Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Where Your Contribution Counts!
    eNewsletter
    Support Us!

If Both Your Kids Have Celiac, Does That Mean A Parent Has It?


chisket

Recommended Posts

chisket Newbie

Hi there,

I posted about three weeks ago when my youngest daughter had a celiac panel show positive. Since then she has had a biopsy that reveals she indeed has celiac disease. I went on the gluten free diet with her last week because two years ago I was tentatively diagnosed with Dermatitis Herpetiformis from a skin biopsy, but then they dismissed it because both my blood test and stomach biopsy showed negative. My daughter's gastro suggested I revisit my diagnosis.

Last week I had my husband and oldest daughter screened via bloodtest. My husband's came back perfectly normal, but my daughter's test came back positive. Now they want her to do a gluten challenge for one month and then retest the blood work. If it comes back abnormal again, they want to do a biopsy to confirm celiac (which they suspect she has as well).

Here's my question (and sorry for the long-windedness): Should I go back on gluten and get retested in a month, or should I assume if both of my daughters have celiac and my husband does not, then I do?

I have been trying to find out the answer to this basic question, but can't find an answer anywhere. I see lots of responses to people who ask if they have it then do their kids have it? My question is if my two kids have it, then would a parent have it?

Thanks for your help.

Mary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GlutenFreeManna Rising Star

Hi there,

I posted about three weeks ago when my youngest daughter had a celiac panel show positive. Since then she has had a biopsy that reveals she indeed has celiac disease. I went on the gluten free diet with her last week because two years ago I was tentatively diagnosed with Dermatitis Herpetiformis from a skin biopsy, but then they dismissed it because both my blood test and stomach biopsy showed negative. My daughter's gastro suggested I revisit my diagnosis.

Last week I had my husband and oldest daughter screened via bloodtest. My husband's came back perfectly normal, but my daughter's test came back positive. Now they want her to do a gluten challenge for one month and then retest the blood work. If it comes back abnormal again, they want to do a biopsy to confirm celiac (which they suspect she has as well).

Here's my question (and sorry for the long-windedness): Should I go back on gluten and get retested in a month, or should I assume if both of my daughters have celiac and my husband does not, then I do?

I have been trying to find out the answer to this basic question, but can't find an answer anywhere. I see lots of responses to people who ask if they have it then do their kids have it? My question is if my two kids have it, then would a parent have it?

Thanks for your help.

Mary

If you have DH then you have celiac. It does not matter what the other tests said. I also don't understand why your doctor would want MORE testing after your daughter got a positive test. The blood tests are very, very very rarely false positive. It just does not happen. People get a lot more false negatives (which means your husband is not completely ruled out just because he had a negative). A good dr would either diagnose her based on the positve blood work and response to the diet or do the endo with/biopsy right away (and she would still be diagnosed if the biopsy was negative). It makes no sense to torture her with a high gluten diet for a month for a re-test of the blood work. IMO, you should get a new dr and consider yourself to be diagnosed based on having DH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chisket Newbie

Thanks for your response. Actually, our primary care first called to tell me that my oldest (who is asymptomatic) had it because her TT number came in just over normal and since my other daughter had full blown celiac, he concluded so did she. Then he called me back to say that after conferring with the pediatric gastro doc, they want to make sure of that by doing a challenge (which doesn't cause her discomfort), they can confirm with confidence it's celiac and not an anomoly. Since my initial diagnosis was later changed because of lack of blood/internal biopsy evidence (only punch biopsy at the rash site), I wondered if I needed something more conclusive as well.

It sounds like you're saying that I needn't bother with additional tests and should assume we're all celiac, correct?

I'm also very curious to know if there's research out there that suggests if you have two kids with celiac, then they must have received it from their parent. (In other words, their parent ALSO has celiac.) Is this true, or just coincidence?

Thanks again. M

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rosetapper23 Explorer

Yes...what GlutenFreeManna said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GlutenFreeManna Rising Star

Thanks for your response. Actually, our primary care first called to tell me that my oldest (who is asymptomatic) had it because her TT number came in just over normal and since my other daughter had full blown celiac, he concluded so did she. Then he called me back to say that after conferring with the pediatric gastro doc, they want to make sure of that by doing a challenge (which doesn't cause her discomfort), they can confirm with confidence it's celiac and not an anomoly. Since my initial diagnosis was later changed because of lack of blood/internal biopsy evidence (only punch biopsy at the rash site), I wondered if I needed something more conclusive as well.

