Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Pillcam In A Week

Sandi*

Recommended Posts

Sandi* Apprentice
Sandi*
Posted

Both my bloodwork and biopsy were negative for celiac disease (two years ago); however, I can definitely see positive response to diet change. I've been gluten-light for about 3 or 4 months. That is, sometimes I would have a regular cookie (maybe once every two weeks) and I just realized that I've been glutening myself unknowingly all this time. For example, I drink this coffee substitute that I didn't realize that barley malt. I've used cooking sauces that had wheat protein. I know that I have to be more careful.

However, I'm trying to figure out, if in case I do have celiac disease, is this gluten-light diet still enough to show damage that could be detected by the pillcam test? Or would I have to stuff myself with bread for months? I'm still having a lot of symptoms and digestive problems (mainly bloating and constipation, pain, cramps, as well as knee pain). So I figured I might as well take an advantage of the fact that I've been glutening myself and don't start being really strict about the diet until the test is over. It's only a week away so if a little gluten here and there is what it takes to get a diagnosis I can deal with that. Since I never went fully gluten-free for a long enough period of time I should still show damage, right (provided it is celiac disease)?

OK, so just to make sure I've expressed myself well enough, my question is: would my intestines still show damage since I've only been gluten-light but not fully gluten free or would that be enough for them to heal anyway?

TIA!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


moldlady Rookie
moldlady
Posted

Sandi,

How did the pill cam go? Did it show anything?

ML

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sandi* Apprentice
Sandi*
  • Author
Posted

moldlady, it's not for another week (actually more like 10 days, it's on the 8th) and then I assume I will need to get an appointment to actually talk about the results. But I'll post here once I'm all finished!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
moldlady Rookie
moldlady
Posted

Thanks Sandi,

Sorry, I thought I read about this two weeks ago and then I just checked the date of your post. Someone else must have posted something similar. Dah!

I wish we could get test results as fast as food!

I'll be waiting for your report.

ML

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MDRB Explorer
MDRB
Posted

Hi,

Most doctors think that the only way to diagnose celiacs is with an endoscopy.

When I had mine done, I had been gluten lite for about 6 months, as a result my blood tests came back negative. Before the endoscopy, I was told to eat at least one gluten based meal every day for one month otherwise the test would not be conclusive. From what you have said about your symptoms and reaction to the diet it seems likely that you do have celiacs.

Good luck

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ThatlldoGyp Rookie
ThatlldoGyp
Posted

yes, if you have celiac, your villi would most likely still show damage. I just read a study... endos taken on Catholic celiacs. Villi damage still seen when their only known gluten intake would be the communion wafer once a week, all participants were asymptomatic yet still showed damage enough to be seen with sb biopsy. So, based on that study, then you should be good. Either way, it takes adults 6 months to a year to repair their gut, so damage from before you went gluten-free lite should still be present, add that to additional exposures and you are most likely glutened enough to have damage.

Please talk to your Dr. about this though, your degree of sensitivity is also important, and just because you may not have celiac doesn't mean that you aren't gluten sensitive. Hope you feel better soona and good luck on your pill cam study.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sandi* Apprentice
Sandi*
  • Author
Posted
Hi,

Most doctors think that the only way to diagnose celiacs is with an endoscopy.

When I had mine done, I had been gluten lite for about 6 months, as a result my blood tests came back negative. Before the endoscopy, I was told to eat at least one gluten based meal every day for one month otherwise the test would not be conclusive. From what you have said about your symptoms and reaction to the diet it seems likely that you do have celiacs.

Good luck

new2celiacs, thanks for the answer. Did you have the endo done yet? Was eating gluten for a month sufficient to get a positive diagnosis?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Sandi* Apprentice
Sandi*
  • Author
Posted
yes, if you have celiac, your villi would most likely still show damage. I just read a study... endos taken on Catholic celiacs. Villi damage still seen when their only known gluten intake would be the communion wafer once a week, all participants were asymptomatic yet still showed damage enough to be seen with sb biopsy. So, based on that study, then you should be good. Either way, it takes adults 6 months to a year to repair their gut, so damage from before you went gluten-free lite should still be present, add that to additional exposures and you are most likely glutened enough to have damage.

