Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Confused is an understatement


beyondbabs23

Recommended Posts

beyondbabs23 Newbie

Hello! 

I am new to this so forgive my ignorance.

I was given a GI referral after what seemed like diverticulitis and an ER visit. They ran a Celiac blood test, ESR, CRP and fecal calprotectin test. All were negative but they state Celiac was positive and needed EGD. They never called but mailed me a letter stating my biopsy was negative for Celiac and H. Pylori. I cannot get my doctor to contact me back. 

So i figured until then this might be a safe space. I haven’t went completely gluten-free yet, because if my biopsy and nobody telling me otherwise. However from my blood tests I’m confused. 

I was reading that most people have IgA positive. I am not only IgA and EMA negative, I am only IgG positive, is that still indicative of Celiac or something worse? Any help is appreciated! 

My results were as follows:

Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgA = 8

Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgG = 41 H

tTG IgA = <2

tTG IgG = 10 H

Endomysial Antibody IgA = Negative 

Immunoglobulin A Qn, Serum = 250


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

Welcome to the forum, @beyondbabs23!

Your post is confusing. You typed, "They ran a Celiac blood test, ESR, CRP and fecal calprotectin test. All were negative but they state Celiac was positive and needed EGD." It is not true that all your celiac blood tests were negative. The Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgG (aka, "DGP-IGG") at 41 is positive and that is in fact a celiac antibody blood test. The IGG tests are second tier celiac antibody tests and not quite as specific as the IGA tests. But they are still to be taken seriously and more often than not do indicate celiac disease. The IGA tests are first tier diagnostic tests and the tTG-IGA is the centerpiece of that group, the one most often ordered by physicians when checking for celiac disease. It is relatively inexpensive, very sensitive and very specific for celiac disease. However, some people who actually do have celiac disease, for whatever reason, will still test negative on it. That is the importance of running a full celiac panel.

I'm not sure what you mean when you say you were "reading that most people have IGA positive". Do you mean most people with celiac disease? And which IGA measurement are you talking about? There are several IGA antibody tests that can be run when checking for celiac disease. It is true that most people are not IGA "deficient" and one of the tests that should be run, commonly known as "total IGA" (Immunoglobulin A Qn, Serum = 250 in your post above) tests for IGA deficiency. If someone is IGA deficient, this can cause false negatives in the individual IGA antibody tests such as the tTG-IGA and DGP-IGA. At 250, you are not IGA deficient. I will include an article on Celiac Blood Antibody Testing in this post.

As to your negative biopsy, perhaps the onset of your celiac disease (if you have it) is so recent that very little damage has been done to the small bowel villous lining, or the damage was patchy and missed by the sampling.

Another possibility is that you don't have celiac disease but NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). NCGS shares many of the same symptoms of celiac disease but does not damage the lining of the small bowel as does celiac disease. There is no test for it. It is 10x more common than celiac disease. Some experts feel it can be a precursor to the development of celiac disease. Eliminating gluten from your life is the antidote for both.

It would seem your next logical step would be to eliminate gluten from your life for about three months and see if your symptoms improve. Easier said than done. Easy to lower gluten intake but to eliminate it is another thing. I'll also include a primer on getting started on the glutenn free diet.

 

beyondbabs23 Newbie

@trents Thank you so much for ALL of this info and really breaking it down for me. As I said, I’m sorry for my ignorance or any misinterpretation of tests ran, my doctor has explained none of this to me. They actually told me “You don’t have the typical symptoms for Celiac or IBD, we are just completing the protocol from the ER” and the Celiac test came back with antibodies. 

I did mean the Celiac was positive, but the CRP, ESR, and fecal calprotectin were negative which is what prompted them to do the EGD, since they originally told me it was just IBS, and the other testing ruled out IBD, along with a CT scan from the ER showing no inflammation. 

I am going to keep pushing to get in contact with my doctor, it is very frustrating to just receive a letter without any follow up or explanations. And Google is a scary thing, statins IgG without IgA can mean other terrible things liver diseases, etc. 

