Jump to content
  • You are not alone. Join Celiac.com for trusted gluten-free answers and forum support.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Do You Feel Better On A High/moderate Fat Or Low Fat Diet?


mle-ii

Do you feel better on a high/moderate fat or low fat diet?  

16 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

mle-ii Explorer

Do you feel better on a high/moderate fat or low fat diet?

By low fat I'm thinking something lower than 15-10% fat by calories and most likely high in carbohydrates.

By high/moderate fat I'm thinking something around 20%+ fat by calories and most likely low in carbohydrates.

By feeling better I mean you feel like you have more energy, better mood, no brain fog, less pain, etc.

I'm also thinking long term, like say being low fat or high/moderate fat for greater than say 2 weeks.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



eKatherine Apprentice

By the way, 10-15% of calories as fat would be considered an extremely low fat diet, while 20% is still considered unsustainably low.

mle-ii Explorer
By the way, 10-15% of calories as fat would be considered an extremely low fat diet, while 20% is still considered unsustainably low.

Agreed, but in the mindset of "fat is bad" it's not. ;)

I was trying to come up with some decent numbers that see about right for most folks, perhaps I'm off.

I just read something recently on gut health and so I was curious on how the real world of folks with damaged GIs would respond to this question. That and I'm trying ever so hard not to bias the poll.

Thanks,

Mike

Ursa Major Collaborator

I feel absolutely rotten if I don't get enough saturated fat. I cook with lard, and others will often not want to eat my 'greasy' food (I can't tolerate butter or coconut oil, which I'd prefer). I need to be on a high protein, high fat, low carbohydrate diet, or I lose all energy.

dlp252 Apprentice

I feel much better on a higher fat diet, with lower carbs. I have a lot more energy overall and feel full longer with a higher fat diet.

VydorScope Proficient

Agree, Higher (good) fat, Higher Protien, lower carb = best diet in my experence. :)

plantime Contributor

Low fat diet=depression and constipation for me.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



eKatherine Apprentice

I go crazy on a low fat diet. The cravings eventually consume me and I start eating things that are way off the scale as far as fat content is cncerned. Now that I can't eat dairy anymore, I'd better keep the fat in my diet up, no cheese or chocolate mousse in my future.

tarnalberry Community Regular
By low fat I'm thinking something lower than 15-10% fat by calories and most likely high in carbohydrates.

By high/moderate fat I'm thinking something around 20%+ fat by calories and most likely low in carbohydrates.

By feeling better I mean you feel like you have more energy, better mood, no brain fog, less pain, etc.

I'm also thinking long term, like say being low fat or high/moderate fat for greater than say 2 weeks.

Like the others, I also disagree with your definition, based on standard nutritional science (as much as there is a standard). Extrememly low fat is 10% of calories from fat. Low fat is less than 30%. High fat is over 70% calories from fat (yes, there are people who follow a high fat diet). moderate fat does not necessarily mean "low" carbohydrates. Additionally, there is reason to suggest that the body takes longer than 2 weeks to transition fully.

I tend towards hypoglycemic symptoms, so I CANNOT eat extremely low fat. I aim for about something like 25-30% fat, 20-30% protein, and 40-50% fat. Anything less than that is likely to leave me feeling low on energy and cranky, not to mention very 'brittle' when it comes to having controlled blood sugar. Also, on a very low fat diet, you're less likely to get enough of, or absorb enough of, the fat soluble vitamins that keep you healthy and keep your energy levels up. I really don't like 10% fat diets. My FIL is on one (Ornish) due to a heart attack, and it's working for him, and I support that it works for him, but generally don't like them for all the things they are missing. Veggies and fruit and grains and legumes are wonderful, but don't provide everything the human body and brain needs.

Sarah8793 Enthusiast

Me too. I feel best on a diet higher in fats and proteins and lower in carbs.

mle-ii Explorer
Like the others, I also disagree with your definition, based on standard nutritional science (as much as there is a standard). Extrememly low fat is 10% of calories from fat. Low fat is less than 30%. High fat is over 70% calories from fat (yes, there are people who follow a high fat diet). moderate fat does not necessarily mean "low" carbohydrates. Additionally, there is reason to suggest that the body takes longer than 2 weeks to transition fully.

I tend towards hypoglycemic symptoms, so I CANNOT eat extremely low fat. I aim for about something like 25-30% fat, 20-30% protein, and 40-50% fat. Anything less than that is likely to leave me feeling low on energy and cranky, not to mention very 'brittle' when it comes to having controlled blood sugar. Also, on a very low fat diet, you're less likely to get enough of, or absorb enough of, the fat soluble vitamins that keep you healthy and keep your energy levels up. I really don't like 10% fat diets. My FIL is on one (Ornish) due to a heart attack, and it's working for him, and I support that it works for him, but generally don't like them for all the things they are missing. Veggies and fruit and grains and legumes are wonderful, but don't provide everything the human body and brain needs.

I agree that my numbers were off now. Guess I'll have to rethink how to do the poll. I just wanted to make sure that folks that think fat is bad and cut a lot out don't think that 20% is high fat. Clearly I'm not a good poll taker. :P

I find for myself that somewhere around 33% from each is about right. Give or take. Though I don't use macros to determine how many grams from each. Usually I shoot for around 1 g per lean lb body mass, at least 100g carbs + more depending on activitiy and the rest fat.

