Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Which Tests Should I Request For A Diagnosis?


Tim86

Recommended Posts

Tim86 Apprentice

I have an annual physical with my doctor on Wednesday, and I plan to ask him about Celiac and gluten intolerance (we've never discussed it before). I attempted a gluten-free diet throughout March, and noticed a very slight improvement in IBS symptoms, but it wasn't definitive enough to convince me to stay on the diet. I've been back on a regular diet since the end of March. I'd really like to have some lab tests done to confirm/deny if I have Celiac or a gluten intolerance.

  1. Should I ask my doctor for specific tests, or just see what he suggests and go from there?
  2. Do you recommend starting with a few of the most common tests for an initial screening, and then follow-up with a more comprehensive group of tests if needed? Or just start right off with a comprehensive group of tests?
  3. Please list the tests you recommend, and classify them as "Initial screening tests" or "Comprehensive tests".
  4. I've learned that EnteroLabs might be a good option for testing, as well. Are the typical lab tests from a doctor expensive (even after insurance)? If so, should I consider skipping the doctor-ordered tests and jump right to the EnteroLabs tests? Open Original Shared Link

THANKS!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Tim86 Apprentice

Why hasn't anyone responded, and why hasn't my topic been pinned yet? I thought this was the place to come for answers. I only have one day until my Dr appt., so I need answers soon, please!

gfb1 Rookie
I have an annual physical with my doctor on Wednesday, and I plan to ask him about Celiac and gluten intolerance (we've never discussed it before). I attempted a gluten-free diet throughout March, and noticed a very slight improvement in IBS symptoms, but it wasn't definitive enough to convince me to stay on the diet. I've been back on a regular diet since the end of March. I'd really like to have some lab tests done to confirm/deny if I have Celiac or a gluten intolerance.

  1. Should I ask my doctor for specific tests, or just see what he suggests and go from there?
  2. Do you recommend starting with a few of the most common tests for an initial screening, and then follow-up with a more comprehensive group of tests if needed? Or just start right off with a comprehensive group of tests?
  3. Please list the tests you recommend, and classify them as "Initial screening tests" or "Comprehensive tests".
  4. I've learned that EnteroLabs might be a good option for testing, as well. Are the typical lab tests from a doctor expensive (even after insurance)? If so, should I consider skipping the doctor-ordered tests and jump right to the EnteroLabs tests? Open Original Shared Link

THANKS!

i'll take a shot....

i pick door#1;

ask your doctor and see what he suggests.

then; be prepared to ask which tests... usually blood tests are first, a good decision tree can be found here:

Open Original Shared Link

print it and take it with you.

many docs like to measure total IgA at the same time as the blood tests -- since low IgA can confound some of the celiac serology.

but, as you can see from the 'tree', some docs like to wait for the 2nd blood tests... but, that would not be my preference.

if the tests are positive, he will, most likely, schedule an endoscopy.

you will need to be eating gluten both before and up to the tests for them to register postively.

no gluten in the diet; all tests will be negative -- even if you are celiac...

genetic tests are useless at this point.

Lisa Mentor

This the test serology panel to request:

Antigliadin antibodies (AGA) both IrA and IgG

Antiendomysial antibodies (EMA) - IgA

Anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (tTG) - IgA

Total IgA level.

It is imperative to continue with a full gluten diet for the optimum accuracy. Enterolabs can indicate any sensitivities, but it will not/can not diagnose for Celiac. My suggestion is to follow through with conventional testing first. Good luck

Tim86 Apprentice
if the tests are positive, he will, most likely, schedule an endoscopy.

genetic tests are useless at this point.

Thanks for the reply. Why do they need to do an endoscopy if the tests were already positive. Are there false positives? I thought they did an endoscopy to rule out false negatives.

Also, why are the "genetic tests useless at this point"? Do you mean that I should already have the answers I need after those other tests, so the genetic test is unnecessary?

Tim86 Apprentice
This the test serology panel to request:

Antigliadin antibodies (AGA) both IrA and IgG

Antiendomysial antibodies (EMA) - IgA

Anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (tTG) - IgA

Total IgA level.

Thanks for the reply. Any ideas if these tests are extremely expensive compared to typical bloodwork labs? If some are expensive, I might want to stick with the decision tree provided by "gfb1". If not, I could request the whole list you suggested.

lizard00 Enthusiast

I don't know a specific price range for the testing, it would probably depend on the lab.

