• Ads by Google:
     




    Get email alerts Celiac.com E-Newsletter

    Ads by Google:



       Get email alertsCeliac.com E-Newsletter

  • Announcements

    • admin

      Frequently Asked Questions About Celiac Disease   09/30/2015

      This Celiac.com FAQ on celiac disease will guide you to all of the basic information you will need to know about the disease, its diagnosis, testing methods, a gluten-free diet, etc.   Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts What are the major symptoms of celiac disease? Celiac Disease Symptoms What testing is available for celiac disease? - list blood tests, endo with biopsy, genetic test and enterolab (not diagnostic) Celiac Disease Screening Interpretation of Celiac Disease Blood Test Results Can I be tested even though I am eating gluten free? How long must gluten be taken for the serological tests to be meaningful? The Gluten-Free Diet 101 - A Beginner's Guide to Going Gluten-Free Is celiac inherited? Should my children be tested? Ten Facts About Celiac Disease Genetic Testing Is there a link between celiac and other autoimmune diseases? Celiac Disease Research: Associated Diseases and Disorders Is there a list of gluten foods to avoid? Unsafe Gluten-Free Food List (Unsafe Ingredients) Is there a list of gluten free foods? Safe Gluten-Free Food List (Safe Ingredients) Gluten-Free Alcoholic Beverages Distilled Spirits (Grain Alcohols) and Vinegar: Are they Gluten-Free? Where does gluten hide? Additional Things to Beware of to Maintain a 100% Gluten-Free Diet Free recipes: Gluten-Free Recipes Where can I buy gluten-free stuff? Support this site by shopping at The Celiac.com Store.

Labeled Gluten Free, But Not!
0

15 posts in this topic

Maybe, it is because I am a newbie, but this is confusing! When I buy a product which states "Gluten Free" I assume it contains no gluten ingredients, and has no possibility of being cross contaiminated with gluten. How wrong was I! They got me! Mi-Del Gluten Free Cookies, this is the statement...

<BR>

"Produced in a facility that also produces milk, peanuts, tree nuts, and wheat. MI-DEL Gluten Free products are routinely tested using the ELISA method to ensure 'gluten free status' as determined by the World Health Organization."

<BR>

Nature's Path Life Stream Gluten Free Frozen Waffles:

"Produced in a non-gluten free facility.

Produced in a facility that uses dairy, sesame & soy."

<BR>

Blue Diamond Nut Thins:

States Gluten Free on Box and Website

Also found on box-

Allergen Disclaimer

Produced in a facility that also also makes products containing: dairy, soy, other tree nuts, and wheat.And they even have an endorsment from the Celiac Foundation!

<BR>

Barabara's Bakery Rice Cereal

States Gluten Free on box.

Also states: "Made with Gluten Free ingredients" on website

A phone call confirmed the cereal is not produced in a gluten free facility.

<BR>

And I keep finding MORE! There are so many ways that they sneak by it. How do I know for sure, I mean there aren't very many products that actually say, made in a dedicated gluten free facility. I usually eat single ingredient foods anyway, but there is always a need for some processed products too. So, what are the laws on stating Gluten Free? Are there any? What is the best thing to do? Is it safe to eat these foods that are "tested" to be Gluten Free? It seems like all of those so called "minute" amounts would add up in your system. And, even if I don't react can't I still be damaging my intestines? Yikes!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:
Ads by Google:


Well, while being processed in a facility that also processes wheat can mean CC, in some ways it may not be any more risky than other routine things. For instance, going through the store, placing your items in a shopping cart, going through the checkout line. None of those things are gluten-free either. There may always be some risk I guess. Even if there isn't any gluten inside the package, by the time you get it home, there may be gluten ON the package. So then how would you open it without any risk? Suppose the clerk who filled the shelf was eating a sandwich moments before, and didn't wash his hands?

You see, it can drive you batty to contemplate every possible avenue of contamination. The good news is that there is a level under which the immune system does not react. Each of us is different in that, but from what I understand, the vast majority should be able to remain safe with reasonable precautions. I always carefully empty packages into appropriate containers, dispose of the packaging, and wash my hands thoroughly. Of course, if you find yourself in the checkout line behind some kid eating crackers or something, it might be a good idea to move to another line, rather than get gluten smeared all over your items as they are slid over the barcode scanner. Small health stores, and online stores would presumably not have such problems, as they don't usually have conveyor belts. At least not that I've ever seen.

