Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Does It Have To Be Completely Gluten Free


Anya

Recommended Posts

Anya Apprentice

I am wondering if you have to be completely gluten free as a Celiac? My 20 month old daughter has the celiac gene. I have a GI condition that I have managed with an "almost gluten free" and casein free diet. My daughter has had recurrent c.diff infections for over 8 months and the celiac gene was discovered as part of investigating underlying conditions. It is likely that we are both celiac. I find it so hard to go completely gluten free. I have been fine with the occasional gluten. I am wondering if other people have experienced that? I am wondering if I need to put my daughter on a strict gluten free diet or if I can relax it a bit. I have been eating spelt bread, which is significantly reduced in gluten. I tried gluten free bread with my daughter, but she spit it out and got mad at me. If I could just do the spelt bread and crackers with her, that would make things so much easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



scarlett77 Apprentice

I am wondering if you have to be completely gluten free as a Celiac? My 20 month old daughter has the celiac gene. I have a GI condition that I have managed with an "almost gluten free" and casein free diet. My daughter has had recurrent c.diff infections for over 8 months and the celiac gene was discovered as part of investigating underlying conditions. It is likely that we are both celiac. I find it so hard to go completely gluten free. I have been fine with the occasional gluten. I am wondering if other people have experienced that? I am wondering if I need to put my daughter on a strict gluten free diet or if I can relax it a bit. I have been eating spelt bread, which is significantly reduced in gluten. I tried gluten free bread with my daughter, but she spit it out and got mad at me. If I could just do the spelt bread and crackers with her, that would make things so much easier.

Try Rudi's or Udi's. Even a little gluten will cause damage. You may not have a big reaction now, but it may cause issues later on. I'm not going to lie and say that gluten free is easy, but IMHO it is necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dixiebell Contributor

If you or your daughter have celiac then you are doing damage to your bodies even if you don't have noticeable reactions. So to answer your question, yes, you need to be completely gluten free.

We eat Udi's gluten free bread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
T.H. Community Regular

Short answer: yeah, 'fraid so. You'll need to keep your gluten levels below 20ppm of gluten. Otherwise, even if you don't see symptoms of this, it's doing damage.

I think of it this way: a little cut across your skin may not hurt you much, but if you cut the same scar open, over and over and over, it's a bit more of an issue. That's pretty much what you're doing when you eat gluten, just damaging your intestines over and over and over.

You also have cumulative problems that can arise. My father's spine and joints deteriorated from gluten exposure. My own spine had issues, as well as neurological problems. My brother had ulcers develop. My 12 year old daughter had such severe depression that she considered jumping off the roof. Kids who get this young can have developmental issues, problems during puberty, and women can have big issues with still-births and fertility, when the time comes.

And as one more problem, you are making both you and your daughter immuno-compromised for a while each time you consume gluten. While maybe this doesn't matter at times, if it happens at the WRONG time it can have severe consequences. Getting a serious flu when your immune system isn't in top shape could be really bad, for example. Or you could have my problem. I caught a disease that is normally unpleasant, but not horrific, but because I was immuno-compromised, it invaded other areas of my body and I ended up sick and barely able to walk for nearly a year.

I know it's hard - oh wow do I - but I guess I think of it like looking both ways before I cross the street. It's extra work, and kind of annoying. If I don't do it, maybe nothing bad happens that I notice. But when something DOES go wrong, it's SO wrong that I'd be wishing I'd been doing the extra work all along. So in the end, I consider the risks of eating gluten not worth the short term benefit of eating it, if that makes sense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Skylark Collaborator

I am wondering if you have to be completely gluten free as a Celiac? My 20 month old daughter has the celiac gene. I have a GI condition that I have managed with an "almost gluten free" and casein free diet. My daughter has had recurrent c.diff infections for over 8 months and the celiac gene was discovered as part of investigating underlying conditions. It is likely that we are both celiac. I find it so hard to go completely gluten free. I have been fine with the occasional gluten. I am wondering if other people have experienced that? I am wondering if I need to put my daughter on a strict gluten free diet or if I can relax it a bit. I have been eating spelt bread, which is significantly reduced in gluten. I tried gluten free bread with my daughter, but she spit it out and got mad at me. If I could just do the spelt bread and crackers with her, that would make things so much easier.