Where I was going with this came from some studies (ok done on rats) that pointed towards gut growth (and I mean intestine/GI growth not belly growth) in rats that had part of their GI dammaged or removed.

I wondered if eating higher fat made us feel better because it helped grow/heal the GI. Thus the body takes in more vitamins, minerals and calories.

Perhaps I just misread the article, but it does make me wonder why some folks feel and do better on a higher fat diet and others do better on a higher carb diet.

Thanks,

Mike

VydorScope Proficient
I aim for about something like 25-30% fat, 20-30% protein, and 40-50% fat.

Shouldnt you have some carbs to? :P :P :P

mle-ii Explorer
Shouldnt you have some carbs to? :P :P :P

LOL I didn't even notice that. Who needs the stinkin carbs?!!?! ;)

covsooze Enthusiast

This is a difficult one for me. I need the fat for energy and to stave off depression, but fat also makes my stomach sore. I guess I need to be more careful about getting the 'right' fats....but even then, olive oil can irritate my stomach. :unsure:

jerseyangel Proficient

I definately feel better with a moderate amount of fat. I stick to olive oil, olives, palm oil (as shortening) almonds and meats as my sources of fat.

tarnalberry Community Regular
Shouldnt you have some carbs to? :P :P :P

lol :lol: I must have "fat" fingers. make that 25-30% fat, 20-30% protein, 40-55% carbs. (corrected my math as well. :P )

to the OP - and that's a loose estimate, unless I've been having blood sugar troubles, I'm not militant about it. if I've been having blood sugar difficulties, or in a situation where I expect I might (like the long hikes I'm doing) I'm somewhat militant about at *least* 25/25/50, at each meal/snack, or at least no more than 50% carbs.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Wheatwacked replied to Ginger38's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      6

      The Struggle Has Overtaken Me

    2. - cristiana replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    3. - CC90 replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    4. - Wheatwacked replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    5. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Origins of Celiac Disease
      19

      Do Antibiotics in Babies Increase Celiac Disease Risk Later in Life? (+Video)

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,192
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    LINDA ZIEL
    Newest Member
    LINDA ZIEL
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      Hi @Ginger38, By now you know that these things improve without gluten. I once saw an interview with a corporation executive where he proudly declared that his wheat products are more addictive than potato chips. Dr Fuhrman (Eat to Live) said find foods that are friendly to you to be friends with.  
    • cristiana
      Hi @CC90 Ah... that is very interesting.  Although it is very annoying for you to have to go through it all again, I would say that almost sounds like an admission that they didn't look far enough last time?   I could be wrong, but I would not be at all surprised if they find something on the next attempt.  Coeliac damage can be very patchy, as I understand it, so that's why my own gastroenterologist always likes to point out that he's taken lots of samples!  In the kindest possible way (you don't want to upset the person doing the procedure!) I'd be inclined to tell them what happened last time and to ask them in person to take samples lower down, as  if your health system is anything like the one in my country, communication between GPs, consultants and hospitals isn't always very good.  You don't want the same mistake to be made again. You say that your first endoscopy was traumatic?  May I ask, looking at your spelling of coeliac, was this done at an NHS hospital in England?  The reason for the question is that one of my NHS diagnosed friends was not automatically offered a sedative and managed without one.  Inspired by her, I tried to have an endoscopy one time, in a private setting, without one, so that I could recover quicker, but I had to request sedative in the end it was so uncomfortable.    I am sorry that you will have to go through a gluten challenge again but to make things easier, ensure you eat things containing gluten that you will miss should you have to go gluten free one day. 😂 I was told to eat 2 slices of normal wholemeal bread or the equivalent every day in the weeks before , but I also opted for Weetabix and dozens of Penguin chocolate biscuits.  (I had a very tight headache across my temple for days before the procedure, which I thought was interesting as I had that frequently growing up. - must have been a coeliac symptom!)  Anyway, I do hope you soon get the answers you are looking for and do keep us posted. Cristiana  
    • CC90
      Hi Cristiana   Yes I've had the biopsy results showing normal villi and intestinal mucosa.  The repeat endoscopy (requested by the gastro doc) would be to take samples from further into the intestine than the previous endoscopy reached.      
    • Wheatwacked
      Transglutaminase IgA is the gold-standard blood test for celiac disease. Sensitivity of over 90% and specificity of 95–99%. It rarely produces false positives.  An elevated level means your immune system is reacting to gluten.  Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) does not typically cause high levels of tTG-IgA. Unfortunately the protocols for a diagnosis of Celiac Disease are aimed at proving you don't have it, leaving you twisting in the wind. Genetic testing and improvement on a trial gluten free diet, also avoiding milk protein, will likely show improvement in short order if it is Celiac; but will that satisfy the medical system for a diagnosis? If you do end up scheduling a repeat endoscopy, be sure to eat up to 10 grams of gluten for 8 - 12 weeks.  You want  to create maximum damage. Not a medical opinion, but my vote is yes.
    • trents
      Cristiana asks a very relevant question. What looks normal to the naked eye may not look normal under the microscope.
×
×
  • Create New...