Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Feeling Cross About "cross Sensitivity"


Raywuwei

Recommended Posts

Raywuwei Explorer

I've already written here about oats a few times because I am desperate to reintroduce them into my diet, but I am being strong and sticking with the one year elimination plan. But now that I've swallowed that pill, I just learned at a GIG meeting that people can be as cross reactive to coffee, dairy and yeast as they are to oats! They all have proteins that are super similar to gluten. People, I live in Portland Oregon. And they're trying to tell me I can't have my coffee??

I just can't seam to get a handle on this diet. Just when I think I am being strict enough (following doctor and naturopaths orders, btw!) I hear from some strict celiacs that there is more I need to cut out. Or that I'll never be able to eat something again. And so I can't even tell if I am feeling healthy or not, and I am just so confused about what to put into my body. Aren't we all a little different? Oh, I dont know, UGH!

So about this cross sensitivity stuff. At the GIG meeting they were saying that if you reacted to coffee, oats, dairy or yeast, then you'd have to eliminate it for life. That there is no training your body to understand their proteins are different from gluten. I think I feel fine when I have coffee, but I mean it's a laxative so how do I know if my resulting bathroom things are a bad reaction or regular coffee stuff? I know I'm fine with dairy, I feel great when I have kefir and icelandic yogurt. I dunno about yeast.

And apparently there is a test you can order on this stuff, Cyrex #4 Cross reactivity test. Anyone heard of that? I don't have health insurance, so I can'r order one up. But would you trust those results anyway? I hear that the whole IgA, IgG distinction of sensitivity and intolerance is still greatly debated because again, no one in the health community can agree about what we celiacs should be eating. Grrrr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

Your insurance wouldn't pay for that sort of unproven testing.

This " cross- reactivity", the proteins are almost like gluten, theory has no real scientific merit that I have seen. People have posted all kinds of things on here to prove it - a woman with no medical or chemical training and a blog, something that looked like a kids high school sciene paper, info from websites trying to sell tests, books, miracle cures, etc.

Most of us who want to, drink coffee. A few people with Celiac have a problem with coffee. A few people without Celiac have a problem with coffee. My SIL can't have dairy but she doesn't have Celiac ( they have looked a few times). I can have dairy and I have Celiac ( they only had to take a quick glance).

An interesting thought - brewed coffee has almost no protein - like 0.2-0.3 grams per cup. Perhaps they are eating coffee beans?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lisa Mentor

Cross reaction is a relativly new terminology and definition. And I'm not too sure that there are substantiated studies for cross reaction, but there may be. Although, it's very typical that many people here have multiple intolerances that they have self discovered over a number of years. I'm not one of them. What is the common demonator, I don't know.

I would recomend that you stay exclusively on the gluten free diet, keep a food diary for several months. And after some time, you still have issues, then explore other possible intolerances.

An allergy test could be an aid, but I have no experience with that. AND follow your gut.... enjoy your coffee! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
IrishHeart Veteran

No peer-reviewed scientific evidence/articles whatsoever of this "cross reactivity" theory

or the "tests" that prove it. I have looked for them in Pub Med.

No celiac specialists support this "theory" at this time --nor do they find

any of those Cyrex lab tests valid.

I find it astounding that someone at a GIG meeting is telling you this.

Unless you have digestive issues with coffee or dairy or yeast, etc. or an allergy to them,

there is no reason for a celiac to avoid those "alleged" cross-reactive foods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kareng Grand Master

I will say I have seen people use the term " cross reactive" in different ways. Some just mean they are intolerant to something and it feels like when they are glutened. It does not mean that the offending food had a gluten- like protein. For example, bananas make me burp and bloat much like gluten does. Some would say I " cross react" to bananas because they cause me the same discomfort/ issues as gluten.

The definition I think you are asking about has been bouncing around the Internet, first spread by a non- medical, non- chemist's blog. This theory is that your body looks at all that protein in coffee ( less than a third of a gram) and thinks its gluten. I'm not a chemist, but I don't see how the proteins in such diverse foods could all resemble each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mushroom Proficient

It is a brave soul indeed who would get up and say "All celiacs should avoid x, y, z " (apart from gluten of course),or "No gluten intolerant should eat a, b, c "(apart from gluten) because there is so much we don't know, such a paucity of scientific evidence and so much pseudo-science spread around on the internet and in books. Everywhere we turn someone is promoting this or pooh-poohing that with very little support for any statement. The best way to determine what your body tolerates is to test it out, one food at a time. It is still the most infallible test. If it doesn't like it this year, test it next year. If it doesn't like it then, it is up to you whether you want to try it again or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raywuwei Explorer
Perhaps they are eating coffee beans?
Haha! Who knows.

