• Ads by Google:
     




    Get email alerts Celiac.com E-Newsletter

    Ads by Google:



       Get email alertsCeliac.com E-Newsletter

  • Announcements

    • admin

      Frequently Asked Questions About Celiac Disease   09/30/2015

      This Celiac.com FAQ on celiac disease will guide you to all of the basic information you will need to know about the disease, its diagnosis, testing methods, a gluten-free diet, etc.   Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts What are the major symptoms of celiac disease? Celiac Disease Symptoms What testing is available for celiac disease? - list blood tests, endo with biopsy, genetic test and enterolab (not diagnostic) Celiac Disease Screening Interpretation of Celiac Disease Blood Test Results Can I be tested even though I am eating gluten free? How long must gluten be taken for the serological tests to be meaningful? The Gluten-Free Diet 101 - A Beginner's Guide to Going Gluten-Free Is celiac inherited? Should my children be tested? Ten Facts About Celiac Disease Genetic Testing Is there a link between celiac and other autoimmune diseases? Celiac Disease Research: Associated Diseases and Disorders Is there a list of gluten foods to avoid? Unsafe Gluten-Free Food List (Unsafe Ingredients) Is there a list of gluten free foods? Safe Gluten-Free Food List (Safe Ingredients) Gluten-Free Alcoholic Beverages Distilled Spirits (Grain Alcohols) and Vinegar: Are they Gluten-Free? Where does gluten hide? Additional Things to Beware of to Maintain a 100% Gluten-Free Diet Free recipes: Gluten-Free Recipes Where can I buy gluten-free stuff? Support this site by shopping at The Celiac.com Store.

Criticizing Ideas And Not People
0

20 posts in this topic

Hello.

Today, I learned some REALLY important things about being on a web support group, and I wanted to share them here:

One thing I came to understand is that no matter how defensive people may get, it is still ok to criticize their ideas...but, it is NEVER ok to criticize a person.

I also learned that when someone criticizes me (and/or those who believe as I do)versus my ideas, then that is 'their problem.'

I am thrilled to have learned these things today.

"Thank you" to those who taught me.

That's all I wanted to share.

Best wishes to everyone here,

Gina

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:
Ads by Google:


Hello.

Today, I learned some REALLY important things about being on a web support group, and I wanted to share them here:

One thing I came to understand is that no matter how defensive people may get, it is still ok to criticize their ideas...but, it is NEVER ok to criticize a person.

I also learned that when someone criticizes me (and/or those who believe as I do)versus my ideas, then that is 'their problem.'

I am thrilled to have learned these things today.

"Thank you" to those who taught me.

That's all I wanted to share.

Best wishes to everyone here,

Gina

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I know of the argument you are refering to and have refrained from reading it so that I would not get pulled in. But what you said above couldn't be better said. I'm with you all the way!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree completely. I have been following the thread that this alludes to, and some people crossed the line.

Ideas are subject to debate, and criticism. People who hold those ideas deserve our respect, even if we disagree with them. Name calling and personal attacks are not called for, and not something I expect on this usually polite board.

Enough said.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like to point out that, of the message boards I've been on, even though this one gets some heated debates sometimes, we seem to have a fairly even keel group. There's at least two message boards I've left, because I just got tired of a fairly aggressive woman calling me all sorts of names, repeatedly. And while I'll put up with a fair amount, it was too much. And I miss the help I was able to get and give. So, thanks for not being too crazy guys! :-)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dang Tiffany--calling you names? why can't all people just have good basic social and conflict skills? too much to ask i guess! overall, i am also pretty pleased with how people respond here. and the point of this board, at least in my mind, is to be helping others...not pushing any other sort of agenda. good thoughts....

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:


Over they years, I found the secret to message board surival is learning when to not reply, not read, and esply when to walk away from a thread. :) There are threads here I have plain skipped (Consiparcy theroy one, US Ecomony one, for 2 easy examples) and threads that I got in a debate in and stop reading cause I felt it was turning in to an arugement and not helpfull.

Message boards grant a false sense of anominity, and take the "personal face to face" factor out of it. You can not see how your commnets effect ppl, and this tends to make ppl forget they are talking to ppl, real ppl with real feelings.

I know one board that I never visit any more that I got draw in to fight all the time, litter spent HOURS every day typing up replies in fights over there, I evnetaully realized how far drawn in I gott, and stop visiting the board completely to break the cycle. Since then I have been much more careful, but the competive fast re-acting implusive side of me leaks out form time to time LOL.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice to hear that others have come to similar conclusions in their web-experiences, and have even learned when to walk away...

