• Ads by Google:
     




    Get email alerts Celiac.com E-Newsletter

    Ads by Google:



       Get email alertsCeliac.com E-Newsletter

  • Announcements

    • admin

      Frequently Asked Questions About Celiac Disease   09/30/2015

      This Celiac.com FAQ on celiac disease will guide you to all of the basic information you will need to know about the disease, its diagnosis, testing methods, a gluten-free diet, etc.   Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts What are the major symptoms of celiac disease? Celiac Disease Symptoms What testing is available for celiac disease? - list blood tests, endo with biopsy, genetic test and enterolab (not diagnostic) Celiac Disease Screening Interpretation of Celiac Disease Blood Test Results Can I be tested even though I am eating gluten free? How long must gluten be taken for the serological tests to be meaningful? The Gluten-Free Diet 101 - A Beginner's Guide to Going Gluten-Free Is celiac inherited? Should my children be tested? Ten Facts About Celiac Disease Genetic Testing Is there a link between celiac and other autoimmune diseases? Celiac Disease Research: Associated Diseases and Disorders Is there a list of gluten foods to avoid? Unsafe Gluten-Free Food List (Unsafe Ingredients) Is there a list of gluten free foods? Safe Gluten-Free Food List (Safe Ingredients) Gluten-Free Alcoholic Beverages Distilled Spirits (Grain Alcohols) and Vinegar: Are they Gluten-Free? Where does gluten hide? Additional Things to Beware of to Maintain a 100% Gluten-Free Diet Free recipes: Gluten-Free Recipes Where can I buy gluten-free stuff? Support this site by shopping at The Celiac.com Store.

Can You Eat Gluten-Free Oats?
0

   52 members have voted

  1. 1. Can you eat certified gluten-free oats?

    • Yes
      21
    • No
      15
    • I'm not sure. I might have reacted.
      6
    • I haven't tried them.
      10

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

55 posts in this topic

With the 2007 FDA Gluten-free proposal open for comments, I got curious about how many of us can eat oats. This isn't a scientific survey, but I thought other people on the board might be curious as well. Please don't answer if you've only tried Quaker, McCann's or any other mass market brand because they are known to be CC with wheat. I'm curious if you can eat certified gluten-free oats like Bob's.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:
Ads by Google:


I picked I might have reacted. I was eating Bob's for awhile and kept getting stomach aches so eliminated oats. Recently I was tempted by the Udi's granola and have been eating it for over two weeks without issue! So basically either just the Bob's didn't agree, the stomach aches were random or caused by something else (very likely), or I wasn't healed enough and still sensitive.

Funny thing is I never really liked oatmeal and lately I've been craving cinammon raisin oatmeal like crazy!!! The Quaker kind I used to get as a kid. I may breakdown and buy the Glutenfreeda flavored instant packs!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I selected Might have reacted .

The last time I tried them was last fall. I had so many other issues (soy ,nightshades,eggs,gallbladder ect..)going on at that time I am just not sure.

I am considering trying them again when the weather turns colder ,,apple and cinnamon sound yummy :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As I mentioned on another thread I was told not to have even certified gluten-free oats for two years post my celiac diagnosis (must give my gut time to heal - not a gluten issue). Still unsure of that one. Anyway, previously I had been having oats regularly without any problems whatsoever. But then I have never had any obvious reactions even from gluten so how can I even tell??!!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was also told to eliminate all oats, including gluten-free for six months. I haven't been on the gluten-free diet for that long yet. But I'll be free to start them just in time for apple cobbler!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:


I haven't tried any yet. But I'm so sensitive that I'm very scared to try! I'm two years past diagnosis, so I'm 'technically' allowed to try, but I can't afford the reaction if I do react (in grad school, not the best time to be hit by brain fog...!).

-Daisy

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are none available in Australia. Our health people are of the belief that even if America believes there are oats that are 99% gluten free it's not good enough to be available on our strict market. They may be labelled as low gluten (although we still don't have any) but not gluten free unless there's no trace of gluten at all.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was told to wait 6 months before trying them. By then I was pregnant and I didn't want to chance a reaction so I waied until after I had the baby. I tried them about a year after going gluten-free without any trouble. I've been enjoying them since on a regular basis. I had a biopsy done a month ago to verify my damage was healed and I had a 100% normal biopsy so I can safely say the gluten-free oats are not causing me any sort of reaction at all.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the answers. Keep 'em coming! I totally understand people's reluctance to try. It took me two years to get up the courage. :lol:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does oat intolerance have something to do with the DQ8 Coeliac gene? According to the Coeliac Vaccine being developed for DQ2 patients, it applies to the three peptides (1 (in wheat), 2 (in rye) and 3 (in barley))... :unsure:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried them accidentally in a chip that was not marked as having them, and I reacted. I was surprised. I haven't deliberately eaten them for .... I dunno, maybe 7 or 8 years ? I buy the certified gluten free ones for my husband, because he eats gluten free at home. I haven't really been that curious to re- test them on myself.

