Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Would You Do?


beebs

Recommended Posts

beebs Enthusiast

My whole family are gluten free, me because my reactions are severe, my two kids are on a trial and then will most likely do a challenge, my husband is because we all are and has found he reacts badly too, so needs to go for testing, and one of my twins is just because everyone else is.

My newest baby is about to starts solids - I really don't know what I should do. I am thinking two things here - is it kind of silly to make him gluten free just because? The problem is that my reactions are so severe to be considered life threatening - so I don't have any gluten in the house ever.

Arrrghhh! What would you do??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



pricklypear1971 Community Regular

When he's old enough to eat out, let him eat gluten.

Otherwise, you're risking everyone else's health if you bring it in the house.

And when he's that little, it's a huge risk to you - what he touches, touches you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
eatmeat4good Enthusiast

Without a doubt if I had a baby, that baby would be gluten free.

Gluten is not necessaary for life.

You are not harming your baby in any way if you never feed him gluten.

You want to be able to kiss and nuzzle your baby.

Your baby needs you to kiss and nuzzle him way more than he needs gluten.

If I got life threatening reactions like yours there would be no question about the decision that we would both always be gluten free.

If something is potentially harmful to you, the baby doesn't need it. He needs a healthy mom...always.

If he wants to eat gluten when he gets his own place...then so be it...but I would still make Holiday dinners gluten free. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beebs Enthusiast

Thanks guys - I hate second guessing myself like that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Skylark Collaborator

Gosh that's hard. Other people are offering you very kind advice, but you do need to be aware of current research suggesting that introducing gluten around 4-6 months while still breastfeeding helps prevent celiac. The idea is that it trains his immune system that gluten is OK. Could you husband possibly give your baby small amounts of a gluten food and wash him really well? If there is no way to give your son gluten without endangering your own health, obviously you can't worry about it. Ending up in the hospital is far worse than taking your chances about him being celiac and who knows what we'll think 10 years from now?

Anyway, I've copied and pasted from the full article, since you probably can't get it.

H. Esch et al. The PreventCD Study design: towards new strategies for the prevention of coeliac disease European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Issue: Volume 22(12), December 2010, p 1424–1430

Importantly, many studies have focused on the effect of gluten intake by infants on the development of celiac disease [25–31]; however early exposure to gluten has never been identified as an independent risk factor in the development of celiac disease. The study of Norris et al. [32] suggested a ‘window of opportunity’ for lowering the risk of celiac disease by introducing gluten into the child's diet at the age of 4–6 months. This period in infancy is thought to be important for the development of the immune system and also for the discrimination between tolerance and intolerance to specific nutritional antigens [32,33]. Data from the Swedish celiac disease epidemic, which arose in the mid-1980s, suggest that celiac disease may be prevented by adjusting infant nutrition [30,31]. In the case of this epidemic, the incidence rate of symptomatic celiac disease among children below 2 years of age increased 4-fold, and declined equally abruptly approximately a decade later. Potential contributing factors were investigated, with the main cause subsequently established as changes in infant feeding practices [30,31]. Prior to the epidemic, it was recommended nationally that the introduction of gluten into children's diet should be postponed from the age of 4–6 months, the interval during which breast-feeding is commonly discontinued. At the same time, although notably unrelated to this, the gluten content of commercially available cereal milk drinks and porridges was increased. The decline of the epidemic was preceded by a reinstatement of the earlier recommendation, and to reduce the gluten content in commercial infant foods.

The Swedish experience suggests that a gradual introduction of gluten, if possible while breast-feeding, will reduce the risk of celiac disease [30,31,34,35]. Moreover, a meta-analysis, which includes the Swedish findings, confirms the protective effects of breast-feeding at the time of gluten introduction [36]. Additional studies also suggest that infant nutrition may have a significant impact on the subsequent risk of developing celiac disease, and other autoimmune disorders [32,34,35,37]. These findings corroborate the need to develop prevention strategies, particularly as the current guideline recommends the introduction of gluten only after 6 months [38].

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sandsurfgirl Collaborator

With any child you shouldn't introduce gluten containing foods or any major allergens until they are one year old. Many don't follow that rule, which is sad because there are an awful lot of babies on reflux medicines and whatnot who don't need to be sick.

