• Ads by Google:
     




    Get email alerts Celiac.com E-Newsletter

    Ads by Google:



       Get email alertsCeliac.com E-Newsletter

  • Announcements

    • admin

      Frequently Asked Questions About Celiac Disease   09/30/2015

      This Celiac.com FAQ on celiac disease will guide you to all of the basic information you will need to know about the disease, its diagnosis, testing methods, a gluten-free diet, etc.   Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts What are the major symptoms of celiac disease? Celiac Disease Symptoms What testing is available for celiac disease? - list blood tests, endo with biopsy, genetic test and enterolab (not diagnostic) Celiac Disease Screening Interpretation of Celiac Disease Blood Test Results Can I be tested even though I am eating gluten free? How long must gluten be taken for the serological tests to be meaningful? The Gluten-Free Diet 101 - A Beginner's Guide to Going Gluten-Free Is celiac inherited? Should my children be tested? Ten Facts About Celiac Disease Genetic Testing Is there a link between celiac and other autoimmune diseases? Celiac Disease Research: Associated Diseases and Disorders Is there a list of gluten foods to avoid? Unsafe Gluten-Free Food List (Unsafe Ingredients) Is there a list of gluten free foods? Safe Gluten-Free Food List (Safe Ingredients) Gluten-Free Alcoholic Beverages Distilled Spirits (Grain Alcohols) and Vinegar: Are they Gluten-Free? Where does gluten hide? Additional Things to Beware of to Maintain a 100% Gluten-Free Diet Free recipes: Gluten-Free Recipes Where can I buy gluten-free stuff? Support this site by shopping at The Celiac.com Store.

Celiac Vs Gluten Sensitivity. Is There A Difference?
0

15 posts in this topic

My daughter had an endoscopy and a colonoscopy 2 weeks ago. The lab results came back negative for Celiac, but she has Gastritis. I heard back from the doctor today because he wanted to look at the slides again. He said she has a gluten sensitivity and we need to eliminate large amounts of gluten from her diet. But after looking up Gluten Sensitivity online everything comes back associated with Celiac. Is there a difference? Is there a website that talks about the difference? I'm more confused now than before. I'm having them mail me her entire chart so I can have an independent review of it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:
Ads by Google:


If she had any damage to her intestinal villi visible on the slides the doctor was looking at she has celiac disease. Any damage is positive for celiac.

There is really no definition to gluten intolerance. There are many forms of gluten intolerance (celiac being one of them). The thing is, celiac is the only form that has been researched at all.

Some people with gluten intolerance may have just caught true celiac before there was damage done to the intestine.

Some might have neurological symptoms, but no digestive symptoms or damage.

Some, like me, have another disease altogether that's making them sensitive to gluten.

The solution to all is to be 100% gluten-free. Again, if he saw damage on the slide, it's celiac, not "just" gluten intolerance. I suspect he's calling it that because the damage isn't bad??? I'd clarify with him -- Did you see any damage at all? If so, you know she has celiac, no point arguing with doctor. If no, ask why he thinks she's gluten intolerant.

Was her blood work positive? Could he be saying she's gluten intolerant because of the blood work?

I would clarify this with the doctor.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Her IgG was elevated, her IgA, and the Ttg were not elevated. The lab results said negative for Celiac. I will have to clarify more. Any questions that I should be asking? What about H. Pylori? Could this result in a gluten sensitivity? There is a possibility that this could be the case, as Gastritis in children is usually caused by H. Pylori. I've asked for all the results to be sent to me so I can review them as well.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would try to find out why her doctor said she was gluten intolerant. What made him decide she was based on looking at her slides again?

Some people are genuinly gluten intolerant, and your daughter may be, but if she's not celiac, then the best way to determine it is by dietary response. I am just curious as to why your doctor came to the gluten intolerance conclusion.

I don't know about the other question, but there are others here who have dealt with that and hopefully will answer.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've also been diagnosed as gluten intolerant, but I respond to the diet, and especially slip-ups, as if I have celiac. I really don't believe there is much difference at all. I think the villous atrophy is one of many things that can happen to someone with gluten issues.

