Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Where Your Contribution Counts!
    eNewsletter
    Support Us!

Testing Kids - How Far To Push When It's Negative?


T.H.

Recommended Posts

T.H. Community Regular

This is my first post here, so sorry if it's a bit scattered!

My father has celiac disease, and I was just diagnosed with it 9 days ago - eek, big changes! But since that made 2 in our family, I immediately requested the celiac blood panel for my kids. My 11 year old daughter came back positive for celiac, and my 8 year old son came back negative.

I don't know if the doctor is going to suggest biopsy for my daughter to confirm or not, and I would welcome anyone's experience in having the biopsy done for their children, or avoided for their children.

Also, I am worried about my son. He already has issues with consuming dairy, and has all his life. And he's tiny - at least a head shorter than the average kid his age. He's active, but often has these mood issues, like he's tired and cranky and can't 'cope.' In the past, we've noticed him like this when he accidentally has dairy, but recently, I'm starting to notice it when I can't think of anything that might be causing it, not even simply being tired and cranky. Or maybe I should say, there's this subtle difference when he really IS just tired and cranky, and it's not the same as what I'm seeing now periodically.

So I very much worry about whether we are getting a false negative with him, but I don't really want to subject him to unnecessary tests. Has anyone else run into this with their own children? What did you do?

As an added note, he is likely going to be going on a gluten free diet, in any case, because I'm the cook, and with two of us to cook for who are gluten free...the whole family is going to get to enjoy that diet too. :-) But I would hate to miss something important about his health by not testing, and I know if he's going gluten free, the tests would be useless later...

So, again...any words of advice, experience with this? Any help you could give would be much appreciated!

Thanks,

T.H.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



runningcrazy Contributor

Hi, Im fairly new to this too so im sorry if this isnt a huge help.

I would say be strict with him being gluten free as well, see if you notice any changes. I have had 3 negative blood tests, but we ordered an enterolab test to see what it says, and ive been gluten free nearly 2 weeks now and i feel great. So i think even with the negative tests i react to gluten.

The blood tests can check for celiac, not intolerance, there is the possibility of that.

If you want some answers, i would consider looking into enterolab tests if you can pay for it. I got the gene testing and the stool test to check for antibodies. You may or may not want to do the gene test because you know you must have the gene since you have celiac.

It can tell you if your son is reacting to gluten. It is much more sensitve than the blood test. Type in enterolab in the thread searcfh box on this website and youll see a lot more info. It takes about 3 days to recieve your kit and 2-3 weeks for results. Myh results should be here soon!

good luck~

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rondar2001 Apprentice

Hi, my daughter had an endoscopy to confirm her diagnosis when she was 7. We felt that having a definitive diagnosis would be important as she gets older. There is no questioning a positive biopsy and hopefully this will be a tool to keep her gluten free as she gets into her teens and may want to cheat on the diet. A confirmed diagnosis also gives us a little more credibility when dealing with teachers and family in our effort to keep her gluten free.

The biopsy itself was quick and painless. She was at the hospital at 7 am and home by noon with no lasting effects.

For you son, I would discuss his symptoms with his doctor and see if they would biopsy him as well. In addition to checking for celiac, they may see another issue that could be causing his symptoms.

The choice to biopsy is of course yours, these are just the reasons that we decided to go ahead with it.

Good luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
momxyz Contributor
Hi, my daughter had an endoscopy to confirm her diagnosis when she was 7. We felt that having a definitive diagnosis would be important as she gets older. There is no questioning a positive biopsy and hopefully this will be a tool to keep her gluten free as she gets into her teens and may want to cheat on the diet. A confirmed diagnosis also gives us a little more credibility when dealing with teachers and family in our effort to keep her gluten free.

The biopsy itself was quick and painless. She was at the hospital at 7 am and home by noon with no lasting effects.

For you son, I would discuss his symptoms with his doctor and see if they would biopsy him as well. In addition to checking for celiac, they may see another issue that could be causing his symptoms.

The choice to biopsy is of course yours, these are just the reasons that we decided to go ahead with it.

Good luck!

if the biopsy comes back positive, I agree, then you have a confirmed diagnosis.

But since his antibodies were negative, the biopsy could very well come back negative. Some people with celiacs don't present with GI symptoms as their first or main problem......

I think the gene testing would be very useful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DanAbimytwomiracles Newbie

An elimination diet is just as accurate as a biopsy. And I don't ever see a need to put a child under general anesthesia when there is a perfectly acceptable non-surgical method to determine an answer. With my daughter, who had more mild, atypical celiac symptoms and a negative blood panel, we knew within 3 days that things were better, and after 4 weeks it was amazing the difference. Giving her a gluten challenge after those 4 weeks made all the symptoms return. Our final proof was that after 1.5 years of barely growing (from 2-3.5 she gained 8 ounces), she then gained 5 lbs in one year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
T.H. Community Regular

Thanks for all the replies! I'm thinking I may avoid testing any further for the little guy and simply keep good track of how he's reacting to the gluten-free diet. Thanks!