Spelt is a wheat and it is not "significantly reduced in gluten" in terms of a celiac diet. All grains from the triticum family will trigger the autoimmune reaction, including wheat, rye, barley, spelt, kamut, einkorn wheat, durum, semolina, and triticale. A slice of spelt bread is an enormous dose of gluten for someone with celiac.

Having the celiac gene is not the same as being celiac. About 30% of the US population has either DQ2 or DQ8 but only about 1% is celiac. If you are unwilling to stick to a strict celiac diet, you will need to gluten challenge with the help of your doctor and undergo both blood testing and a biopsy. The blood tests have a 20% false negative rate, which is why you need both. To get reliable results on biopsy, you have to eat about the equivalent of 4 slices of bread a day for quite a while. When I looked up research papers, the challenge time to get reliable tests was typically 12 weeks.

If you are celiac, meaning you have an autoimmune reaction with detectable antibodies, the dermatitis herpetiformis rash, or villous damage from eating gluten-containing grains, eating gluten is pretty dangerous and will adversely affect your long-term health. There is a nasty condition called refractory celiac disease, where you stop responding to the diet and have a higher risk of intestinal cancers. Refractory celiac is thought to be triggered by continuing to consume wheat. People with celiac who continue to trigger autoimmunity also tend to develop other autoimmune diseases, including thyroid disease, Sjogren's syndrome, and autoimmune neurological disoreders. Malabsorption from "silent" celiac where there is damage but not symptoms from eating traces of wheat can cause vitamin B and D deficiency and osteoporosis. Very small amounts of wheat have been documented to cause damage in celiacs, so it really is a "zero tolerance" diet. Some cross-contamination is inevitable, but we never knowingly ingest gluten.

If you are not celiac but sensitive to wheat, it's unclear what you need to do. Some scientists think non-celiac gluten intolerance is just an early stage of celiac disease and you should avoid all gluten. Others think it may be a somewhat different disorder and you can eat what you can tolerate. We certainly have people around here who have pretty bad vitamin deficiencies and neurological problems from non-celiac intolerance, and they get noticeably ill from tiny amounts of gluten.

So... I'd strongly suggest you get diagnosed for sure with a challenge, or make the commitment to stick to a celiac diet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Juliebove Rising Star

