0
licel

Conflicting Bloodwork

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

:blink:

A few months ago I was told by my internist that I tested positive for celiac. I had the blood test re-done last week in a GI specialty group and found out today that I was negative, "well within the norms". Proir to this I had IBS every now and then. I have diarrhea a few times a month, yet, I have a cramping feeling on my right side -- from beltline to lower pubic area every now and then...it sems to come and go and I know when I'm stressed it seems to occur more frequently. I avoid lactose as mucha as possible but will cheat once in a while and there's a 50/50 chance that I get symtoms. I seem to be gassy and my bowel movemnets sometimes seem flattened a bit when I am experiencing that cramping feeling. I was assessed with spastic colon 20 years ago. What should I do about the conflicting blood results? Is it possible that I am sensitive to certain foods or is this a stress related phenomenon. I had a colonoscopy 2 years ago and everything is fine. I turn 49 next month......I have no weight loss and all the other symptoms. Please help and advise.

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:
Ads by Google:


Get a copy of your lab results and post them here...someone will be happy to interpret, I'm sure. I would hope that your GI doc knows more about how to interpret celiac labs, but don't be too sure!

Also, do some research on what all the lab tests mean. (see www.celiac.com or

www.clanthompson.com for good reviews on the topic)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have some blood results regarding the conflicting bloodwork:

First Dr. found Transglutaminase 8 and Gliadin 28

A second Dr. found Transglutaminase 1.2 and Gliadin 23

The second Dr. said I was negative for celiac and the 1st Dr. said I was positive.

Please offer any help out there. Is it true that different labs use different methods of reference? Any help on these results would be appreciated.

Thanks a million!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is it true that different labs use different methods of reference?

Yes, that's true. Normally the Antigliadin (otherwise referred to as AGA) is usually normal < 20. If this were the case for you, then you're positive both times, yet only slightly on the 2nd... but, still positive. Now, there are two types of AGA... IGG & IGA. It might help you to find out which one.

I don't know much about the Ttg levels... sorry!

My AGA Igg level was the first to elevate... then a year later the Iga showed up positive. I believe if you're experiencing symptoms and you've got antibodies showing up, then you're seeing that your body isn't liking gluten too much. PS... in case you're wondering if it's just an allergy, an IGE antibody would show up for that.

Doctors are very protective about the celiac diagnosis, unless they can prove it 100%. In your case, they might say you're gluten intolerant (which I think is just a pre-celiac condition).

Fun stuff huh?

Gretchen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm still confused! After spending considerable time reading these baords it appears that there is "Celiac Disease" and "Wheat Sensitivity or Intolerance". Are they the same. I'm 49 years old, would extensive damage occurred by now? I'm not interesyed in having the invasive endoscopy which one Dr. said is the gold standard. I have read that if biopsies are not taken in the right places the test could be negative when in fact you're positive. I have noticed that some foods cause more symptoms than others (spicy, broccoli, dairy, grainy mustards, nuts, chocolate). I would rate wheat items -- breads, pastas, etc. as being the food items that do NOT bring on symptoms. My bloodwork is in previous postings above and I'm confused as to getting a biopsy, contacting enterolabs, or just dismissing it as IBS as the 2nd Dr. suggested??? The 2nd Dr. said that each lab uses different cutoffs and comparison methods??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:


Licel.

My IGA antibody was elevated, biopsy neg, no damage to the villi.

GI doc said he can't prove I don't have Celiac and can't prove I do

have celiac disease. Because my gene test was neg, I think that there are two separate

diseases (in my humble opinion), similar in symptoms, treated by

gluten-free diet. I was really sick for 2 years. I spent last summer in bed,

curled up in a fetal position. This summer I am pain free/symptom free.

Until someone proves different I have gluten sensitivity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply.....

2 years ago I had a calcium oxalate kidney stone. On the enterolab site it said this "could" be related to malabsorption of calcium.???

I'm trying to avoid the invasive endoscopy test. Would my GI Dr. be able to do a gene test? The enterolab site seems to say that the stool test is much better than a blood test.....the more I read, the more confused, and anxious, I become.

The feedback is greatly appeciated....any response to LICEL postings would helppppp!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Licel,

If you are 49 years old I would advise you to have the scope with the

biopsy and also the colonoscopy. They really aren't bad and you will get some answers to your questions.'

Yes, a GI doctor can do the gene test, they have to be sent to a special lab.

