0
tailz

Anybody End Up With Grave's Disease?

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

It's possible some of the foods I'm reacting to are from the Lyme and Bartonella my new doc suspects I have. He also wants to run another blood test because he thinks they missed subclinical hyperthyroidism.

It's not looking good. I read the choices are meds, radioactive I treatment, or surgery. Anybody on here have experience with Grave's to give me a list of pros and cons to each treatment? How has the Grave's affected you long term? Thanks...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:
Ads by Google:


It's possible some of the foods I'm reacting to are from the Lyme and Bartonella my new doc suspects I have. He also wants to run another blood test because he thinks they missed subclinical hyperthyroidism.

It's not looking good. I read the choices are meds, radioactive I treatment, or surgery. Anybody on here have experience with Grave's to give me a list of pros and cons to each treatment? How has the Grave's affected you long term? Thanks...

How long have you been gluten-free? If it has not been long I would monitor my thyroid levels for a while before doing anything drastic. Untreated celiac can mess with your thyroid levels. They may stabalize on their own after your body heals sans gluten. Hopefully the new test he runs will tell you more but if it is at a subclinical level your doctor may also want to take a wait and see approach. I know others on the boards have had thyroid issues, mine like yours were always the subclinical results, and hopefully they will be more helpful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yow, are they talking RAI and surgery already? Graves often goes into remission and you don't need to treat it. Basically what they do is suppress the thyroid with drugs and wait it out. If you're going gluten-free then you that will probably help too. I know of someone who claimed she ate lots and lots of goitrogenic foods and it made her Graves go into remission. Goitrogenic means "against thryoid" so it is food that neutralizes the thyroid hormone. Soy, cruciferous veggies, turnips, that sort of thing. Not sure I really believe you could eat enough of those to make it work though.

I rushed into RAI and rather regret it now. That was pre-Internet era and I didn't really know all my options. My regret stems from my feeling that taking synthetic T4 is not as good as having the full complement of thyroid hormones like calcitonin, T1-T7 and whatever else it pumps out. So don't rush to rid yourself of it.

I tried Armour thyroid but I didn't like it. It made me hyper.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was diagnosed with Graves Disease in 2004 and treated with medication. At the time I was given the choice of RAI, surgery or medication, luckily the surgeon I saw suggested that I try medication first to see if the GD would go into remission.

I stayed on the medication for 14 months and now have normal thyroid levels. I know of others with graves disease who have gone on and off medication for years and have resisted RAI.

My GP is amazed that I have not relapsed especially seeing how sick I was when I was diagnosed. I firmly believe that my thyroid is staying in remission now because I am now eating gluten free; I don't have a diagnosis for celiac disease (except positive response to gluten challenge) but I have one for graves disease. Which disease came first? My guess is that the gluten intolerance came first.

From my experience I would be very reluctant to have the RAI. Medication does work and if celiac disease/gluten intolerance is also a possibility, a change of diet could also help. When you have thyroid blood tests make sure they test TSH, Free T3 & Free T4.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My 4 year old was diagonsed with Graves disease a couple of weeks ago. We tried the methimazole but it made her really sick! She is having her thyroid removed this week to get her under control. Her thyroid levels are very high and her resting heartbeat was 130+. I would definately try the medication first but know that not everyone can tolerate it. I don't know if it is because she is so young or not but she was hospitalized with swollen and painful joints and a terrible rash, all due to the medication.

Apart from the medication you can do radioactive iodine or surgery. They both result in the same thing. Removal of the thryoid gland. I choose not to give my child radiation because she is so young but that is the preferred method today. It is quick and painless but lots of radiation involved. If she was older we would probably have done that.

Surgery....well.....it's surgery..with all the complications that go along with it. The other risks are accidental removal of the paratyhroid glands that regulate your calcium levels and possible damage to the laryngeal nerves. Make sure your surgeon has done lots of these procedures!

So you do have choices, just don't ignore it..you need to do something as untreated Graves disease is very hard on your body. It might go into remission with the medication but that is not the expected outcome. I hope you feel better soon and are not faced with the choices we were. Good Luck to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:


I hope everything turns out well for your daughter, she is so young and must feel absolutely awful.

I was very aware while I was on the medication that it could cause adverse reactions. If the medication had not worked for me I would have had surgery. I'm not sure about RAI - from what I have been told radiation will eventually kill the thyroid but that does not stop the body producing the thyroid autoantibodies that cause thyroid disease.

Anyway at the moment I am still in remission and so it's a decision I don't have to make.

