Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help understanding test results after negative biopsy


englishbunny

Recommended Posts

englishbunny Newbie

After testing positive for a celiac antibody a few months ago, I had a biopsy.  Came back normal, but the doc only took two samples from duodenum so given all I have read about patchy damage I am concerned if it was an accurate result. 

They just redid my labs with gene testing included, here are the results.  Again, only high antibody is deamidated IGA (it's actually down from 124 a few months back), and I have one genetic marker.  I have been eating lots of gluten in order to try and get accurate results.  I also have Hashimotos.  Reason they looked at celiac at all was despite thyroid levels being fine I am suffering extreme fatigue, muscle aches, and my digestive system seems to fluctuate from constipation to diarrhea with some nausea and bloating.  But I'm not someone who seems to get super sick every time I eat gluten so celiac would never have occurred to me.

Last time I did labs my ferritin was low but it seems to have recovered a little.

I would love some insight. My doctor is super confusing and dismissive so I am thinking of taking these results to another doctor for a second opinion.  Thanks!

IMMUNOGLOBIN A 135
(Reference range: 47-310 mg/dL)

(TTG) AB, IGG <1.0
<15.0 Antibody not detected > or = 15.0 Antibody detected

(TTG) AB, IGA <1.0
<15.0 Antibody not detected > or = 15.0 Antibody detected

GLIADIN (DEAMIDATED) AB (IGA) 96.8 HIGH
<15.0 Antibody not detected > or = 15.0 Antibody detected

GLIADIN (DEAMIDATED) AB (IGG) <1.0
<15.0 Antibody not detected > or = 15.0 Antibody detected

ENDOMYSIAL ANTIBODY SCR (IGA) W/REFL TO TITER- NEGATIVE

HLA DQ2 Negative
 
HLA DQ8 Positive
 
HLA VARIANTS DETECTED: HLA DQA1*
03
 
HLA DQA1*
05

HLA DQB1*
0301
 
HLA DQB1*
0302

IRON, TOTAL 42
Reference Range: 40-190 mcg/dL

% SATURATION 14 LOW
Reference Range: 16-45 % (calc)

IRON BINDING CAPACITY 309
Reference Range: 250-450 mcg/dL (calc)

FERRITIN 20
Reference Range: 16-232 ng/mL

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Scott Adams Grand Master

HLA DQ8 Positive - This means you have the genes to get celiac disease, which ~40% of people have as well, although only ~1% develop the disease.

GLIADIN (DEAMIDATED) AB (IGA) 96.8 HIGH
<15.0 Antibody not detected > or = 15.0 Antibody detected

Since your biopsy was negative (you're correct that at least 6 samples should have been taken), this could mean non-celiac gluten sensitivity.  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.

My question is, were you doing a proper gluten challenge before your tests and eating at least 2-4 slices of wheat bread worth of gluten per day in the 6-8 weeks before your blood screening, and at least 2 weeks before your biopsy?

This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. 

 

 

 

englishbunny Newbie
29 minutes ago, Scott Adams said:

HLA DQ8 Positive - This means you have the genes to get celiac disease, which ~40% of people have as well, although only ~1% develop the disease.

GLIADIN (DEAMIDATED) AB (IGA) 96.8 HIGH
<15.0 Antibody not detected > or = 15.0 Antibody detected

Since your biopsy was negative (you're correct that at least 6 samples should have been taken), this could mean non-celiac gluten sensitivity.  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.

My question is, were you doing a proper gluten challenge before your tests and eating at least 2-4 slices of wheat bread worth of gluten per day in the 6-8 weeks before your blood screening, and at least 2 weeks before your biopsy?

This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. 

 

 

 

Thank you so much, Scott.  This is very helpful.

Yes, I was eating that amount of gluten before both of the blood tests and especially in the weeks before the biopsy.

Could there be anything else causing the elevated DGP-IgA other than celiac of NCGS?  For example Hashimotos?  I'm wondering if the fluctuating iron issues could also be caused by NCGS?

Scott Adams Grand Master

Great questions! Elevated DGP-IgA is most commonly linked to celiac disease or non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS), but other factors could play a role. Other autoimmune conditions, intestinal permeability (leaky gut), or even food sensitivities (e.g., dairy or FODMAPs) could also contribute to similar symptoms or test results. Fluctuating iron levels are common in celiac and NCGS due to malabsorption, but other causes like menstrual blood loss, dietary deficiencies, or gut infections (e.g., H. pylori) should also be considered. If celiac is ruled out, trying a strict gluten-free diet for several weeks can help determine if NCGS is the issue. Working with a healthcare provider to investigate further is key—let us know how it goes!

englishbunny Newbie

They did a lot of stool samples so I know they ruled out parasites and bacterial infections. It sounds like the next step is trying to find a doctor I trust for a second opinion and to try and figure out if it’s celiac or NCGS. Thanks again so much. Honestly it’s been so hard to find any support until I found this forum 🙏🏻

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,018
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    B R
    Newest Member
    B R
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      71.4k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Essentially all of our UK forum participants who are in the process of a celiac disease diagnosis report that after their blood antibody testing is done, they have to wait many months to get the endoscopy/biopsy for confirmation. My impression is that the UK/European health care models do great at addressing routine healthcare needs but poorly at specialty healthcare needs.
    • Scott Adams
      I think both systems have merits and faults, but in my opinion no citizen of any country should be denied health care, and it should be a basic human right, no matter your income.
    • Monkeyvat
      I want to stand up for the NHS! Yes, it has its issues, but after moving from the U.S. a few years ago, it’s been a real eye-opener to see just how much better the NHS is compared to the American healthcare system. For example, I can call my GP in the morning and often get an appointment that same day. Healthcare is provided to all UK residents, free at the point of use, no matter your income or job status. That’s a massive relief. In the U.S., people regularly go bankrupt because of medical bills—it’s one of the leading causes of financial ruin. Here, that just doesn’t happen. Plus, the UK consistently reports lower infant mortality rates and higher life expectancy compared to the U.S. No system is perfect, but the NHS deserves recognition for what it does right—and that’s a lot.  
    • Russ H
      I developed a heart arrhythmia and on several occasions had to wear a 24 hour Holter monitor. Among other things, I had premature atrial complexes (PACs) and occasional AFib. I was very fit at the time, running and cycling. This completely disappeared following my diagnosis and following a strict gluten free diet. I haven't had a single episode since, in 4 years.
    • trents
      Testing for celiac disease, whether blood antibody testing or biopsy procedure, will likely be invalidated when the gluten consumption has been discontinued ahead of the testing or the procedure for more than a couple of weeks or so. For the person with celiac disease, the consumption of gluten results in the production of specific antibodies that can be detected in the blood because the immune system is attacking the gluten as it comes in contact with the small bowel lining. The blood testing is designed to detect these antibodies. Over time, the inflammation wears down the villi that line the small bowel. The biopsy is designed to spot this damage to the lining. When gluten consumption is discontinued, these processes cease. Antibodies begin to disappear from the blood and the villi begins to rebuild. Many people begin to experiment with the gluten free diet before they seek testing and their doctors often neglect to check for this before ordering blood tests and biopsies.  If you want to be sure that you don't have celiac disease, you would need to endure a "gluten challenge" for a period of weeks. This would consist of resuming gluten consumption in the amount of at least 10g daily (the equivalent of about 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for at least two weeks and then get retested or re-biopsied. But regardless of whether you have celiac disease or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) the antidote is the same: total abstinence from gluten for life.
×
×
  • Create New...