I made the decision not to go for an official diagnosis because some people have run into problems getting insurance when they have a diagnosis. We also have chosen not to go for an official diagnosis with our kids because we don't want them to be limited in career options in the future (military, etc.). Who knows, maybe there will be some official or even unofficial treatment for celiac in the future and they may be saddled with a diagnosis but have no active disease. Some kids even go through a remission of symptoms in adolescence and they still don't know what exactly that means - if they're just not feeling symptoms and still being damaged, or if it's a true remission and the disease is no longer active.

I'm perfectly happy with being officially "gluten intolerant". On this board, and I think most others, people aren't treated any differently if they are gluten intolerant or if they have an official celiac diagnosis. We all seem to be in the same boat as far as day to day living and reactions go.

I thought at first that maybe I wouldn't have to be as careful because I'm just gluten intolerant, but it turns out I'm actually extremely sensitive to even the smallest amount of second-hand gluten. So degree of intestinal damage doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the degree of sensitivity.

Personally, I identify myself as celiac on the board and in real life unless I'm talking to someone who has celiac or gluten intolerance specifically about the difference between celiac and gluten intolerance.

Other than that, I have celiac. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.

:D

Nancy

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:


Would anyone recommend to do a test from Enterolab? Would it be any better or more accurate than the blood work? What about the lab results from the bioposy? Will this tell me how gluten intolerant she is if I do the stool test from Enterolab? I don't want to waste the money if it won't help.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, and I'm someone who did use Enterolab, I think dietary response in the best indicator. After a few months gluten-free, you will be able to see if the symptoms improve, and if necessary, challenge it by eating gluten again to see what happens.

If the biopsy shows ANYTHING, then it's celiac, NOT gluten intolerance. There's no such thing as being a little bit celiac, just like there's no such thing as a little bit pregnant. You either have villi damage or you don't. If her biopsy shows damage, do not challenge by eating gluten.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Her IgG was elevated, her IgA, and the Ttg were not elevated. The lab results said negative for Celiac. I will have to clarify more. Any questions that I should be asking? What about H. Pylori? Could this result in a gluten sensitivity? There is a possibility that this could be the case, as Gastritis in children is usually caused by H. Pylori. I've asked for all the results to be sent to me so I can review them as well.

I am curiuos why the dr said she is only gluten senisitive also. My son also just had the high IgG levels. We decided not to do the scopes because we had already taken him off gluten and tired to put him back and after a few hours we knew he had a problem with gluten. We are now waiitng for his test results from enterolab to see what they show.

He was also diagnosed as gastristis a few months back.

paula

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am curiuos why the dr said she is only gluten senisitive also. My son also just had the high IgG levels. We decided not to do the scopes because we had already taken him off gluten and tired to put him back and after a few hours we knew he had a problem with gluten. We are now waiitng for his test results from enterolab to see what they show.

He was also diagnosed as gastristis a few months back.

paula

The whole celiac vs. gluten intolerance clarification seems to be such a gray area. My bloodwork came back negative for celiac, but my doctor (to his credit) said that did not mean I am not gluten sensitive. There are certain levels of the antibodies, and they are subject to a doctor reading them.

The biopsy is supposed to be the 'gold standard' and my understanding is that if there is damage to the villi, that means celiac. Maybe there was damage, but not to the extent that the doctor expected with "true" celiac? Good for him for taking a second look and determining there is a gluten sensitivity. Not so good that he feels she should only get rid of large amounts of gluten. With either gluten intolerance or celiac, the answer is to eliminate it completely, or the intestinal damage will continue.

I never had a biopsy, but I did follow up with Enterolab testing, which came back with elevated Antigliadin IgA and Trangsglutaminase IgA, as well as a double copy of the gene for gluten intolerance. The enterolab tests are more sensitive, but can't diagnore celiac, they can only diagnose active dietary gluten sensitivity, and test the genes for celiac and gluten sensitivity.