My thoughts and prayers are with you and your daughter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Ruth. I wish she could have stayed on the medication. I am happy it worked for you. We were hoping for remission when we were first told about the methimazole but even then we were told it was uncommon. You are very fortunate. Thanks for your kind thoughts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The rash that SueC is talking about will have been as a result of her daughter taking Methimazole. A bad reaction to the drug will cause aching joints, a rash and a sore throat, I think this can happen because, in large doses, the drug does something with the white blood cells.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i've had graves for 9 years

i've been on tapazole since diagnosis with the expection of 2 possible remissions which didn't last

i've been saying NO to RAI for the past 7 years

tapazole keeps me feeling great

i'm on 2.5 mg /day now - with normal thyroid test results

who knows, maybe remission?

i've been gluten-free for 9 months now

i asked my endo if going gluten free might help my graves into remission

his answer was that it's an interesting question, but no studies have been done

why not?

my plan is to avoid RAI. My endo thinks i'm making a wrong decision. but it;s my decision, and he respects that

good luck

rg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have Hashimotos Thyroid which is different to Graves but have read others and they all say 'NO RAI' unless its for cancer. I take Armour and LOVE IT !! So natural and you feel so good. Most Drs don't know how to prescribe and get the dose all wrong. If you have weak adrenal function you need that treated as well.

www.stopthethyroidmadness.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:


Hi,

I was diagnosed with Graves and Thyroid Eye disease in 2005. I was in the thoes of every mistreatment known to medicine and desperate and certainly not thinking right because of the thyroid storm that came on. I only learned after the fact that nearly a third of the people in severe thyroid storm die from it. I couldn't find verification of the facts, but I certainly felt like it.

PLEASE take the opportunity to educate yourself and don't do the RAI or Surgery unless you have confimation of cancer. These procedures cannot be reversed and they mess you up so badly. I'm not sure which came first the chicken or the egg Graves or Celiac but I know my hormones are a mess and I just now 18 months and 5 doctors later finally found some one who knows what the heck he is doing.

I would be happy to share my links with you to help you learn more, if you would like them, just email me off list: KFulbright@aol.com I'll help in anyway I can. That is now my goal, to help as many people as I can who may be suffering from ignorance and mistreatment by the medical community and endocrinologists.

You are not alone!!!

Karen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
0

  • Who's Online   16 Members, 0 Anonymous, 415 Guests (See full list)

  • Top Posters +

  • Recent Articles

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 06/21/2018 - Would you buy a house advertised as ‘gluten-free’? Yes, there really is such a house for sale. 
    It seems a Phoenix realtor Mike D’Elena is hoping that his trendy claim will catch the eye of a buyer hungry to avoid gluten, or, at least one with a sense of humor. D’Elena said he crafted the ads as a way to “be funny and to draw attention.” The idea, D’Elena said, is to “make it memorable.” 
    Though D’Elena’s marketing seeks to capitalizes on the gluten-free trend, he knows Celiac disease is a serious health issue for some people. “[W]e’re not here to offend anybody….this is just something we're just trying to do to draw attention and do what's best for our clients," he said. 
    Still, the signs seem to be working. D'elena had fielded six offers within a few days of listing the west Phoenix home.
    "Buying can sometimes be the most stressful thing you do in your entire life so why not have some fun with it," he said. 
    What do you think? Clever? Funny?
    Read more at Arizonafamily.com.

    Advertising Banner-Ads
    Bakery On Main started in the small bakery of a natural foods market on Main Street in Glastonbury, Connecticut. Founder Michael Smulders listened when his customers with Celiac Disease would mention the lack of good tasting, gluten-free options available to them. Upon learning this, he believed that nobody should have to suffer due to any kind of food allergy or dietary need. From then on, his mission became creating delicious and fearlessly unique gluten-free products that were clean and great tasting, while still being safe for his Celiac customers!
    Premium ingredients, bakeshop delicious recipes, and happy customers were our inspiration from the beginning— and are still the cornerstones of Bakery On Main today. We are a fiercely ethical company that believes in integrity and feels that happiness and wholesome, great tasting food should be harmonious. We strive for that in everything we bake in our dedicated gluten-free facility that is GFCO Certified and SQF Level 3 Certified. We use only natural, NON-GMO Project Verified ingredients and all of our products are certified Kosher Parve, dairy and casein free, and we have recently introduced certified Organic items as well! 
    Our passion is to bake the very best products while bringing happiness to our customers, each other, and all those we meet!
    We are available during normal business hours at: 1-888-533-8118 EST.
    To learn more about us at: visit our site.

