Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Question About Iga


Sharon C.

Recommended Posts

Sharon C. Explorer

Hi-

My son was diagnosed last Septmeber with Celiac Disease. Since I also have issues with food, I am trying to determine whether I may also have a gluten intolerance.

I discussed it with my doctor who seemed to not have a lot of knowledge about the subject. I asked for the gluten IgA antibody test. The nurses in the office never had to write up that blood test before and they called the lab directly and asked what test it was and filled out a slip for me to take to them.

I had the test done and am waiting for results. My problem is, I have very little confidence that anyone knows what they are doing. I wonder if they did the right test, and I wonder if my doctor will understand the results. I called up and wanted the nurse to give me the antibody level over the phone, but she said she can't. The doctor would let me know if anything was "wrong" when he calls later.

Is there an exact name for the blood test I need? And can anyone tell me the proper number that I, an an adult female, should be over or under to consider myself either tolerant or intolerant? Thanks. I think it shouldn't be over 30, but I'm not sure. If it shows that I am intolerant, I am just going to go gluten free regardless. So I don't know if I need to go ahead with an endoscopy. I won't be eating it anymore anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



celiac3270 Collaborator

If it's the EMA IgA, it will only read positive or negative (with no numbers). They probably ran the Antigliadin IgA. For that test, normal levels are less than 18. For the tTG IgA, normal levels are less than 13, but I suspect it'll be the antigliadin :)

Now, one positive test isn't enough to diagnose you completely or completely dismiss celiac. It's helpful also to do the Antigliadin IgG.

This table explains whether you should suspect celiac disease or not, based on which tests are positive or negative.

EMA IgA/AGA IgA/AGA IgG/Interpretation

+ + + celiac disease 99% Probable

+ - + celiac disease probable

+ + - celiac disease probable

+ - - celiac disease probable

- + + celiac disease less likely

- - + celiac disease less likely

- + - celiac disease less likely

- - - celiac disease very unlikely

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sharon C. Explorer

Hi-

Well, I have my results, only, they are not plus's or minus's like the chart above.

My IGA is 6, my IGG is 15. What does that sound like?

My doctor will not likely run any further tests because in his opinion, these blood tests are negative. If I do the entero lab, do I need to eat large amounts of gluten first, or can I take it anytime? Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KaitiUSA Enthusiast

The results don't come in plus and minus' like above. He was using that to interpret the resulsts. The + means a positive and the - means negative and then they are color coded with IgA, IgG, etc. To me the levels don't seem high.. I think they are in the normal range but I am not sure about that one. Did they test you for tTG? There are certain tests that are more specific for celiac then others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
celiac3270 Collaborator

Both are within normal range. Did he do an EMA IgA or just the antigliadin. If the EMA came back positive (it only comes back pos. or neg.), then celiac disease is probable. Otherwise, it is very unlikely that you have celiac.

The + and - symbols said that if you have a positive result in this and a positive result in that, then...it's very likely, unlikely, etc. For actual normal ranges, the Antigliadin IgA is less than 18 (you're 6) and for the Antigliadin IgG, it's less than 24 (you're 15). You tested negative in both. So, if you look at the color-coded thing I had in an above post, you'd see that a positive EMA IgA would mean that you're probably celiac...if the EMA was negative, it's extremely unlikely that you have celiac disease.

Oh, Kaiti was right. They do come in numbers, not as positive or negative. The only test that comes back as + or - is the EMA IgA

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Yeah the one says positive or negative right on the results but the others come in numbers. celiac3270 is right it is very unlikely if EMA came back negative along with your other ones then you probably do not have it. One thing about just the IgA anti-gliadan is that many celiacs can be IgA deficient so you should get the EMA done and other tests done specifically for celiac :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Bayb replied to Bayb's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Trying to read my lab results

    2. - Aussienae replied to Aussienae's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      65

      Constant low back, abdominal and pelvic pain!

    3. - trents replied to mishyj's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Why?

    4. - trents replied to mishyj's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Why?

    5. - mishyj replied to mishyj's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Why?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,221
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    lortaine
    Newest Member
    lortaine
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Bayb
      Hi Scott, yes I have had symptoms for years and this is the second GI I have seen and he could not believe I have never been tested. He called later today and I am scheduled for an endoscopy. Is there a way to tell how severe my potential celiac is from the results above? What are the chances I will have the biopsy and come back negative and we have to keep searching for a cause? 
    • Aussienae
      I agree christina, there is definitely many contributing factors! I have the pain today, my pelvis, hips and thighs ache! No idea why. But i have been sitting at work for 3 days so im thinking its my back. This disease is very mysterious (and frustrating) but not always to blame for every pain. 
    • trents
      "her stool study showed she had extreme reactions to everything achievement on it long course of microbials to treat that." The wording of this part of the sentence does not make any sense at all. I don't mean to insult you, but is English your first language? This part of the sentence sounds like it was generated by translation software.
    • trents
      What kind of stool test was done? Can you be more specific? 
    • mishyj
      Perhaps I should also have said that in addition to showing a very high response to gluten, her stool study showed that she had extreme reactions to everything achievement on it long course of microbials to treat that.
×
×
  • Create New...