Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Does He Really Have Celiac's?


milkymama

Recommended Posts

milkymama Newbie

I have no idea how to read the results from my 3 y/o blood work. His pediatrician is saying that we can't trust the blood work and really need to have a biopsy done. She says that even though he tested positive, he may not have Celiac's or the gluten sensitivity. I was hoping that if I post the results here, maybe someone (anyone!) could tell me the likelihood of him NOT having the disease. I'm sorry if this is repetitive of what others have posted. My head is just swimming with confusion right now. :wacko:

Gliadin Antibody (IGG) 13

Reference range

<11 ml negative

11-17 equivocal

>17 positive

Gliadin Antibody (IGA) <3

*same reference range as above*

Test Name Out of Range Reference Range

Absolute Lymphocytes 2685 4000-12500 ml

Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody IGG 21

<7 negative

7-10 equivocal

>18 positive

Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody IGA <5

Reference Range same as above

I left out everything that came within range and the CBC info. If there is something I missed, that would help, please let me know. Thanks so much for any help! :)

As of right now, since his pedi said that he tested + for one of the Celiac's test and + for a gluten sensitivity, he is on a gluten-free diet. I have to say, we're in the 4th wk and the results have been incredible. He is a completely different child.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



OBXMom Explorer
I have no idea how to read the results from my 3 y/o blood work. His pediatrician is saying that we can't trust the blood work and really need to have a biopsy done. She says that even though he tested positive, he may not have Celiac's or the gluten sensitivity. I was hoping that if I post the results here, maybe someone (anyone!) could tell me the likelihood of him NOT having the disease. I'm sorry if this is repetitive of what others have posted. My head is just swimming with confusion right now. :wacko:

Gliadin Antibody (IGG) 13

Reference range

<11 ml negative

11-17 equivocal

>17 positive

Gliadin Antibody (IGA) <3

*same reference range as above*

Test Name Out of Range Reference Range

Absolute Lymphocytes 2685 4000-12500 ml

Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody IGG 21

<7 negative

7-10 equivocal

>18 positive

Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody IGA <5

Reference Range same as above

I left out everything that came within range and the CBC info. If there is something I missed, that would help, please let me know. Thanks so much for any help! :)

As of right now, since his pedi said that he tested + for one of the Celiac's test and + for a gluten sensitivity, he is on a gluten-free diet. I have to say, we're in the 4th wk and the results have been incredible. He is a completely different child.

I am not experienced in reviewing lab results, but I do remember a startling moment with our GI pediatrician. He had told me that the only definitive diagnosis for celiac comes from the biopsy, and then in the hospital waiting room following my son's biopsy told me that he had never, never once in his whole career had a patient with positive blood results and a negative biopsy. I remember thinking, you are old enough to have grandchildren, how many biopsies do you have to do before you see the writing on the wall? You might ask your doctor the same question - has he or she ever had someone with your child's blood results that didn't have celliac disease?

Our biopsy went fine, and I'm not sorry we did it. But as a follow up for my daughter I plan to take the enterolab route, which is much less invasive. The other thing you need to be careful about is invalidating the biopsy by going gluten free prior to the test. You can apparently still do the enterolab test for up to a year after going gluten free, but the same is not true for a biopsy.

If you feel pretty convinced that you would not let your child have gluten ever, then you may already have all the results you need. It is such a difficult diet, though, that I need the most definitive results I can come up with to strengthen my resolve.

Wish I could be more helpful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
milkymama Newbie
I am not experienced in reviewing lab results, but I do remember a startling moment with our GI pediatrician. He had told me that the only definitive diagnosis for celiac comes from the biopsy, and then in the hospital waiting room following my son's biopsy told me that he had never, never once in his whole career had a patient with positive blood results and a negative biopsy. I remember thinking, you are old enough to have grandchildren, how many biopsies do you have to do before you see the writing on the wall? You might ask your doctor the same question - has he or she ever had someone with your child's blood results that didn't have celliac disease?

Our biopsy went fine, and I'm not sorry we did it. But as a follow up for my daughter I plan to take the enterolab route, which is much less invasive. The other thing you need to be careful about is invalidating the biopsy by going gluten free prior to the test. You can apparently still do the enterolab test for up to a year after going gluten free, but the same is not true for a biopsy.

If you feel pretty convinced that you would not let your child have gluten ever, then you may already have all the results you need. It is such a difficult diet, though, that I need the most definitive results I can come up with to strengthen my resolve.

Wish I could be more helpful.

