like a new person! And then I thought, 'I need to investigate this again' ...I had changed GP's and this new one wanted me to do an antibody test even though I was gluten-free for 10 weeks and she said "it doesn't matter, if you're celiac, it will show up" lo and behold, the antibody was negative and I was going to give up until my celiac gene test came back as having detected the HLA-DQ2. That gave me momentum to advocate for my body to get further testing (just in case).

Here I am, currently waiting for my scope .. after doing the gluten challenge for 14 weeks now 😵‍💫 and let me tell you, it's been pretty awful. My GI symptoms are back at full force.

They did a 3-day stool test and also abdo x-ray last week. My GP said it's come back as normal and that my insides "are completely healthy" and if the scope comes back as normal and "you get the discomfort back again"  they want me to get investigated for endometriosis... And then begun asking me if my symptoms are just when I'm menstruating or close to it. (Side note: she asked me if I had an eating disorder and to stop being on a gluten-free diet as it is usually a fad these days).

I feel like I'm getting so much gas lighting. I told the GP that all my GI symptoms are a daily occurrence, it is not affected whether I'm menstruating or not. No one takes my symptoms seriously. Of course, there's a chance I'm NCGS.. but geeeez.

Has anyone else experienced this with health care professionals??


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

Welcome to the forum, @Gemz!

Shame on your doctors and their ignorance.! It does matter whether or not you have been eating gluten free before being tested for celiac disease, whether it be the blood antibody test or the endoscopy/biopsy. We hear this same story from new members all too often!

The fact that you have an issue with gluten is indisputable since when you remove it from your diet your symptoms improve. The question is, do you have celiac disease (aka, gluten intolerance) or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity, aka, gluten sensitivity). The difference is, celiac disease damages the villous lining of the small bowel whereas NCGS does not. They share many of the same GI symptoms, however. There is no test for NCGS. Celiac disease must first be ruled out. NCGS is 10x more common than celiac disease.

Having explained all that, I wonder how complete the blood antibody testing was that you had done. Many docs will only order one or two antibody tests instead of a complete celiac antibody panel and so, some people who actually do have celiac disease are missed because the limited testing turns up negative. Do you have access to the specific tests that were run, the scores along with reference ranges for negative vs. positive, and can you post that information?

RMJ Mentor

It’s lucky that people with celiac disease can treat themselves, with a gluten free diet, since so many doctors don’t know what they’re doing when it comes to celiac disease.  

I hope you can get a clearcut diagnosis from the biopsy.  If not, just go gluten free anyway and get rid of your symptoms yourself!

Gemz Newbie
5 hours ago, trents said:

Welcome to the forum, @Gemz!

Shame on your doctors and their ignorance.! It does matter whether or not you have been eating gluten free before being tested for celiac disease, whether it be the blood antibody test or the endoscopy/biopsy. We hear this same story from new members all too often!

The fact that you have an issue with gluten is indisputable since when you remove it from your diet your symptoms improve. The question is, do you have celiac disease (aka, gluten intolerance) or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity, aka, gluten sensitivity). The difference is, celiac disease damages the villous lining of the small bowel whereas NCGS does not. They share many of the same GI symptoms, however. There is no test for NCGS. Celiac disease must first be ruled out. NCGS is 10x more common than celiac disease.

Having explained all that, I wonder how complete the blood antibody testing was that you had done. Many docs will only order one or two antibody tests instead of a complete celiac antibody panel and so, some people who actually do have celiac disease are missed because the limited testing turns up negative. Do you have access to the specific tests that were run, the scores along with reference ranges for negative vs. positive, and can you post that information?

Thanks Trent :)

That's such a shame how common occurrence this is for people. I can only hope that one day NCGS can be diagnosed without trialling gluten-free diet first.

I didn't realise there were more than two antibody tests. Yes, I was ordered two. These being...