AND follow your gut.... enjoy your coffee! :)
Thank you, I WILL!

No peer-reviewed scientific evidence/articles whatsoever of this "cross reactivity" theory or the "tests" that prove it. I have looked for them in Pub Med. No celiac specialists support this "theory" at this time --nor do they find any of those Cyrex lab tests valid.
Oh, thank goodness. I'm glad you've looked into it!

The best way to determine what your body tolerates is to test it out, one food at a time. It is still the most infallible test.
Good, that is what I had thought before this craziness!

Thank you all, I feel very much relieved :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Celiac Mindwarp Community Regular

I agree with the posts above. It seems to me reading around that lots of celiacs and those with NCGI have ranges of intolerances, maybe cross reactivity, but that the only thing we all share beyond needing to avoid gluten is that we all have to find our own way through and find out what we react to, and in which quantities and combinations.

If you have already done a year of elimination diet you are more than up to keeping going and working out what works for you.

It might be worth trying a coffee elimination, who knows if it will make a difference. I am one who did have to give it up, but you can be sure I wouldn't if I didn't have to.

The other thing I have seen here is that sometimes people gain foods back after eliminating for months or years. I have been able to handle 2 to 3 cups of regular tea i a week in the past year, after 9 years without.

One of the things I love about this board is that people tend to make suggestions, rather than give instructions. Looking at all the range of experience has saved me years of trial and error in elimination. I am not there yet, but on the way. Mourning a few loses , celebrating some gains and new foods and combinations.

Sounds to me like you are doing a great job, keep it up :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dilettantesteph Collaborator

My local celiac group broke with GIG because they were accepting non scientifically validated theories. I wonder if that was what they were talking about? I have looked and read and I found very little in the way of scientific validation for cross reactivity. I'm pretty sure that there is none for most of those things that you mentioned. There definitely is evidence for cross reactivity for oats. Botanically speaking, oats are fairly close to wheat, barley and rye. Coffee is not.

As mentioned above, some celiacs do better eliminating coffee and the best way to find out is to stop drinking it for a couple of weeks. That is a lot less expensive than a questionable test array.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GFinDC Veteran

Hi Ray,

I agree with the posters before also. We all can develop intolerances ourselves, or not, but they aren't all the same for everyone. Coffee is a stimulant, but I don't think it causes D for most people. I doubt there would be very many Starbucks around if it did that. that's a pretty unpopular side affect for a product. So, IMHO, if coffee is causing you D then something may be going on there. It could be the coffee itself or something you put in it . Like creamer or other. Eliminating it for a while is a good test. I had cut out coffee a few years ago and all caffeine, but I can now drink black tea. I haven't tried coffee though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
eers03 Explorer

Ray, when I saw my Celiac specialist at Mayo he told me that coffee does not have gluten in it. I mentioned the same points that you just did regarding cross sensitivity. He was not the least bit concerned about me consuming coffee.