If I could go back and 'do it over' now, the ganging up nonsense that went on (a very immature version of a popularity contest), the rude comments directed at anyone not believing in the paranoid conspiracy theory, and the like would roll off my back...and I would have focused ONLY on 'exposing' Kevin Trudeau, and NOT on trying to change anyone's opinions of him.

This board does seem quite civil, in general, as pointed out...and it seems to have many well-educated people with decent manners. We are lucky.

Thanks for the replies.

Gina

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Gina---I have known Kaiti for a long time and we have been friends since then. She is a very smart lady, she knows her stuff and is always ready to help another out. I ask her questions all the time and she always finds an answer for me. Stops what she is doing and looks it up for me.

I read this thread and she didnt ever attack you. She didnt call you names, nothing. You on the other hand have been extremely rude to her. She has an opinion about something that you dont agree with, that's fine. She states her feelings and you state yours, BUT, you didnt have to point your finger at her and say nasty things.

There is a lot of good information in this forum. I am a member of several other boards and I dont find this kind of bickering on them. Just state your opinion and leave it at that--let others decide how they feel.

Deb

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought it was a spirited debate!! (Perhaps that is the lawyer coming out :)

Let's all just make sure we don't cast "the next stone" from our desks! That includes myself and the rest of the peanut gallery!!

E-mails and message boards can be a bit of a paradox!! It is difficult to understand emotion, tone or even sarcasm on these things!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well Gina---I have known Kaiti for a long time and we have been friends since then.  She is a very smart lady, she knows her stuff and is always ready to help another out.  I ask her questions all the time and she always finds an answer for me.  Stops what she is doing and looks it up for me.

I read this thread and she didnt ever attack you.  She didnt call you names, nothing.  You on the other hand have been extremely rude to her.  She has an opinion about something that you dont agree with, that's fine.  She states her feelings and you state yours, BUT, you didnt have to point your finger at her and say nasty things.

There is a lot of good information in this forum.  I am a member of several other boards and I dont find this kind of bickering on them.  Just state your opinion and leave it at that--let others decide how they feel.

Deb

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I wasn't going to get involved in this but I do agree with what Deb has said. I read everything that was posted and I did not see anything that Kaiti wrote as being rude nor did I feel that Gina was being personally attacked. In my opinion it was the other way around. Now...I don't know Kaiti personally and have no reason to "defend" her...I'm just stating the obvious. I've never seen her be anything but polite, helpful and caring towards the members of this board.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Deb,

I will have to respectfully disagree with you about whether or not others said anything inappropriate in their posts. AND, I never said anyone 'called me names' - where'd that come from, Deb?

Anyway, glad that you have made good friends via the Net.

It can be a friendly place, especially when people learn how to be polite -

I would like to see everyone learn how to be more polite.

That was precisely what ths post was about - how to be polite :-)

Hoping that we ALL can learn how to do that,

Gina

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rachael,

My perceptions of what occured in the thread are my own - I felt that a number of people behaved improperly, including myself.

The improper behavior of others, in my opinion, included 'ganging up behavior' - which continues here...

My problem with Kaiti centered around her putting down the intelligence of anyone who believes the negative reviews about Kevin Trudeau - that, I saw as insulting and defensive. Yet, these are ONLY my perceptions...I have a right to them, and I have a right to now say that I believe those behaviors are NOT appropriate here, on a support forum...but I was wrong in taking ANYTHING Kaiti had to say 'personally.'

I would very much like to be sure that everyone knows that I never said, nor thought, I was blameless in the thread in question, I apologized for not having expressed appreciation for Kaiti's obvious desire to assist others in sharing what she believed/believes still to be a great book. I apologized, and I learned something - to focus on ideas...to criticize ideas.

Anyway...I do hope that the others involved will learn their lessons, too.

If no one else learns anthing but me, that's fine - perhaps it is only me who needs to learn something from it -

Best wishes,

Gina

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been on message boards a long time. Nothing compares to the unbelievable things that happen on religious or writer's message boards. That is where some of the most assinine and hideous names and accusations abound. Why this happens on boards is the same reason it happens person to person. It is simple personality conflicts that cause this and s some peoples egos.

The other things that happen are the things you never see. That is what is going on in that persons life at the time. Unfortunately like when you have a bad day at work, you may not berealizing that you take it out on your family. The same thing happens on message boards, a bad day, not feeling well and all it takes is one word to set someone off.

Because I have over 17 years with these things most of the time i prefer to turn a blind eye and a deaf ear to use an old cliche. If I say something I try to state my point and leave it there. However; yes, I have even been sucked into a tiff on- line and it sure didn't make me feel any better in the end, just the opposite.

Debating a topic is great and stating view points is great but unfortunately sometimes someone loses control and someone feels hurt.