If you have a history of celiac, absolutely wait to introduce gluten! Don't take the chance with your baby. Then when the baby is older, you may decide to go full boar with gluten to find out if he has celiac. Or not.

It's risky for you and the child. It's not worth it. Leave the gluten for later.

You need to go very slowly with solids since you have this history in your family. Stay away from the foods on the major allergens list for a long time. Do egg yolks and whites separately. I think the whites are the most allergenic. It's been awhile since I dealt with this with the son. He's 7 now and he has celiac. Was so sick as a baby and toddler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beebs Enthusiast

Hey Skylark, that is why I asked - because I had read something that said the same thing. And now they are saying the same thing about high allergen foods - introduce nuts, eggs etc at 4 months and there is something like a 60% Reduction in anaphalaxis!

He isn't breastfed - due to my autoimmne diseases I can't. So already he is on the backfoot in terms of allergies and celiac...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



sariesue Explorer

What does the pediatritions think? Perhaps you should discuss this with your child's dr and see if he has found skylarks study to be true, and if he feels it's important enough for you to find a procedure that works for you to be able to introduce gluten. Personally, I would introduce it during the window where it is suppose to be helpful even if you don't ever plan on allowing him to eat gluten in your home. I would want to introduce gluten as a single food NOT as someone else suggested waiting until he is older and letting him have gluten while out. If you do introduce it as part of a larger meal, it will be harder to identify what he reacted to or if he just picked up a bug at daycare/preschool/life. To keep you safe I would have your husband prepare and feed the baby the gluten, then immediately have bath time. Plus I would get the baby foods that are meant for single use, preferably ones that are heated and served in the same throwaway container and I would dedicate one spoon to the gluten foods and keep in separate from the other spoons. In my mind the other advantage of introducing gluten at the younger age is they are less mobile. To me this means the child can't be spreading gluten around the house the way a toddler can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mamaw Community Regular

Dr Allessio Fasano is doing a study on this .. Google him & you can read for yourself...Honestly, I have NEVER heard of anyone dying from lack of wheat!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kitgordon Explorer

I would keep the baby gluten free until he is old enough to try it on his own. With your family history, he is at risk for celiac in any case, and there are lots of people (me, for instance) who started on wheat as infants who developed celiac anyway. And if he is celiac, I think it could make him very ill unnecessarily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
domesticactivist Collaborator

You have a life threatening reaction and there is good cause to believe that wheat and grains in general really aren't that good for people in general. No way would I introduce gluten early, and maybe not a all.

I would take the GAPS approach to introducing solids if I had it to do again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Skylark Collaborator

Hey Skylark, that is why I asked - because I had read something that said the same thing. And now they are saying the same thing about high allergen foods - introduce nuts, eggs etc at 4 months and there is something like a 60% Reduction in anaphalaxis!

He isn't breastfed - due to my autoimmne diseases I can't. So already he is on the backfoot in terms of allergies and celiac...

I think you need advice on current thinking from a pediatric allergist! Any chance you can get a referral to one in your area? Someone at a teaching hospital who is up on the latest research would be ideal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tarnalberry Community Regular

I'm sorry that meds you are on are preventing you from breastfeeding! (I'm presuming it's meds for the autoimmune conditions, since the conditions themselves are almost never a cause for avoiding breastfeeding - though most docs are woefully underinformed on the subject.)

The current research suggests introducine gluten early to kids with a risk for it. But the research is... wonky, imho. It suggests between 4 and 6 months - a time when kids don't need to be on solids at all. And I don't recall it having a group that didn't start on it until well after a year. So I'm unimpressed.

There is ample evidence that suggests, in the absence of family food sensitivities, waiting to introduce allergenic foods makes no difference. (And separating out food allergies from reflux-inducing foods is far more complicated and starts way before introducing solids.) But you're not in that sitaution, and most people I know still recommend the 1-year mark. That said, if you're waiting for a year under the hopes that baby will be able tocommunicate with you - well, there's no guarantees there. :) (My 18mo old still doesn't talk. :) With words, anyway.)

