• Ads by Google:
     




    Get email alerts Celiac.com E-Newsletter

    Ads by Google:



       Get email alertsCeliac.com E-Newsletter

  • Announcements

    • admin

      Frequently Asked Questions About Celiac Disease   09/30/2015

      This Celiac.com FAQ on celiac disease will guide you to all of the basic information you will need to know about the disease, its diagnosis, testing methods, a gluten-free diet, etc.   Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts   What are the major symptoms of celiac disease? Celiac Disease Symptoms What testing is available for celiac disease? - list blood tests, endo with biopsy, genetic test and enterolab (not diagnostic) Celiac Disease Screening Interpretation of Celiac Disease Blood Test Results Can I be tested even though I am eating gluten free? How long must gluten be taken for the serological tests to be meaningful? The Gluten-Free Diet 101 - A Beginner's Guide to Going Gluten-Free Is celiac inherited? Should my children be tested? Ten Facts About Celiac Disease Genetic Testing Is there a link between celiac and other autoimmune diseases? Celiac Disease Research: Associated Diseases and Disorders Is there a list of gluten foods to avoid? Unsafe Gluten-Free Food List (Unsafe Ingredients) Is there a list of gluten free foods? Safe Gluten-Free Food List (Safe Ingredients) Gluten-Free Alcoholic Beverages Distilled Spirits (Grain Alcohols) and Vinegar: Are they Gluten-Free? Where does gluten hide? Additional Things to Beware of to Maintain a 100% Gluten-Free Diet What if my doctor won't listen to me? An Open Letter to Skeptical Health Care Practitioners Gluten-Free recipes: Gluten-Free Recipes Where can I buy gluten-free stuff? Support this site by shopping at The Celiac.com Store.

(16 Mos Old) Introducing Gluten Back Into Diet For Testing, Potential Hospitalization
0

14 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

We have discussed potential testing for our 16 month old son for several months.  However, his very severe symptoms when he is exposed -  even CC exposure - are preventing us from moving forward.  Our pediatric gastro recommends he be on a diet with gluten for a minimum of 4 weeks prior to testing.  Both she and our pediatrician agree that exposure for 4 weeks would most likely hospitalize him because of dehydration and other symptoms.  Even "minor" exposure leaves him covered in eczema, writhing in pain (crying for hours at a time) with severe reflux and diarrhea for at least 48 hours, often longer.  He also exhibits neurological issues, like walking directly into walls and hitting his head against the floor.

 

Even though we are somewhat medically conservative, we recognize the need for an official diagnosis.  What we ARE questioning is the best time to move forward with the testing.  Doing it now would mean that our son would retain few (if any) memories of the testing or the sickness he will certainly endure prior to testing.  However, at this age he can't voice symptoms/pains to us.

 

Any input on this?  Has anyone dealt with severe symptoms during the 4-6 week period of gluten intake prior to testing and/or potential hospitalization because of it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:
Ads by Google:


kareng    1,992

My suggestion is that you , or even better, the doctor, email the experts. Dr. G is actually a ped doctor, I think. I'm thinking they may tell you he is too young to produce enough antibodies. If that is the case, it will save you from doing it twice - now and a couple of years along.

http://www.cureceliacdisease.org/contact-us

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My suggestion is that you , or even better, the doctor, email the experts. Dr. G is actually a ped doctor, I think. I'm thinking they may tell you he is too young to produce enough antibodies. If that is the case, it will save you from doing it twice - now and a couple of years along.

http://www.cureceliacdisease.org/contact-us

 

I didn't even know this was possible - to be too young to produce the antibodies necessary to get a positive diagnosis through antibodies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:


tarnalberry    314

Wait - they agree that every time he gets gluten, he has horrible symptoms, but they won't diagnose him until he has horrible symptoms for a month?  This is completely illogical, and I would point it out to them.  Diagnosis CAN be made on dietary response alone.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MoMof2Boyz    3