But, I would think that it would be cheaper to do them all at once, and if they're going to take your blood, why not get the whole panel done to avoid having to go back for more bloodwork for the same disease?

If you are still eating gluten, genetic testing is not going to be nearly as conclusive as blood work. (Which still might not be) You can carry the gene(s) associated with celiac, but that doesn't mean you are going to develop it. For me, it was a last resort with my doc because of where I was when I saw him.

Prometheus, for example, will run the celiac panel and the gene panel at the same time. I'm not sure about others, but could be something to look into if you are curious about which genes you do carry. I do know that they are pricey... my gene panel was somewhere around $500 and I had a heck of a time getting insurance to pay for it. Even then, they only paid for a small percentage.

For diagnostic purposes, at this phase, I would pursue blood work/biopsy.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



gfb1 Rookie
Thanks for the reply. Why do they need to do an endoscopy if the tests were already positive. Are there false positives? I thought they did an endoscopy to rule out false negatives.

Also, why are the "genetic tests useless at this point"? Do you mean that I should already have the answers I need after those other tests, so the genetic test is unnecessary?

yes. after the serology and endoscopy you will have the answers you need.

there is NO genetic test to diagnose for celiac disease (as noone knows what gene or genes are causing the disease).

usually the celiac serology panel listed by mommagoose are done together ... but, the diagnosis tree remains the same.

Lisa16 Collaborator
Thanks for the reply. Why do they need to do an endoscopy if the tests were already positive. Are there false positives? I thought they did an endoscopy to rule out false negatives.

Also, why are the "genetic tests useless at this point"? Do you mean that I should already have the answers I need after those other tests, so the genetic test is unnecessary?

Hi Tim.

You have gotten good answers about which specific tests to request-- these are called a "full celiac panel." They will be expensive (my mom's were several hundred dollars last year), but your insurance should cover the blood tests.

If you read a few older threads (you can search here,) you will see that there are no false positives. There can, however, be false negatives. This complicates the diagnosis. A positive blood test, according to many things I have read, apparently indicates that you have intestinal damage.

For doctors, the "gold standard" of diagnosis is the intestinal biopsy. They will be looking for flattened vili. Unfortunately, celiac damage is patchy and the biopsies frequently miss it (you have over 22 feet of intestine afterall). Ask you doctor to take multiple samples from different sites. It is possible (and fairly common) to have a false negative biopsy. I had this happen to me and I suffered eight more years until I got a positive diagnosis.

Some people (and more enlightened doctors) feel the positive blood panel is enough to diagnose. If you look on the main webpage here, they will tell you exactly how to interpret the blood work results. Some of those tests are highly (like 98%) specific for celiac.

Some doctors will diagnose based on a positive response to the diet. However, since you yourself seem to question whether the diet helped you, the biopsy is probably a good idea because if it is positive then you know for sure what you have to do to feel better. It can take a long time on the diet to see results (in my case it took only four days.) This can be because there are other food intolerances and getting totally gluten-free takes a sharp learning curve and newbies (even oldies!) get small amounts from things like vitamins or other items they are not suspecting.

One reason gfb1 says the genetic tests are useless is that something like 30% of the population has the genes people associate with celiac disease, but many do not ever develop it. So just having the gene doesn't mean you have the disease. But if you are diagnosed, the genetic test can be helpful if you have children, say, in that you know which ones are more at risk. Another problem with the genes is that there are lots of things they still don't understand yet-- like why the disease activates in some and not others. Or why some people who do not have the genes associated with celiac still get the disease. It is more complicated than "having gene X= celiac." The gene tests are an additional expense that won't tell you very much at this point.

Good luck in your diagnosis! If it is celiac, then you will at least have an answer. And may you feel better pretty soon! I was misdiagnosed with IBS-D for 23+ years, so I understand where you are.

Lisa

  • 4 weeks later...
Tim86 Apprentice

I just got my results back. I started a new topic:

https://www.celiac.com/gluten-free/index.php?showtopic=60218

Please check it out and give me your valuable feedback. THANKS!!!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Wheatwacked replied to plumbago's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      Anyone else with very high HDL?

    2. - plumbago replied to plumbago's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      Anyone else with very high HDL?

    3. - trents replied to plumbago's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      Anyone else with very high HDL?