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 06/20/2018 - Currently, the only way to manage celiac disease is to eliminate gluten from the diet. That could be set to change as clinical trials begin in Australia for a new vaccine that aims to switch off the immune response to gluten. 
    The trials are set to begin at Australia’s University of the Sunshine Coast Clinical Trials Centre. The vaccine is designed to allow people with celiac disease to consume gluten with no adverse effects. A successful vaccine could be the beginning of the end for the gluten-free diet as the only currently viable treatment for celiac disease. That could be a massive breakthrough for people with celiac disease.
    USC’s Clinical Trials Centre Director Lucas Litewka said trial participants would receive an injection of the vaccine twice a week for seven weeks. The trials will be conducted alongside gastroenterologist Dr. James Daveson, who called the vaccine “a very exciting potential new therapy that has been undergoing clinical trials for several years now.”
    Dr. Daveson said the investigational vaccine might potentially restore gluten tolerance to people with celiac disease.The trial is open to adults between the ages of 18 and 70 who have clinically diagnosed celiac disease, and have followed a strict gluten-free diet for at least 12 months. Anyone interested in participating can go to www.joinourtrials.com.
    Read more at the website for Australia’s University of the Sunshine Coast Clinical Trials Centre.

    Source:
    FoodProcessing.com.au

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 06/19/2018 - Could baking soda help reduce the inflammation and damage caused by autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, and celiac disease? Scientists at the Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University say that a daily dose of baking soda may in fact help reduce inflammation and damage caused by autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, and celiac disease.
    Those scientists recently gathered some of the first evidence to show that cheap, over-the-counter antacids can prompt the spleen to promote an anti-inflammatory environment that could be helpful in combating inflammatory disease.
    A type of cell called mesothelial cells line our body cavities, like the digestive tract. They have little fingers, called microvilli, that sense the environment, and warn the organs they cover that there is an invader and an immune response is needed.
    The team’s data shows that when rats or healthy people drink a solution of baking soda, the stomach makes more acid, which causes mesothelial cells on the outside of the spleen to tell the spleen to go easy on the immune response.  "It's most likely a hamburger not a bacterial infection," is basically the message, says Dr. Paul O'Connor, renal physiologist in the MCG Department of Physiology at Augusta University and the study's corresponding author.
    That message, which is transmitted with help from a chemical messenger called acetylcholine, seems to encourage the gut to shift against inflammation, say the scientists.
    In patients who drank water with baking soda for two weeks, immune cells called macrophages, shifted from primarily those that promote inflammation, called M1, to those that reduce it, called M2. "The shift from inflammatory to an anti-inflammatory profile is happening everywhere," O'Connor says. "We saw it in the kidneys, we saw it in the spleen, now we see it in the peripheral blood."
    O'Connor hopes drinking baking soda can one day produce similar results for people with autoimmune disease. "You are not really turning anything off or on, you are just pushing it toward one side by giving an anti-inflammatory stimulus," he says, in this case, away from harmful inflammation. "It's potentially a really safe way to treat inflammatory disease."
    The research was funded by the National Institutes of Health.
    Read more at: Sciencedaily.com

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 06/18/2018 - Celiac disease has been mainly associated with Caucasian populations in Northern Europe, and their descendants in other countries, but new scientific evidence is beginning to challenge that view. Still, the exact global prevalence of celiac disease remains unknown.  To get better data on that issue, a team of researchers recently conducted a comprehensive review and meta-analysis to get a reasonably accurate estimate the global prevalence of celiac disease. 
    The research team included P Singh, A Arora, TA Strand, DA Leffler, C Catassi, PH Green, CP Kelly, V Ahuja, and GK Makharia. They are variously affiliated with the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India; Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer, Norway; Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Gastroenterology Research and Development, Takeda Pharmaceuticals Inc, Cambridge, MA; Department of Pediatrics, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy; Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; USA Celiac Disease Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; and the Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
    For their review, the team searched Medline, PubMed, and EMBASE for the keywords ‘celiac disease,’ ‘celiac,’ ‘tissue transglutaminase antibody,’ ‘anti-endomysium antibody,’ ‘endomysial antibody,’ and ‘prevalence’ for studies published from January 1991 through March 2016. 
    The team cross-referenced each article with the words ‘Asia,’ ‘Europe,’ ‘Africa,’ ‘South America,’ ‘North America,’ and ‘Australia.’ They defined celiac diagnosis based on European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition guidelines. The team used 96 articles of 3,843 articles in their final analysis.
    Overall global prevalence of celiac disease was 1.4% in 275,818 individuals, based on positive blood tests for anti-tissue transglutaminase and/or anti-endomysial antibodies. The pooled global prevalence of biopsy-confirmed celiac disease was 0.7% in 138,792 individuals. That means that numerous people with celiac disease potentially remain undiagnosed.
    Rates of celiac disease were 0.4% in South America, 0.5% in Africa and North America, 0.6% in Asia, and 0.8% in Europe and Oceania; the prevalence was 0.6% in female vs 0.4% males. Celiac disease was significantly more common in children than adults.
    This systematic review and meta-analysis showed celiac disease to be reported worldwide. Blood test data shows celiac disease rate of 1.4%, while biopsy data shows 0.7%. The prevalence of celiac disease varies with sex, age, and location. 
    This review demonstrates a need for more comprehensive population-based studies of celiac disease in numerous countries.  The 1.4% rate indicates that there are 91.2 million people worldwide with celiac disease, and 3.9 million are in the U.S.A.
    Source:
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jun;16(6):823-836.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.037.

