Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Testing For Celiac


samanthaw

Recommended Posts

samanthaw Newbie

Hello All,

Like many of you, I am struggling to determine if I have celiac disease. I recently saw my general practitioner for a "well woman" exam -- I had complaints of fatigue, depression -- just not feeling like myself. She ran blood tests including ferritin levels and determined that I was anemic. I then underwent an endoscopy and colonoscopy to make sure I wasn't bleeding internally (I'm 42 years old). The colonoscopy was clear but the endoscopy revealed "mild villous atrophy with intraepithelial lymphocytes consistent with celiac disease". The GI then ran antibody blood tests, which he said were negative for celiac disease. I have not heard back on the results of the gene testing. He now wants me to wait about 3 months and do another endoscopy to see if the results are the same. He does not seem to want to diagnose celiac disease and downplays the illness thinking it is the "popular" disease of the day.

My question to all of you is had anyone had similiar test results and if so, did your doctor diagnose you with celiac disease? Can a person have the results that I had from the small bowel biopsy and not have celiac disease?

Any help provided will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks, Sabrina


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor
Hello All,

Like many of you, I am struggling to determine if I have celiac disease. I recently saw my general practitioner for a "well woman" exam -- I had complaints of fatigue, depression -- just not feeling like myself. She ran blood tests including ferritin levels and determined that I was anemic. I then underwent an endoscopy and colonoscopy to make sure I wasn't bleeding internally (I'm 42 years old). The colonoscopy was clear but the endoscopy revealed "mild villous atrophy with intraepithelial lymphocytes consistent with celiac disease". The GI then ran antibody blood tests, which he said were negative for celiac disease. I have not heard back on the results of the gene testing. He now wants me to wait about 3 months and do another endoscopy to see if the results are the same. He does not seem to want to diagnose celiac disease and downplays the illness thinking it is the "popular" disease of the day.

My question to all of you is had anyone had similar test results and if so, did your doctor diagnose you with celiac disease? Can a person have the results that I had from the small bowel biopsy and not have celiac disease?

Any help provided will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks, Sabrina

Please get a new doctor, one that is knowledgeable and one that doesn't downplay the facts.

Your villous atrophy IS consistent with Celiac Disease and IS considered a diagnosis.

Testing for Celiac can render false negatives but never false positives. Coupled with a positive dietary response, it's a pretty sure bet that you do have Celiac.

Welcome to the Club!

lizard00 Enthusiast

As Momma Goose said, please get another opinion.

Many people can test negative with the blood testing, but the biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosis, especially when the blood tests are negative.

Tallforagirl Rookie
Your villous atrophy IS consistent with Celiac Disease and IS considered a diagnosis.

Testing for Celiac can render false negatives but never false positives. Coupled with a positive dietary response, it's a pretty sure bet that you do have Celiac.

There can be other causes for villous atrophy, so do make sure your doctor rules out any other causes before diagnosing celiac disease. Since you don't have positive blood panel results it may not pay to jump to conclusions before checking out all possibilities.

Other causes of villous atrophy include:

"Cow

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Did this doctor tell you to go on the diet strictly and then he would rebiopsy or did he tell you to keep eating gluten? Some doctors are very reluctant to diagnose celiac and will tell us to keep on gluten until the villi are totally destroyed.

IMHO you should do the former. Go off of gluten strictly and then if symptoms have not resolved start looking for the 'other possible reasons' for the villi atrophy. Most of the other causes are things that can be related to celiac or that can be found in tandum with it.

In addition get your hands on the actual results from the blood tests along with the lab's ranges. There are doctors that will consider a low positive a negative and tell the patients the test was negative if the results were only a few points into the positive range. As for the gene tests do not consider it is a definte 'you don't have it' if you do not have DQ2 or 8. Those are the only celiac related genes that are tested for in the US. In other countries there are 7 others that are also celiac related but doctors here do not look for them.

samanthaw Newbie
Did this doctor tell you to go on the diet strictly and then he would rebiopsy or did he tell you to keep eating gluten? Some doctors are very reluctant to diagnose celiac and will tell us to keep on gluten until the villi are totally destroyed.

IMHO you should do the former. Go off of gluten strictly and then if symptoms have not resolved start looking for the 'other possible reasons' for the villi atrophy. Most of the other causes are things that can be related to celiac or that can be found in tandum with it.

In addition get your hands on the actual results from the blood tests along with the lab's ranges. There are doctors that will consider a low positive a negative and tell the patients the test was negative if the results were only a few points into the positive range. As for the gene tests do not consider it is a definte 'you don't have it' if you do not have DQ2 or 8. Those are the only celiac related genes that are tested for in the US. In other countries there are 7 others that are also celiac related but doctors here do not look for them.

samanthaw Newbie
Please get a new doctor, one that is knowledgeable and one that doesn't downplay the facts.

Your villous atrophy IS consistent with Celiac Disease and IS considered a diagnosis.

Testing for Celiac can render false negatives but never false positives. Coupled with a positive dietary response, it's a pretty sure bet that you do have Celiac.

Welcome to the Club!