T.H.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
balmerhon Rookie

My 3 yo son's blood work came back negative. He had an endoscopic biopsy and that also came back negative for celiac. BUT they did find allergy cells (eosinophilic colitis). This is despite his RAST tests coming back negative as well.

We did 2 weeks of gluten free with no change in his symptoms (diarrhea). This was prior to the endoscopy. We're now doing dairy-free. We know he now has an allergy, but we don't know yet what it is. We may have to revisit a gluten elimination if dairy does not seem to be the problem.

So, bear in mind, it's not always celiac. But blood tests for younger kids are often incorrect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Help Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - cristiana replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      16

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    2. - Julie Riordan replied to Julie Riordan's topic in Traveling with Celiac Disease
      3

      Any ideas for travelling

    3. - Nedast replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      16

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - trents replied to SuzanneL's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Weak Positive Test

    5. - SuzanneL posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Weak Positive Test


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      120,498
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kim.cervone513
    Newest Member
    Kim.cervone513
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Thank you for your post, @Nedast, and welcome to the forum. It is interesting to read of your experiences. Although I've not had TMJ, from time to time I have had a bit of mild pain in my jaw, sharp stabbing pains and tingling in my face which appears to have been caused by issues with my trigeminal nerve.  I read that sometimes a damaged trigeminal nerve in coeliacs can heal after adopting a gluten free diet.  I try to keep out of cold winds or wear a scarf over my face when it is cold and windy, those conditions tend to be my 'trigger' but I do think that staying clear of gluten has helped.  Also, sleeping with a rolled up towel under my neck is a tip I picked up online, again, that seems to bring benefits. Thank you again for your input - living with this sort of pain can be very hard, so it is good to be able to share advice.
    • Julie Riordan
      I am going to France in two weeks and then to Portugal in May   Thanks for your reply 
    • Nedast
      I made an account just to reply to this topic. My story resembles yours in so many ways that it is truly amazing. I also suddenly became lactose intolerant, went a little under 10 years attributing all my symtoms to different body parts, never thinking it was something systemic until much later. I had the same mental problems - anxiety, depression, fatigue, etc. In fact, the only real difference in our story is that I was never formally diagnosed. When I discovered that my myriad symtoms, that had been continuous and worsening for years, all rapidly subsided upon cessation of consuming gluten, I immediately took it upon myself to cut gluten out of my diet completely. I live in America, and had lost my health insurance within the year prior to my discovery, so I could not get tested, and I will never willingly or knowingly consume gluten again, which I would have to do in order to get tested now that I have insurance again. But that is not the point of this reply. I also had extreme TMJ pain that began within months of getting my wisdom teeth out at - you guessed it - 17 years old. I was in and out of doctors for my various symptoms for about 5 years before I gave up, but during that time I had also kept getting reffered to different kinds of doctors that had their own, different solutions to my TMJ issue, an issue which I only recently discovered was related to my other symptoms. I began with physical therapy, and the physical therapist eventually broke down at me after many months, raising her voice at me and saying that there was nothing she could do for me. After that saga, I saw a plastic surgeon at the request of my GP, who he knew personally. This palstic surgeon began using botox injections to stop my spasming jaw muscles, and he managed to get it covered by my insurace in 2011, which was harder to do back then. This helped the pain tremendously, but did not solve the underlying problem, and I had to get repeat injections every three months. After a couple of years, this began to lose effectiveness, and I needed treatments more often than my insurance would cover. The surgeon did a scan on the joint and saw slight damage to the tissues. He then got approved by insurance to do a small surgery on the massseter (jaw) muscle - making an incision, and then splicing tissue into the muscle to stop the spasming. It worked amazingly, but about three months later it had stopped working. I was on the verge of seeing the top oral surgeon in our city, but instead of operating on me, he referred me to a unique group of dentists who focus on the TMJ and its biomechanical relationship to teeth occlusion (i.e. how the teeth fit together). This is what your dentist did, and what he did to you was boderline if not outright malpractice. There is a dental field that specializes in doing this kind of dental work, and it takes many years of extra schooling (and a lot of money invested into education) to be able to modify teeth occusion in this manner. Just based on the way you describe your dentist doing this, I can tell he was not qualified to do this to you. Dentists who are qualified and engage in this practice take many measurments of your head, mouth, teeth, etc., they take laboratory molds of your teeth, and they then make a complete, life-size model of your skull and teeth to help them guide their work on you. They then have a lab construct, and give you what is called a "bite splint." It looks and feels like a retainer, but its function is entirely different. This is essentially