It sounds like you're saying that I needn't bother with additional tests and should assume we're all celiac, correct?

I'm also very curious to know if there's research out there that suggests if you have two kids with celiac, then they must have received it from their parent. (In other words, their parent ALSO has celiac.) Is this true, or just coincidence?

Thanks again. M

Celiac disease is genetic if that is what you are asking, so yes. Your daughters got this from somewhere. It could have come from you or it could have come from both sides of the family. It is most common in people of Northern European descent (especially Irish/Scottish/English) although they are finding more and more that any ethnicity can have it. It's also possible your parents or grandparents had it but back then they did not have the testing and knowledge they have today.

As far as you daughter is concerned, I can understand why you would want to do all the additional testing to be sure. If she doesn't have symptoms then it won't be so bad, however if she ends up having a negative biopsy, just remmember that that does not mean she doesn't have it. Make sure the doctor takes 8-10 biopsies from different areas of her intestines, not just one or two. It's impossible to tell whether the villi is damaged during the endoscopy so the dr will just be guessing about where to biopsy. The endscopy also will not be able to physically reach every part of her intestines. That's why it's possible to miss the damage (if any) during endoscopy. Also she could just be in the early stages with positive bloodwork and not have any villi damage yet. So negative endoscopy does not mean no celiac. The positve blood test and response to diet should trump that. I know you said she has no symptoms, but she will still have a response to diet in that her blood antibodies will decrease when she is retested after being gluten-free. Like I said before, a good doctor will know this and diagnose based on the positive bloodwork and subsequently negative bloodwork once she has been gluten-free for several months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Takala Enthusiast

You need to emphasize to whatever doctor you end up with that you had a positive biopsy for the DH, which IS the way celiac is diagnosed externally. Be sure to get a written copy of that test result. It's just a huge pain in the ***, when doctors attempt to go on "fishing expeditions" when they ignore symptoms and test results.

If a blood relative child has celiac it is because it inherited the genes predisposing one towards it from at least one parent. About 30% of the population carries the genes, but there needs to be some sort of trigger event and environmental impact (say, you're stressed, you ate a lot of gluten, your intestinal flora were damaged by antibiotics, you took a lot of aspirin, you were exposed to some toxins, then you got a bad infection) on the person to start the process up, and then roughly 1% of the general population gets it. However, most people with celiac are not diagnosed. Most don't get diagnosed until there is so much damage that the symptoms are causing major problems and/or other associated diseases.

If you are a parent with a diagnosed child, that means you're a first degree relative with a higher probability of being a gene carrier and that means a higher probability of developing it, but it doesn't mean "for sure" you have it. However, that, AND a positive biopsy for DH.... hello ! B)

Now, about the husband... he's not completely off the hook. You can develop celiac at any age, and some people go through most of their adult lives without knowing that they have it. But he also could just be a "donation" to the gene makeup, because more women than men develop auto immune diseases.

DQ2 Open Original Shared Link

DQ8 Open Original Shared Link (I like this link better as it talks about the different ethnic groups and the % of carriers, and as the joke goes, Irish - Native American - Northern European = "Golden Cross for Auto Immune Diseases" :rolleyes: )

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Darn210 Enthusiast

If you had a positive DH biopsy done, then that is conclusive for Celiac regardless of the blood test and intestinal biopsy.

That being said, having children with Celiac does not mean that a parent has Celiac. It does mean that one or both parents carry a Celiac gene which they have passed down to their children. Many people, about a third of the population (at least in the US), carry one or both of the currently accepted Celiac genes. It makes them more susceptible but does not mean that they have it or will develop it.

I also have to mention that there is still work to be done in identifying the genetic components. There are some people that develop Celiac that don't have DQ2 or DQ8.

ETA: Dang, I'm a slow typer. Takala's post wasn't there when I started this ... ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lovegrov Collaborator

I'm pretty sure that a skin biopsy that's positive for DH means you have DH. My derm never even bothered with anything other than a diagnosis by sight -- not even a skin biopsy.

richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chisket Newbie

Thanks to all of you for your responses. I guess I'm the lucky winner of celiac. I appreciate your time and wisdom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kareng Grand Master

Thanks to all of you for your responses. I guess I'm the lucky winner of celiac. I appreciate your time and wisdom.