Please talk to your Dr. about this though, your degree of sensitivity is also important, and just because you may not have celiac doesn't mean that you aren't gluten sensitive. Hope you feel better soona and good luck on your pill cam study.

Thanks Tha'lldoGyp, you're answer is kind of what I was thinking. I still have symptoms so I don't think I healed by just being gluten light.

My doctor is great when it comes to running tests, etc. but I think she's also very results-oriented. Basically, if I test negative for celiac, then according to her there's no reason not to eat gluten. But I'm really grateful for all the testing I got and I'm just going to listen to my own body. I feel better not eating gluten so I definitely believe that I'm at least gluten sensitive if not celiac and won't go back to eating it ;).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MDRB Explorer
MDRB
Posted
new2celiacs, thanks for the answer. Did you have the endo done yet? Was eating gluten for a month sufficient to get a positive diagnosis?

Yep, I had my endoscopy a while ago and it showed enough damage to the villi for a diagnosis. My understanding is that there are other things that can cause slight villi damage and that the doctor might want to do another endoscopy after a few months gluten free to check that the damage is healing with the new diet.

Having said all this, If I knew how sick the gluten was going to make me, I would not have gone back on it for those for weeks. They were the worst 4 weeks of my life, I was SO sick I could barely get out of bed.

The only reason to get a diagnosis is if you are not sure if you feel better without the gluten. Otherwise its just not worth the time feeling sick.

Good luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sandi* Apprentice
Sandi*
  • Author
Posted

I'm sorry those 4 weeks were so horrible for you! But at least you have a proper diagnosis now.

As for me I don't think I'd go back to gluten eating for the endoscopy since I already had one and it was negative. I'm just hoping that the camera might find something further down there that the endo could have missed. I'm still so sick that I think if I do have celiac disease then the damage will still be there. But if not, I don't care, I'll just listen to my body and see how I respond to a full removal of gluten. Thank you for your help!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lisa Mentor
Lisa
Posted

This is a recently released study done by the Mayo:

Given Imaging Announces New Mayo Clinic Study Concludes Celiac Disease May Be More Severe Than Symptoms Indicate for Some Patients

PillCam

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sandi* Apprentice
Sandi*
  • Author
Posted

Very informative, thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
Sandi* Apprentice
Sandi*
  • Author
Posted

So the test did not confirm celiac disease. The only thing that was found were several intramucosal lesions. To be honest I'm not exactly sure what they are. I have a colonoscopy and my doc wants to take a biopsy of these lesions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,088
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Aventine
    Newest Member
    Aventine
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Anmol
      Recently Diagnosed Celiac- Need advice

      By Anmol · Posted

      Thanks this is helpful. Couple of follow -ups- that critical point till it stays silent is age dependent or dependent on continuing to eat gluten. In other words if she is on gluten-free diet can she stay on silent celiac disease forever?    what are the most cost effective yet efficient test to track the inflammation/antibodies and see if gluten-free is working . 
    • trents
      Recently Diagnosed Celiac- Need advice

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the community forum, @Anmol! There are a number of blood antibody tests that can be administered when diagnosing celiac disease and it is normal that not all of them will be positive. Three out of four that were run for you were positive. It looks pretty conclusive that you have celiac disease. Many physicians will only run the tTG-IGA test so I applaud your doctor for being so thorough. Note, the Immunoglobulin A is not a test for celiac disease per se but a measure of total IGA antibody levels in your blood. If this number is low it can cause false negatives in the individual IGA-based celiac antibody tests. There are many celiacs who are asymptomatic when consuming gluten, at least until damage to the villous lining of the small bowel progresses to a certain critical point. I was one of them. We call them "silent" celiacs".  Unfortunately, being asymptomatic does not equate to no damage being done to the villous lining of the small bowel. No, the fact that your wife is asymptomatic should not be viewed as a license to not practice strict gluten free eating. She is damaging her health by doing so and the continuing high antibody test scores are proof of that. The antibodies are produced by inflammation in the small bowel lining and over time this inflammation destroys the villous lining. Continuing to disregard this will catch up to her. While it may be true that a little gluten does less harm to the villous lining than a lot, why would you even want to tolerate any harm at all to it? Being a "silent" celiac is both a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing in the sense of being able to endure some cross contamination in social settings without embarrassing repercussions. It's a curse in that it slows down the learning curve of avoiding foods where gluten is not an obvious ingredient, yet still may be doing damage to the villous lining of the small bowel. GliadinX is helpful to many celiacs in avoiding illness from cross contamination when eating out but it is not effective when consuming larger amounts of gluten. It was never intended for that purpose. Eating out is the number one sabotager of gluten free eating. You have no control of how food is prepared and handled in restaurant kitchens.  
    • knitty kitty
      14 year old with Celiac & EOE still suffering...