a literal splint for the TMJ that situates on the teeth. The splint is progressively modified once or twice per week, over several months, in order to slowly move the joint to its correct position. The muscles spasm less, stress is taken off the joint, as the joint slowly moves back into its proper position. The pain reduces each month, each week, sometimes even each day you go in for a visit. The joint has to be moved in this manner with the splint BEFORE the modification to the teeth begins. They then add to your tooth structure with small bits of composite, to keep the joint in its proper place after it has been sucessfully repositioned. Subtracting from your teeth, by grinding down bits of your natural tooth structure, is done very conservatively, if they have to do it at all. This process worked for me - after six months, my face, jaw, neck all felt normal, and I had no more pain - a feeling I had not had in a long time. It also made my face look better. I had not realized the true extent that the spasming muscles and the joint derangement had effected the shape of my face. The pain began to return after a few months, but nowhere near where it had been before. This immense reduction in pain lasted for a little over two years. The treatment still ultimately failed, but it is not their fault, and it is still the treatment that has given me the most relief to this day. Later on, I even went about three years with very, very good pain reduction, before the joint severely destabilized again. This field of dentistry is the last line treatment for TMJ issues before oral surgery on the TMJ. There aren't as many denists around who practice this anymore, and the practice is currently shrinking due to dentists opting for less espensive, additional educations in things like professional whitening, which have a broader marketability. Getting this treatment is also very expensive if not covered by insurance (in America at least). My first time was covered by insurance, second time was not, though the dentist took pity on me due to the nature of my case and charged like a quarter of usual pricing. Most cases seen by these dentists are complete successes, and the patient never has to come back again. But occasionally they get a case that is not a success, and I was one of those cases. A little over a year ago, I began seeing the second dentist who keeps my TMJ stable in this manner. The first dentist retired, and then died sadly. A shame too, because he was a truly amazing, knowledgable guy who really wanted to help people. The new dentist began to get suspicious when my joint failed to stay stable after I was finished with the bite splint and his modifications, so he did another scan on me. This is ten years after the first scan (remember, I said the surgeon saw "slight" damage to the tissue on the first scan). This new scan revealed that I now no longer have cartilage in the joint, on both sides - complete degeneration of the soft tissues and some damage to the bone. The dentist sat me down and had a talk with me after these results came in, and said that when he sees damage like this in cases like mine, that the damage to the joint is most likely autoimmune, and that, in his experinece, it is usually autoimmune. He has sent patients with cases like mine to Mayo Clinic. He said he will continue to see me as long as the treatment continues to offer me relief, but also said that I will probably have to see a dentist for this type of treatment for the rest of my life. He is not currently recommending surgery due to my young age and the fact that the treatment he provides manages my symptoms pretty well. I still see this dentist today, and probably will see this kind of dental specialist for the rest of my life, since they have helped with this issue the most. I did not inform him that I am 100% sure that I have celiac disease (due to my complete symptom remission upon gluten cessation). I didn't inform him because I thought it would be inappropriate due to not having a formal diagnosis. I was disappointed, because I had believed I had caught it BEFORE it had done permanent damage to my body. I had never suspected that my TMJ issues may be related to my other symptoms, and that the damage would end up complete and permanent. Luckily, I caught it about 6 months after my other joints started hurting, and they stopped hurting right after I went gluten free, and haven't hurt since. I of course did the necessary research after the results of the second scan, and found out that the TMJ is the most commonly involved joint in autoimmune disease of the intestines, and if mutliple joints are effected, it is usually the first one effected. This makes complete sense, since the TMJ is the most closely related joint to the intestines, and literally controls the opening that allows food passage into your intestines. I am here to tell you, that if anyone says there is no potential relationship between TMJ issues and celiac disease, they are absolutely wrong. Just google TMJ and Celiac disease, and read the scientific articles you find. Research on issues regarding the TMJ is relatively sparse, but you will find the association you're looking for validated.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @SuzanneL! Which tTG was that? tTG-IGA? tTG-IGG? Were there other celiac antibody tests run from that blood draw? Was total IGA measured? By some chance were you already cutting back on gluten by the time the blood draw was taken or just not eating much? For the celiac antibody tests to be accurate a person needs to be eating about 10g of gluten daily which is about 4-6 pieces of bread.
    • SuzanneL
      I've recently received a weak positive tTG, 6. For about six years, I've been sick almost everyday. I was told it was just my IBS. I have constant nausea. Sometimes after I eat, I have sharp, upper pain in my abdomen. I sometimes feel or vomit (bile) after eating. The doctor wanted me to try a stronger anti acid before doing an endoscopy. I'm just curious if these symptoms are pointing towards Celiac Disease? 
×
×
  • Create New...