With the severe symptoms you son has, I would not put gluten back in his diet. It is not worth the risk and you already know your son's reaction to gluten. I understand the need to know with the tests but you already know he has a severe problem with gluten that can land him in the hospital. I would not do it. period.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:


ravenwoodglass    1,218

With the reactions this little guy has it is inconcievable to me that a doctor would want to do this to him. Can you find another doctor with some common sense who might give you an 'official' diagnosis based on his symptoms and the resolution of them on the diet? There is no way I would do this to my child but ultimately the choice is yours alone to make. Do keep in mind that even after the challenge he may have negative test results. Ask yourself what you will do if that happens. Will you put him back on a gluten diet? If the answer is no then I would tell the doctor to take a long walk off a short pier.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Takala    413

My current doctor has agreed to consider me a patient who avoids gluten, or gluten- intolerant, or "allergic" to gluten, for the purpose of dispensing medications, etc, on my records, after I told him hell would freeze over before I would ever be forced to consume it again (after 5+ years off of it, and a resolution of many chronic symptoms).  While this does not give me an official seal of celiac diagnostic approval, it does go along with the medically verified other test results I had, quite visible to the naked eye bone loss,  (my c- spine looked shocking) and brain lesions, aka "bright spots,"  which showed on a scan, which are consistent with the neurological form of celiac/gluten intolerance/whatever the "experts" want to call it this week.  I have subsequently told medical people I_Am_Gluten_Intolerant_NO WHEAT GRAIN FAMILY_Do_Not_Give_Me_Exposure_To_It, and have never been questioned on it.  The only 2 other situations I could think of possible impact would be in a boarding school, (hypothetical, too old) where, since I have other allergies anyway, it would be treated as just - another - food -allergy, or a work situation, where, since I would not take a job whereby I could not pack a meal & snacks if I needed one, it's moot.  "Allergies"-  mold, dust, ragweed, wheat rye barley (and a few others...)  Not the end of the world.  I trade off the technical accuracy of it is really some sort of auto immune reaction, for the inaccurate form of understanding by the general public, which can protect me better in these circumstances.  There is no question I have auto immune stuff, closely associated with it, I've been previously diagnosed with it, even if the one stupid HMO attempted to "fibromyalgia" me.  

 

Since it is an observable phenomena that the child gets severe symptoms when ingesting gluten, then that may have to be it.  

 

There is no reason that any doctor shouldn't be willing to scope a small child right now, who is displaying such symptoms, even if the test came back negative, which could happen anyway even if he WAS put back on gluten for an extended period of time, the end result is going to be the same-  he isn't going to be eating gluten anymore.  Unless you continue to feed it to him and make him sick.  Which would be illogical and inadvisable.  But a baseline scope should be done anyway.   The entire concept of sickening a tiny, defenseless child deliberately and drastically, for diagnostic purposes only, needs to be revisited on ethical grounds, in my opinion.  I believe in the future they will come up with a better way to diagnose celiac, just as a result of this supposed medical "cure" or "treatment" that these researchers are currently working on.  

 

The diagnostic guidelines for an official diagnosis are typically given for medical insurance reimbursement purposes in the USA, specifying doctors can't do (hypothetical) needed procedures #2 and #3 unless the first procedure #1 gives a certain result.  They go ahead and scope some people and children who do not test bloods positive, if the symptoms upon ingestion of gluten are still severe enough....  so what is the hold- up, really ?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ollie's Mom    29

Wow.. Just wow. I would look for another doctor who would diagnose based on symptoms and resolution of said symptoms on the gluten-free diet. I am with the PPs - I can't imagine any doctor being willing to subject a toddler to such severe reactions and hospitalization by giving the child the thing that the doctor already knows makes that child sick. It is up to you, but I would never subject my child to that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:


frieze    114

If a parent persists in feeding a child something that that child is intolerant of to the point of being ill, who do you think the docs would be calling???  But it is ethical and legal for them to demand it be done, to get a diagnosis???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
megsybeth    5

Oh no, this is not a good idea. I can understand the appeal of testing young, for some procedures that does make sense. But do you know what makes a brain? Fat. Cholesterol, fat. Your child is doing some of the most important neurological growth right now. This is why nutrition and high calorie diets are so critical. You cannot consider depriving your child of nutrition so drmatically.