I would also like to speak with them regarding the NCGS and if I need to repeat the Celiac Panel or endoscopy in the future. 

Thank you again. :) 

trents Grand Master

Keep in mind that if you decide to get any repeat testing done for celiac disease, whether it be blood antibody testing or endoscopy/biopsy, those tests are invalid if you are already on a gluten free diet. If you start a gluten free diet at some point as an experiment, you would need to go back to eating generous amounts of gluten (the amount in approximately 4-6 slices of bread) daily for several weeks leading up to the testing.

Many doctors are ignorant of the wide range of symptoms and associated medical conditions caused by celiac disease. There are over 200 of them. Yet, many physicians are stuck back on dated models of celiac symptomology composed of "classic symptoms" and give bum steers to their patients. You mention being evaluated for possible diverticular disease which would easily present symptoms that overlap with celiac disease.

beyondbabs23 Newbie

@trents Thankfully I haven’t given up Gluten yet fully due to just having my biopsy and have been savoring it until I’m told to let it go, lol. 

 

Yeah very much so it seems the symptoms overlap, as you said from what I’ve been reading. I was having sigmoid pain and strange bowel movement issues. but the doctor told me all Celiacs have upper stomach pain, vomiting, and those are the only Hallmark symptoms, which I don’t believe in the slightest. 

 

I’ll keep pushing ! I did a food intolerance test 2 years ago so I knew I was intolerant to gluten and wheat, but never was tested for Celiac despite that. So NCGS is very possible, I’m not sure if that would elevate IgG like mine or not, but worth asking about ! 

Wheatwacked Veteran

It is not your ignorance but your doctors ignorance that is concerning,

38 minutes ago, trents said:

The Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgG (aka, "DGP-IGG") at 41 is positive and that is in fact a celiac antibody blood test.

That’s why the moral of the story at this time is to evaluate how you feel when you eat 100% gluten-free for a couple of months. Until we have highly sensitive tests we can rely on to accurately diagnose gluten sensitivity, diagnosing will involve “building a case” by pulling together many pieces In an effort to justify why we can go against the result of a positive test, we ask “how positive is it’? It’s like getting a positive pregnancy test back and asking “how pregnant am I?”  Are You Confused About Your Celiac Disease Lab Results?

beyondbabs23 Newbie

@Wheatwacked I am a little frustrated with my doctor and the way things have went. I also have been suffering with severe acid reflux and nausea since my EGD, called the office to let them know and haven’t even gotten a call back for that, let alone anything else. 

When I return home after this job assignment, I will look for a better Gastro to build a repor with, as of course this happens out of town.

Im also frustrated because I’m 26, this is all new to me. I feel like they are treating this as a  run of the mill diagnosis to them, when it isn’t to me! It just isn’t being handled with much grace


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

Yes, by all means, get another doc. Believe me, the ignorance about celiac disease in the medical community sometimes amazes me! Some of them treat it as if it were the latest "fad" diagnosis. It is getting better but there are a lot older docs, even GI specialists out there, who are operating on very outdated notions concerning celiac disease.

RMJ Mentor

Do you have the actual biopsy results (pathology report) or just the statement that biopsies were negative? You may want to ask for the actual report to see if it shows any MILD signs of celiac disease.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Wheatwacked replied to plumbago's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      Anyone else with very high HDL?

    2. - plumbago replied to plumbago's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      Anyone else with very high HDL?

    3. - trents replied to plumbago's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      Anyone else with very high HDL?

    4. - knitty kitty replied to plumbago's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      Anyone else with very high HDL?