Re the proposed gluten free rule label FDA proposal-

It's like soy, or tapioca, or other common things that other people react to, when you hear about enough instances, you think, hmmm, maybe having the stuff labeled as to content is a good idea.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I keep saying that I am going to try them, but I'm too chicken to actually do it. Before I went gluten free I loved oatmeal though so hopefully I wouldn't react to them (fingers crossed for whenever I get up the nerve to try them).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At first oats bothered me, even Bob's Red Mill. About 6 months into being gluten-free, I was able to add them back on. I mostly use them to make treats (Cookies). I make the no-bake type with the peanut butter, added nuts, coconut, etc. Quite good. Kids love them and it slows the absorption of all the sugars because of the proteins & oats.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are none available in Australia. Our health people are of the belief that even if America believes there are oats that are 99% gluten free it's not good enough to be available on our strict market. They may be labelled as low gluten (although we still don't have any) but not gluten free unless there's no trace of gluten at all.

I find that very compelling and telling.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I wrote Bob's about their oats, here is what they sent.

"Thank you for your inquiry. Our R5 ELISA Test allows for up to 20 parts per million, however, the majority of our products, including our oats, test below 5. Because the marker below five doesn’t specify where exactly any given batch falls, we simply consider it a trace amount (which is basically what 20 parts per million is, anyway). I must say, however, that even though our products generally test below 5, there is always a chance that they will test higher in different batches and we only guarantee that our Gluten Free Products test below 20 ppm."

They say below 5 doesn't specify how much gluten becasue 5 ppm is below the sensitivity of the R5 ELISA. In other words, most of their oats would be legal even under Australian standards.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does oat intolerance have something to do with the DQ8 Coeliac gene? According to the Coeliac Vaccine being developed for DQ2 patients, it applies to the three peptides (1 (in wheat), 2 (in rye) and 3 (in barley))... :unsure:

Nope. I put the DQ2/oat research in your other thread.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dutifully bought a bag of Bob's Red Mill Certified Gluten Free Oats.

That was 10 months ago.

They still sit on the shelf waiting for me to work up the courage to try them.

But it's kinda like planning a vacation only in reverse...

I have to plan for whole sick week to be able to try them.

They may stay there for a number of years but at least I have them.

One check off the gluten free bucket list!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well here is the thing with me. I can not eat certified gluten free oats at all! I reacted horribly to BRM. I also discovered that I can not eat any product that may have gluten free oat contamination in them. So that means all BRM products and anything else that may contain traces of them are out. I don't believe in my case that it is a matter of those oats containing traces of gluten. I truely believe that I have an avenin sensitivity (the protein in oats) and it causes me the same if not worse symptoms as gluten. The tests that test for gluten do not test for avenin so you have to go with your gut instinct. (I know bad pun :P:lol:) I'm convinced that this was the cause of my symptoms that lasted 8 months last year and caused me to develope a peptic ulcer. Luckily I figured it out and I'm all better now and avoided having to take steroids.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are none available in Australia. Our health people are of the belief that even if America believes there are oats that are 99% gluten free it's not good enough to be available on our strict market. They may be labelled as low gluten (although we still don't have any) but not gluten free unless there's no trace of gluten at all.

Just to clear things up a little bit. In Australia, it is ILLEGAL to label anything as "GLUTEN FREE" unless the following conditions are met:

NO Detectable Gluten (i.e. currently <3ppm detectable gluten)

NO Oats

NO Malted Cereals that contain Gluten (i.e. Wheat, Rye, Barley, Oats, Spelt, Triticale).

It is ILLEGAL to label anything in Australia as "LOW GLUTEN" unless the following conditions are met:

NO more than 200ppm Gluten

NO Oats

NO Malted Cereals that contain Gluten (i.e. Wheat, Rye, Barley, Oats, Spelt, Triticale).

Manufacturers may claim that their foods contain gluten, are high in gluten, or are a source of gluten.

All other claims in relation to gluten content of food are illegal (some examples of this include "gluten friendly", "gluten-less", "not gluten free", etc.)

Oats can be labelled as wheat free and if this is the case, they are most likely pure. Many Australian oats are pure and many bare the "wheat free" label. Freedom Foods and a couple of other companies sell them in the health food aisle of Woolworths and Coles supermarkets.