Congratulations! Welcome to the club!

:ph34r: Too bad it doesn't come with the Prize Patrol & a big check!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
maximoo Enthusiast

Yeah we need the big chk to afford all this gluten-free food!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Help Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - cristiana replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      16

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    2. - Julie Riordan replied to Julie Riordan's topic in Traveling with Celiac Disease
      3

      Any ideas for travelling

    3. - Nedast replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      16

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - trents replied to SuzanneL's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Weak Positive Test

    5. - SuzanneL posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Weak Positive Test


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      120,495
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Zofosho
    Newest Member
    Zofosho
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Thank you for your post, @Nedast, and welcome to the forum. There have been many posts on this subject on the forum, it is interesting to read of your experiences. Although I've not had TMJ, except from time to time have had a bit of mild tension in my jaw, I have had issues with my trigeminal nerve.  I read that sometimes a damaged nerve in coeliacs can heal after adopting a gluten free diet.  I try to keep out of cold winds or wear a scarf over my face when it is cold and windy, those conditions tend to be my 'trigger' but I do think that staying clear of gluten has helped.   Thank you again for your input.
    • Julie Riordan
      I am going to France in two weeks and then to Portugal in May   Thanks for your reply 
    • Nedast
      I made an account just to reply to this topic. My story resembles yours in so many ways that it is truly amazing. I also suddenly became lactose intolerant, went a little under 10 years attributing all my symtoms to different body parts, never thinking it was something systemic until much later. I had the same mental problems - anxiety, depression, fatigue, etc. In fact, the only real difference in our story is that I was never formally diagnosed. When I discovered that my myriad symtoms, that had been continuous and worsening for years, all rapidly subsided upon cessation of consuming gluten, I immediately took it upon myself to cut gluten out of my diet completely. I live in America, and had lost my health insurance within the year prior to my discovery, so I could not get tested, and I will never willingly or knowingly consume gluten again, which I would have to do in order to get tested now that I have insurance again. But that is not the point of this reply. I also had extreme TMJ pain that began within months of getting my wisdom teeth out at - you guessed it - 17 years old. I was in and out of doctors for my various symptoms for about 5 years before I gave up, but during that time I had also kept getting reffered to different kinds of doctors that had their own, different solutions to my TMJ issue, an issue which I only recently discovered was related to my other symptoms. I began with physical therapy, and the physical therapist eventually broke down at me after many months, raising her voice at me and saying that there was nothing she could do for me. After that saga, I saw a plastic surgeon at the request of my GP, who he knew personally. This palstic surgeon began using botox injections to stop my spasming jaw muscles, and he managed to get it covered by my insurace in 2011, which was harder to do back then. This helped the pain tremendously, but did not solve the underlying problem, and I had to get repeat injections every three months. After a couple of years, this began to lose effectiveness, and I needed treatments more often than my insurance would cover. The surgeon did a scan on the joint and saw slight damage to the tissues. He then got approved by insurance to do a small surgery on the massseter (jaw) muscle - making an incision, and then splicing tissue into the muscle to stop the spasming. It worked amazingly, but about three months later it had stopped working. I was on the verge of seeing the top oral surgeon in our city, but instead of operating on me, he referred me to a unique group of dentists who focus on the TMJ and its biomechanical relationship to teeth occlusion (i.e. how the teeth fit together). This is what your dentist did, and what he did to you was boderline if not outright malpractice. There is a dental field that specializes in doing this kind of dental work, and it takes many years of extra schooling (and a lot of money invested into education) to be able to modify teeth occusion in this manner. Just based on the way you describe your dentist doing this, I can tell he was not qualified to do this to you. Dentists who are qualified and engage in this practice take many measurments of your head, mouth, teeth, etc., they take laboratory molds of your teeth, and they then make a complete, life-size model of your skull and teeth to help them guide their work on you. They then have a lab construct, and give you what is called a "bite splint." It looks and feels like a retainer, but its function is entirely different. This is essentially a literal splint for the TMJ that situates on the teeth. The splint is progressively modified once or twice per week, over several months, in order to slowly move the joint to its correct position. The muscles spasm less, stress is taken off the joint, as the joint slowly moves back into its proper position. The pain reduces each month, each