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      110,263
    • Total Posts
      949,793
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      77,671
    • Most Online
      3,093

    Newest Member
    Tjn89
    Joined
  • Popular Now

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you - I had my endoscopy today and the doctor said he didn't see the telltale signs of celiac but he did biopsy. There were a number of other things he noted, like a polyp found in the fundus, and my stomach was very inflamed.       He said to start a gluten free diet right away anyway.  It is hard not to get ahead of myself and wonder about the results and if they come back negative.   
    • Congratulations!!🎆🎇🎊🥂  
    • Becca4130, Being gluten free for a while would cause your blood serology to test negative but many people choose not to finish a gluten challenge because of how bad they feel on gluten. NCGS is a real thing even though most doctors don't recognize it today. See this care2 article that explains what might be  happening in your case. https://www.care2.com/causes/new-study-confirms-existence-of-non-celiac-gluten-sensitivity.html The rate of positive blood serology is 2x higher than biopsy confirmed Celiac disease. see this new research about the rate of NCGS (serology postive Celiac)  in the general public without positive biopsy.  . . though for this research they considered both serology (blood tests) and biopsy confirmed celiac diagnosis as the real rate of Celiac disease in the general public. quoting Overall global prevalence of celiac disease was 1.4% in 275,818 individuals, based on positive blood tests for anti-tissue transglutaminase and/or anti-endomysial antibodies. The pooled global prevalence of biopsy-confirmed celiac disease was 0.7% in 138,792 individuals." Which they say  quoting again "means that numerous people with celiac disease potentially remain undiagnosed" or I think in many causes NCGS is not being declared because they consider a blood positive test inconclusive in the absence of a confirmed biopsy. and it sounds like what is happening in your Case especially since you have been gluten free long enough to not test positive on your blood work. See the Care2 article which is typically 6 months and your antibodies goes down naturally when you are gluten free that long. quoting "Though the cause of the two conditions seems to be very different, the study confirmed that the best treatment is the same for both conditions. After six months of only consuming gluten-free grains, the NCGS group reported a significant improvement in their digestive and non-digestive symptoms, and the immune system markers identified earlier in the study had normalized." ****this is not medical advice but what makes sense to me after having been serology (blood) positive for antibodies that went down on a gluten free diet. You might also see this thread that talks about some of these same issues. I hope this is helpful and good luck on your continued journey. I also meant to add this link http://www.mdmag.com/medical-news/not-everyone-predisposed-to-celiac-disease-develops-it Or It could be you have not developed celiac yet because your gut biome has protected you so far from developing it. quoting "The study authors determined that while about 40 percent of the population have a genetic disposition to celiac disease, just about 1 percent develop the condition upon exposure to gluten. Mice who housed Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria (Psa) in their guts – transplanted from celiac patients – metabolized gluten different than mice treated with the probiotic Lactobacillus.

      The researchers further observed that Psa produced gluten sequences that initiated inflammation in celiac patients. Lactobacillus was used to detoxify the gluten.

      "So the type of bacteria that we have in our gut contributes to the digestion of gluten, and the way this digestion is performed could increase or decrease the chances of developing celiac disease in a person with genetic risk,” senior study author Dr. Elena Verdu explain(s)" Again I hope this is helpful. 2 Timothy 2: 7 “Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things” this included. Posterboy by the Grace of God,
    • Fun fact, google your doctors name, 2-4 review sites will have them and their info. You can submit a public review of your doctor.......inform people of this story on the review sites and this doctors "incompetence" in relation to your disease.
    • After I posted this, he called me because I replied to the note questioning if I was reading the test results correctly because they didn't look negative to me. He told me that A. diarrhea is not really a symptom of celiac (huh, wonder why all the poop jokes about it then...) B. if I had both genes plus a positive antibody test, that would mean that there was about a 95% chance that I do have celiac right now, not a potential to develop it and C. if I stay on a gluten free diet (which I don't have to because he says I don't have celiac) then he won't retest the antibodies because of course they will go down and there is no need to test. I'm pretty much speechless. It is abundantly clear why he was the first available when others had a wait.
  • Blog Entries

  • Upcoming Events