• Ads by Google:
     




    Get email alerts Celiac.com E-Newsletter

    Ads by Google:



       Get email alertsCeliac.com E-Newsletter

  • Announcements

    • admin

      Frequently Asked Questions About Celiac Disease   09/30/2015

      This Celiac.com FAQ on celiac disease will guide you to all of the basic information you will need to know about the disease, its diagnosis, testing methods, a gluten-free diet, etc.   Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts What are the major symptoms of celiac disease? Celiac Disease Symptoms What testing is available for celiac disease? - list blood tests, endo with biopsy, genetic test and enterolab (not diagnostic) Celiac Disease Screening Interpretation of Celiac Disease Blood Test Results Can I be tested even though I am eating gluten free? How long must gluten be taken for the serological tests to be meaningful? The Gluten-Free Diet 101 - A Beginner's Guide to Going Gluten-Free Is celiac inherited? Should my children be tested? Ten Facts About Celiac Disease Genetic Testing Is there a link between celiac and other autoimmune diseases? Celiac Disease Research: Associated Diseases and Disorders Is there a list of gluten foods to avoid? Unsafe Gluten-Free Food List (Unsafe Ingredients) Is there a list of gluten free foods? Safe Gluten-Free Food List (Safe Ingredients) Gluten-Free Alcoholic Beverages Distilled Spirits (Grain Alcohols) and Vinegar: Are they Gluten-Free? Where does gluten hide? Additional Things to Beware of to Maintain a 100% Gluten-Free Diet Free recipes: Gluten-Free Recipes Where can I buy gluten-free stuff? Support this site by shopping at The Celiac.com Store.

Enterolab Test Results
0

33 posts in this topic

So, below are my results and I can happily say that I finally have an answer... Well, sort of. From the interpretation, it appears that I am producing anti-bodies so I should go on a strict gluten free diet. Also, my body has not received any damage from gluten and is still absorbing nutrients. Am I correct? Now I am curious if I should even bother going to my MD with these results and ask for additional tests for Celiac Disease. Should I even bother?

Additional notes: I have a suspected autoimmune condition called Vitiligo and I suffer from chronic constipation. I'm wondering if maybe I have a Fungal overgrowth and/or bacterial overgrowth of some type that may be causing an anti-body reaction (Candida, H.Pylori, etc...). Any type of digestive stress and/or dysfunction would logically cause me to have problems digesting a protein such as gluten. Anyone that would like to comment should because I would appreciate many perspectives :). Thanks!

Kenneth D. Fine, M.D.

Medical Director

10875 Plano Rd., Suite 123 Dallas, Texas 75238

Final Laboratory Report

Date: 6/16/2010

Name: Kline, Kameron

A) Gluten Sensitivity Stool and Gene Panel Complete *Best test/best value

Fecal Anti-gliadin IgA 19 Units (Normal Range is less than 10 Units)

Fecal Anti-tissue Transglutaminase IgA 7 Units (Normal Range is less than 10 Units)

Quantitative Microscopic Fecal Fat Score Less than 300 Units (Normal Range is less than 300 Units)

Fecal Anti-casein (cow

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:
Ads by Google:


Correct. Your Elab results indicate nonceliac (intestinal damage) gluten sensitivity. So you need to abstain from gluten to prevent further damage somewhere in your body. Gluten sensitivity reactions could cause your constipation. You also might have other undiagnosed allergies which cause constipation. Not everyone gets diarrhea from allergy reactions. My usual reaction is constipation.

Also consider getting a stool test for bacterial dysbiosis. You may have deficient good bacteria or even an overgrowth (infection) of bad (even pathogenic) bacteria, parasites or candida (fungus). Candida classically causes constipation. However, I initially reacted to 5 different bacteria and 2 different parasites (as well as candida) with constipation.

SUE

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you should ask for standard celiac bloodwork from your doctor if your insurance covers it before going off gluten. Enterolab is not a substitute for a proper celiac panel. You need to be sure you don't have anti-endomysial antibodies, or anti-tTG antibodies in your blood, which would indicate a clear need to go off gluten permanently.

Your serotype is DQ6 and DQ9. As your test results note, neither of those are really associated with celiac disease. That's actually really good news. Having only anti-gliadin IgA is not necessarily a clear-cut result either. Enterolab is the only place that recommends a permanent gluten-free diet based only on fecal anti-gliadin IgA, and it seems to be a very extreme stance that is not supported in the scientific literature. It would be more compelling if you had a celiac allele, because then the anti-gliadin IgA might be an early sign of autoimmune gluten reactivity in your intestine.

