• Ads by Google:
     




    Get email alerts Celiac.com E-Newsletter

    Ads by Google:



       Get email alertsCeliac.com E-Newsletter

  • Announcements

    • admin

      Frequently Asked Questions About Celiac Disease   09/30/2015

      This Celiac.com FAQ on celiac disease will guide you to all of the basic information you will need to know about the disease, its diagnosis, testing methods, a gluten-free diet, etc.   Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts   What are the major symptoms of celiac disease? Celiac Disease Symptoms What testing is available for celiac disease? - list blood tests, endo with biopsy, genetic test and enterolab (not diagnostic) Celiac Disease Screening Interpretation of Celiac Disease Blood Test Results Can I be tested even though I am eating gluten free? How long must gluten be taken for the serological tests to be meaningful? The Gluten-Free Diet 101 - A Beginner's Guide to Going Gluten-Free Is celiac inherited? Should my children be tested? Ten Facts About Celiac Disease Genetic Testing Is there a link between celiac and other autoimmune diseases? Celiac Disease Research: Associated Diseases and Disorders Is there a list of gluten foods to avoid? Unsafe Gluten-Free Food List (Unsafe Ingredients) Is there a list of gluten free foods? Safe Gluten-Free Food List (Safe Ingredients) Gluten-Free Alcoholic Beverages Distilled Spirits (Grain Alcohols) and Vinegar: Are they Gluten-Free? Where does gluten hide? Additional Things to Beware of to Maintain a 100% Gluten-Free Diet What if my doctor won't listen to me? An Open Letter to Skeptical Health Care Practitioners Gluten-Free recipes: Gluten-Free Recipes Where can I buy gluten-free stuff? Support this site by shopping at The Celiac.com Store.

Positive Blood Test, Negative Endoscopy?
0

9 posts in this topic

Hi - I'm very confused and a bit frustrated. I had pretty much given up on getting help for chronic GI symptoms - have been told its IBS and for all intents and purposes to suck it up. I went to a new doctor (because I moved) for something unrelated, and she ran a bunch of blood tests since I was a new patient. To my shock she called me in to tell me my bloodwork was positive for Celiac. The full panel was run and all of the numbers were considerably high (one, IGg?, was 35). I finally had my endoscopy on Thursday and the doctor said he did not see signs of Celiac, although we will wait for the biopsy to come back. I am supposed to make an appointment for three weeks from now to discuss this with him. Three weeks feels like an eternity to wait for the results, but I realize that's just because I'm anxious. Any thoughts on whether the blood test is likely to be negative, or if the endoscopy is more likely to be incorrect? Thanks for any insight!

Rachel

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:
Ads by Google:


If you went gluten free between the blood test and the endoscopy, then I'd bet money the endoscopy could be incorrect as you were healing.

If you've had these symptoms fairly recently (within the past few years, not all your life), then I'd bet the endoscopy could be incorrect as you hadn't done enough damage yet.

If the lab doesn't accept moderately blunted villi as "damaged", I'd call the endoscopy the incorrect one because they have unrealistic expectations.

If the doctor didn't take enough samples to get a fair assessment, in the most likely places of damage, I'd call the endoscopy the incorrect one because they missed it.

All that aside, the doctor can't tell - without the slides being looked at - if you have celiac or not. So, saying anything prematurely was, IMHO, bad practice.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

my tests were the same way - positive blood but the endoscopy was negative so my GI doc wouldn't diagnose me. but i had such a strong positive reaction to the diet, plus i tested positive for one of the genes, i decided i don't need a doctor to tell me "you have Celiac".

it's my understanding that a positive blood result is more likely to be accurate. the biopsy only tests a few small samples of your 20-something feet of intestine so there's a good chance they'll miss the damage if it isn't widespread. i think that's what happened with me - i was just lucky to have caught it before too much damage could be done.

the good news for you is the endoscopy is over with and you can start a gluten free diet now, if that's what you choose to do. no more glutening yourself just for the sake of a test.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read over and over, and it has been stated repeatedly here by many who really know their stuff, that a false positive on the blood panel is next to impossible. If the antibodies are there, they are there. Add to that the fact that false negatives with the biopsy are most definitely possible, and I would say you likely have your answer.

SO many members here have talked about their bogus diagnosis of IBS (which some say really stands for "I be stumped", proclaimed when doctors don't know what else to call it), and how putting themselves on the gluten-free diet finally made their symptoms go away.

Welcome to the board..........you've come to the right place! :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My daughter had a negative endoscopy before her blood test results came back. Her blood test was postive and a second biopsy was done which also came back negative. Her provider diagnosed her with celiac based on the blood test. She has been gluten free ever since and feels better than she has in years. All of the vague symptoms she has experienced the past few years (belly discomfort, constipation, chest pain, skin rashes, mood swings) have all but gone away. Since going gluten free though, she has found that she has become alot more sensitive to gluten and can tell almost immediately when she has been "glutened". Luckily this rarely happens. It is so painful for her now to ingest gluten that she is diligent about making sure it does not happen.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:


I returned positive bloodwork in 2007, but my biopsy was negative. My gastroenterologist told me not to bother going off gluten as there was no way it was causing my severe GI symptoms!! I believed him, so spent the next year of my life in severe pain and poor health due to malabsorption problems. I really wish that I had done a bit more research at the time, but I was so happy to hear that I wouldn't have to go gluten-free that I was too willing to believe it.

