Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

I Want To Get A Test Done But Im Worried ...


mr. moore

Recommended Posts

mr. moore Explorer

if it comes back negative, that it was all in my head!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

Tests aren't perfect and false negatives are seen but the adherence to the diet and the resolution of symptoms is also a diagnostic tool. After you have all the testing done that you choose to do a dietary trial of the gluten free diet can sometimes provide the answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ShayFL Enthusiast

That's right. I was NEG for hypothyroid for nearly 15 years (because the lab ranges were WRONG). It WAS all in my head until I showed my doctor the correct lab ranges and got treated properly (and got better).

So do not worry if you get a NEG result. Try the diet anyway. If it works for you, then you have your answer. Even if they still think it is all in your head, at least you will have a healthy head now. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lizard00 Enthusiast

False negatives are not uncommon, I am in that category. In fact, my doctor told me that I could be half dead and still not test positive on a celiac panel, even though I do have it.

No doctor can argue with positive dietary results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
caek-is-a-lie Explorer
False negatives are not uncommon, I am in that category. In fact, my doctor told me that I could be half dead and still not test positive on a celiac panel, even though I do have it.

No doctor can argue with positive dietary results.

Haha I want YOUR doctor! My doctor said via e-mail the basic equivalent of "if it hurts, don't do it" and left it at that. Testing was optional. He didn't think testing was necessary but at the same time left it up to me to figure out what to call it. Doctors confuse me. Is 4 weeks gluten free too late to do a blood test? He wouldn't say. I'll never know if I have intestinal damage. In a way I guess it doesn't really matter if the diet's working, but on the other hand I think it kind of stinks. I kind of want to know (unless it's negative and they use that to call me crazy.) You can see my dilemma and I can't seem to get a straight answer from anyone. *sigh*

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LAH Newbie

I'm in the same situation as I finally realized I needed to stop eating gluten about 3 years ago but I did not have insurance so I just stopped eating gluten and started getting better. Now I wonder if I made a mistake but I can't imagine eating gluten again just to get an 'official' diagnosis. I"ve accidentally injested gluten or gluten contaminated food several times and honestly say I don't want to suffer the price just for a positve test. I talked to one woman who was DX after a 2nd enteric biopsy, apparently the first pathologist was blind or the doctor took villi from a patch of undamaged tissue but she was brave enough to go back for a second biopsy.

I've been lucky to find a nurse practitioner who has celiac disease and she told me it could be gluten intolerance or celiac disease after I described the symptoms I was exeriencing to her. I was so relieved to find someone who understood the symptoms I was experiencing and who could tell me that some people do become very sensitive to small amounts of gluten once they go on the diet.

Stay on the diet why suffer more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mr. moore Explorer

stay on the diet for sure!! ;)

you know its only been 2 days but i feel my vision is getting better and i don't feel as anxious. hmmm....

i wrote this in another topic but how much is enough gluten to set you off?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



caek-is-a-lie Explorer
stay on the diet for sure!! ;)

you know its only been 2 days but i feel my vision is getting better and i don't feel as anxious. hmmm....

i wrote this in another topic but how much is enough gluten to set you off?

The tiniest little remnant of a crumb that I tried to wash off my fork with soap and lots of hot water. That's how much. (someone used my fork at work to eat cake! Ahhh the horror!!! I seized all night.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LAH Newbie

I have a reaction to some products that are labeled gluten free, ex. Sams Choice from Walmart always gets me as do any type of corn or potato chip. My nurse practitioner said that some people become very sensitive to very small amounts of gluten after going on the diet and that I was probably one of those people. The gluten free label does not always mean 100% gluten free, a product can have up to, I think, 200 ppm gluten and still be labeled gluten-free. :o:o

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mr. moore Explorer
I have a reaction to some products that are labeled gluten free, ex. Sams Choice from Walmart always gets me as do any type of corn or potato chip. My nurse practitioner said that some people become very sensitive to very small amounts of gluten after going on the diet and that I was probably one of those people. The gluten free label does not always mean 100% gluten free, a product can have up to, I think, 200 ppm gluten and still be labeled gluten-free. :o:o

**U(*(&(*&(*#*#**# :angry:

what?! you mean ive been eating brown rice bread that could have gluten in it? is there ANY FREAKIN way to do this diet?! what does ppm mean?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mushroom Proficient

ppm = parts per million! But I think in the U.S. the standard is 20 ppm. The Codex Alimentarius in the UK permits them to include 200 ppm, as I understand it, which would probably be enough to set most people off from my point of view.

But I am not one of the more sensitive ones to tiny amounts and therefore engage in the "risky" behavior of eating things that are processed in the same facility or on the same lines as gluten products. Others on here would not dream of doing that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mr. moore Explorer
ppm = parts per million! But I think in the U.S. the standard is 20 ppm. The Codex Alimentarius in the UK permits them to include 200 ppm, as I understand it, which would probably be enough to set most people off from my point of view.

But I am not one of the more sensitive ones to tiny amounts and therefore engage in the "risky" behavior of eating things that are processed in the same facility or on the same lines as gluten products. Others on here would not dream of doing that.

but i thought it doesn't matter even the tiniest amount can take me back to square one! right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mushroom Proficient
but i thought it doesn't matter even the tiniest amount can take me back to square one! right?

Not back to square one, exactly. Certainly gluten is to be avoided entirely to the best of one's ability, but even if you get accidentally glutened, while you will suffer and do some additional damage, you will not go all the way back to square one. What I was saying in my clumsy way was that different people have different sensitivities and food processors are allowed to claim gluten-free status in the U.S. for foods that contain less than 20 ppm. Some people will react even to these, others will not. Some are afraid to walk down the flour aisle in the supermarket; others are not that sensitive. You will have to determine your own level of sensitivity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,201
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Sohaib Askar
    Newest Member
    Sohaib Askar
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      So, I contacted Scott Adams, the author of that article and also the creator/admin of this website, and pointed out to him the need to clarify the information in the paragraph in question. He has now updated the paragraph and it is clear that the DGP-IGA does serve the purpose of circumventing the false negatives that IGA deficiencies can generate in the tTG-IGA antibody test.
    • knitty kitty
      Here's a link... Thiamine Deficiency Causes Intracellular Potassium Wasting https://www.hormonesmatter.com/thiamine-deficiency-causes-intracellular-potassium-wasting/
    • Soleihey
      Has anyone experimenced enlarged lymph nodes with celiac? Both in the neck and groin area. Imaging of both areas have said that lymph nodes are reactive in nature. However, they have been present for months and just wondering how long this may take to go down. Been gluten-free for about two months. Blood counts are normal.
    • Kmd2024
      Hmm interesting I just assumed that any “IGA” tests including the DPG iga would be negative in a person who is IGA deficient but maybe that is not the case for the DPG test.
    • Scott Adams
      If you were just diagnosed I can say that if you go 100% gluten-free should should see dramatic improvement of your symptoms over the next few months, but the hard part is to stay gluten-free. This article has some detailed information on how to be 100% gluten-free, so it may be helpful (be sure to also read the comments section.):    
×
×
  • Create New...