Here is a study showing that the anti-gliadin IgA by itself doesn't mean much.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16607144

By the way, you might find it interesting that your DQB1*0303 allele is linked to the gene for vitiligo in people of Chinese ancestry.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HLA-DQ9

Once you have a celiac panel done, the positive anti-gliadin IgA is a decent reason to at least try a gluten-free diet and see if it helps. Tests are not nearly as good as listening to your body.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say, don't bother. You wouldn't ask your doctor before going vegetarian, so why do it to go gluten-free?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your serotype is DQ6 and DQ9. As your test results note, neither of those are really associated with celiac disease. That's actually really good news.

As someone who is a double DQ9 I can say from personal experience that it can have devestating effects on the body and brain when combined with gluten. That gene is not to be taken lightly IMHO. If you read my signature the reason I say that is obvious.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:


As someone who is a double DQ9 I can say from personal experience that it can have devestating effects on the body and brain when combined with gluten. That gene is not to be taken lightly IMHO. If you read my signature the reason I say that is obvious.

I forgot about your DQ9! I wonder what the mechanism of DQ9 celiac is. The structural biology studies that are so compelling are on DQ2, and DQ8 is structurally similar enough that the pathway to celiac is fairly clear.

Hmmm... There is some real science I could possibly do there... You've just inspired me to do a little research.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I forgot about your DQ9! I wonder what the mechanism of DQ9 celiac is. The structural biology studies that are so compelling are on DQ2, and DQ8 is structurally similar enough that the pathway to celiac is fairly clear.

Hmmm... There is some real science I could possibly do there... You've just inspired me to do a little research.

Finding that our lead me to a lot of research also. It was how I found out it is linked to RA which was no surprise to me since my arthritis has been in remission now for many years. Since many RA patients are also diagnosed with IBS it makes me wonder how many are suffering needlessly and taking toxic meds like I was prescribed that they wouldn't need gluten free.

It also made me very angry because since my DD does not carry DQ2 or DQ8 she was told she could never be celiac and she is now back on gluten. She had been diagnosed by both positive blood test and biopsy but since she is an RN and my child I of course can't tell her anything. LOL I hope someday she realizes her need for the diet before as our GI told her after her diagnosis 'she ends up just like me' on the gluten diet.

I should note that most of the research I found was done in Europe, the Middle East and Asia since it is an uncommon gene, or thought to be, in the US caucasian population and found in rather technical medical journals. I unfortunately had a computer crash and lost all my saved links but hopefully you will be able to find some info.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bummer about the computer crash. I'm sure I can find what I need if I know there is some info out there. I mostly read biological and medical journals for information so "technical" is not a problem. (To me they are not technical. Scary, huh? :lol: )

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just pointing out that this was done in silico, which doesn't mean it's wrong, it just hasn't been tested biologically.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just pointing out that this was done in silico, which doesn't mean it's wrong, it just hasn't been tested biologically.

Pointing out to whom? It says so in the abstract. *looks confused*

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To people just reading the thread that don't look at the link.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DQ9 is common in Japan, and DQ2 uncommon.

Now DQ9 differs from DQ8 by just one base I think and therefore can present gliadin kinda like DQ2 or DQ8 can.

Even DQ7 is a celiac gene in Sicily, and there is research on that too, and how it does it structure-wise.

About gliadin, this is very important re. neuro issues with gluten, just google hadjivassiliou and you get explanation about the significance of antigliadin antibodies, AND DQ1 (DQ6 and DQ5 are DQ1, and DQ1 was the old name before they could discriminate between them)

Another thing to google regarding the significance of antigliadin, is Ford Gluten, you get to Dr. Fords website where he explains the significance of the antigliadin test.

You know gluten intolerance is NOT a gut issue, it is an immune issue, and has got a lot to do with the brain.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To people just reading the thread that don't look at the link.

Gotcha! B) I'll put a wee bit more detail in the thread next time. I was excited to find something that fast on DQ9. I haven't had time to chase down whether DQ9 got put into an in vivo system to validate those computational models. I don't think it's been crystallized like DQ2 and gliadin.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is one article that says DQ7 (beta 0301 and 0304) and DQ5 (beta 0501) have been found in celiacs:

http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/full/44/8/1755 note the conclusion is different from what we read out of the article......researchers probably are not allowed to publish they found other genes in celiacs.

another thread about non-typical genes and celiac

yes, I found the link to THE article about DQ9 in the above thread:

http://intimm.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/12/8/1157

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gotcha! B) I'll put a wee bit more detail in the thread next time.