Things were terrible until October last year - all it took was one good doctor to see the pattern of GI problems, malabsorption and positive blood work, and she immediately told me that I had to go gluten free.

There are differences of opinion on biopsies and blood tests, celiac vs gluten sensitivity, but at the end of the day you have positive blood work and GI symptoms. That alone is enough to say it's worth trying a gluten-free diet to see if you feel better.

I would also suggest keeping a food and symptom diary, which can be useful to pinpoint other possible food sensitivities, and also to help you appreciate any symptom improvements. For example, within a couple of weeks of going gluten free I found that I was free of my chronic foot cramps and mouth ulcers, which I had never thought to associate with gluten. Other symptom improvement came later, but those first few things indicated I was on the right track.

I hope your appointment goes well, but remember that not all doctors are familiar with the full range of gluten-related health problems. I was also lumped with the IBS diagnosis, and it was never an adequate explanation. There is a lot of good information around, and especially on this board.

Let us know how it goes!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all so much for the advice! The idea of going gluten free is pretty intimidating, but it sounds like I should give it a shot and see if it makes a difference. I am going to spend some time reading some posts on this board for tips on how to do this. Thanks again!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




Hi Rachel,

I was wondering if you ever had luck with the endoscope? What I learned from my own experience and from someone giving me advice beforehand was, make sure the doctors take enough samples of the intestine to test and to not be afraid to tell the doctor that.

:)Kirsten

Hi - I'm very confused and a bit frustrated. I had pretty much given up on getting help for chronic GI symptoms - have been told its IBS and for all intents and purposes to suck it up. I went to a new doctor (because I moved) for something unrelated, and she ran a bunch of blood tests since I was a new patient. To my shock she called me in to tell me my bloodwork was positive for Celiac. The full panel was run and all of the numbers were considerably high (one, IGg?, was 35). I finally had my endoscopy on Thursday and the doctor said he did not see signs of Celiac, although we will wait for the biopsy to come back. I am supposed to make an appointment for three weeks from now to discuss this with him. Three weeks feels like an eternity to wait for the results, but I realize that's just because I'm anxious. Any thoughts on whether the blood test is likely to be negative, or if the endoscopy is more likely to be incorrect? Thanks for any insight!

Rachel

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rachel,

I was wondering if you ever had luck with the endoscope? What I learned from my own experience and from someone giving me advice beforehand was, make sure the doctors take enough samples of the intestine to test and to not be afraid to tell the doctor that.

:)Kirsten

Welcome to the forum, Kirsten! Since you have replied to an old post, it's highly unlikely that Rachel will see your question since she hasn't been on the forum since Sept., 2009. Just so you now...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      107,339
    • Total Posts
      935,566
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      64,999
    • Most Online
      3,093

    Newest Member
    Con Smith
    Joined
  • Popular Now

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes you are correct. Interestingly my genes in the US are thought to be more associated with RA. Which is something they thought I had prediagnosis. In the Middle and far East they are more likely to be associated with celiac and they are rare genes in Caucasians which I am according to my parents known heritage. I always caution folks not to take the gene tests as absolute proof they can't have celiac because I had one child who had positive blood and biopsy, did well on the diet, then got genes tested in young adulthood and was told they could never be celiac. Of course that resulted in her abandoning the diet. I worry but hope someday doctors will realise we still have a lot to learn about the genetics of this disease. PS While I still have some deformity in my hands my joint pain resolved after a few months on the diet.
    • It seems like you really need a concrete or near concrete answer so I would say maybe you ought to get the gene testing. Then you can decide on the gluten challenge.   Thanks! I am convinced our dogs are there waiting for us. Meanwhile they are playing, running, laughing, barking & chasing. I have another favorite quote dealing with dogs: "If a dog will not come to you after having looked you in the face, you should go home & examine your conscience."  ~~~ Woodrow Wilson ~~~
    • I can't help thinking that all of this would be so much easier if the doctor I went to 10 years ago would have done testing for celiac, rather than tell me I probably should avoid gluten. He was looking to sell allergy shots and hormone treatment, he had nothing to gain from me being diagnosed celiac. I've been messing around ever since, sort-of-most-of the time being gluten free but never being strict about it. I really feel like three months of eating gluten would do my body a lot of permanent damage. I've got elevated liver enzymes for the third time since 2008 and no cause can be found which might be good, I guess. I wonder if it would be reasonable to do the HLA testing first, to decide if I really need to do the gluten challenge. If the biopsy is negative, that is. Squirmingitch, love your tag line about dogs in heaven. We lost the best dog ever last December. I sure hope all my dogs are there waiting for me!
    • Most (90%-95%) patients with celiac disease have 1 or 2 copies of HLA-DQ2 haplotype (see below), while the remainder have HLA-DQ8 haplotype. Rare exceptions to these associations have been occasionally seen. In 1 study of celiac disease, only 0.7% of patients with celiac disease lacked the HLA alleles mentioned above. Results are reported as permissive, nonpermissive, or equivocal gene pairs. From: http://www.mayomedicallaboratories.com/test-catalog/Clinical+and+Interpretive/88906  
    • This is not quite as cut & dried as it sounds. Although rare, there are diagnosed celiacs who do not have either of those genes. Ravenwoodglass, who posted above, is one of those people. I think she has double DQ9 genes? Am I right Raven?  My point is, that getting the gene testing is not an absolute determination either way.
  • Upcoming Events