That was helpful! I'm meeting with the GI to ask some questions, but at this point, I don't want the biopsy done. It will be interesting to see if he has had any positive blood tests and negative biopsies.

Thanks again!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cruelshoes Enthusiast

The total IgA is not shown above. The TtG IgA and Anti Gliadin IgA results you posted are negative, while the Anti Gliadin IgG and tTg IgG are both positive. It would be very helpful to know if your child is IgA deficient. That would give more power to the positive IgG results. Did they run that test?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
milkymama Newbie

As far as I know, they didn't run the test to see if he is IgA deficient. What would that mean? Is it something I should have him taken back in for? My husband and I are planning on testing through Entero. Would they be able to say definitively whether he has celiac disease or not? I'm so confused and frankly ready to cry. His doc has been so unhelpful and I dn't know what to do. I honestly had no idea about celiac disease. I thought he had other food allergies and was testing for that.

I am looking at the test results and I don't see a total IgA number. The only # I see that may be it, says <5.

I'm sorry to be thick, but can you tell me what this means, "The TtG IgA and Anti Gliadin IgA results you posted are negative, while the Anti Gliadin IgG and tTg IgG are both positive."

Thank you so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cruelshoes Enthusiast
As far as I know, they didn't run the test to see if he is IgA deficient. What would that mean? Is it something I should have him taken back in for? My husband and I are planning on testing through Entero. Would they be able to say definitively whether he has celiac disease or not? I'm so confused and frankly ready to cry. His doc has been so unhelpful and I dn't know what to do. I honestly had no idea about celiac disease. I thought he had other food allergies and was testing for that.

I am looking at the test results and I don't see a total IgA number. The only # I see that may be it, says <5.

I'm sorry to be thick, but can you tell me what this means, "The TtG IgA and Anti Gliadin IgA results you posted are negative, while the Anti Gliadin IgG and tTg IgG are both positive."

Thank you so much.

You are not being thick at all! Considering you probably hadn't heard much about celiac before your child got tested, you are practically an expert now. ;) I'm going to give you a whole bunch of information - sorry if its overload.

Open Original Shared Linkof the different types of antibodies:

The five major types of antibodies are:

IgA. IgA antibodies are found in areas of the body such the nose, breathing passages, digestive tract, ears, eyes, and vagina. IgA antibodies protect body surfaces that are exposed to outside foreign substances. This type of antibody is also found in saliva and tears. About 10% to 15% of the antibodies present in the body are IgA antibodies. A small number of people do not make IgA antibodies.

IgG. IgG antibodies are found in all body fluids. They are the smallest but most common antibody (75% to 80%) of all the antibodies in the body. IgG antibodies are very important in fighting bacterial and viral infections. IgG antibodies are the only type of antibody that can cross the placenta in a pregnant woman to help protect her baby (fetus).

IgM. IgM antibodies are the largest antibody. They are found in blood and lymph fluid and are the first type of antibody made in response to an infection. They also cause other immune system cells to destroy foreign substances. IgM antibodies are about 5% to 10% of all the antibodies in the body.

IgE. IgE antibodies are found in the lungs, skin, and mucous membranes. They cause the body to react against foreign substances such as pollen, fungus spores, and animal dander. They may occur in allergic reactions to milk, some medicines, and some poisons. IgE antibody levels are often high in people with allergies.

IgD. IgD antibodies are found in small amounts in the tissues that line the belly or chest. How they work is not clear.

You see how some of your lab results say IgA and some say IgG? That's because they are measuring different classes of antibodies. The tests that are most often used to diagnose celiac (TtG and EMA) are IgA results. That's why it is important to have the total IgA done when the doctor is looking at those tests. If your child were IgA deficient, it would explain why the tests were negative. If that were true, the IgA results would always be negative, and the doctor would have to rely on IgG results.

The celiac disease bloodwork is actually a set of tests that are viewed in combination.

Open Original Shared Link

What are the different antibody tests available? Can there be errors in testing?