:) Thanks. We're working on making this an excellent forum, not just a great one and links and explanations go a long way towards that.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is one article that says DQ7 (beta 0301 and 0304) and DQ5 (beta 0501) have been found in celiacs:

http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/full/44/8/1755 note the conclusion is different from what we read out of the article......researchers probably are not allowed to publish they found other genes in celiacs.

Allowed by whom? I get very upset when people say things like that because it impugns the integrity of scientific work. Studies are a lot of work, and getting journal articles through the peer review process is even more so. This comment reads as if there is some imaginary council of overlords controlling what scientists can and cannot publish. I assure you that this is not the case. Individual journal editorial boards absolutely have bias, but you can always eventually find a journal that will take a well designed study. With Pubmed indexing and the Internet, even low impact factor journals are useful.

I don't agree with you that their conclusion is different from the data. The researchers are testing the hypothesis that their rapid genetic test for DQA10501/DQB10201 (DQ2.5) can be used as a laboratory diagnostic marker to help find people who are celiac. Their conclusion shows that their hypothesis was correct, and that DQ2.5 has some predictive value. They don't rule out other alleles, and even present an association of DQ7 with celiac disease.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Skylark I hear you, but I speak for myself I am double DQ5 and they actually use the gene test for DQ2 and DQ8 to absolutely exclude a celiac diagnosis for the likes of me.

I even have DH, and my migraines stopped after stopping gluten, and I had to double thyroid hormones because of malabsorption, and then go back on the original thyroid hormone dose after the gut got more normal, and so on.

I am in Norway, where Sollid and Lundin have gotten a lot of gluten about how the DQ2 works re. celiac, so they do not want to hear anyting about other genes here. I was even tested at their lab.

I ahve been on thyrod forums for ages, and read the research, and it is all rigged to get the results they wanted in the first place. Example: they postulate that t3 is ineffective, so they give some subjects some t3 AFTER reducing the dose of the t4 so the TSH gets even higher, and the free t3 and the free t4 gets lower than before, and conclude it was ineffective. They did such things in several studies. Jorde in Norway did a similar thing, they screened the whole population in Tromso for undiagnosed male hypos then they gave them t4 in small doses and noone got a TSH lower than 2,5, and they did not improve, so t4 to subclinical hypos was ineffective. Go figure, they wer all grossly underdosed. TSH should go to 1 or lower before anythign happens, everyone knows that.

Again: they use the gene test to rule out celiac.

(my back hurts this morning and I am a bit cranky, this will pass)

Nora

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm so sorry to hear you had a bad experience getting your celiac diagnosed. I think a lot of us are angry around here, me included. I had diagnoses of food allergies, gastritis, borderline anemia, IBS, and depression, all of which resolved when I stopped eating gluten. No doctor I saw even suggested I be tested for celiac.

I looked at Sollid and Lundin's articles and they do seem to suffer from some tunnel vision about celiac alleles. I see why you wrote what you did. Please don't extend your very legitimate anger over bad experiences to all scientists. Some of us try really hard to stay objective (and even spend time on message boards trying to be helpful as we look for a little company and emotional support).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

skylark, I am not cranky today, and my back does not hurt, and I have been in the garden doing some gardening, and managed to get the flowers planted in the pots (urns) that are supposed to sit around the porch here. Nice.

Thank you for your answer.

What science do you do?

Lundin is the expert connected with the norwegian celiac society and he says wheat starch is okay for celiacs, but other doctors in Norway shudder at the thought of wheat starch.

I cannot eat most gluten-free items here, since most are based on wheat starch.

I guess DQ2 celiacs with mostly symptoms in the gut tolerate wheat starch, whereas we who have DH and DQ1 (which have gluten intolerance in the rest of the body, including the CNS) are very sensitive.

I have yet to test the new gluten-free wheatstarch that they have started to make in accordance to the new rules, it is below 20ppm. I will try it and post here some day.

I do find it interesting that there are two kinds of celiacs, those that tolerate some ppm gluten, and those that are very sensitive. There is little talk about that.

I also tolerate oats (gluten-free oats) and some percent of celiacs do not.