 

My son didn't get the official diagnosis. I just lie.  I'm lucky enough not to need free lunch but I think even in my school district they would accomodate because they are decent. Teachers are also usually decent and if not, even if you have an official dx they'll probably do what they want. How could it really be important to have a celiac vs. gluten intolerant dx?


Please find another doctor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, everyone.  We already drive more than 2 hours to a "good" specialist, which is why we even considered this in the first place.  But even being new to the whole celiac world, my husband and I knew that this couldn't be the only option for diagnosis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With the reactions this little guy has it is inconcievable to me that a doctor would want to do this to him. Can you find another doctor with some common sense who might give you an 'official' diagnosis based on his symptoms and the resolution of them on the diet? There is no way I would do this to my child but ultimately the choice is yours alone to make. Do keep in mind that even after the challenge he may have negative test results. Ask yourself what you will do if that happens. Will you put him back on a gluten diet? If the answer is no then I would tell the doctor to take a long walk off a short pier.

 

Yes, this is our greatest fear.... that he will be severely sick for a month, have the test done and it comes back negative.

 

 

My current doctor has agreed to consider me a patient who avoids gluten, or gluten- intolerant, or "allergic" to gluten, for the purpose of dispensing medications, etc, on my records, after I told him hell would freeze over before I would ever be forced to consume it again (after 5+ years off of it, and a resolution of many chronic symptoms).  While this does not give me an official seal of celiac diagnostic approval, it does go along with the medically verified other test results I had, quite visible to the naked eye bone loss,  (my c- spine looked shocking) and brain lesions, aka "bright spots,"  which showed on a scan, which are consistent with the neurological form of celiac/gluten intolerance/whatever the "experts" want to call it this week.  I have subsequently told medical people I_Am_Gluten_Intolerant_NO WHEAT GRAIN FAMILY_Do_Not_Give_Me_Exposure_To_It, and have never been questioned on it.  The only 2 other situations I could think of possible impact would be in a boarding school, (hypothetical, too old) where, since I have other allergies anyway, it would be treated as just - another - food -allergy, or a work situation, where, since I would not take a job whereby I could not pack a meal & snacks if I needed one, it's moot.  "Allergies"-  mold, dust, ragweed, wheat rye barley (and a few others...)  Not the end of the world.  I trade off the technical accuracy of it is really some sort of auto immune reaction, for the inaccurate form of understanding by the general public, which can protect me better in these circumstances.  There is no question I have auto immune stuff, closely associated with it, I've been previously diagnosed with it, even if the one stupid HMO attempted to "fibromyalgia" me.  

 

Since it is an observable phenomena that the child gets severe symptoms when ingesting gluten, then that may have to be it.  

 

There is no reason that any doctor shouldn't be willing to scope a small child right now, who is displaying such symptoms, even if the test came back negative, which could happen anyway even if he WAS put back on gluten for an extended period of time, the end result is going to be the same-  he isn't going to be eating gluten anymore.  Unless you continue to feed it to him and make him sick.  Which would be illogical and inadvisable.  But a baseline scope should be done anyway.   The entire concept of sickening a tiny, defenseless child deliberately and drastically, for diagnostic purposes only, needs to be revisited on ethical grounds, in my opinion.  I believe in the future they will come up with a better way to diagnose celiac, just as a result of this supposed medical "cure" or "treatment" that these researchers are currently working on.  

 

The diagnostic guidelines for an official diagnosis are typically given for medical insurance reimbursement purposes in the USA, specifying doctors can't do (hypothetical) needed procedures #2 and #3 unless the first procedure #1 gives a certain result.  They go ahead and scope some people and children who do not test bloods positive, if the symptoms upon ingestion of gluten are still severe enough....  so what is the hold- up, really ?  

 

They are only willing to scope him after a MINIMUM of 4 weeks on a gluten diet.  We say the same - the end result is the same: if it's negative, he won't have gluten... if it's positive, he won't have gluten.

Yes, we are just now joining the frustration with (lack of) testing options...