I waited until 9mo or so, but we do allow some gluten in the house. If we didn't, I would not alter our diet just to bring in gluten for a baby. Plenty of families around the world don't get to eat wheat, and they're fine. You could consider introducing it outside the house when baby is older, but I'd definitely let someone else do it (IL's introduced DD to cheerios before I might have otherwise...).

good luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beebs Enthusiast

I'm sorry that meds you are on are preventing you from breastfeeding! (I'm presuming it's meds for the autoimmune conditions, since the conditions themselves are almost never a cause for avoiding breastfeeding - though most docs are woefully underinformed on the subject.)

At the risk of TMI, I have severe nipple vasospasm (that was my first clue that anything was wrong autoimmune wise) and after my first child was born and trying to feed for 3 months in agony a lactation consultant referred me to a rheumy which is where all the autoimmune stuff started to click together. Also after this baby I developed a bad infection that turned systemic, I ended up on two kinds of anti bs for 10 weeks and lost about 35 pounds and couldn't eat, walk or stand. Ended up getting a uterus infection as well - so ill. So basically I started to express, but I just couldn't keep it up - plus the medication wasn't good for breastfeeding and I was only getting between 3-10mls. Just didn't work out. Not that it usually does for me as the vasospasm is always there and bad and I always get infections after having babies - this was the worst by far though. I have no doubt that I get infections because of the autoimmune stuff.

My GP is gluten intolerant and believes that gluten is bad generally, so she wouldn't think twice about the baby being gluten free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tarnalberry Community Regular

Ick! I also had a vasospasm issue, which was partially due to my daughter not nursing well - she would compress my nipple with her tongue against the roof of her mouth. The physical irritation was really what was primarily setting off the issue. We worked with an OT, a PT, and an MD who specializes in breastfeeding medicine to try to address the issue. I was very fortunate that, at three months, my daughter "got her act together" and stop compressing so much. (I gave her until then to develop the ability to nurse better, or I was giving up, as I was tired of crying through nursing sessions and just wanting to give her to someone, anyone after nursing her. It was horrid. You have my sympathies!) The vasospasm issue continued for another few months after that, but with the help of extra magnesium, heating pads and keeping otherwise warm and other non-pharmaceutical interventions, we have been able to get past it. (There is at least one med that they can put you on, that is safe for breastfeeding, to address vasospasm, but most cases are contributed to from the baby's end as well.)

But adding infections, meds, and no real opportunity to get your supply up sounds like a whirlwind of circumstances that would keep the most dedicated from being able to breast feed! Congrats for giving it a go; that's awesome that you tried so hard!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Di2011 Enthusiast

My gut is telling me you should go the gluten-free route however my brain suggests it may not be the best bet. What do you do when the 8-9 year old gets gluten at school, friends house etc and either 1. reacts violently or 2. thinks its all good so goes for more next time, and again, and again.. and then there is a problem or 3. point number 2 and never reacts????

If you have a good doctor talk to the clinic about testing in their rooms. Especially the first few times. Otherwise go and sit in Emergency and feed gluten there. This would cover point 1 (violent reaction) and point 2 (nasty reaction somewhere out of your control at some point in the poisoning process). And how do ever figure out point 3 (no problem) if you don't figure out points 1 & 2.

I'm not a doc etc and have not thought this through to any great length but thought my first thoughts might be worth putting on the table despite how crazy they may seem (to you others or to me after some contemplation :blink: ) I have a 9y/o and know how hard it would be to face the problem and have thought long and hard about having a 9y/o who is probably gluten intolerant because avoids too much gluten in his diet etc etc etc.. Behaviours I've always had. I don't want him to get to 38y/o to fall in a heap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beebs Enthusiast

Ick! I also had a vasospasm issue, which was partially due to my daughter not nursing well - she would compress my nipple with her tongue against the roof of her mouth. The physical irritation was really what was primarily setting off the issue. We worked with an OT, a PT, and an MD who specializes in breastfeeding medicine to try to address the issue. I was very fortunate that, at three months, my daughter "got her act together" and stop compressing so much. (I gave her until then to develop the ability to nurse better, or I was giving up, as I was tired of crying through nursing sessions and just wanting to give her to someone, anyone after nursing her. It was horrid. You have my sympathies!) The vasospasm issue continued for another few months after that, but with the help of extra magnesium, heating pads and keeping otherwise warm and other non-pharmaceutical interventions, we have been able to get past it. (There is at least one med that they can put you on, that is safe for breastfeeding, to address vasospasm, but most cases are contributed to from the baby's end as well.)