Nora

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do find it interesting that there are two kinds of celiacs, those that tolerate some ppm gluten, and those that are very sensitive. There is little talk about that.

I find that very interesting too. I'd love to hear what the experts have to say about it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nora, I'm not going to talk about exactly what science I do because I have spoken so openly about my bipolar illness here. It's very important to me to spread my story of gluten-related bipolar illness in case I might help someone else who is suffering the way I did. Bipolar illness carries a tremendous stigma and job interviewers regularly Google search people.

I have a Ph.D. and most of my work these days is computational. I am studying a protein that might be involved in Lupus, and another that is involved in cancer. I come here sometimes while my computer is chugging away. I did about ten years of laboratory biochemistry, and I've done some clinical trials statistics as well.

As for the gluten tolerance, there is a classic study on Codex wheat starch where they fed it to 17 celiacs for a year. Nobody in the study became positive for anti-gliadin IgG or IgA. Two had no symptoms at all, and four others had only mild symptoms with a little occasional diarrhea. The other eleven had fatigue, GI trouble, DH outbreaks and other discomfort. Only the two people without symptoms wanted to keep eating the stuff at the end of the study.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9183321

Maki did a recent study where he biopsied a random series of celiacs and DH patients, most of whom were eating Codex wheat starch products regularly. Only those celiacs who admitted to cheating with normal bread had villous damage. There were six in his group of 52 who didn't eat any wheat starch products and instead chose to follow a naturally gluten free diet. Nobody eating the Codex starch showed villous damage, which is good. In the conclusion he writes "However, we agree that there will always be some patients who require a naturally gluten free diet to remain symptom-free." In this cohort, that was 11% of the people.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10192194

So, even in the studies scientists see a range of sensitivity and it's not correlated to mucosal damage.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The old wheat starch many years ago had 200 or more ppm, so they did find some damage according to the canadian celiac society webpage.

I believe tehre is another study showing damage from wheat starch, I will have to mail someone privately to get that one.

me, I get DH and I throw up from wheat starch, but I do not try it often. Several people on the orwegian forum never got better, or their antibodies stayed high, while eating codex wheat starch. One person had to stop eating other grains and starches before the antibodies went down. (that is interesting, since there was a huge outcry about a newspaper reporter who wrote about something similar, that some have to stop corn too, on another forum and tey even wrote to the publisher to stop spreading nonsense, yet we had someone with a similar experience here)

So there are a very few patietns who must eat even stricter before their antibodies go down.

I must say 17 people is a small trial.

Interestng about the 11%, we had stipulated the percentage to be around that, like 15%.

Mäki is interesting, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%22M%C3%A4ki%20M%22[Author]

they have wheat starch in Finland as far as I know, and i found out they have that in Poland too.

I was there last week-end and got some DH from the rolls. There was very very little gluten in them, though otherwise my intestines would have felt like barb wire in them.

The celiacs here actually want the wheat starch.

nora

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As someone who is a double DQ9 I can say from personal experience that it can have devestating effects on the body and brain when combined with gluten. That gene is not to be taken lightly IMHO. If you read my signature the reason I say that is obvious.

This is very interesting. I am a researcher working on celiac disease in Norway. I have recently published a paper suggesting that DQ9 seems to predispose for celiac disease, based on studies from one single patient. Obviously investigation of more patients would be useful to confirm this association and how celiac disease manifests in this rare patient group.

Best regards,

Michael

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems this thread has gotten away a bit from the OP's question.

My advice, if you can, is get a celiac blood panel done while you are eating gluten. Expect it to be negative, but do it anyway.

Then, go gluten-free. Ipersonally feel no one is benefiting by eating it!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      106,421
    • Total Posts
      930,469
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      63,848
    • Most Online
      3,093