 

 

If a parent persists in feeding a child something that that child is intolerant of to the point of being ill, who do you think the docs would be calling???  But it is ethical and legal for them to demand it be done, to get a diagnosis???

 

I know, it doesn't at all seem right to be able to say "well, I know that forcing your toddler to eat gluten will make them sick and potentially hospitalize him, but go ahead and do it and we will do a test that may or may not be accurate."  :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      107,896
    • Total Posts
      938,531
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      65,804
    • Most Online
      3,093

    Newest Member
    Junimoon
    Joined
  • Popular Now

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most physicians follow the joint commission’s guidelines on prescribing HTN medications which usually begin with a diuretic and calcium channel blocker (the amlodipine) - see below. Is it possible that your bp was still not controlled on the CCB (amlodipine)? So the ARB was added? Again, I’d just like to say that just bc a drug does have certain adverse effects does not mean you will have them, but I understand if you would not even want to take the chance, given a previous history of celiac disease. http://www.aafp.org/afp/2014/1001/p503.html “In the general nonblack population, including those with diabetes, initial anti-hypertensive treatment should include a thiazide diuretic, calcium channel blocker, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). In the general black population, including those with diabetes, initial treatment should include a thiazide diuretic or calcium channel blocker. If the target blood pressure is not reached within one month after initiating therapy, the dosage of the initial medication should be increased or a second medication should be added (thiazide diuretic, calcium channel blocker, ACE inhibitor, or ARB; do not combine an ACE inhibitor with an ARB). Blood pressure should be monitored and the treatment regimen adjusted until the target blood pressure is reached. A third drug should be added if necessary; however, if the target blood pressure cannot be achieved using only the drug classes listed above, antihypertensive drugs from other classes can be used (e.g., beta blockers, aldosterone antagonists). Referral to a physician with expertise in treating hypertension may be necessary for patients who do not reach the target blood pressure using these strategies.” Drugs for BP in different classes work by different mechanisms. It may be worth it to print out those huge, long drug information sheets and go over them with a fine toothed comb. As for CoQ10, have you checked for coupons online? Can your doctor write you an Rx and get your insurance to pay? They might say it’s on OTC and you have to pay out of pocket, but it may be worth it to find a way around that - would a prior authorization do the trick? I don’t know, just bringing up the questions. In the report you cited, these concluding words were to me, chilling:
      “Therefore, we suggest the possibility of a class effect.” Losartan, olmeseartan - doesn’t matter. And I'll say it again, there must be a way to disseminate this information more widely as I had no idea about this adverse effect, and never heard any docs speaking about it either. It really warrants wider sharing. Finally, one person who is often an overlooked resource is your pharmacist. They have just tons of knowledge and should be able to talk to you in some depth if asked, in an articulate, easy to understand way. They may even be able to do some digging and research for you. Plumbago
    • Plumbago et al, Thanks for letting me know  about the "artan" drugs being ARBs. I think Cyclinglady was right the Losartan research is not free and thus not public. I saw the link with no abstract but wanted to read it to confirm as you noted in your ETA that it was another "Artan" drug Losartan causing the problem. I believe it is. I found a great (after more digging) review of all the "artans"/ARBs or most of them about whether they can contribute to sprue symptom's in addition to Benicar. here on wiley as studied by the alimentary pharmacology and therapeutic journal (AP&T) for short. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.14176/full I wish I knew how to post the able alone it is very informative.  Please scroll over the table to the end of it since it even tells how long to expect before your sprue symptom's/conditions improve IF the "artan" drug is causing your symptom's which I find the most helpful thing about the table.  