To make a long story somewhat shorter, it doesn't really matter if she has celiac or gluten intolerance, the treatment, symptoms, and potential for long term damage are identical. It's almost like they are two types of the same thing.

Sheryll

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Celiac disease is an autoimmune disease. If the tests results are accurate, then a person with Celiac should have elevated tTG levels and damage to their intestinal villi. High tTG levels are indicative of autoimmune disorders. Gluten intolerance should not cause intestinal damage or elevated tTG levels. Gluten intolerance is similar in nature to other intolerances, such as lactose intolerance. An intolerant person may not be able to digest the gluten protein and this osmotically active protein draws water into the intestine. This results in diarrhea, cramps, bloating, and possibly dehydration. As in other intolerances, there can be levels of severity.

They are different diseases, but many of the symptoms are the same. And the diet is the same.

Hope this helps.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Medical opinion varies....

Your daughter would be classed as celiac in Italy...

Negative IgA is meaninglless without TgA... and meaningless in young children anyway...

Negative biopsy is pretty meaningless all the time...

Non of these being negative rules out celiac but it only really depends on the defintion you use for celiac.

Its just semantics at the moment...

Noone understands WHY some people are IgA +ve and IgG negative or visa versa...

On top of this I think an increasing number of us look as gluten-intolerance as celiac disease that is still not fully developed.

The point is you are either celiac or not... retrospectively many of us can look back at symptoms developing and perhaps then note changes but the point is we always were celiac.... to some extent or another...

The amount of damage to your body doesn't seem to make any difference... perhaps when we are younger or fitter the body repairs villi faster and so biopsies tend to be negative but that doesn';t mean damage isn't being done... we just are not observing it..

As everyone else has said.. the treatment is exactly the same...

Its worth repeating Nantzie

I thought at first that maybe I wouldn't have to be as careful because I'm just gluten intolerant, but it turns out I'm actually extremely sensitive to even the smallest amount of second-hand gluten. So degree of intestinal damage doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the degree of sensitivity.

and what happygirl wrote on a different thread

http://www.glutenfreeforum.com/index.php?s...st&p=292916

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me tell you more what the doctor said. After the endoscopy he brought me pictures from the procedure. Showed me where it "looked a little like Celiac". Those were his exact words. The biopsy came back negative for Celiac. But the doctor wasn't convinced. He wanted to relook at the slides from endoscopy. He said he was not Celiac. But to me it sounds like there was damage and that is why he wanted to re look at the slides. The doctor's office is sending me her full chart. So, before I call back with any questions (keeping a log of all questions), I'm going to review the chart. I might even take it to another doctor to review.

From what I gather, nothing else can cause damage to the intestines like Celiac. So any small damage would more than likely be Celiac.

She's doesn't have typical symptoms of Celiac other than the rash, behavior issues, and canker sores in the mouth.

I also want to say, that I feel I get no help from the staff. It's like if I ask a question, I'm putting them out. So inse, I come to the internet to clarify my questions.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your first question already gives the the answer

He said she has a gluten sensitivity and we need to eliminate large amounts of gluten from her diet. But after looking up Gluten Sensitivity online everything comes back associated with Celiac.

Your MD is fixating on one test....

You can still be be celiac and have NO damage or nothing that "looks like celiac"

In the end its just semantics.... defintion from one book or a different one... it looks like the book he has says one thing!

I also want to say, that I feel I get no help from the staff. It's like if I ask a question, I'm putting them out. So inse, I come to the internet to clarify my questions.

Hardly surprising if they know near nothing about celiac..... I have yet to have a MD that did... although others are lucky...

Some MD's will read what you take them and other's won't.... I can link you to hundreds of medical papers but non of that will make a difference if your MD won't read them....

Part of out frustration seems to be we are not happ;y with an MD that say "uggh I dunno, don't know much about celiac disease " and we expect MD's to know thousands of different diseases off the top of their head.... they don't, they're just people like us.

If you are the 1st patient that doctor has had with celiac disease then chances are your MD won't know diddlysquat apart from 10 minutes in passing at med school.