week, sometimes even each day you go in for a visit. The joint has to be moved in this manner with the splint BEFORE the modification to the teeth begins. They then add to your tooth structure with small bits of composite, to keep the joint in its proper place after it has been sucessfully repositioned. Subtracting from your teeth, by grinding down bits of your natural tooth structure, is done very conservatively, if they have to do it at all. This process worked for me - after six months, my face, jaw, neck all felt normal, and I had no more pain - a feeling I had not had in a long time. It also made my face look better. I had not realized the true extent that the spasming muscles and the joint derangement had effected the shape of my face. The pain began to return after a few months, but nowhere near where it had been before. This immense reduction in pain lasted for a little over two years. The treatment still ultimately failed, but it is not their fault, and it is still the treatment that has given me the most relief to this day. Later on, I even went about three years with very, very good pain reduction, before the joint severely destabilized again. This field of dentistry is the last line treatment for TMJ issues before oral surgery on the TMJ. There aren't as many denists around who practice this anymore, and the practice is currently shrinking due to dentists opting for less espensive, additional educations in things like professional whitening, which have a broader marketability. Getting this treatment is also very expensive if not covered by insurance (in America at least). My first time was covered by insurance, second time was not, though the dentist took pity on me due to the nature of my case and charged like a quarter of usual pricing. Most cases seen by these dentists are complete successes, and the patient never has to come back again. But occasionally they get a case that is not a success, and I was one of those cases. A little over a year ago, I began seeing the second dentist who keeps my TMJ stable in this manner. The first dentist retired, and then died sadly. A shame too, because he was a truly amazing, knowledgable guy who really wanted to help people. The new dentist began to get suspicious when my joint failed to stay stable after I was finished with the bite splint and his modifications, so he did another scan on me. This is ten years after the first scan (remember, I said the surgeon saw "slight" damage to the tissue on the first scan). This new scan revealed that I now no longer have cartilage in the joint, on both sides - complete degeneration of the soft tissues and some damage to the bone. The dentist sat me down and had a talk with me after these results came in, and said that when he sees damage like this in cases like mine, that the damage to the joint is most likely autoimmune, and that, in his experinece, it is usually autoimmune. He has sent patients with cases like mine to Mayo Clinic. He said he will continue to see me as long as the treatment continues to offer me relief, but also said that I will probably have to see a dentist for this type of treatment for the rest of my life. He is not currently recommending surgery due to my young age and the fact that the treatment he provides manages my symptoms pretty well. I still see this dentist today, and probably will see this kind of dental specialist for the rest of my life, since they have helped with this issue the most. I did not inform him that I am 100% sure that I have celiac disease (due to my complete symptom remission upon gluten cessation). I didn't inform him because I thought it would be inappropriate due to not having a formal diagnosis. I was disappointed, because I had believed I had caught it BEFORE it had done permanent damage to my body. I had never suspected that my TMJ issues may be related to my other symptoms, and that the damage would end up complete and permanent. Luckily, I caught it about 6 months after my other joints started hurting, and they stopped hurting right after I went gluten free, and haven't hurt since. I of course did the necessary research after the results of the second scan, and found out that the TMJ is the most commonly involved joint in autoimmune disease of the intestines, and if mutliple joints are effected, it is usually the first one effected. This makes complete sense, since the TMJ is the most closely related joint to the intestines, and literally controls the opening that allows food passage into your intestines. I am here to tell you, that if anyone says there is no potential relationship between TMJ issues and celiac disease, they are absolutely wrong. Just google TMJ and Celiac disease, and read the scientific articles you find. Research on issues regarding the TMJ is relatively sparse, but you will find the association you're looking for validated.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @SuzanneL! Which tTG was that? tTG-IGA? tTG-IGG? Were there other celiac antibody tests run from that blood draw? Was total IGA measured? By some chance were you already cutting back on gluten by the time the blood draw was taken or just not eating much? For the celiac antibody tests to be accurate a person needs to be eating about 10g of gluten daily which is about 4-6 pieces of bread.
    • SuzanneL
      I've recently received a weak positive tTG, 6. For about six years, I've been sick almost everyday. I was told it was just my IBS. I have constant nausea. Sometimes after I eat, I have sharp, upper pain in my abdomen. I sometimes feel or vomit (bile) after eating. The doctor wanted me to try a stronger anti acid before doing an endoscopy. I'm just curious if these symptoms are pointing towards Celiac Disease? 
×
×
  • Create New...