Jump to content
  • You are not alone. Join Celiac.com for trusted gluten-free answers and forum support.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Asian Market Rice Flours


MartialArtist

Recommended Posts

MartialArtist Apprentice

I have found that my nearest Asian market carries 2 brands of rice flour -- Flying Horse and Erawan -- and I am seeking any personal experience testimonials people can offer comparing the two. Specifically, do you believe one makes a moister final baked good or one that lasts longer before going stale? Have you had a gluten reaction from either one (shouldn't be a problem for either based on ingredients, but never know...)?

Looking at the package info, they both contain "rice flour, water" as the ingredients. The nutrition panel for Flying Horse indicates 2g of dietary fiber while Erawan claims 0g, and FH has 200 calories per serving while Erawan has 110 (same serving size).

I have done some baking with each, and in the few cases where I have used each on the same recipe, I don't think I have noticed a taste or texture difference, but I'd like more than just my own opinion!

Any input?

BTW -- I am NOT talking about the sweet rice flour or glutinous rice flour products. I have selected the Mochiko brand as my brand of choice for that and am happy with the price and outcomes I have had with it so I don't intend to keep messing with various brands for that ingredient, I don't think. (Feel free to convince me otherwise if I'm wrong, though!)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



freeatlast Collaborator

I have found that my nearest Asian market carries 2 brands of rice flour -- Flying Horse and Erawan -- and I am seeking any personal experience testimonials people can offer comparing the two. Specifically, do you believe one makes a moister final baked good or one that lasts longer before going stale? Have you had a gluten reaction from either one (shouldn't be a problem for either based on ingredients, but never know...)?

Looking at the package info, they both contain "rice flour, water" as the ingredients. The nutrition panel for Flying Horse indicates 2g of dietary fiber while Erawan claims 0g, and FH has 200 calories per serving while Erawan has 110 (same serving size).

I have done some baking with each, and in the few cases where I have used each on the same recipe, I don't think I have noticed a taste or texture difference, but I'd like more than just my own opinion!

Any input?

BTW -- I am NOT talking about the sweet rice flour or glutinous rice flour products. I have selected the Mochiko brand as my brand of choice for that and am happy with the price and outcomes I have had with it so I don't intend to keep messing with various brands for that ingredient, I don't think. (Feel free to convince me otherwise if I'm wrong, though!)

I do not know the brand name of the one I bought b/c it was written in Chinese in red letters. I could tell a definite difference in the freshness department as in it was a bit stale. Bob's Red Mill has always been fresher and so I'm back using their brand.

MartialArtist Apprentice

I do not know the brand name of the one I bought b/c it was written in Chinese in red letters. I could tell a definite difference in the freshness department as in it was a bit stale. Bob's Red Mill has always been fresher and so I'm back using their brand.

Unfortunately for me, both are covered in red lettering. Frankly, I had to pay fairly close attention to identify one from the other since I don't read any type of character writing. But one's logo is a flying horse and the other is an adorned elephant I think.

Darn210 Enthusiast

I use Flying Horse (it's the only brand that they carry). We have never had any issues with it. I use it mostly for my cake/cupcake recipe so it's not something that we ingest on a daily basis (I use Authentic Foods Fine Ground Brown Rice Flour in the recipe for my everyday flour blend). I prefer the Flying Horse brand quite a bit over Bob's Red Mill because of price and because it is a much finer ground flour and provides a better texture (not gritty) for my cakes.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Diagnosis, Testing & Treatment
      5

      New Study Reveals Hidden Gut Damage in Celiac Disease—Even Without Gluten (+Video)

    2. - Wheatwacked replied to Ginger38's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      6

      The Struggle Has Overtaken Me

    3. - cristiana replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    4. - CC90 replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    5. - Wheatwacked replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,196
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    Spider2026
    Newest Member
    Spider2026
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      Hi @Ginger38, By now you know that these things improve without gluten. I once saw an interview with a corporation executive where he proudly declared that his wheat products are more addictive than potato chips. Dr Fuhrman (Eat to Live) said find foods that are friendly to you to be friends with.  
    • cristiana
      Hi @CC90 Ah... that is very interesting.  Although it is very annoying for you to have to go through it all again, I would say that almost sounds like an admission that they didn't look far enough last time?   I could be wrong, but I would not be at all surprised if they find something on the next attempt.  Coeliac damage can be very patchy, as I understand it, so that's why my own gastroenterologist always likes to point out that he's taken lots of samples!  In the kindest possible way (you don't want to upset the person doing the procedure!) I'd be inclined to tell them what happened last time and to ask them in person to take samples lower down, as  if your health system is anything like the one in my country, communication between GPs, consultants and hospitals isn't always very good.  You don't want the same mistake to be made again. You say that your first endoscopy was traumatic?  May I ask, looking at your spelling of coeliac, was this done at an NHS hospital in England?  The reason for the question is that one of my NHS diagnosed friends was not automatically offered a sedative and managed without one.  Inspired by her, I tried to have an endoscopy one time, in a private setting, without one, so that I could recover quicker, but I had to request sedative in the end it was so uncomfortable.    I am sorry that you will have to go through a gluten challenge again but to make things easier, ensure you eat things containing gluten that you will miss should you have to go gluten free one day. 😂 I was told to eat 2 slices of normal wholemeal bread or the equivalent every day in the weeks before , but I also opted for Weetabix and dozens of Penguin chocolate biscuits.  (I had a very tight headache across my temple for days before the procedure, which I thought was interesting as I had that frequently growing up. - must have been a coeliac symptom!)  Anyway, I do hope you soon get the answers you are looking for and do keep us posted. Cristiana  
    • CC90
      Hi Cristiana   Yes I've had the biopsy results showing normal villi and intestinal mucosa.  The repeat endoscopy (requested by the gastro doc) would be to take samples from further into the intestine than the previous endoscopy reached.      
    • Wheatwacked
      Transglutaminase IgA is the gold-standard blood test for celiac disease. Sensitivity of over 90% and specificity of 95–99%. It rarely produces false positives.  An elevated level means your immune system is reacting to gluten.  Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) does not typically cause high levels of tTG-IgA. Unfortunately the protocols for a diagnosis of Celiac Disease are aimed at proving you don't have it, leaving you twisting in the wind. Genetic testing and improvement on a trial gluten free diet, also avoiding milk protein, will likely show improvement in short order if it is Celiac; but will that satisfy the medical system for a diagnosis? If you do end up scheduling a repeat endoscopy, be sure to eat up to 10 grams of gluten for 8 - 12 weeks.  You want  to create maximum damage. Not a medical opinion, but my vote is yes.
    • trents
      Cristiana asks a very relevant question. What looks normal to the naked eye may not look normal under the microscope.
×
×
  • Create New...