Yes, it has to be completely gluten-free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,088
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Aventine
    Newest Member
    Aventine
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Anmol
      Thanks this is helpful. Couple of follow -ups- that critical point till it stays silent is age dependent or dependent on continuing to eat gluten. In other words if she is on gluten-free diet can she stay on silent celiac disease forever?    what are the most cost effective yet efficient test to track the inflammation/antibodies and see if gluten-free is working . 
    • trents
      Welcome to the community forum, @Anmol! There are a number of blood antibody tests that can be administered when diagnosing celiac disease and it is normal that not all of them will be positive. Three out of four that were run for you were positive. It looks pretty conclusive that you have celiac disease. Many physicians will only run the tTG-IGA test so I applaud your doctor for being so thorough. Note, the Immunoglobulin A is not a test for celiac disease per se but a measure of total IGA antibody levels in your blood. If this number is low it can cause false negatives in the individual IGA-based celiac antibody tests. There are many celiacs who are asymptomatic when consuming gluten, at least until damage to the villous lining of the small bowel progresses to a certain critical point. I was one of them. We call them "silent" celiacs".  Unfortunately, being asymptomatic does not equate to no damage being done to the villous lining of the small bowel. No, the fact that your wife is asymptomatic should not be viewed as a license to not practice strict gluten free eating. She is damaging her health by doing so and the continuing high antibody test scores are proof of that. The antibodies are produced by inflammation in the small bowel lining and over time this inflammation destroys the villous lining. Continuing to disregard this will catch up to her. While it may be true that a little gluten does less harm to the villous lining than a lot, why would you even want to tolerate any harm at all to it? Being a "silent" celiac is both a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing in the sense of being able to endure some cross contamination in social settings without embarrassing repercussions. It's a curse in that it slows down the learning curve of avoiding foods where gluten is not an obvious ingredient, yet still may be doing damage to the villous lining of the small bowel. GliadinX is helpful to many celiacs in avoiding illness from cross contamination when eating out but it is not effective when consuming larger amounts of gluten. It was never intended for that purpose. Eating out is the number one sabotager of gluten free eating. You have no control of how food is prepared and handled in restaurant kitchens.  
    • knitty kitty
      Forgot one... https://www.hormonesmatter.com/eosinophilic-esophagitis-sugar-thiamine-sensitive/
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum community, @ekelsay! Yes, your tTG-IGA score is strongly positive for celiac disease. There are other antibody tests that can be run when diagnosing celiac disease but the tTG-IGA is the most popular with physicians because it combines good sensitivity with good specificity, and it is a relatively inexpensive test to perform. The onset of celiac disease can happen at any stage of life and the size of the score is not necessarily an indicator of the progress of the disease. It is likely that you you experienced onset well before you became aware of symptoms. It often takes 10 years or more to get a diagnosis of celiac disease after the first appearance of symptoms. In my case, the first indicator was mildly elevated liver enzymes that resulted in a rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross at age 37. There was no GI discomfort at that point, at least none that I noticed. Over time, other lab values began to get out of norm, including decreased iron levels. My PCP was at a complete loss to explain any of this. I finally scheduled an appointment with a GI doc because the liver enzymes concerned me and he tested me right away for celiac disease. I was positive and within three months of gluten free eating my liver enzymes were back to normal. That took 13 years since the rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross. And my story is typical. Toward the end of that period I had developed some occasional diarrhea and oily stool but no major GI distress. Many celiacs do not have classic GI symptoms and are "silent" celiacs. There are around 200 symptoms that have been associated with celiac disease and many or most of them do not involve conscious GI distress. Via an autoimmune process, gluten ingestion triggers inflammation in the villous lining of the small bowel which damages it over time and inhibits the ability of this organ to absorb the vitamins and minerals in the food we ingest. So, that explains why those with celiac disease often suffer iron deficiency anemia, osteoporosis and a host of other vitamin and mineral deficiency related medical issues. The villous lining of the small bowel is where essentially all of our nutrition is absorbed. So, yes, anemia is one of the classic symptoms of celiac disease. One very important thing you need to be aware of is that your PCP may refer you to a GI doc for an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel lining to confirm the results of the blood antibody testing. So, you must not begin gluten free eating until that is done or at least you know they are going to diagnose you with celiac disease without it. If you start gluten free eating now there will be healing in the villous lining that will begin to take place which may compromise the results of the biopsy.
    • Anmol
      Hello all- my wife was recently diagnosed with Celiac below are her blood results. We are still absorbing this.  I wanted to seek clarity on few things:  1. Her symptoms aren't extreme. She was asked to go on gluten free diet a couple years ago but she did not completely cut off gluten. Partly because she wasn't seeing extreme symptoms. Only bloating and mild diarrhea after a meal full of gluten.  Does this mean that she is asymptomatic but enormous harm is done with every gram of gluten.? in other words is amount gluten directly correlated with harm on the intestines? or few mg of gluten can be really harmful to the villi  2. Why is she asymptomatic?  3. Is Gliadin X safe to take and effective for Cross -contamination or while going out to eat?  4. Since she is asymptomatic, can we sometimes indulge in a gluten diet? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deamidated Gliadin, IgG - 64 (0-19) units tTG IgA -  >100 (0-3) U/ml tTG IgG - 4   (0-5) Why is this in normal range? Endomysial Antibody - Positive  Immunoglobulin A - 352 (87-352) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thanks for help in advance, really appreciate! 
×
×
  • Create New...