    Newest Member
    glutenfreekiddo
    Joined
  • Popular Now

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello Anonymous, and if nobody has said as much yet, welcome Don't worry (difficult to do when it can cause anxiety :P) it's very early days and you have a lot of healing to come.  If you've not already seen it there's advice and further info here:    It gets easier over time as checking becomes routine, you know your 'safe' products and your eating pattern changes. You'll get there  Maybe start a thread of your own if you'd like some input from others? Finally, back on topic. My Aunt has narcolepsy and although she's fiercely resistant to giving up gluten she has now made a connnection to eating bread and it's onset. As often, not conclusive but suggestive...
    • Hello again   Well first thing is the - Usual disclaimers apply... and this is something you have to follow up with your doctors as you know. But it's helpful sometimes to get another perspective so here's this layman see's from outside.  What I have seen from the various results posted here is that people's numbers vary wildly and, just as important, the numbers often don't bear any direct relationship to the level of intestinal damage revealed via endoscopy. Ultimately although you're not scoring much above positive, you are scoring a positive  and there are a couple of other risk factors you've mentioned that are suggestive if not conclusive - you have another autoimmune which raises the odds of having another one for example.  You've had two tests that are positive. The purpose of taking the second test was either to invalidate or confirm the first. I'd suggest it's achieved the latter, at least inasmuch as a GI may want to check you via endoscopy. That's still the 'gold standard' of celiac diagnosis and would give you an idea if there's any intestinal damage. I suspect with 2 positive tests and the history above that's what they'll suggest.  If your doctor or GI doesn't want to proceed with that you have a decision to make. Push for a second opinion or new doctor or if you're done with testing give the gluten free diet a proper try. Make a journal and see if some of those subtle things you reference may actually be symptoms. Fwiw, there are a lot of people here whose thyroid issues improved dramatically once they were gluten free, so whether celiac or gluten sensitive you should certainly give the diet a try. Only however once the testing is completed and remember: 
    • Hi! I've just been recently diagnosed as Celiac through the whole biopsy-shebang, and I have a little bit of insight on the whole diagnosis thing and how I was eventually diagnosed, and my advice for you. Brace yourself, this might be a bit long, but it might be worth the read and I promise I will eventually get to the point. If you don't want the huge story, skip to the long line of capital As: I first saw my doctor when I had a few problems swallowing. I've compared it to when you're nervous and you feel like you have a lump in your throat - but after I eat and (sometimes) drink. I just mentioned briefly it to my family doctor when I was addressing another issue, but right away he referred me to a gastroenterologist and ordered a barium swallow x-ray test. The x-ray came back completely normal, and so the g.e. then suspected GERD, put me on acid blockers to see if they would work, no harm done sort of thing. The only thing I got out of the acid blockers were the side effects, so it was back to square 1. The g.e. said that the next test he could do was an upper endoscopy with biopsies. (hint: the celiac test!) Wanting to find a solution to my problems, the endoscopy was scheduled. Pretty painless, I was in and out in a day, but the results took much much longer. Biopsies, or the little pieces of my esophagus, stomach, and small intestine, were sent to the lab, and they came back clean. I didn't really go back to the g.e. for a whole year after that because life became busy, I wasn't prompted to follow up, and I just dismissed the swallowing problems the best I could and went on my way. Now, I've never been huge on the gluten, big bread-y sandwiches or croissants or pies were never foods that I super "enjoyed". I wouldn't feel bad after eating them, I just didn't like the taste of bread so much, but I loved cookies, cake and a lot of other things that do have gluten in them. I lead a lowish gluten life but I wasn't really monitoring it that way. Everything changed when I got really nasty (systemic) poison ivy. My eyes were swollen shut, and the rash was everywhere. I almost went to the hospital, but cooped out at the family doctor's place and got a script for prednisone (a steroid). But, I found that after I had tapered off the steroids, I had magically become lactose intolerant. So back to the family doctor again probably because I broke my toe or something, but we also got to talk about this magical lactose intolerance business (because I love anything dairy and it was indeed devastating). He was surprised as there is literally no correlation between steroids and becoming lactose intolerant. He asked me if I still had the swallowing problems, which I did, and so it was back to the g.e. for round 3. because my family doctor "does not believe in coincidences". Meeting with the G.E., he mainly addressed the swallowing problems telling me that he had done what he could to diagnose with the technology that we had at the highly specialized hospital that we were at, and I would have to travel about 3 hours away to see a different doctor who would do some tests involving the muscles in the esophagus. But right before I was about to leave, we started talking about lactose intolerance. He brought up other foods that I was avoiding (if any), and then the conversation went to gluten. I mentioned that I had an aunt that was