As more people are diagnosed this is slowly changing....

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was just diagnosed celiac even with a negative biopsy and negative bloodwork. My other risk factors were enough that my doctor truly believes that I have active celiac, not just gluten sensitivity. I think that the mainstream medical community has been very slow to accept that celiac is really just the tip of the gluten issue. Celiac is like the stage 4 of gluten sensitivity. If you ignore gluten sensitivity, I believe that it will eventually turn into celiac, just like cancer, if not caught early enough, will progress from a stage one onward.

Even before my celiac diagnosis, I took myself off gluten because of my Enterolab results, which showed significant gluten sensitivity (not the highest I've ever seen on this board, but high enough). I have responded beautifully to the gluten free diet, and many other symptoms that I had no idea were related have now disappeared as well. It helped me figure out that even though the blood tests were negative, I could still have a problem with gluten.

I have learned more from the internet and this forum than I could possibly have from my old GI--they knew nothing and are probably too pig headed to ever want to learn more about it.

Here is a website that has great information on celiac and gluten sensitivity: www.thefooddoc.com

The dr. is Dr. Lewey, who has done a great deal of research on both and has come up with some conclusions that make a lot of sense.

The bottom line is that, as many have already said, the treatment is the same, and the end result is the same. I have noticed significant differences in my kids since taking them off gluten, and all of their bloodwork was negative. I also feel better knowing that I am possibly preventing them from having major issues in the future--medically, psychologically, neurologically...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So much is not known or understood about celiac disease, especially in this country. And even LESS is known about gluten sensitivity, or about gluten sensitivity compared to celiac disease. There are actually a few celiac specialists who suggest eliminating the term "celiac disease" and call the entire spectrum "gluten sensitivity, which would include celiac disease as a subset of this larger gluten sensitivity spectrum.

However, think about this: if you put gluten into a petri dish with human tissue, the gluten attacks and destroys the tissue. Do you want this to happen inside your body, to your organs, to your tissues? Many doctors are now concluding that it probably would be best if people did not eat gluten as their digestive systems are not equipped to handle it and break it down without reactions. Add to this the fact that the gluten that exists today in all the products we eat is far more intense than the gluten people ate 100, 200 years ago. Wheat is developed to have higher and higher gluten content, and therefore, the amount of gluten people eat is far higher than it was in the past.

It is a known fact that people with only gluten sensitivity genes can be just as sick as a person with celiac genes. The bottom line is that particuarly if you are sick with symptoms, and if a gluten free diet eliminates or lessens those symptoms, then it is clear you should no longer eat gluten.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      106,421
    • Total Posts
      930,469
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      63,848
    • Most Online
      3,093