Gliadin-IgG <0.4 (N<7, P>10)
TTG-IgA <0.1 (N<7, P>10)

I'd be curious to see what this is like when I'm actually eating gluten. Alas, I am getting the biopsy and finally will end this madness that's been going on for a few years now.

5 hours ago, RMJ said:

It’s lucky that people with celiac disease can treat themselves, with a gluten free diet, since so many doctors don’t know what they’re doing when it comes to celiac disease.  

I hope you can get a clearcut diagnosis from the biopsy.  If not, just go gluten free anyway and get rid of your symptoms yourself!

Thanks RMJ, it sure is eye opening.

I plan to do this because I've noticed ridiculous results, despite the dietician telling me that I shouldn't have stopped gluten if I don't need to.

trents Grand Master
(edited)

@Gemz, 14 weeks should be plenty of time for the gluten challenge but make sure you are also eating enough gluten daily during that time. More recent guidelines call for the daily consumption of at least 10gm of gluten (the amount found in about 4-6 slices of bread) for at least 2 weeks before either the blood antibody test or the endoscopy/biopsy. So, however you get that gluten, don't skimp on it.

Just for your information, here is an article outlining the various antibody tests that can be ordered to detect celiac disease. The TTG-IGA is the most popular one and often the only one ordered by physicians. As the article explains, the IGA test scores can be falsely low if someone is IGA deficient so, a "total IGA" test should always be ordered to check for IGA deficiency. And some people, for whatever reason, have atypical immune system responses such that the IGA spectrum is not triggered. Those people may be caught with the IGG tests. The IGG tests also seem to be able to catch some who have already started the gluten free diet but haven't been on it for a terribly long time. So, at least your physician did something right in ordering the Gliaddin IGG test. But the IGG tests are not as specific for celiac disease as are the IGA tests.

Kudos to you for doggedly pursuing this in the right way through the gluten challenge. Keep us posted. And realize that, at the end of the day, the antidote is the same whether or not you have celiac disease or NCGS. Namely, a gluten-free diet. And some experts believe that NCGS can be a precursor to the development of celiac disease. 

 

Edited by trents

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,538
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    CaptainCobra
    Newest Member
    CaptainCobra
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      71k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
    • Michael McDonald
      It’s been 3 days so far. I think I might be on the mend, but every time I think that, I go on rewind.  Thanks for your reply, I appreciate it.    
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Michael McDonald! That's going to be a hard question to answer because of individual differences. I would think in most cases a few days to a couple of weeks to completely return to normal. How long are you into it now?
    • Michael McDonald
      How long should it take to recover after a significant cross contamination situation?
    • Pat B
      I was very surprised to read the following in the link below: Medications and Gluten | FDA What types of ingredients that may contain gluten are in oral drug products? The majority of oral drug products either contain no gluten or virtually no gluten. Based on information available to the Agency, we are aware of no oral drug products currently marketed in the United States that contain wheat gluten or wheat flour intentionally added as an inactive ingredient. We would expect any such product, if it existed, to include wheat gluten or wheat flour in the list of ingredients in its labeling. FDA has identified very few oral drugs that contain wheat starch as an ingredient. Starch can also be used as a starting material for manufacturing various ingredients found in oral drugs. Starch used for this purpose is often corn starch or potato starch, not wheat starch. Even if wheat starch were used, either as an ingredient or as a starting material, there would be very little gluten, if any, expected to be present in the ingredient or the drug product. Very few, if any, oral drug products contain ingredients derived from barley or rye. Typically, how much gluten is in a drug product? The vast majority of oral drug products either contain no gluten or virtually no gluten. In the very rare cases where gluten may be present, we estimate based on drug formulation information that wheat starch and other ingredients derived from wheat would contribute no more than 0.5 mg gluten to a unit dose of an oral drug product. This amount is less than may be found in a single 30-gram serving of food labeled gluten-free according to FDA’s regulations.    Does this mean we no longer have to be so particular in what manufacturers we use?  I'd be interested in everyone's thoughts. Thanks!
×
×
  • Create New...