This is just my two cents worth.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gina--Several felt there was name calling going on--read the posts. You may not have said a specific word directed at her, but the words were there and you meant them to be cruel and hurtful. Kaiti didnt "put down the intelligence of anyone who believes the negative reviews about Kevin Trudeau,"--it was you putting down Kaiti for believing as she does. You were very unfair to a lady we all very much appreciate, at least a very good share of us do anyways, I cant speak for others. From now on just voice the opinion and dont attack the individual, please!

Deb

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand the "ganging up on" and "popularity contest" comments. My comments on that thread were because I felt that my chosen career was being maligned and I strongly disagreed with the comments to that regard.

I'm glad you feel that you've learned something from this experience. I think most of us here just want to be helpful.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I say let the past stay in the past & move on & lets just keep helping each other understand & learn about celiac & share our experiences.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gina--Several felt there was name calling going on--read the posts.  You may not have said a specific word directed at her, but the words were there and you meant them to be cruel and hurtful.   Kaiti didnt "put down the intelligence of anyone who believes the negative reviews about Kevin Trudeau,"--it was you putting down Kaiti for believing as she does.  You were very unfair to a lady we all very much appreciate, at least a very good share of us do anyways, I cant speak for others.  From now on just voice the opinion and dont attack the individual, please!

Deb

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Deb is right on. And I would fall more in the Keven T is a bit of a scam artist camp, but never thought Kaiti was a dope for liking the book or had poor judgement for recommending the book. Gina, your dislike of the material wasn't ganged up on.... Your relentless, passive aggressive, put-downs of anyone who would be 'stupid enough' to like the Keven T book are what set you in opposition to other posters....even the posters who don't think the book is totally on the level.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is fast becoming a good exmaple of a thread to walk away from for me. The anger is building. :(

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      106,784
    • Total Posts
      932,407
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      64,262
    • Most Online
      3,093