But adding infections, meds, and no real opportunity to get your supply up sounds like a whirlwind of circumstances that would keep the most dedicated from being able to breast feed! Congrats for giving it a go; that's awesome that you tried so hard!

I tried that heating pads, nifedapine and evening primrose oil. The LC said our attatchment was perfect, used to go and see her every couple of days and she was flummoxed. But I had it really bad even when I wasn't bfing - so I think that just made it worse. I used to think it was normal - it was only when I went to see the rheumy did I find out that not everyone has agonising pain:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ravenwoodglass Mentor

Personally I would let him be gluten free until he is older or perhaps let him have a bit at a sitters or grands house. I don't know that much about the study that was done but introducing gluten between 4 and 6 months sure didn't prevent my children, or myself for that matter, from becoming celiac. I would have given anything for my son not to have developed issues in infancy, when he basically stopped growing, and wish in retrospect that I hadn't listened to the doctor who told me to go ahead and give him gluteny cereals at a young age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tarnalberry Community Regular

I tried that heating pads, nifedapine and evening primrose oil. The LC said our attatchment was perfect, used to go and see her every couple of days and she was flummoxed. But I had it really bad even when I wasn't bfing - so I think that just made it worse. I used to think it was normal - it was only when I went to see the rheumy did I find out that not everyone has agonising pain:lol:

While I'm incredibly sorry that you had to find out about the autoimmune issues that way ('cause that's a physically *and* emotionally hard way to go about it), I'm glad you got into someone who could start figuring out what was happening!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Roda Rising Star

Personally I would let him be gluten free until he is older or perhaps let him have a bit at a sitters or grands house. I don't know that much about the study that was done but introducing gluten between 4 and 6 months sure didn't prevent my children, or myself for that matter, from becoming celiac. I would have given anything for my son not to have developed issues in infancy, when he basically stopped growing, and wish in retrospect that I hadn't listened to the doctor who told me to go ahead and give him gluteny cereals at a young age.