They also note histological feature (degree of villi blunting) to expect on biopsy. They note Losartan can cause "total atrophy of duodenal villi" by their reporting. I also recently had an issue with my potassium levels so I feel sure it is the Losartan. I remember reading a study about how losartan was better at the "chronic cough" I had developed using Lisinopril so I changed to Losartan a few years ago . . . now I find I could of been making my GI symptom's worse. But to answer  your other question since I began taking Folic Acid a few months ago my BP numbers went down to a healthy level of 120/80 or less sometimes . . . but with medicine. I had already been thinking I wanted to try get off the BP medicine (for good) so this is more motivation. C0q10 worked well but it is too expensive for me to take all the time! I called my doctor to have them put me back on Amlodipine/Norvasc and I can't remember why I changed off that medicine to begin with now.  I do remember needing two medicine's back then to control my BP so maybe we stopped the Norvasc instead of the Linsinopril. But now that they have put me back on Norvasc I hope my potassium levels will correct themselves. I just don't feel safe anymore taking Losartan after learning it could be making my GI symptom's worse or causing the to be unreliable. I first thought my touch of D. was from an antibiotic round but when kefir didn't get me back on track I suspected something else when my Vitamin D levels showed up low too again! Thanks everybody for ya'lls great suggestions and good research on my behalf. I also recommend this verywell article if you are still having GI problems and you suspect an "artan" like ARBs BP medicine and looking for a medicine that might have less severe  or more manageable symptom's for your lifestyle because it comprehensively list's the medicine's by drug types. https://www.verywell.com/hypertension-drugs-1745989 no medicine is without a side effect as (I) am learning but I never thought sprue would be one for my BP medicine and why I prefer Vitamins when I can find out which one too take. Now that I have the Norvasc approved as a replacement for the Losartan I might see if my BP goes up again if I stop my medicine all together as I was hoping the Folic Acid might help me with it (without medicine) and it explains why I was low in Folic Acid to begin with again. posterboy,    
    •   Ironic, We went entirely gluten-free in our home after 2016 for how bad my neurological , joints, mood gets now in addition to my former gi, skin, and other issues . My son shows signs of my early symptoms and voluntarily went off gluten, corn, and milk like me as he did his own food like diary symptom tracking. My daughter continues on gluten outside the home. We warn her of our concern for at times in toddler hood she was constipated and would bloat.  We asked their Dr to test them as I was undergoing my testing and she said no until I had my diagnosis. As we know these things take time and my son went gluten-free . He said after watching mom on my gluten challenge that he will not go back on it .  We await technology further research and we silently watch our soon to be teen girl for we know even if tested negative it can show up one day.  She says I know mom I know. The more Whole Foods here in the home we notice she actually craves gluten / processed foods less and is slowly transitioning as well.  Does your child also naturally eat less gluten and processed as well away from home? I wonder if the taste buds / craving change as the parents diet changes food options.  Thoughts?
    • Funny though, my brother and I were just discussing this. He has celiac and both his son and him are gene positive. Both were TTG/EMA negative but never tested for DGP. My brother had damage on endoscopy. They have not scoped his son. He feels his son is symptomatic but not his daughter.  I have conflicting positive and negative DGP, recent damage on biopsy and negative TTG/EMA. Two years ago my son had negative TTG and DGP. No EMA. I plan to have him gene tested and full antibodies screened again.  My brother has opted to have his children follow a gluten-free diet. I am currently allowing my son a normal diet.  But my own chaos with diagnosis, and my brother's too because he was TTG negative, makes me ultra sensitive to the possibility.  My son's ped doc has a  daughter who was recently diagnosed with celiac.  it was in the family so her mom, my son's doctor, suspected it as soon as she started getting digestive issues and losing weight.  she pretty much told me that she was glad that they didn't put her on a gluten-free diet as a child so she can enjoy eating the things she wanted to Throughout her life.  I have to say I agree to a large extent. There are many diseases that we could get At anytime. we cannot change our lives for that reason alone.  However that being said, my family has both thyroid disease and multiple sclerosis as well.   I know all too well the naive statements and assumptions that doctors can make in the face of science still working to find conclusions.  There are other types of TTG the doctors don't typically test for.  I am well aware of this, and sensitive to it. As a parent, I'm going to allow my son to continue on a normal diet for now, but we are going to pursue testinG  And I'm going to watch it very closely.  
    • It might generate based on traffic searches  or posts etc. My guess. I read them and respond because I wasn't on here as a member in 2012. I only use to visit then. So it's new to me V. happy friday   😋  
  • Upcoming Events