Another thing I wanted to tell you is that after my scope was finished my

doctor showed me a picture of another problem, I have Barrett's ring

around the esophagus. It is caused by the acid in the stomach splashing

up into the esophagus and must be checked every year because it can sometime lead to cancer.If I had not had this done i wouldn't have known it. Don't you

think that having the endo would help end the stress your under. When you find out the problem, you can make informed choices on how to treat it. Good luck to you..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm still confused!  After spending considerable time reading these baords it appears that there is "Celiac Disease" and "Wheat Sensitivity or Intolerance".  Are they the same. 

I have read that if biopsies are not taken in the right places the test could be negative when in fact you're positive.

My bloodwork is in previous postings above and I'm confused as to getting a biopsy, contacting enterolabs, or just dismissing it as IBS as the 2nd Dr. suggested???

The 2nd Dr. said that each lab uses different cutoffs and comparison methods??

Licel,

I'll give you the Gretch's dictionary definition on the Celiac vs. Sensitivity/Intolerance. ;) ... but, I don't know if it will help.

Celiac disease & Gluten Intolerance are pretty much the same... however, celiac is where there is evidence (visually by eye and/or microscope) that there is damage to the small intestine due to a protein found in wheat, rye, barley, oats called gliadin. There are supposedly 1 in 133 that have a genetic disposition to not be able to tolerate this protein in their bodies and their immune system launches an attack via antibodies (ie: IGG, IGA). Some of the other tests that your doctor runs, like the Ttg & Ema can also check for immune response and are somehow sensitive to those who have damage.

Those of us without 100% positives any or all of these blood tests and/or haven't shown any damage with a biopsy, are sometimes told by our doctors that we don't have celiac (damage to the intestines due to an autoimmune response to gliadin). Not many tell us that however, that we're still having an immune response to gliadin (gluten intolerance / sensitivity), but we haven't suffered damage... yet. That's why most of us are here.

We're suffering the symptoms of an immune response to gliadin (the same as a celiac), but our condition hasn't fully developed yet. Some doctors don't like to see their patients go on a gluten-free diet unless they're 100% diagnosed. But, many of us don't care... we just want to feel better and be healthy and prevent what we believe would be inevitable (full-blown celiac) if we went untreated.

... and please don't accept IBS... I spoke with my (former) doctor the other day and he wanted to give me that and I have antibodies to gliadin! He admitted that's where doctor's put people that they just don't know what's causing their symptoms.

And yes, different labs have different ranges of normal, etc... but, the lab will usually tell you what they are on the results.

Good luck!

Gretchen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a copy of the results in the mail today from the 2nd Dr. who said I am negative. Can anyone out there help interpret these?? I do plan for a followup visit to talk.

Transglutaminase IgG Abs 1.2 (reference range... less than 6 = negative)

Transglutaminase IgA Abs less than 1.2 (reference range..less than 4 = negative)

Gliadin IGG AB 23.9 (reference range less than 45)

Gliadin IGA AB 28.4 (reference range less than 45)...for both of these tests, the report indicates I am in normal range..asis also the case with the results above.

What about EMA...should that have been tested??

Any help or feedback would be apreciated.

Thanks!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:


Transglutaminase IgG Abs 1.2 (reference range... less than 6 = negative)

Transglutaminase IgA Abs less than 1.2 (reference range..less than 4 = negative)

Gliadin IGG AB 23.9 (reference range less than 45)

Gliadin IGA AB 28.4 (reference range less than 45)

I am a bit confused by the reference ranges. Usually the range for Gliadin is 20 or 30 depending on the lab. I have never seen it be as high as 45. And I wish they had considered the TTG IgA Abs reference range "less than 4 = negative" for my test. I had a 9 and they said it was negative if less than 20! I guess it is the diefference in labs. Maybe my blood tests would not have been considered negative!

By other labs standards your Gliadin tests would be weak positives.

God bless,

Mariann

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so if my IGA glutaminase is 5 (with <20 negative) and my IGG gliadin is 73 (with >30 strong positive), should i be worried that my IGG was a false positive? isn't that the less reliable of the two? i'm not sure if the seeming sky-highness makes it more absurd or more definitive.

i also had a gliadin IGA at 8 units, but there was NO reference range on the test result for that test. unless it's assumed to fall under the same as the gliadin IGG.

any thoughts?

this test was done two years ago, and i had a neg. biopsy. should i get the bloodwork done again?

luckily i just made an appt with a nutritionist for next week... maybe she'll give me a better answer than "IBS!"

monica

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Monica,

so if my IGA glutaminase is 5 (with <20 negative) and my IGG gliadin is 73 (with >30 strong positive), should i be worried that my IGG was a false positive? isn't that the less reliable of the two? i'm not sure if the seeming sky-highness makes it more absurd or more definitive.