In short, I don't think we should worry ourselves over it too much, unless you do find you are getting glutened by them. How you can know for sure, I don't know.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to agree. In most cases the lines are flushed and clean so you should be okay. I regularly buy alot of the products on your list and have had no problem. We are always at risk of getting glutened that just the nature of the disorder however if something says gluten free it is most likely tested to make sure it is. You can try any of the Enjoy Life brand as they are made in a dedicated facility.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm also new to this and was driving myself crazy trying to avoid all CC. Then someone pointed out to me that I eat things processed in a non-gluten free facility every day - MY kitchen! My family are still gluten eaters and although they are very careful to avoid contamination, there's no way I can guarantee that the entire kitchen is gluten free.

So my rule of thumb has become - if it's processed in a *facility* that also processes wheat, it's probably okay. If it's processed on *machinery* that also processes wheat - then I say "no thanks". I know how well I wash the pots between meals; I can't say the same for them.

Hope this helps you prevent a brain meltdown!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You won't find many processed foods that come from dedicated gluten-free facilities. Like others have said, that absolutely doesn't mean they are all contaminated.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:


In short, I don't think we should worry ourselves over it too much, unless you do find you are getting glutened by them. How you can know for sure, I don't know.

I agree. Take neccessary precautions to the best of your ability. Don't drive yourself crazy.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Many companies put the "produced in a facilty" portion to protect themselves from this sue hungry world we live in I think....

envision what would happen if they didnt add that disclaimer to their products and someone died because of CC ? How many millions of dollars would the family be able to sue for?

I agree and practice what was stated before, if it says "produced in a facility" I dont worry to much if its made on the same line as others I generally pass.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, while being processed in a facility that also processes wheat can mean CC, in some ways it may not be any more risky than other routine things. For instance, going through the store, placing your items in a shopping cart, going through the checkout line. None of those things are gluten-free either. There may always be some risk I guess. Even if there isn't any gluten inside the package, by the time you get it home, there may be gluten ON the package. So then how would you open it without any risk? Suppose the clerk who filled the shelf was eating a sandwich moments before, and didn't wash his hands?

You see, it can drive you batty to contemplate every possible avenue of contamination. The good news is that there is a level under which the immune system does not react. Each of us is different in that, but from what I understand, the vast majority should be able to remain safe with reasonable precautions. I always carefully empty packages into appropriate containers, dispose of the packaging, and wash my hands thoroughly. Of course, if you find yourself in the checkout line behind some kid eating crackers or something, it might be a good idea to move to another line, rather than get gluten smeared all over your items as they are slid over the barcode scanner. Small health stores, and online stores would presumably not have such problems, as they don't usually have conveyor belts. At least not that I've ever seen.

In short, I don't think we should worry ourselves over it too much, unless you do find you are getting glutened by them. How you can know for sure, I don't know.

I agree, and while I don't worry about the packaging at all, I just envisioned a flour dust filled factory with my food getting contaiminated. I suppose they must take better percautions than that. No, I too, think it is too much to worry about who touches my box! lol :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rice guy

You did a great job on this... I agree . We all must just do our best & live on................You know the saying "S_ _ _ t happens" Mistakes are great learning tools!!!!

mamaw

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe, it is because I am a newbie, but this is confusing! When I buy a product which states "Gluten Free" I assume it contains no gluten ingredients, and has no possibility of being cross contaiminated with gluten. How wrong was I! They got me! Mi-Del Gluten Free Cookies, this is the statement...

<BR>

"Produced in a facility that also produces milk, peanuts, tree nuts, and wheat. MI-DEL Gluten Free products are routinely tested using the ELISA method to ensure 'gluten free status' as determined by the World Health Organization."

<BR>

Nature's Path Life Stream Gluten Free Frozen Waffles:

"Produced in a non-gluten free facility.

Produced in a facility that uses dairy, sesame & soy."

<BR>

Blue Diamond Nut Thins:

States Gluten Free on Box and Website

Also found on box-

Allergen Disclaimer

Produced in a facility that also also makes products containing: dairy, soy, other tree nuts, and wheat.And they even have an endorsment from the Celiac Foundation!

<BR>

Barabara's Bakery Rice Cereal

States Gluten Free on box.

Also states: "Made with Gluten Free ingredients" on website

A phone call confirmed the cereal is not produced in a gluten free facility.

<BR>

And I keep finding MORE! There are so many ways that they sneak by it. How do I know for sure, I mean there aren't very many products that actually say, made in a dedicated gluten free facility. I usually eat single ingredient foods anyway, but there is always a need for some processed products too. So, what are the laws on stating Gluten Free? Are there any? What is the best thing to do? Is it safe to eat these foods that are "tested" to be Gluten Free? It seems like all of those so called "minute" amounts would add up in your system. And, even if I don't react can't I still be damaging my intestines? Yikes!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe, it is because I am a newbie, but this is confusing! When I buy a product which states "Gluten Free" I assume it contains no gluten ingredients, and has no possibility of being cross contaiminated with gluten.