    Newest Member
    glutenfreekiddo
    Joined
  • Popular Now

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello Anonymous, and if nobody has said as much yet, welcome Don't worry (difficult to do when it can cause anxiety :P) it's very early days and you have a lot of healing to come.  If you've not already seen it there's advice and further info here:    It gets easier over time as checking becomes routine, you know your 'safe' products and your eating pattern changes. You'll get there  Maybe start a thread of your own if you'd like some input from others? Finally, back on topic. My Aunt has narcolepsy and although she's fiercely resistant to giving up gluten she has now made a connnection to eating bread and it's onset. As often, not conclusive but suggestive...
    • Hello again   Well first thing is the - Usual disclaimers apply... and this is something you have to follow up with your doctors as you know. But it's helpful sometimes to get another perspective so here's this layman see's from outside.  What I have seen from the various results posted here is that people's numbers vary wildly and, just as important, the numbers often don't bear any direct relationship to the level of intestinal damage revealed via endoscopy. Ultimately although you're not scoring much above positive, you are scoring a positive  and there are a couple of other risk factors you've mentioned that are suggestive if not conclusive - you have another autoimmune which raises the odds of having another one for example.  You've had two tests that are positive. The purpose of taking the second test was either to invalidate or confirm the first. I'd suggest it's achieved the latter, at least inasmuch as a GI may want to check you via endoscopy. That's still the 'gold standard' of celiac diagnosis and would give you an idea if there's any intestinal damage. I suspect with 2 positive tests and the history above that's what they'll suggest.  If your doctor or GI doesn't want to proceed with that you have a decision to make. Push for a second opinion or new doctor or if you're done with testing give the gluten free diet a proper try. Make a journal and see if some of those subtle things you reference may actually be symptoms. Fwiw, there are a lot of people here whose thyroid issues improved dramatically once they were gluten free, so whether celiac or gluten sensitive you should certainly give the diet a try. Only however once the testing is completed and remember: 
    • Hi! I've just been recently diagnosed as Celiac through the whole biopsy-shebang, and I have a little bit of insight on the whole diagnosis thing and how I was eventually diagnosed, and my advice for you. Brace yourself, this might be a bit long, but it might be worth the read and I promise I will eventually get to the point. If you don't want the huge story, skip to the long line of capital As: I first saw my doctor when I had a few problems swallowing. I've compared it to when you're nervous and you feel like you have a lump in your throat - but after I eat and (sometimes) drink. I just mentioned briefly it to my family doctor when I was addressing another issue, but right away he referred me to a gastroenterologist and ordered a barium swallow x-ray test. The x-ray came back completely normal, and so the g.e. then suspected GERD, put me on acid blockers to see if they would work, no harm done sort of thing. The only thing I got out of the acid blockers were the side effects, so it was back to square 1. The g.e. said that the next test he could do was an upper endoscopy with biopsies. (hint: the celiac test!) Wanting to find a solution to my problems, the endoscopy was scheduled. Pretty painless, I was in and out in a day, but the results took much much longer. Biopsies, or the little pieces of my esophagus, stomach, and small intestine, were sent to the lab, and they came back clean. I didn't really go back to the g.e. for a whole year after that because life became busy, I wasn't prompted to follow up, and I just dismissed the swallowing problems the best I could and went on my way. Now, I've never been huge on the gluten, big bread-y sandwiches or croissants or pies were never foods that I super "enjoyed". I wouldn't feel bad after eating them, I just didn't like the taste of bread so much, but I loved cookies, cake and a lot of other things that do have gluten in them. I lead a lowish gluten life but I wasn't really monitoring it that way. Everything changed when I got really nasty (systemic) poison ivy. My eyes were swollen shut, and the rash was everywhere. I almost went to the hospital, but cooped out at the family doctor's place and got a script for prednisone (a steroid). But, I found that after I had tapered off the steroids, I had magically become lactose intolerant. So back to the family doctor again probably because I broke my toe or something, but we also got to talk about this magical lactose intolerance business (because I love anything dairy and it was indeed devastating). He was surprised as there is literally no correlation between steroids and becoming lactose intolerant. He asked me if I still had the swallowing problems, which I did, and so it was back to the g.e. for round 3. because my family doctor "does not believe in coincidences". Meeting with the G.E., he mainly addressed the swallowing problems telling me that he had done what he could to diagnose with the technology that we had at the highly specialized hospital that we were at, and I would have to travel about 3 hours away to see a different doctor who would do some tests involving the muscles in the esophagus. But right before I was about to leave, we started talking about lactose intolerance. He brought up other foods that I was avoiding (if any), and then the conversation went to gluten. I mentioned that I had an aunt that was