It didn't prevent me or my youngest son either from developing celiac. For my youngest we introduced cereals early at the pediatricians recommendation because of his bad reflux. Ironically I fed my youngest barley cereal because the rice and oat cereal made him break out in a rash on his head. No rash with the barley. He was breast fed until 16 months and neither him or I was gluten free. I was inadvertantly gluten light though due to all the things I eliminated in my diet. He was around 14 months old when I started having my first issues(I had added all the eliminated things back into my diet by then but didn't make the connection). In hindsite I feel it was gluten all along that caused him his bad reflux that went on to cause reactive airway disease. He had to be on meds and neb treatments till he was 3 years old. He had a period from age 3-5 1/2 that he seemed normal and was off all meds. He even had a blood test at at 3 almost 4 years old that was negative(right after I was diagnosed). At 5 1/2 is when he started having issues and was blood tested 5 months later. Some of his symptoms I didn't realize were gluten related. His test was positive and he has been gluten free since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,088
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Aventine
    Newest Member
    Aventine
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      I'll answer your second question first. The single best antibody test for monitoring celiac blood antibody levels is the tTG-IGA and it is very cost effective. For this reason, it is the most popular and often the only test ordered by physicians when checking for celiac disease. There are some people who actually do have celiac disease who will score negatives on this test anyway because of anomalies in their immune system but your wife is not one of them. So for her, the tTG-IGA should be sufficient. It is highly sensitive and highly specific for celiac disease. If your wife gets serious about eating gluten free and stays on a gluten free diet for the duration, she should experience healing in her villous lining, normalization in her antibody numbers and avoid reaching a celiac health crisis tipping point. I am attaching an article that will provide guidance for getting serious about gluten free living. It really is an advantage if all wheat products are taken out of the house and other household members adopt gluten free eating in order to avoid cross contamination and mistakes.  
    • Anmol
      Thanks this is helpful. Couple of follow -ups- that critical point till it stays silent is age dependent or dependent on continuing to eat gluten. In other words if she is on gluten-free diet can she stay on silent celiac disease forever?    what are the most cost effective yet efficient test to track the inflammation/antibodies and see if gluten-free is working . 
    • trents
      Welcome to the community forum, @Anmol! There are a number of blood antibody tests that can be administered when diagnosing celiac disease and it is normal that not all of them will be positive. Three out of four that were run for you were positive. It looks pretty conclusive that you have celiac disease. Many physicians will only run the tTG-IGA test so I applaud your doctor for being so thorough. Note, the Immunoglobulin A is not a test for celiac disease per se but a measure of total IGA antibody levels in your blood. If this number is low it can cause false negatives in the individual IGA-based celiac antibody tests. There are many celiacs who are asymptomatic when consuming gluten, at least until damage to the villous lining of the small bowel progresses to a certain critical point. I was one of them. We call them "silent" celiacs".  Unfortunately, being asymptomatic does not equate to no damage being done to the villous lining of the small bowel. No, the fact that your wife is asymptomatic should not be viewed as a license to not practice strict gluten free eating. She is damaging her health by doing so and the continuing high antibody test scores are proof of that. The antibodies are produced by inflammation in the small bowel lining and over time this inflammation destroys the villous lining. Continuing to disregard this will catch up to her. While it may be true that a little gluten does less harm to the villous lining than a lot, why would you even want to tolerate any harm at all to it? Being a "silent" celiac is both a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing in the sense of being able to endure some cross contamination in social settings without embarrassing repercussions. It's a curse in that it slows down the learning curve of avoiding foods where gluten is not an obvious ingredient, yet still may be doing damage to the villous lining of the small bowel. GliadinX is helpful to many celiacs in avoiding illness from cross contamination when eating out but it is not effective when consuming larger amounts of gluten. It was never intended for that purpose. Eating out is the number one sabotager of gluten free eating. You have no control of how food is prepared and handled in restaurant kitchens.  
    • knitty kitty
      Forgot one... https://www.hormonesmatter.com/eosinophilic-esophagitis-sugar-thiamine-sensitive/
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum community, @ekelsay! Yes, your tTG-IGA score is strongly positive for celiac disease. There are other antibody tests that can be run when diagnosing celiac disease but the tTG-IGA is the most popular with physicians because it combines good sensitivity with good specificity, and it is a relatively inexpensive test to perform. The onset of celiac disease can happen at any stage of life and the size of the score is not necessarily an indicator of the progress of the disease. It is likely that you you experienced onset well before you became aware of symptoms. It often takes 10 years or more to get a diagnosis of celiac disease after the first appearance of symptoms. In my case, the first indicator was mildly elevated liver enzymes that resulted in a rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross at age 37. There was no GI discomfort at that point, at least none that I noticed. Over time, other lab values began to get out of norm, including decreased iron levels. My PCP was at a complete loss to explain any of this. I finally scheduled an appointment with a GI doc because the liver enzymes concerned me and he tested me right away for celiac disease. I was positive and within three months of gluten free eating my liver enzymes were back to normal. That took 13 years since the rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross. And my story is typical. Toward the end of that period I had developed some occasional diarrhea and oily stool but no major GI distress. Many celiacs do not have classic GI symptoms and are "silent" celiacs. There are around 200 symptoms that have been associated with celiac disease and many or most of them do not involve conscious GI distress. Via an autoimmune process, gluten ingestion triggers inflammation in the villous lining of the small bowel which damages it over time and inhibits the ability of this organ to absorb the vitamins and minerals in the food we ingest. So, that explains why those with celiac disease often suffer iron deficiency anemia, osteoporosis and a host of other vitamin and mineral deficiency related medical issues. The villous lining of the small bowel is where essentially all of our nutrition is absorbed. So, yes, anemia is one of the classic symptoms of celiac disease. One very important thing you need to be aware of is that your PCP may refer you to a GI doc for an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel lining to confirm the results of the blood antibody testing. So, you must not begin gluten free eating until that is done or at least you know they are going to diagnose you with celiac disease without it. If you start gluten free eating now there will be healing in the villous lining that will begin to take place which may compromise the results of the biopsy.
×
×
  • Create New...