I was told my Igg @ 33 (normal < 20) was a false positive and I believed it. A year later, my Igg has elevated even more and my Iga is now a part of the story. I would have to say to listen to your body... ultimately, you know your body best. Conditions that cause your intestines to be more permeable (leaky gut) can cause your Igg to elevate. It has something to do with those gluten proteins leaking into your bloodstream and irregardless of why they're there... a gluten free diet has still been benefitial to many.

It's always good to get your blood tests re-run and I've already decided to do it regularily (when I visit my doctor).

I myself am joining the ranks of those who don't want to be full-blown celiac before treatment. You won't be alone if that's what you decide :)

Gretchen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Going for biopsy tomorrow. I understand several biopsies will be taken. Will I get the results right after the test or sometime that day? Does the Dr. ead the slides of the biopsies or does the pathologist? Both? The test is being done in a hospital under general anesthesia. I'm anxious!!!! I hope all is well and other problems aren't found... Dr. predicts biopsies will be negative and I have IBS based on bloodwork as previously posted. We'll see.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a note for people out there to people who may have put off the biopsy like myself. The test was easy and I shouldn't have put myself through all the anxiety. I had it done in a hospital. You are put to sleep and you don't feel anything during or after. I hope the biopsy rules out celiac. Is it possible that celiac can develop later even if the biopsy of the villi is negative? I understand the pathologist reads the slides and scores the biopsies??

My gastro Dr. also recommended a pelvic catscan with contrast dye to rule out other issues including possibly even a hernia. I do get a cramping feeling and he still believes it's IBS. He advised/prescribed Librax until results are in. (PS another Dr. prescribed this and I found it helped, but this whole proces started with those initial blood tests)

My advice to all -- have the tests and avoid the worry! Peace of Mind is worth a million bucks. This board has helped tremendously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is it possible that celiac can develop later even if the biopsy of the villi is negative?

YES! It is possible, especially if you are having obvious reactions to gluten.

I'm glad the endoscopy went well for you. :)

God bless,

Mariann

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As indicated....I had the biopsy completed (since my bloodwork was conflicting) in a hospiatal setting on the day after my birthday. The next day, I had a complete abdominal catscan (drinking barium solution with contrast solution pumped in intravenously during test).

GREAT NEWS!!!

All tests were negative. Stress and lactose intolerance seem to be the problem which results in spastic colon during these times. I also have some trigger foods and wheat prodicts seem to be ok.

MY ADVICE TO ALL......HAVE THE BLOODTESTS AND ENDOSCOPY DONE TO PUT ALL FEARS TO REST. I will use some gluten free foods since I was researching and trying different foods just in case.

Keep this message board going...It was a great help!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
0

  • Who's Online   21 Members, 1 Anonymous, 493 Guests (See full list)

  • Top Posters +

  • Recent Articles

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 06/23/2018 - If you’re looking for a great gluten-free Mexican-style favorite that is sure to be a big hit at dinner or at your next potluck, try these green chili enchiladas with roasted cauliflower. The recipe calls for chicken, but they are just as delicious when made vegetarian using just the roasted cauliflower. Either way, these enchiladas will disappear fast. Roasted cauliflower gives these green chili chicken enchiladas a deep, smokey flavor that diners are sure to love.
    Ingredients:
    2 cans gluten-free green chili enchilada sauce (I use Hatch brand) 1 small head cauliflower, roasted and chopped 6 ounces chicken meat, browned ½ cup cotija cheese, crumbled ½ cup queso fresco, diced 1 medium onion, diced ⅓ cup green onions, minced ¼ cup radishes, sliced 1 tablespoon cooking oil 1 cup chopped cabbage, for serving ½ cup sliced cherry or grape tomatoes, for serving ¼ cup cilantro, chopped 1 dozen fresh corn tortillas  ⅔ cup oil, for softening tortillas 1 large avocado, cut into small chunks Note: For a tasty vegetarian version, just omit the chicken, double the roasted cauliflower, and prepare according to directions.
    Directions:
    Heat 1 tablespoon oil in a cast iron or ovenproof pan until hot.
    Add chicken and brown lightly on both sides. 
    Remove chicken to paper towels to cool.
     