    Newest Member
    plimpyanp
    Joined
  • Popular Now

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello and welcome I'd just echo CyclingLady - do you need to put yourself through this? There are lots of good reasons for pursuing a diagnosis but amongst the strongest are helping you to 'keep honest' on the diet or ensuring that your not denying yourselves a lot of foods for good reason. Neither of these apply to you and so I'd have to ask what you have to gain by putting yourself through it?  Oh and: Me too, but every so often I fall of the wagon into a gluten free cheesecake or similar Best of luck!
    • My own bugbear is that in dismissing the fad diet journalists will typically reference Celiac but will often say that only Celiac patients should be following the gluten free diet. Whatever the consensus medical opinion of NCGS, it's a fact that there are many people who are not diagnosed Celiac but who have been advised by their doctors to follow a gluten free diet. That distinction is typically too subtle for such articles and they therefore help to support the idea amongst the wider populace that if you're not celiac you can eat gluten and if you're avoiding it your either deluded, a chronic attention seeker or jumping on a bandwagon. A reductive and potentially harmful generalisation. 
    • Hello,  Celiac Disease and alcohol consumption cause malabsorption that can lead to vitamin deficiencies. Nutrition has a part to play in connective tissue disorders like arthritis, Sjorgren's, Ehlers-Danlos, and polychondritis.  Here's an article about EDS and nutritional therapy. http://www.chronicpainpartners.com/nutritional-therapeutic-strategy-for-ehlers-danlos-syndrome/  Vitamin D is really important in controlling inflammation.   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23830380 You might consider checking for vitamin deficiencies at your next doctor's appointment.   You might want to look into a low histamine diet and mast cell activation syndrome.  I found going on the Autoimmune Immune Paleo diet, a low histamine diet, and a low sulfite diet simultaneously helpful.   The low histamine diet doesn't allow anything fermented. If your reaction to the fermented cabbage is "ugh," it's your body telling you not to eat it.   Cabbage, fish oil, and wine are high in Sulfites.  Metformin is a sulfa drug.  Your body might be inflamed because of a Sulfites hypersensitivity that may occur with Celiac Disease.   These are things I found helpful.  It took several months to figure out what works for me.  I'm doing much better now.  Like CyclingLady, I "eat to my meter" and don't take medication.  I hope this helps us on our journey to wellness.
    • Well first things first, I always read your posts with interest, you have gone the extra mile for answers, put the intellectual work in and crucially kept a rational and grounded perspective throughout and if anyone deserves them you do.  Sadly of course I don't have any,  so I'll simply send my sincere best wishes across the Atlantic.  I really do hope you find your answer.  On this: I tested negative for celiac and my endoscopy didn't show villi blunting. I do however definitely react to gluten in all sorts of ways. So I'm in the nebulous NCGS group, a condition that most of the world seems uncertain even exists or if so questions its relation to gluten.  I wanted certainty and answers and I never really got them. I've come to accept that it's an imperfect world and this is still in medical terms an imperfectly understood area. I've had to park the question of whether I had celiac but it wasn't picked up (there were some flaws in the diagnostic process) or early onset celiac or NCGS or its really fodmaps and I'm working on a false correlation or it's NCIS, no, CSI New York, etc etc. In the end I was exhausted, sick of feeling ill and had proved to my own satisfaction that gluten was a problem and I decided to leave it at that. It's not ideal by any means, but, hey, whaddya gonna do?  There are things I know about my own condition that I can't necessarily demonstrate or have validated by a test. It is, by definition, anecdotal at best, but I'll offer it in any case. One of them would be the recovery on the gluten free diet. This was very much a matter of time. I did have some very quick responses, within a few days for instance for an improvement in brain fog, anxiety etc. Some of the weirder neuro symptoms seemed to take much longer and although the endoscopy was negative for villi damage I can't help thinking that malabsorbtion may be an explanation for the time some of these longer term issues took to resolve.  Weirdly some of those neuro symptoms, say the muscle twinges, that took a long time to resolve now seem to trigger occasionally I think in response to minute cross contamination issues. I have no idea what this means, maybe they require the least amount of gluten present to present so they were amongst the last to stop? I know just a few days ago I was noticing an errant muscle repeatedly twitching and I started thinking about the bbq I'd just risked using... None of which of course proves anything or gets you further down the road. I do think however that this: is a good idea and I'd encourage you to push that limit back from the end of summer to a date at least 6 months and perhaps longer away (I'm thinking 12). The gluten free diet is a pain in the arse but it's healthy (or it is if you make it so) and aside from a slight increase in expense it's increasingly straightforward to follow. Go gluten free, apply just the same rigour in pursuing the diet that you have in looking for answers. Do the food journal. Do the whole foods for 3 months, cross contamination procedure with pans, check toothpaste etc.  In short, proceed as if you'd had a positive celiac diagnosis and try to eliminate all doubts. For X many months, live as if gluten free isn't a choice, but a necessity.  It makes it easier believe it or not. Give the diet sufficient time and you will be running perhaps your last test by yourself, for me that was the most significant test of all.  Oh and on this: I learnt, at great personal cost in terms of the sheer misery I went through that my view of health professionals was juvenile and unhelpful. The unquestioning belief that as children we invest in doctors, nurses etc can translate into an over investment of trust to a level which would not be the case in any other comparable scenario. You go to them at your weakest moments, in search of validation, comfort, solutions etc. and if you have a bad experience the first impulse is to blame yourself or question your own experience. Well I'm way past that now. Just like any other walk of life there are good, bad and lot's of indifferent people working within. I've had some great experiences but I've also had some awful ones and indeed just a few days ago I had one so bad that for the first time in my life, I lodged a complaint. Please understand as a British person this is very unusual indeed  It was a horrendous meeting and I was treated in such an appalling way that if I related it here you may not believe me. A couple of years ago it would've destroyed me. Now I just shrugged it off, then realised that if I allowed that behaviour to pass unquestioned I'd be doing a disservice to the next person who had to suffer that kind of treatment. You've shown on here your an intelligent person with a fully justified and admirable engagement in looking for answers. If your doctors aren't picking up on that the fault lies with them. tldr **** them. Best wishes from the sunny UK  Matt  
    • I think the gripe with this sort of article is that it's not telling the right story. When you write anything, you have a choice about whose story you tell and the consequences of it.  While such articles are factual in the sense that objectively, a GFD is worse than a similar regular one, the focus of these articles undermines the struggles of those who must be gluten-free while also not really giving any information that is likely to result in changed behaviour. All this sort of article does is justify the anti-gluten-free circlejerk. I think many of the journalists here think they're on the side of people with celiac disease because they're underlining that the fad diet is dumb/pointless/harmful/whatever. While this may be true, the message the reader remembers is this: the GFD is frivolous. It doesn't matter if there's a line in the article that says something about how the GFD is a medical necessity for those with celiac disease. People don't remember the asterisk in the article. All they remember is that the GFD is for idiots.  What would be valuable and useful is discussing celiac disease - symptoms, longterm consequences etc. and how strict those with celiac disease must be with the GFD in the context of this research. This will do a better job of convincing people that the fad diet is dumb, but do so in a responsible way that doesn't undermine the real problems faced by those with celiac disease or other medical conditions. Plus, the increased awareness might make someone realize that they should get tested.
  • Upcoming Events