    5. - trents replied to Tyoung's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      1

      Celiac Disease and Mild Chronic Gastritis


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,908
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Rhan
    Newest Member
    Rhan
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      @plumbago, I found a good PDF on cholesterol:  Unlocking the mysteries of VLDL: exploring its production, intracellular trafficking, and metabolism as therapeutic targets I just started it, but it may have answers for us, with whacky cholesterol.  The pharmaceuticals don't seem to be interested in anything but statins.   "The nicotine in tobacco causes a decrease in the HDL cholesterol level. " Maybe you should start smoking? 🤪 I have high LDL and low HDL.  It is genetic mutations in the LDLR, APOB, PCSK9, or LDLRAP1 genes. My whole family is on statins for Familial Hyperliperdemia except me.  December I had ultrasound and cat scan for Carotid Artery blockage and both sides are above 85% blockage.  I started on Atorvastatin and that made me weaker than ever, even with CoQ10.  I asked for and got prescription for 2000 mg/day Nicotinic Acid B3 and in the 3 weeks my numbers changed. I am feeling realy good lately.  Stronger and more flexible.  Sleeping better.  Getting roto router (TCar) as soon as I get clearance from a cardiologist.  I expect that by my next blood panels in April to be even better. I am beginning to believe that like vitamin D where the RDA only accounts for preventing Rickets, the RDA for B3 is way underestimated.   From Oct 22 to Jan 17: A1c from 13.5 to 10.2 eGFR from 55 to 79 Triglyeride from 458 to 362 Total cholesterol from 245 to 264 HDL from 27 to 44 VLDL from 84 to 68 LDL from 134 to 154
    • plumbago
      I have taken thiamine on and off (just not at this exact moment), and I’m not sure it's made any difference. Yes, I almost always “fast” (12 hours NPO) for blood tests, as do a great many other Americans, so I tend to think that’s not it. All I can say is that the mystery continues. I could do some speculating here…well, heck, let me go ahead and speculate now: The lab ranges we all see on our reports are more or less the averages of Americans who have had those blood tests. Now, it’s up to you and me whether or not to think of the average American as healthy. I can make arguments both ways, more often than not, on the negative. My point here is that maybe the current range of HDL is somewhat skewed (ie, low), and maybe just maybe my super high (plus 100s) HDL results are not something to worry about; the range just needs updating. Why do I say this? Because pre-celiac disease diagnosis, my HDL values were in the normal range, but post celiac disease diagnosis, my HDL levels are way above average. See where I’m going? My trusty guidebook on celiac disease, Recognizing Celiac Disease by Cleo Libonati, RN, BSN, says that HDL increases after being on the gluten free diet. Or can increase, I guess. Then again, it could be something else. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ In thinking of going to a cardiologist, I sort of fear that he/she will be dismissive of a link to celiac disease, treated celiac disease, and would not therefore be considering all possibilities. @trents I'm sorry you've been diligently working on your numbers to no effect. That must be frustrating. LDL is a world that is far better understood than HDL, so for you there's maybe less "mystery." Familial hypercholesterolemia is for sure something that can be tested. Outside of that, you're right, genetics can determine a general pattern.
    • trents
      Well, I have the opposite problem. My LDL has been moderately high for years. I eat healthy and exercise regularly but can't seem to move that meter. I used to be on a statin (and my doctors want me to go back on one) and it brought both HDL and LDL down but the ratios never changed. I think a lot of that cholesterol stuff is just baked into the genes.
    • knitty kitty
      Wow, @plumbago, Curiouser, and curioser... Have you been fasting?  Apparently HDL levels increase after fasting... https://ajcn.nutrition.org/article/S0002-9165(23)31185-7/abstract   I must say it, try taking some Thiamine.  Thiamine helps regulate lipoproteins... Thiamine helped lower HDL in this study whether they had diabetes or not. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3921172/#:~:text=Serum thiamine and its derivatives,supplementation (p %3D 0.009).
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Tyoung! I would assume for the time being that the mild gastritis and the celiac disease are connected and that once you get a good handle on gluten free eating and experience significant healing in the lining of your duodenum, you will also see improvement in the gastritis as well. Gastritis is more often than not an accompanying finding that is commented on in the post scope/biopsy notes when people are positive for celiac disease. 
×
×
  • Create New...