The blood tests can be divided into 2 different types of antibodies: those which are

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ShayBraMom Apprentice

Bloodtests are supposedly notoriously inaccurate! that;'s why even to this day, Goldstandard for Celiac is the Biopsie which he would be knocked out for! ASince he ahs been off of gluten for 4 weeks laready it is questionable that the PDI would still do it without him beeing back on gluten for a good while. Our PDI refused to make the scope since she was already 2 weeks off of the gluten, he wanted her back on it for 2 month!!!!!! before he'd do it. We tried for 3 weeks but then gave up tbecause our daughter suffered too much! We know in our hearts she is a picturebook celiac, she just doesn't have the scope. He at least gave as a note for school that she is highly glutensensitive and is not allowed to get any under any circumstances. At least we have that because Celiac or Glutensensitive, the course of Treatment is the same. Never again eat gluten! Even as a glutensensitive you CAN turn Celiac someday. Your sones bloodwork is positive, I can see that, that in combination with those amazing results you saw on the glutenfree diet speaks for itself!!!!!! We do have a bunch of people here, that do neither hacve the Celiac-Genes NOR do they have a positive biopsy OR positive bloodwork in any way but still, their response to glutenfree is amazing and that is proof enough! Testws cannot show everything now a days, specially in this chapter! If you want to, you can try EnteroLab.com. A Lab that is privately used by many here when their doc did not want to go further in testing or thei wanted additional proof. My son has been tested by blood twoo years ago almost for the Tissuetransglutaminase, his genes where tested last year and he's got one of the two major Celiac-Genes, the DQ2. The Doc refused to test further, now I had him tested through enteroLab again, I did the Stool Tissuetransglutaminase test and he turned up positive. Normal isa reading there fo less then 10 units, he had 45- so he's clearly glutensensitive. Schoolbreask fo 10 weeks is coming up and that's when I will ruyn a strikt glutenfree trial to see how he does on it. right now I cannot be sure that he won't get anything at school and results may be hazy. so I'll wait for Summerbreak and then see, if we do good I will make the house completely glutenfree since his little sister is a celiac anyway!

Any way, if you have doubts or want to be sure, do private testing with EnteroLab. The Stooltests are still accurate even though you are off of gluten/your son. It is so easy! I even ordered another test on a stoolspecimen I sent in in October from my daughter (they keep it for 6 month if further testing should be needed), I'm glad they still ghave it because this stool is from when she was still weaned off of gluten! I"m curious to see what her tissuetransglutaminasetest says compared to my son!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



fedora Enthusiast

I've read, someone correct me if I am wrong, that celiacs are more likely to be IgA deficient. If your child gets total Iga serum tests done, and it comes back negative, then they check the IgG levels. I would definately check on this one Also did they run the anti-EMA test?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,214
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Julez13
    Newest Member
    Julez13
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      I think sometimes the pain described here can be a result of a sort of 'perfect storm' of contributing factors.  Recently I had an appalling bout of lower back pain, lower burning gut pain and what felt like cramps.  I then started to think about what could have caused it and I realised it was several things that had set it off: I'd been carrying heavy luggage (back strain); I had been sitting down in a car for too long and wearing a tight belt (I have pudendal nerve issues and sacroiliac issues and this exacerbates the pain), and I had bloating and burning pain in my colon caused by eating too much soy, latte and caffeine, I guess putting further pressure in the lower abdomen.  I had this same pain prior to my diagnosis and a couple of years post-diagnosis, I'd quite forgotten how unpleasant it was. 
    • cristiana
      HI @Kirbyqueen That's great news your insurance will be kicking in soon.  Sorry to see that you have been dealing with this for six months now, but I do hope you have managed to find some relief with some of the suggestions in the meantime. Perhaps come back and let us know what the doctor says. Cristiana
    • Scott Adams
      I agree, and hopefully your doctor will contact you soon about the next step, which will likely be an endoscopy to confirm your diagnosis. Do you have celiac disease symptoms? 
    • Kirbyqueen
      Still dealing with this rash on my legs. I've eliminated ringworm (through use of topical ointments). And I also know it's not shingles, as I've never had chickenpox before and I'm still fairly young. Through a lot of online research, I'm leaning more towards dermatitis herpetiformis, eczema, or psoriasis. I've actually got a doctor's appointment in May (finally got some insurance) and I'm going to bring it up then. I'm feeling really hopeful and excited to maybe be getting some relief soon.   Big thanks to everyone for the suggestions and positive thoughts!
    • trents
      You have three celiac disease specific antibody tests that are positive: Endomysial  Antibody IGA (aka, EMA), tTG-IGA, and tTG_IGG. Furthermore, your Immunoglobulin A at 55 is low, meaning you are IGA deficient. This one is not an antibody test for celaic disease per se but a measure of "total IGA" levels and if low (yours is low) it can suppress the individual antibody scores and even cause false negatives. So, yes, it definitely looks like you have celiac disease.   Do not yet begin a gluten free diet as your physician may refer you to a GI doc for an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel lining for confirmation of the antibody testing. This may help:   
×
×
  • Create New...