However, the dietician there did not want to see me exceed a 3 cup serving per day. Hope this helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,088
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Aventine
    Newest Member
    Aventine
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the community forum, @Anmol! There are a number of blood antibody tests that can be administered when diagnosing celiac disease and it is normal that not all of them will be positive. Three out of four that were run for you were positive. It looks pretty conclusive that you have celiac disease. Many physicians will only run the tTG-IGA test so I applaud your doctor for being so thorough. Note, the Immunoglobulin A is not a test for celiac disease per se but a measure of total IGA antibody levels in your blood. If this number is low it can cause false negatives in the individual IGA-based celiac antibody tests. There are many celiacs who are asymptomatic when consuming gluten, at least until damage to the villous lining of the small bowel progresses to a certain critical point. I was one of them. We call them "silent" celiacs".  Unfortunately, being asymptomatic does not equate to no damage being done to the villous lining of the small bowel. No, the fact that your wife is asymptomatic should not be viewed as a license to not practice strict gluten free eating. She is damaging her health by doing so and the continuing high antibody test scores are proof of that. The antibodies are produced by inflammation in the small bowel lining and over time this inflammation destroys the villous lining. Continuing to disregard this will catch up to her. While it may be true that a little gluten does less harm to the villous lining than a lot, why would you even want to tolerate any harm at all to it? Being a "silent" celiac is both a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing in the sense of being able to endure some cross contamination in social settings without embarrassing repercussions. It's a curse in that it slows down the learning curve of avoiding foods where gluten is not an obvious ingredient, yet still may be doing damage to the villous lining of the small bowel. GliadinX is helpful to many celiacs in avoiding illness from cross contamination when eating out but it is not effective when consuming larger amounts of gluten. It was never intended for that purpose. Eating out is the number one sabotager of gluten free eating. You have no control of how food is prepared and handled in restaurant kitchens.  
    • knitty kitty
      Forgot one... https://www.hormonesmatter.com/eosinophilic-esophagitis-sugar-thiamine-sensitive/
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum community, @ekelsay! Yes, your tTG-IGA score is strongly positive for celiac disease. There are other antibody tests that can be run when diagnosing celiac disease but the tTG-IGA is the most popular with physicians because it combines good sensitivity with good specificity, and it is a relatively inexpensive test to perform. The onset of celiac disease can happen at any stage of life and the size of the score is not necessarily an indicator of the progress of the disease. It is likely that you you experienced onset well before you became aware of symptoms. It often takes 10 years or more to get a diagnosis of celiac disease after the first appearance of symptoms. In my case, the first indicator was mildly elevated liver enzymes that resulted in a rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross at age 37. There was no GI discomfort at that point, at least none that I noticed. Over time, other lab values began to get out of norm, including decreased iron levels. My PCP was at a complete loss to explain any of this. I finally scheduled an appointment with a GI doc because the liver enzymes concerned me and he tested me right away for celiac disease. I was positive and within three months of gluten free eating my liver enzymes were back to normal. That took 13 years since the rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross. And my story is typical. Toward the end of that period I had developed some occasional diarrhea and oily stool but no major GI distress. Many celiacs do not have classic GI symptoms and are "silent" celiacs. There are around 200 symptoms that have been associated with celiac disease and many or most of them do not involve conscious GI distress. Via an autoimmune process, gluten ingestion triggers inflammation in the villous lining of the small bowel which damages it over time and inhibits the ability of this organ to absorb the vitamins and minerals in the food we ingest. So, that explains why those with celiac disease often suffer iron deficiency anemia, osteoporosis and a host of other vitamin and mineral deficiency related medical issues. The villous lining of the small bowel is where essentially all of our nutrition is absorbed. So, yes, anemia is one of the classic symptoms of celiac disease. One very important thing you need to be aware of is that your PCP may refer you to a GI doc for an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel lining to confirm the results of the blood antibody testing. So, you must not begin gluten free eating until that is done or at least you know they are going to diagnose you with celiac disease without it. If you start gluten free eating now there will be healing in the villous lining that will begin to take place which may compromise the results of the biopsy.
    • Anmol
      Hello all- my wife was recently diagnosed with Celiac below are her blood results. We are still absorbing this.  I wanted to seek clarity on few things:  1. Her symptoms aren't extreme. She was asked to go on gluten free diet a couple years ago but she did not completely cut off gluten. Partly because she wasn't seeing extreme symptoms. Only bloating and mild diarrhea after a meal full of gluten.  Does this mean that she is asymptomatic but enormous harm is done with every gram of gluten.? in other words is amount gluten directly correlated with harm on the intestines? or few mg of gluten can be really harmful to the villi  2. Why is she asymptomatic?  3. Is Gliadin X safe to take and effective for Cross -contamination or while going out to eat?  4. Since she is asymptomatic, can we sometimes indulge in a gluten diet? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deamidated Gliadin, IgG - 64 (0-19) units tTG IgA -  >100 (0-3) U/ml tTG IgG - 4   (0-5) Why is this in normal range? Endomysial Antibody - Positive  Immunoglobulin A - 352 (87-352) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thanks for help in advance, really appreciate! 
    • Tanner L
      Constantly! I don't want everything to cost as much as a KIND bar, as great as they are.  Happy most of the info is available to us to make smart decisions for our health, just need to do a little more research. 
×
×
  • Create New...