Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Ttg Question For You?


arkoflove

Recommended Posts

arkoflove Apprentice

Hi there,

2 years ago my PCP diagnosed me with Celiac due to my blood test results being 'equivical' and having a good response to going off gluten. At the time I was not 100% gluten free, but was on a low carb, thus lower gluten diet. I couldn't help but wonder at the time if my tests would have been a definitive positive if I had been consuming more gluten.

I went off hgluten for a time, and when I began to feel better I ate it agin because I kept being told that blood tests aren't the gold standard and I would need an edoscopy, and I must not have it.

I was fine for a time, for 3 months plus an entire pregnancy. After that my issues started up again.

This month I went to see a GI, looking for possible IBD. No IBD was found with both a colonoscopy and MRI. A celiac blood draw was done for TTG. My value was 3. Under 5 was considered negative, 5-8 equivocal, and 8+ positive. I had been gluten free for 6 months. My doc and I discussed the need to be on gluten before the test, but we decided to run it anyway. I can't help but wonder why I am even producing TTG 6 months after stopping gluten, and if it actually indicates that it would have been positive 6 months ago?

It's hard not having a definate answer. What do you think?

-Megan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Gemini Experienced

Hi there,

2 years ago my PCP diagnosed me with Celiac due to my blood test results being 'equivical' and having a good response to going off gluten. At the time I was not 100% gluten free, but was on a low carb, thus lower gluten diet. I couldn't help but wonder at the time if my tests would have been a definitive positive if I had been consuming more gluten.

I went off hgluten for a time, and when I began to feel better I ate it agin because I kept being told that blood tests aren't the gold standard and I would need an edoscopy, and I must not have it.

I was fine for a time, for 3 months plus an entire pregnancy. After that my issues started up again.

This month I went to see a GI, looking for possible IBD. No IBD was found with both a colonoscopy and MRI. A celiac blood draw was done for TTG. My value was 3. Under 5 was considered negative, 5-8 equivocal, and 8+ positive. I had been gluten free for 6 months. My doc and I discussed the need to be on gluten before the test, but we decided to run it anyway. I can't help but wonder why I am even producing TTG 6 months after stopping gluten, and if it actually indicates that it would have been positive 6 months ago?

It's hard not having a definate answer. What do you think?

-Megan

The tTg test will never be zero, which is why there is a range given for normal. I do not know what your original tTg numbers were when diagnosed but they must have been elevated for a doctor to diagnose you with Celiac. If you had continued to consume gluten on a regular basis, then your blood work most certainly would have been higher. It would naturally lower even on a lower gluten diet.

As far as the "Gold Standard" is concerned, that is a term penned by the AMA and you do not have to have a biopsy to prove Celiac. If your Celiac blood panel was elevated on one or more tests, you have a problem with gluten and should stop eating it. You proved this with a dietary trial so don't let the doctors put doubts in your head, unless you want to eat gluten again for more testing. You have to have active Celiac for awhile and eat a lot of gluten to produce enough damage to be seen on the scope. Are you willing to go that far to have a definitive diagnosis to convince yourself?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jenngolightly Contributor

The tTg test will never be zero, which is why there is a range given for normal.

It might be zero if you have IGA, IGG, or IGE antibody deficiencies like I do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gemini Experienced

It might be zero if you have IGA, IGG, or IGE antibody deficiencies like I do.

I think the original poster was referring to those who do not have IgA deficiency, which would make a biopsy or dietary trial your only option. It is possible to bring those down close to zero even if you were diagnosed by blood work and not deficient.....at least the IgA/IgG. Mine were 1 at last testing butI have been gluten-free for 6 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,173
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Art34
    Newest Member
    Art34
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • LovintheGFlife
      I recently started shopping at a nearby Trader Joe's store. I was surprised at the number and variety of (healthy) gluten-free options sold there. I must admit their low prices are also quite tempting. However, I am curious as to the labeling on all their packages. While none of their products are certified as gluten-free, many are identified as 'GLUTEN FREE' on the packaging. Are these items safe for celiacs? Has anyone tried Trader Joe's products and have there been any adverse reactions?
    • Beverley Ann Johnson
      HI, my doctor suggested one week of consuming gluten before blood tests.  I have been gluten free for 3 years.  Has anyone been through this and will I get exact results after one week of consuming gluten?  I don't even know if I can do this, if I get sick I am not sure if I can continue, any suggestions??  Thanks in advance.  
    • Denise I
      I did reach out to them on April 4th and left a message. I will try calling again. Thank you!
    • trents
      PPI's can be a wonderful healing agent when used as prescribed on the label which I believe recommends use of up to 8 weeks. But they are like antibiotics in that they are overprescribed and undermonitored. Docs generally prescribe them and then keep prescribing them because they take care of immediate symptoms so well. Physicians are more into treating symptoms than uncovering causes.
    • Scott Adams
      For the vast majority of celiacs it's probably safe, however, it seems that for those who are super sensitive it's best to avoid such products. It's fairly easy now to find brands that are naturally gluten-free, which is what Celiac.com recommends.  You might finds this article interesting:  
×
×
  • Create New...