Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Rat Poison Analogy


MartialArtist

Recommended Posts

MartialArtist Apprentice

I was at a Celiac support group meeting last Wednesday and I shared in a casual conversation with a couple of people what I thought was kind of an extreme emotional reaction to this whole thing. Half laughing (at myself), I said that working in my kitchen, where other family members can and do eat and prepare foods made with wheat products, I feel like someone is bringing rat poison into my kitchen and that I'm having to be extra diligent in cleaning every surface and every tool before I do anything in there. They both nodded and agreed, basically saying that it really is something I have to take that seriously.

Is that an extreme over-exaggeration, a mild over-exaggeration, or a good way of approaching a non-gluten-free household kitchen to ensure that my food is ultimately truly gluten-free? If it's an exaggeration, I will continue to keep this analogy to myself and not bother my family members with my overreaction. But if it's really a reasonable analogy, I think I need to voice this.

Help would be appreciated.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kenlove Rising Star

There are a lot of variables for each of us and on top it it we're all different. That analogy works for me but others my get squimish at it. I dont want anything with flour in my house.

cross contamination is a very serious issue for many of us while for others its not an issue at all.

ken

I was at a Celiac support group meeting last Wednesday and I shared in a casual conversation with a couple of people what I thought was kind of an extreme emotional reaction to this whole thing. Half laughing (at myself), I said that working in my kitchen, where other family members can and do eat and prepare foods made with wheat products, I feel like someone is bringing rat poison into my kitchen and that I'm having to be extra diligent in cleaning every surface and every tool before I do anything in there. They both nodded and agreed, basically saying that it really is something I have to take that seriously.

Is that an extreme over-exaggeration, a mild over-exaggeration, or a good way of approaching a non-gluten-free household kitchen to ensure that my food is ultimately truly gluten-free? If it's an exaggeration, I will continue to keep this analogy to myself and not bother my family members with my overreaction. But if it's really a reasonable analogy, I think I need to voice this.

Help would be appreciated.

Jestgar Rising Star

It's how I feel. I don't even like touching wheat products, although I've never had a problem doing that.

tarnalberry Community Regular

I think it's really a decent analogy (to a point). It breaks down in the effects of getting a lot of it (rat poison kills you now, gluten kills you later), but the basic premise that a very small amount can make you very sick is still true.

K8ling Enthusiast

I liken it to a virus, that seems to get through to people. Think of it like the flu...if it touches something with the flu on it, it is "infected".

CeliacMom2008 Enthusiast

We use the rat poison analogy here. It helps people understand that a little does matter. Where it breaks down is that if you ate a tub of rat poison you'd be dead but a tub of gluten isn't going to kill you immediately. None the less, we use it and find it a very effective way of explaining it to people. Our dietician was the first place we heard it (she has Celiac as well). It's also been used at our support group meetings that way before. I'd say stick with it!

sandsurfgirl Collaborator

Rat poison, a little bit of glass, toxins, whatever analogy makes sense to you. When you eat gluten as a celiac your body has an autoimmune reaction and destroys your intestine, whether it's a little bit or a lot. So... it's dangerous.

I have small kids, age 2 and 5. I had to make our house gluten free because they were glutening me constantly. I couldn't get better until I banished the crumbs. But... my kids are little like I said. Food flies everywhere when toddlers eat and they wipe it all over the place because you can't grab their hands fast enough. Then they would hug and kiss me with gluten faces before I could wipe them down.

I think that you need to impress upon your family the real and actual danger of gluten crumbs and residue. Get your own toaster and condiments. Label things gluten-free that must be gluten free for you. You have to be safe at home.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kayo Explorer

I like it! I don't think it's an overreaction at all. I guess you could gauge your audience and go from there. Rat poison, arsenic, and even e-coli paint a very clear picture.

I've used 'raw chicken' as an affective analogy, particularly when discussing cross contamination. Things like: You wouldn't plop a raw chicken on the counter and then prepare a meal before cleaning the surface right? Getting gluten everywhere is like rubbing raw chicken everywhere.

I've also compared the effects of gluten on us as being similar to how sugar affects diabetics. That one only works if the person understands diabetes.

buffettbride Enthusiast

I use rat poison quite a bit as an analaogy (although the virus one makes good sense, too). What this analogy helps to do is helps YOU explain to others so they really, really, really, really get that even the teeniest tinyest bit is bad. "Just a little" is WAY too much. Whenver people try to give me the "just a little" line of garbage, I ask them if they'd like "just a little" rat poison in their food. Then the FINALLY get the point (or shut up 'cause they are tired of me).

ciavyn Contributor

For the squeamish, I prefer the raw chicken example. Anyone who cooks anything has probably handled raw chicken (barring the vegetarians among us) and understands the importance of handling chicken very carefully and cleaning up afterwards. That is the way I view gluten. It can come into my house, but it stays in a separate container, and away from other foods. When making it, clean up after yourself with antibacterial cleaner.

jerseyangel Proficient

I use a couple of analogies. To explain the need for care during food prep in the kitchen, I use salmonella. I say that I wouldn't think of working with raw chicken and not clean up well afterwords and wash my hands before making them a salad.

For the trace glutening, I use cold and flu germs as an example. I say that just as you can pick up a virus on a doorknob and transfer microscopic germs--the same is true of the gluten molecule. And just as getting ill from a cold isn't the actual virus making you sick--it's your immune system's reaction to it, it's the same with gluten.

farmwife67 Explorer

We use the rat poison analogy here. It helps people understand that a little does matter. Where it breaks down is that if you ate a tub of rat poison you'd be dead but a tub of gluten isn't going to kill you immediately. None the less, we use it and find it a very effective way of explaining it to people. Our dietician was the first place we heard it (she has Celiac as well). It's also been used at our support group meetings that way before. I'd say stick with it!

It may not kill you instantly but it does kill your villi in your intestine, just like rat poison would!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.