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Forgot one... https://www.hormonesmatter.com/eosinophilic-esophagitis-sugar-thiamine-sensitive/
    • trents
      50 YO Male Recently Diagnosed with Celiac Disease

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum community, @ekelsay! Yes, your tTG-IGA score is strongly positive for celiac disease. There are other antibody tests that can be run when diagnosing celiac disease but the tTG-IGA is the most popular with physicians because it combines good sensitivity with good specificity, and it is a relatively inexpensive test to perform. The onset of celiac disease can happen at any stage of life and the size of the score is not necessarily an indicator of the progress of the disease. It is likely that you you experienced onset well before you became aware of symptoms. It often takes 10 years or more to get a diagnosis of celiac disease after the first appearance of symptoms. In my case, the first indicator was mildly elevated liver enzymes that resulted in a rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross at age 37. There was no GI discomfort at that point, at least none that I noticed. Over time, other lab values began to get out of norm, including decreased iron levels. My PCP was at a complete loss to explain any of this. I finally scheduled an appointment with a GI doc because the liver enzymes concerned me and he tested me right away for celiac disease. I was positive and within three months of gluten free eating my liver enzymes were back to normal. That took 13 years since the rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross. And my story is typical. Toward the end of that period I had developed some occasional diarrhea and oily stool but no major GI distress. Many celiacs do not have classic GI symptoms and are "silent" celiacs. There are around 200 symptoms that have been associated with celiac disease and many or most of them do not involve conscious GI distress. Via an autoimmune process, gluten ingestion triggers inflammation in the villous lining of the small bowel which damages it over time and inhibits the ability of this organ to absorb the vitamins and minerals in the food we ingest. So, that explains why those with celiac disease often suffer iron deficiency anemia, osteoporosis and a host of other vitamin and mineral deficiency related medical issues. The villous lining of the small bowel is where essentially all of our nutrition is absorbed. So, yes, anemia is one of the classic symptoms of celiac disease. One very important thing you need to be aware of is that your PCP may refer you to a GI doc for an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel lining to confirm the results of the blood antibody testing. So, you must not begin gluten free eating until that is done or at least you know they are going to diagnose you with celiac disease without it. If you start gluten free eating now there will be healing in the villous lining that will begin to take place which may compromise the results of the biopsy.
    • Anmol
      Recently Diagnosed Celiac- Need advice

      By Anmol · Posted

      Hello all- my wife was recently diagnosed with Celiac below are her blood results. We are still absorbing this.  I wanted to seek clarity on few things:  1. Her symptoms aren't extreme. She was asked to go on gluten free diet a couple years ago but she did not completely cut off gluten. Partly because she wasn't seeing extreme symptoms. Only bloating and mild diarrhea after a meal full of gluten.  Does this mean that she is asymptomatic but enormous harm is done with every gram of gluten.? in other words is amount gluten directly correlated with harm on the intestines? or few mg of gluten can be really harmful to the villi  2. Why is she asymptomatic?  3. Is Gliadin X safe to take and effective for Cross -contamination or while going out to eat?  4. Since she is asymptomatic, can we sometimes indulge in a gluten diet? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deamidated Gliadin, IgG - 64 (0-19) units tTG IgA -  >100 (0-3) U/ml tTG IgG - 4   (0-5) Why is this in normal range? Endomysial Antibody - Positive  Immunoglobulin A - 352 (87-352) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thanks for help in advance, really appreciate! 
×
×
  • Create New...