There is no "rule" or "law" determining what gluten free means. It is being worked on in the FDA now.

But "no" possibility is virtually impossible. lots of things aren't produced in a gluten-free facility that don't mark it. Some are marked. Doesn't mean that they don't take every precaution, and it doesn't mean that wheat is prepared right next to the gluten-free products.

Just something to keep in mind.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So my rule of thumb has become - if it's processed in a *facility* that also processes wheat, it's probably okay. If it's processed on *machinery* that also processes wheat - then I say "no thanks". I know how well I wash the pots between meals; I can't say the same for them.

This has become my policy as well. I have reacted to items labeled "gluten-free" and produced on shared lines that were cleaned. Apparently I'm one of the very sensitive ones. Someone close to me, who is a doctor said "this is a good thing" and while it sucks, I have to agree. My body tells me exactly what is OK and what is not. In the end I think this is to my benefit.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

my understanding of the "official" definition of gluten-free, according to the FDA as of January 2008, is that a product has to be tested under 20 parts per million of gluten in order for it to bear the label.

that said, i pretty much follow the same philosophy as everyone else- shared facility, i just take into account the brand and how well trusted it is, and the type of food. eg i'll eat nuts that are manufactured in a wheat-containing facility because i feel there is less of a chance of flour being in the air than say a bakery. cc is everywhere. i eat lunch at school everyday, and the tables have visible crumbs on them! i just make sure i dont touch them, and neither does my food.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if you ever have bread, or cereal, or a granola bar in your kitchen, YOUR KITCHEN is a shared manufacturing line. sure, you have cleaning processes between 'runs', but it's still shared. and that's why I don't worry about it overly much, depending on the product and how I'm feeling. the equipment versus facility differentiation is fair as well; it's always a personal decision.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      106,784
    • Total Posts
      932,407
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      64,262
    • Most Online
      3,093

