Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Package Label Question


Kimbalou

Recommended Posts

Kimbalou Enthusiast

I bought some crackers from Blue Diamond that are really good. Label said Gluten and Wheat free...but on the back it also said prepared in a facility shared with wheat, eggs, etc. Gluten only to 20ppm. Do you feel safe eating things with this kind of label? They had the Celiac Sprue Association label on it too, so I am assuming it's ok. But, it's so odd how I find these labels a lot that say Gluten Free but shared in a facility with wheat, etc.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor

I bought some crackers from Blue Diamond that are really good. Label said Gluten and Wheat free...but on the back it also said prepared in a facility shared with wheat, eggs, etc. Gluten only to 20ppm. Do you feel safe eating things with this kind of label? They had the Celiac Sprue Association label on it too, so I am assuming it's ok. But, it's so odd how I find these labels a lot that say Gluten Free but shared in a facility with wheat, etc.

Good question! Many of us have a spectrum of sensitivity. And it's basically trial and error. I would personally feel comfortable with Blue Diamond, but other super sensitives may not be.

They are fully disclosing, the ultra slight possibility of cross contamination. A shared facility is safer than shared equipment (even thought shared lines are cleaned and sanitized between varied products).

I applaud Blue Diamond for their accuracy in labeling. We like those companies. :D

T.H. Community Regular

Sadly, it's pretty much an individual thing. I've seen products that are made on lines that are shared with gluten products, but that test every batch to be below 5ppm. Then I've seen food made in entirely gluten free facilities that only test to 20ppm or below. :huh:

So some foods made in a gluten-free facility will have more than those sharing processing lines...it kind of boggles the mind, eh?

In my family, we have three celiacs who can eat 20ppm or less stuff, and two who get very ill on it. So for us, this is what we look for:

1. Does the company test every batch or every few batches? If they test every batch, then even if there is wheat processing nearby, they should hopefully catch any bad batches. If they don't test every batch, that ups your risk for a bad CC moment.

2. Do a number of people on forums claim to react to this particular product. I've had a few times where we tried a product, reacted, and then later checked the forums and found that a number of people had problems with this product, too. It just...well...I suppose it just lets you know more about the odds of reacting, you know?

3. And then we just started hunting down what ppm of gluten were the foods that we reacted to, so that we could figure out what our sensitivity level was.

Maybe, if you know some gluten-free foods that you are fine with, you could call up the companies and see what level of gluten they have? Might help you know if 20ppm is an okay level for you?

CeliacMom2008 Enthusiast

My understanding is that there are two ELISA tests out there - one tests to 20 PPM and the other 5 PPM. By stating that a product tests below 20 PPM it isn't saying that it has 19 PPM. It could very well have 0, but the test only states results as less than a certain threshold. My understanding is also that the 5 PPM test is more expensive than the 20 PPM.

When my son was first diagnosed I freaked when I saw the Nutthins label. Then after more research I understood what it meant. He has eaten the Nutthins, but he isn't a big cracker fan, so I can't say that we use them often. BUT, I can tell you that many members of our Celiac support group use them very regularly.

Personally, if they're testing, I'd say they're being very careful and would feel comfortable feeding them to my son. And with the Celiac seal I'd really feel comfortable.

i-geek Rookie

My rule of thumb is that if it's made in a shared facility, give it a try, especially if it's as carefully labeled as the Nut Thins (which are quite good IMO). I don't knowingly eat things made on shared lines anymore. I've gotten sick a couple of times from doing that.

cassP Contributor

they never bothered me before going 100% gluten free. a couple of weeks ago-> they make me a little itchy in the spots where i had DH. i didnt notice any gut discomfort at all... but ill just pick different gluten-free crackers next time

Roda Rising Star

I seem to tolerate these fine.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



psawyer Proficient

My understanding is that there are two ELISA tests out there - one tests to 20 PPM and the other 5 PPM. By stating that a product tests below 20 PPM it isn't saying that it has 19 PPM. It could very well have 0, but the test only states results as less than a certain threshold. My understanding is also that the 5 PPM test is more expensive than the 20 PPM.

True that.

There is no possible test for zero gluten content. Tests are available that will detect 5 ppm and 20 ppm. They are not free, and the 5 ppm test is much more expensive than the 20 ppm test. The cost of the test is, of course, included in the price of the product.

As said, "less than x ppm" includes 0 ppm -- zero can not be proven.

Even specialty manufacturers with "gluten-free" facilities recognize that contamination can occur from outside sources. Glutino tests for 20 ppm. El Peto tests for 5 ppm.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.