    Cut cauliflower into small pieces and place in the oiled pan.
    Roast in oven at 350F until browned on both sides.
    Remove from the oven when tender. 
    Allow roasted cauliflower to cool.
    Chop cauliflower, or break into small pieces and set aside.
    Chop cooled chicken and set aside.
    Heat 1 inch of cooking oil in a small frying pan.
    When oil is hot, use a spatula to submerge a tortilla in the oil and leave only long enough to soften, about 10 seconds or so. 
    Remove soft tortilla to a paper towel and repeat with remaining tortillas.
    Pour enough enchilada sauce to coat the bottom of a large casserole pan.
    Dunk a tortilla into the sauce and cover both sides. Add more sauce as needed.
    Fill each tortilla with bits of chicken, cauliflower, onion, and queso fresco, and roll into shape.
    When pan is full of rolled enchiladas, top with remaining sauce.
    Cook at 350F until sauce bubbles.
    Remove and top with fresh cotija cheese and scallions.
    Serve with rice, beans, and cabbage, and garnish with avocado, cilantro, and sliced grape tomatoes.

     

    Roxanne Bracknell
    Celiac.com 06/22/2018 - The rise of food allergies means that many people are avoiding gluten in recent times. In fact, the number of Americans who have stopped eating gluten has tripled in eight years between 2009 and 2017.
    Whatever your rationale for avoiding gluten, whether its celiac disease, a sensitivity to the protein, or any other reason, it can be really hard to find suitable places to eat out. When you’re on holiday in a new and unknown environment, this can be near impossible. As awareness of celiac disease grows around the world, however, more and more cities are opening their doors to gluten-free lifestyles, none more so than the 10 locations on the list below.
    Perhaps unsurprisingly, the U.S is a hotbed of gluten-free options, with four cities making the top 10, as well as the Hawaiian island of Maui. Chicago, in particular, is a real haven of gluten-free fare, with 240 coeliac-safe eateries throughout this huge city. The super hip city of Portland also ranks highly on this list, with the capital of counterculture rich in gluten-free cuisine, with San Francisco and Denver also included. Outside of the states, several prominent European capitals also rank very highly on the list, including Prague, the picturesque and historic capital of the Czech Republic, which boasts the best-reviewed restaurants on this list.
    The Irish capital of Dublin, meanwhile, has the most gluten-free establishments, with a huge 330 to choose from, while Amsterdam and Barcelona also feature prominently thanks to their variety of top-notch gluten-free fodder.
    Finally, a special mention must go to Auckland, the sole representative of Australasia in this list, with the largest city in New Zealand rounding out the top 10 thanks to its 180 coeliacsafe eateries.
    The full top ten gluten-free cities are shown in the graphic below:
     

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 06/21/2018 - Would you buy a house advertised as ‘gluten-free’? Yes, there really is such a house for sale. 
    It seems a Phoenix realtor Mike D’Elena is hoping that his trendy claim will catch the eye of a buyer hungry to avoid gluten, or, at least one with a sense of humor. D’Elena said he crafted the ads as a way to “be funny and to draw attention.” The idea, D’Elena said, is to “make it memorable.” 
    Though D’Elena’s marketing seeks to capitalizes on the gluten-free trend, he knows Celiac disease is a serious health issue for some people. “[W]e’re not here to offend anybody….this is just something we're just trying to do to draw attention and do what's best for our clients," he said. 
    Still, the signs seem to be working. D'elena had fielded six offers within a few days of listing the west Phoenix home.
    "Buying can sometimes be the most stressful thing you do in your entire life so why not have some fun with it," he said. 
    What do you think? Clever? Funny?
    Read more at Arizonafamily.com.

    Advertising Banner-Ads
    Bakery On Main started in the small bakery of a natural foods market on Main Street in Glastonbury, Connecticut. Founder Michael Smulders listened when his customers with Celiac Disease would mention the lack of good tasting, gluten-free options available to them. Upon learning this, he believed that nobody should have to suffer due to any kind of food allergy or dietary need. From then on, his mission became creating delicious and fearlessly unique gluten-free products that were clean and great tasting, while still being safe for his Celiac customers!
    Premium ingredients, bakeshop delicious recipes, and happy customers were our inspiration from the beginning— and are still the cornerstones of Bakery On Main today. We are a fiercely ethical company that believes in integrity and feels that happiness and wholesome, great tasting food should be harmonious. We strive for that in everything we bake in our dedicated gluten-free facility that is GFCO Certified and SQF Level 3 Certified. We use only natural, NON-GMO Project Verified ingredients and all of our products are certified Kosher Parve, dairy and casein free, and we have recently introduced certified Organic items as well! 
    Our passion is to bake the very best products while bringing happiness to our customers, each other, and all those we meet!
    We are available during normal business hours at: 1-888-533-8118 EST.
    To learn more about us at: visit our site.