    Newest Member
    plimpyanp
    Joined
  • Popular Now

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello and welcome I'd just echo CyclingLady - do you need to put yourself through this? There are lots of good reasons for pursuing a diagnosis but amongst the strongest are helping you to 'keep honest' on the diet or ensuring that your not denying yourselves a lot of foods for good reason. Neither of these apply to you and so I'd have to ask what you have to gain by putting yourself through it?  Oh and: Me too, but every so often I fall of the wagon into a gluten free cheesecake or similar Best of luck!
    • My own bugbear is that in dismissing the fad diet journalists will typically reference Celiac but will often say that only Celiac patients should be following the gluten free diet. Whatever the consensus medical opinion of NCGS, it's a fact that there are many people who are not diagnosed Celiac but who have been advised by their doctors to follow a gluten free diet. That distinction is typically too subtle for such articles and they therefore help to support the idea amongst the wider populace that if you're not celiac you can eat gluten and if you're avoiding it your either deluded, a chronic attention seeker or jumping on a bandwagon. A reductive and potentially harmful generalisation. 
    • Hello,  Celiac Disease and alcohol consumption cause malabsorption that can lead to vitamin deficiencies. Nutrition has a part to play in connective tissue disorders like arthritis, Sjorgren's, Ehlers-Danlos, and polychondritis.  Here's an article about EDS and nutritional therapy. http://www.chronicpainpartners.com/nutritional-therapeutic-strategy-for-ehlers-danlos-syndrome/  Vitamin D is really important in controlling inflammation.   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23830380 You might consider checking for vitamin deficiencies at your next doctor's appointment.   You might want to look into a low histamine diet and mast cell activation syndrome.  I found going on the Autoimmune Immune Paleo diet, a low histamine diet, and a low sulfite diet simultaneously helpful.   The low histamine diet doesn't allow anything fermented. If your reaction to the fermented cabbage is "ugh," it's your body telling you not to eat it.   Cabbage, fish oil, and wine are high in Sulfites.  Metformin is a sulfa drug.  Your body might be inflamed because of a Sulfites hypersensitivity that may occur with Celiac Disease.   These are things I found helpful.  It took several months to figure out what works for me.  I'm doing much better now.  Like CyclingLady, I "eat to my meter" and don't take medication.  I hope this helps us on our journey to wellness.
    • Well first things first, I always read your posts with interest, you have gone the extra mile for answers, put the intellectual work in and crucially kept a rational and grounded perspective throughout and if anyone deserves them you do.  Sadly of course I don't have any,  so I'll simply send my sincere best wishes across the Atlantic.  I really do hope you find your answer.  On this: I tested negative for celiac and my endoscopy didn't show villi blunting. I do however definitely react to gluten in all sorts of ways. So I'm in the nebulous NCGS group, a condition that most of the world seems uncertain even exists or if so questions its relation to gluten.  I wanted certainty and answers and I never really got them. I've come to accept that it's an imperfect world and this is still in medical terms an imperfectly understood area. I've had to park the question of whether I had celiac but it wasn't picked up (there were some flaws in the diagnostic process) or early onset celiac or NCGS or its really fodmaps and I'm working on a false correlation or it's NCIS, no, CSI New York, etc etc. In the end I was exhausted, sick of feeling ill and had proved to my own satisfaction that gluten was a problem and I decided to leave it at that. It's not ideal by any means, but, hey, whaddya gonna do?  There are things I know about my own condition that I can't necessarily demonstrate or have validated by a test. It is, by definition, anecdotal at best, but I'll offer it in any case. One of them would be the recovery on the gluten free diet. This was very much a matter of time. I did have some very quick responses, within a few days for instance for an improvement in brain fog, anxiety etc. Some of the weirder neuro symptoms seemed to take much longer and although the endoscopy was negative for villi damage I can't help thinking that malabsorbtion may be an explanation for the time some of these longer term issues took to resolve.  Weirdly some of those neuro symptoms, say the muscle twinges, that took a long time to resolve now seem to trigger occasionally I think in response to minute cross contamination issues. I have no idea what this means, maybe they require the least amount of gluten present to present so they were amongst the last to stop? I know just a few days ago I was noticing an errant muscle repeatedly twitching and I started thinking about the bbq I'd just risked using... None of which of course proves anything or gets you further down the road. I do think however that this: is a good idea and I'd encourage you to push that limit back from the end of summer to a date at least 6 months and perhaps longer away (I'm thinking 12). The gluten free diet is a pain in the arse but it's healthy (or it is if you make it so) and aside from a slight increase in expense it's increasingly straightforward to follow. Go gluten free, apply just the same rigour in pursuing the diet that you have in looking for answers. Do the food journal. Do the whole foods for 3 months, cross contamination procedure with pans, check toothpaste etc.  In short, proceed as if you'd had a positive celiac diagnosis and try to eliminate all doubts. For X many months, live as if gluten free isn't a choice, but a necessity.  It makes it easier believe it or not. Give the diet sufficient time and you will be running perhaps your last test by yourself, for me that was the most significant test of all.  Oh and on this: I learnt, at great personal cost in terms of the sheer misery I went through that my view of health professionals was juvenile and unhelpful. The unquestioning belief that as children we invest in doctors, nurses etc can translate into an over investment of trust to a level which would not be the case in any other comparable scenario. You go to them at your weakest moments, in search of validation, comfort, solutions etc. and if you have a bad experience the first impulse is to blame yourself or question your own experience. Well I'm way past that now. Just like any other walk of life there are good, bad and lot's of indifferent people working within. I've had some great experiences but I've also had some awful ones and indeed just a few days ago I had one so bad that for the first time in my life, I lodged a complaint. Please understand as a British person this is very unusual indeed  It was a horrendous meeting and I was treated in such an appalling way that if I related it here you may not believe me. A couple of years ago it would've destroyed me. Now I just shrugged it off, then realised that if I allowed that behaviour to pass unquestioned I'd be doing a disservice to the next person who had to suffer that kind of treatment. You've shown on here your an intelligent person with a fully justified and admirable engagement in looking for answers. If your doctors aren't picking up on that the fault lies with them. tldr **** them. Best wishes from the sunny UK  Matt  
    • I think the gripe with this sort of article is that it's not telling the right story. When you write anything, you have a choice about whose story you tell and the consequences of it.  While such articles are factual in the sense that objectively, a GFD is worse than a similar regular one, the focus of these articles undermines the struggles of those who must be gluten-free while also not really giving any information that is likely to result in changed behaviour. All this sort of article does is justify the anti-gluten-free circlejerk. I think many of the journalists here think they're on the side of people with celiac disease because they're underlining that the fad diet is dumb/pointless/harmful/whatever. While this may be true, the message the reader remembers is this: the GFD is frivolous. It doesn't matter if there's a line in the article that says something about how the GFD is a medical necessity for those with celiac disease. People don't remember the asterisk in the article. All they remember is that the GFD is for idiots.  What would be valuable and useful is discussing celiac disease - symptoms, longterm consequences etc. and how strict those with celiac disease must be with the GFD in the context of this research. This will do a better job of convincing people that the fad diet is dumb, but do so in a responsible way that doesn't undermine the real problems faced by those with celiac disease or other medical conditions. Plus, the increased awareness might make someone realize that they should get tested.
  • Upcoming Events