gluten-sensitive. He advised that I do the blood test that can show an indication of celiac whenever in the future. I decided to do it that day. At this point in time, I was not eating much gluten because of the fact that it was personal preference. The normal range for values in this test is from 0 to 20. A few weeks later, I learned that I scored a 35. A second upper endoscopy with biopsies was scheduled, but this time I was told to eat a moderate amount of gluten everyday before the procedure. I ate about two slices of bread per day, which is more than I normally would. I was normal for the first two-three weeks of the gluten plus diet, but then I became really sick. I started getting the normal celiac symptoms, like diarrhea and extreme tiredness. Near the end, I had debilitating stomach pain and I was 2 times more asleep than awake each day. I couldn't do the 2 pieces of bread a day some days, but the pain was still there. I knew that I wouldn't ever have to force myself to eat bread for a test ever again. I was called a few days before my endoscopy telling me that a kid in a worse state than me had to take the OR during my time. I forced myself to eat more bread for another month and a half. The day finally came. I was diagnosed celiac, which I have concluded to be initiated by (1) the steroids/poison ivy and (2) the gluten binge fest.  AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Celiac Disease isn't completely understood yet. Most of the time if you weren't showing symptoms when you were a baby (so your case) it means that celiac was/could be triggered by an event in your life that causes stress on the body (like stress, physical injury, etc.).  The positive result that you got from the blood test doesn't automatically mean celiac, but it could. Here's some options: Talk to your doctor (or a different doctor) or even a specialist gastroenterologist (you can get a referral from a family doctor (general physician)) and see if you can do the blood test again, you have to have some kind of gluten for this to work in advance, so if you don't want to break your gluten-free streak, than don't really invest in this option. If you feel comfortable, you could even ask to do this test under a few scenarios (no gluten (now) and after a gluten binge, compare results). If you do this test and your indication is low off gluten and then high after gluten, I'd probably skip the biopsy. That's a strong enough sign that you don't need to put yourself through the painful-gluten binge. Maybe this is what that first doctor just assumed. But having that test when you haven't had any gluten could make the difference - it acts as a control. Go straight to the biopsy. You could do this, but I'd probably do the blood test first. I went through a lot of stress with the gluten-binge that you have to do to get an accurate result, you would also be breaking your gluten-free diet that may/may not be helping you right now. Do nothing, stay on your gluten free diet hoping that it is helping you. But if you are not celiac or gluten-sensitive (celiac before it starts to wreck your small intestine), going gluten free isn't healthy - you can do some research on this if it interests you. If you feel bad/unhealthy after going gluten free it's probably a sign. Good luck, also know that you might come to a point of stress in your life that can start celiac's destructive path. Ultimately, it is your body, and you should not feel forced or hesitate to act on health issues that impact you.
    • I'm sorry that life is so hard right now. Really.  I can't imagine working 3 jobs and trying to manage this terrible illness.  I think about American society and their obsession with food often.  Whenever you look at the internet, there are all these fabulous gluten-free recipes, but when you don't have time or money to cook these things, a simple gluten-free lifestyle is just that - simple. There isn't a lot of variety, so it's kind of boring. But, I guess I have gotten used to being boring. I just eat corn chex and fruit or yogurt for breakfast. I eat a lot of eggs, beans, rice, corn tortillas, nuts, chicken, fruit and veggies.  A loaf of gluten-free bread will last me 4-6 months in the freezer.  I buy a bag of dried beans for $1.29, I soak them overnight, and put them in the crockpot the next day. I add different spices, sometimes chicken and Voila! - dinner is ready when I get home from a long day. Family gatherings are miserable and I haven't quite figured out the best way to deal yet. If my grandmother were still alive, I imagine she would be a lot like yours - well-meaning but not really able to understand the nitty-gritty.   I just reassure my family that I am fine and that they really shouldn't do anything special for me. I bring a bag of Hershey's kisses or other gluten-free candy I can nibble on along with my meal and then I try to treat myself to a nicer home cooked meal later in the week when I have time to cook - because who has time to cook during Christmas???? And, I agree with knitty knitty. If someone else in your family/friends were gluten-free for medical reasons, it would make socializing a bit easier. One of my husband's good friends is NCGS. When we get together as a group, we can make each other special dishes and it helps to feel less isolated.  Good luck!  
    • Hi!  Um, please forgive my quirky sense of humor..... Celiac Disease is genetic... All first degree relatives of people diagnosed with Celiac Disease should be tested for the disease, too.  Gall bladder problems are often associated with Celiac Disease.  Your diagnosis might save your whole family from further medical problems as they age and the disease progresses... You need to set a good example if relatives are similarly diagnosed.... and then everybody will have to eat gluten free at family gatherings....  
  • Upcoming Events