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 06/20/2018 - Currently, the only way to manage celiac disease is to eliminate gluten from the diet. That could be set to change as clinical trials begin in Australia for a new vaccine that aims to switch off the immune response to gluten. 
    The trials are set to begin at Australia’s University of the Sunshine Coast Clinical Trials Centre. The vaccine is designed to allow people with celiac disease to consume gluten with no adverse effects. A successful vaccine could be the beginning of the end for the gluten-free diet as the only currently viable treatment for celiac disease. That could be a massive breakthrough for people with celiac disease.
    USC’s Clinical Trials Centre Director Lucas Litewka said trial participants would receive an injection of the vaccine twice a week for seven weeks. The trials will be conducted alongside gastroenterologist Dr. James Daveson, who called the vaccine “a very exciting potential new therapy that has been undergoing clinical trials for several years now.”
    Dr. Daveson said the investigational vaccine might potentially restore gluten tolerance to people with celiac disease.The trial is open to adults between the ages of 18 and 70 who have clinically diagnosed celiac disease, and have followed a strict gluten-free diet for at least 12 months. Anyone interested in participating can go to www.joinourtrials.com.
    Read more at the website for Australia’s University of the Sunshine Coast Clinical Trials Centre.

    Source:
    FoodProcessing.com.au

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      110,282
    • Total Posts
      949,894
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      77,982
    • Most Online
      3,093

    Newest Member
    Sisterbelle
    Joined
  • Popular Now

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • While not the best (less specific), AGA antibodies still have some value.  For the most part, most labs are now just running the newer DGP tests in the U.S. Some posters reside in countries that may not have the most current tests.  I assume the DGP was run, but I could be wrong.  Maybe the OP can clarify. Here is a study to back my claim: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5553580/
    • IgA 678 Tissue Transglutaminase IgA 2 units Tissue Transglutaminase IgG 3 units Giliadin IgG 24 units Giliadin IgA 62 Units but Endomysial Ab negative?
    • It looks like you were tested with the old anti-gliadin antibodies, which unfortunately are not good tests for Celiac Disease.  These old tests show that at some point gliadin has gotten into your system and an antibody has formed against it.  It may be a sign that you had "leaky gut".  These kinds of antibodies can come and go and overall are not very helpful in establishing a diagnosis. But there are some other blood tests that still might be useful:  the tissue transglutaminase (tTG-IgA) and the newer gliadin test:  deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies (DGP IgA and DGP IgG).       Some doctors will proceed with a biopsy if you have symptoms and negative celiac blood tests, because even in Celiac Disease blood tests are negative about 10% of the time.  There are some screening checklists here:  http://www.glutenfreeindy.com/screening-checklists.html If you have all the right tests and they are negative, you could still have non-celiac gluten sensitivity or other types of food sensitivity.  At that point you could do an elimination diet to determine what is causing symptoms.
    • Wow!  I wish you the best on your upcoming Ironman.  I have done some sprints and relays, but never an Ironman.  Usually, I do Century Rides.  Like you, I am on a lower carb, high fat gluten-free diet.   Hey, I am looking at two Nunn containers right now in y kitchen.  One, citrus fruit does have corn, dextrose.  The other, Pomergranate Blueberry does not.  It simply has sugar (non-GMO sourced).  
    • Welcome!  At 235, your Immunoglobulin A is normal.  In the case of celiac disease, this test validates the other IgA celiac tests (it is a control test).  The positive gliadin IgA is elevated.  This means you should get referred to a Gastroenterologist for an endoscopy to obtain small intestinal biopsies.  You do not need all the celiac blood tests to be positive.  In fact, I just had only the elevated gliadin IGA and my biopsies revealed some moderate to severe patches of damaged villi.   Keep eating gluten until you see the Gastroenterologist.  In the meantime, keep researching celiac disease and ask questions!  
  • Blog Entries

  • Upcoming Events