    4. - knitty kitty replied to plumbago's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      Anyone else with very high HDL?

    5. - trents replied to Tyoung's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      1

      Celiac Disease and Mild Chronic Gastritis


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,908
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Rhan
    Newest Member
    Rhan
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      @plumbago, I found a good PDF on cholesterol:  Unlocking the mysteries of VLDL: exploring its production, intracellular trafficking, and metabolism as therapeutic targets I just started it, but it may have answers for us, with whacky cholesterol.  The pharmaceuticals don't seem to be interested in anything but statins.   "The nicotine in tobacco causes a decrease in the HDL cholesterol level. " Maybe you should start smoking? 🤪 I have high LDL and low HDL.  It is genetic mutations in the LDLR, APOB, PCSK9, or LDLRAP1 genes. My whole family is on statins for Familial Hyperliperdemia except me.  December I had ultrasound and cat scan for Carotid Artery blockage and both sides are above 85% blockage.  I started on Atorvastatin and that made me weaker than ever, even with CoQ10.  I asked for and got prescription for 2000 mg/day Nicotinic Acid B3 and in the 3 weeks my numbers changed. I am feeling realy good lately.  Stronger and more flexible.  Sleeping better.  Getting roto router (TCar) as soon as I get clearance from a cardiologist.  I expect that by my next blood panels in April to be even better. I am beginning to believe that like vitamin D where the RDA only accounts for preventing Rickets, the RDA for B3 is way underestimated.   From Oct 22 to Jan 17: A1c from 13.5 to 10.2 eGFR from 55 to 79 Triglyeride from 458 to 362 Total cholesterol from 245 to 264 HDL from 27 to 44 VLDL from 84 to 68 LDL from 134 to 154
    • plumbago
      I have taken thiamine on and off (just not at this exact moment), and I’m not sure it's made any difference. Yes, I almost always “fast” (12 hours NPO) for blood tests, as do a great many other Americans, so I tend to think that’s not it. All I can say is that the mystery continues. I could do some speculating here…well, heck, let me go ahead and speculate now: The lab ranges we all see on our reports are more or less the averages of Americans who have had those blood tests. Now, it’s up to you and me whether or not to think of the average American as healthy. I can make arguments both ways, more often than not, on the negative. My point here is that maybe the current range of HDL is somewhat skewed (ie, low), and maybe just maybe my super high (plus 100s) HDL results are not something to worry about; the range just needs updating. Why do I say this? Because pre-celiac disease diagnosis, my HDL values were in the normal range, but post celiac disease diagnosis, my HDL levels are way above average. See where I’m going? My trusty guidebook on celiac disease, Recognizing Celiac Disease by Cleo Libonati, RN, BSN, says that HDL increases after being on the gluten free diet. Or can increase, I guess. Then again, it could be something else. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ In thinking of going to a cardiologist, I sort of fear that he/she will be dismissive of a link to celiac disease, treated celiac disease, and would not therefore be considering all possibilities. @trents I'm sorry you've been diligently working on your numbers to no effect. That must be frustrating. LDL is a world that is far better understood than HDL, so for you there's maybe less "mystery." Familial hypercholesterolemia is for sure something that can be tested. Outside of that, you're right, genetics can determine a general pattern.
    • trents
      Well, I have the opposite problem. My LDL has been moderately high for years. I eat healthy and exercise regularly but can't seem to move that meter. I used to be on a statin (and my doctors want me to go back on one) and it brought both HDL and LDL down but the ratios never changed. I think a lot of that cholesterol stuff is just baked into the genes.
    • knitty kitty
      Wow, @plumbago, Curiouser, and curioser... Have you been fasting?  Apparently HDL levels increase after fasting... https://ajcn.nutrition.org/article/S0002-9165(23)31185-7/abstract   I must say it, try taking some Thiamine.  Thiamine helps regulate lipoproteins... Thiamine helped lower HDL in this study whether they had diabetes or not. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3921172/#:~:text=Serum thiamine and its derivatives,supplementation (p %3D 0.009).
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Tyoung! I would assume for the time being that the mild gastritis and the celiac disease are connected and that once you get a good handle on gluten free eating and experience significant healing in the lining of your duodenum, you will also see improvement in the gastritis as well. Gastritis is more often than not an accompanying finding that is commented on in the post scope/biopsy notes when people are positive for celiac disease. 
×
×
  • Create New...