gluten-sensitive. He advised that I do the blood test that can show an indication of celiac whenever in the future. I decided to do it that day. At this point in time, I was not eating much gluten because of the fact that it was personal preference. The normal range for values in this test is from 0 to 20. A few weeks later, I learned that I scored a 35. A second upper endoscopy with biopsies was scheduled, but this time I was told to eat a moderate amount of gluten everyday before the procedure. I ate about two slices of bread per day, which is more than I normally would. I was normal for the first two-three weeks of the gluten plus diet, but then I became really sick. I started getting the normal celiac symptoms, like diarrhea and extreme tiredness. Near the end, I had debilitating stomach pain and I was 2 times more asleep than awake each day. I couldn't do the 2 pieces of bread a day some days, but the pain was still there. I knew that I wouldn't ever have to force myself to eat bread for a test ever again. I was called a few days before my endoscopy telling me that a kid in a worse state than me had to take the OR during my time. I forced myself to eat more bread for another month and a half. The day finally came. I was diagnosed celiac, which I have concluded to be initiated by (1) the steroids/poison ivy and (2) the gluten binge fest.  AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Celiac Disease isn't completely understood yet. Most of the time if you weren't showing symptoms when you were a baby (so your case) it means that celiac was/could be triggered by an event in your life that causes stress on the body (like stress, physical injury, etc.).  The positive result that you got from the blood test doesn't automatically mean celiac, but it could. Here's some options: Talk to your doctor (or a different doctor) or even a specialist gastroenterologist (you can get a referral from a family doctor (general physician)) and see if you can do the blood test again, you have to have some kind of gluten for this to work in advance, so if you don't want to break your gluten-free streak, than don't really invest in this option. If you feel comfortable, you could even ask to do this test under a few scenarios (no gluten (now) and after a gluten binge, compare results). If you do this test and your indication is low off gluten and then high after gluten, I'd probably skip the biopsy. That's a strong enough sign that you don't need to put yourself through the painful-gluten binge. Maybe this is what that first doctor just assumed. But having that test when you haven't had any gluten could make the difference - it acts as a control. Go straight to the biopsy. You could do this, but I'd probably do the blood test first. I went through a lot of stress with the gluten-binge that you have to do to get an accurate result, you would also be breaking your gluten-free diet that may/may not be helping you right now. Do nothing, stay on your gluten free diet hoping that it is helping you. But if you are not celiac or gluten-sensitive (celiac before it starts to wreck your small intestine), going gluten free isn't healthy - you can do some research on this if it interests you. If you feel bad/unhealthy after going gluten free it's probably a sign. Good luck, also know that you might come to a point of stress in your life that can start celiac's destructive path. Ultimately, it is your body, and you should not feel forced or hesitate to act on health issues that impact you.
    • I'm sorry that life is so hard right now. Really.  I can't imagine working 3 jobs and trying to manage this terrible illness.  I think about American society and their obsession with food often.  Whenever you look at the internet, there are all these fabulous gluten-free recipes, but when you don't have time or money to cook these things, a simple gluten-free lifestyle is just that - simple. There isn't a lot of variety, so it's kind of boring. But, I guess I have gotten used to being boring. I just eat corn chex and fruit or yogurt for breakfast. I eat a lot of eggs, beans, rice, corn tortillas, nuts, chicken, fruit and veggies.  A loaf of gluten-free bread will last me 4-6 months in the freezer.  I buy a bag of dried beans for $1.29, I soak them overnight, and put them in the crockpot the next day. I add different spices, sometimes chicken and Voila! - dinner is ready when I get home from a long day. Family gatherings are miserable and I haven't quite figured out the best way to deal yet. If my grandmother were still alive, I imagine she would be a lot like yours - well-meaning but not really able to understand the nitty-gritty.   I just reassure my family that I am fine and that they really shouldn't do anything special for me. I bring a bag of Hershey's kisses or other gluten-free candy I can nibble on along with my meal and then I try to treat myself to a nicer home cooked meal later in the week when I have time to cook - because who has time to cook during Christmas???? And, I agree with knitty knitty. If someone else in your family/friends were gluten-free for medical reasons, it would make socializing a bit easier. One of my husband's good friends is NCGS. When we get together as a group, we can make each other special dishes and it helps to feel less isolated.  Good luck!  
    • Hi!  Um, please forgive my quirky sense of humor..... Celiac Disease is genetic... All first degree relatives of people diagnosed with Celiac Disease should be tested for the disease, too.  Gall bladder problems are often associated with Celiac Disease.  Your diagnosis might save your whole family from further medical problems as they age and the disease progresses... You need to set a good example if relatives are similarly diagnosed.... and then everybody will have to eat gluten free at family gatherings....  
  • Upcoming Events