Thanks Lisa and I do plan to get a new doctors that hopefully specializes in patients with Celiad Disease.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



samanthaw Newbie
There can be other causes for villous atrophy, so do make sure your doctor rules out any other causes before diagnosing celiac disease. Since you don't have positive blood panel results it may not pay to jump to conclusions before checking out all possibilities.

Other causes of villous atrophy include:

"Cow

samanthaw Newbie
Did this doctor tell you to go on the diet strictly and then he would rebiopsy or did he tell you to keep eating gluten? Some doctors are very reluctant to diagnose celiac and will tell us to keep on gluten until the villi are totally destroyed.

IMHO you should do the former. Go off of gluten strictly and then if symptoms have not resolved start looking for the 'other possible reasons' for the villi atrophy. Most of the other causes are things that can be related to celiac or that can be found in tandum with it.

In addition get your hands on the actual results from the blood tests along with the lab's ranges. There are doctors that will consider a low positive a negative and tell the patients the test was negative if the results were only a few points into the positive range. As for the gene tests do not consider it is a definte 'you don't have it' if you do not have DQ2 or 8. Those are the only celiac related genes that are tested for in the US. In other countries there are 7 others that are also celiac related but doctors here do not look for them.

He told me to continue eating gluten I suppose with the thought that he would see if the problem cleared without a gluten-free diet and then he would assume I did not have celiac disease. However, I have read that symptoms of Celiac Disease can wax and wane. What I failed to ask him is what would he then recommend if the biopsy showed abnormal results. Would I then go on a gluten-free diet and undergo a third endoscopy????

I have requested the lab reports and hope to get them soon. I may ask for your IMHO again.

Thanks so much!!

happygirl Collaborator

You may want to post on the board asking for an experienced doctor in your area, or contact a local Celiac support group and ask who their members use.

You do not have to have positive bloodwork and biopsy for diagnosis.

It'll be interesting to see which bloodwork he ran.

Also, there is some research that indicates that "lesser" damage (mild) isn't often picked up on blood tests. The blood tests are generally more accurate with "more" damage.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,947
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    cookiesyum
    Newest Member
    cookiesyum
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • pdm1981
      It's also a symptom of EPI.
    • Wheatwacked
      Yes.  Proportionately a small piece to a toddler is like a whole slice to an adult.  This is an important clue.  She was doing well, accidentally ate gluten and later the old behavior returned. I remember reading posts here of people reacting to a kiss from someone who had just eaten gluten. Recent research indicates that 40% of first degree relatives of someone with Celiac have undiagnosed Celiac Disease.  Father, mother, siblings.  There is a whole list of symtoms of "silent celiac".  Here is an article of symptoms possibly mistaken for other causes than Celiac Disease.  When I finally stopped gluten at 63 years old, I counted 19 things that improved, including lifelong mouthbreathing.  I never smelled bad things, so I as a kid, I learned to respond to the other kid's response in order to not seem weird. I really recommend you pursue testing for all the family if you can, and the whole family following GFD.  It is difficult at first, but the benefits will be worth it.  
    • Visionaerie
      I get these but where we are, they are called chicken potstickers. I would obviously suggest that it is the ginger in the product that is causing a stimulative digestive effect! So you might want to do what I do, just cook one of them with the rest of your meal so you don't have the same effect. I love the Feel Good products but they are on the expensive side. (I also drink Reed's ginger brew so in general, ginger is a friend of mine..when delivered at the right dose). Hope this helps and have a warm healthy week!
    • ognam
      Has anyone had Steatorrhea (oily/fatty poop) as a temporary glutening symptom or should I be concerned I've introduced chronic gluten somewhere (like in meds)? I haven't gotten Steatorrhea since before I went gluten free. However, I moved in the past few weeks and haven't been as careful - I've eaten at restauraunts with cross contamination but only experienced minor symptoms like headache. The past week, I ate only gluten free food at home except I went to Red Robin and got fries (told them gluten-free; allergy). The next day I had Steatorrhea and the day after that.   I know it's a symptom of malabsorption so I was wondering if it was the kind of thing that could be caused by one event or if it was due to a more chronic issue. Of course I will speak to a GI but I recently moved and need to find one.   Thank you for any info
    • plumbago
      A relative has opened another door for me on this issue -- the possibility of menopause raising HDL. Most studies suggest that menopause decreases HDL-C, however, one study found that often it's increased. "Surprisingly, HDL cholesterol was higher (p < 0.001) in postmenopausal women by 11%. Further, the number of women who had low HDL cholesterol was higher in pre vs. postmenopausal women. The range of ages were 26–49 years for pre-menopausal and 51–74 years for postmenopausal women. "This interesting finding has also been observed by other investigators. It is possible that the observed increase in HDL-C in postmenopausal women could be due to a protective mechanism to counterbalance the deleterious effects of biomarkers associated with menopause. However, further studies are needed to confirm this theory. And to the point raised earlier about functionality: "...some patients with elevated HDL-C concentrations could remain at risk for coronary events if HDL is not functional and some authors have suggested that this could be the case for menopausal women." Postmenopausal Women Have Higher HDL and Decreased Incidence of Low HDL than Premenopausal Women with Metabolic Syndrome. By no means to I think this is definitive, rather food for thought.
×
×
  • Create New...