Thought I'd clear up the LAW for you all. :rolleyes:

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clear things up a little bit. In Australia, it is ILLEGAL to label anything as "GLUTEN FREE" unless the following conditions are met:

NO Detectable Gluten (i.e. currently <3ppm detectable gluten)

NO Oats

NO Malted Cereals that contain Gluten (i.e. Wheat, Rye, Barley, Oats, Spelt, Triticale).

It is ILLEGAL to label anything in Australia as "LOW GLUTEN" unless the following conditions are met:

NO more than 200ppm Gluten

NO Oats

NO Malted Cereals that contain Gluten (i.e. Wheat, Rye, Barley, Oats, Spelt, Triticale).

Manufacturers may claim that their foods contain gluten, are high in gluten, or are a source of gluten.

All other claims in relation to gluten content of food are illegal (some examples of this include "gluten friendly", "gluten-less", "not gluten free", etc.)

Oats can be labelled as wheat free and if this is the case, they are most likely pure. Many Australian oats are pure and many bare the "wheat free" label. Freedom Foods and a couple of other companies sell them in the health food aisle of Woolworths and Coles supermarkets.

Thought I'd clear up the LAW for you all. :rolleyes:

That is absolutely wonderful. I cannot wait until Canada's labeling laws change next summer! They are pretty darned vague at the moment. Some companies are better than others, of course, but we need it to be standardized! No gluten at >3 ppm is certainly better than 10-20 ppm. They obviously know what they are talking about there. :)

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've tried the gluten free oats. I know they were not Bob's (hate Bob's anything) and they were not Quacker's. I'd have to go to the store to see the brand name. They were about $8 for a little package. The oats bother me just like it had gluten. No to oats here.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I admit I'm afraid to try them. I was getting sick from steel-cut oats months before I found out I had a problem with wheat. I couldn't figure out why something so "healthy" was making me spend the rest of the day in the bathroom.

I realize the certified gluten-free oats should be okay but I can't bring myself to take a chance on them.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I react. Not as badly, but I tried them several times thinking it might be something else. This was post-normal bloodwork, after 6 months.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm so new to gluten-free that I'm afraid to try oats of any kind! :blink:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought I'd clear up the LAW for you all. :rolleyes:

Thanks, Kelly!

It's nice that no oats can ever be labeled gluten-free, but a wheat-free label is allowed. I wish the proposed US laws were as sophisticated as you have in Australia.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      106,784
    • Total Posts
      932,407
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      64,262
    • Most Online
      3,093

    Newest Member
    plimpyanp
    Joined
  • Popular Now

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello and welcome I'd just echo CyclingLady - do you need to put yourself through this? There are lots of good reasons for pursuing a diagnosis but amongst the strongest are helping you to 'keep honest' on the diet or ensuring that your not denying yourselves a lot of foods for good reason. Neither of these apply to you and so I'd have to ask what you have to gain by putting yourself through it?  Oh and: Me too, but every so often I fall of the wagon into a gluten free cheesecake or similar Best of luck!
    • My own bugbear is that in dismissing the fad diet journalists will typically reference Celiac but will often say that only Celiac patients should be following the gluten free diet. Whatever the consensus medical opinion of NCGS, it's a fact that there are many people who are not diagnosed Celiac but who have been advised by their doctors to follow a gluten free diet. That distinction is typically too subtle for such articles and they therefore help to support the idea amongst the wider populace that if you're not celiac you can eat gluten and if you're avoiding it your either deluded, a chronic attention seeker or jumping on a bandwagon. A reductive and potentially harmful generalisation. 
    • Hello,  Celiac Disease and alcohol consumption cause malabsorption that can lead to vitamin deficiencies. Nutrition has a part to play in connective tissue disorders like arthritis, Sjorgren's, Ehlers-Danlos, and polychondritis.  Here's an article about EDS and nutritional therapy. http://www.chronicpainpartners.com/nutritional-therapeutic-strategy-for-ehlers-danlos-syndrome/  Vitamin D is really important in controlling inflammation.   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23830380 You might consider checking for vitamin deficiencies at your next doctor's appointment.   You might want to look into a low histamine diet and mast cell activation syndrome.  I found going on the Autoimmune Immune Paleo diet, a low histamine diet, and a low sulfite diet simultaneously helpful.   The low histamine diet doesn't allow anything fermented. If your reaction to the fermented cabbage is "ugh," it's your body telling you not to eat it.   Cabbage, fish oil, and wine are high in Sulfites.  Metformin is a sulfa drug.  Your body might be inflamed because of a Sulfites hypersensitivity that may occur with Celiac Disease.   These are things I found helpful.  It took several months to figure out what works for me.  I'm doing much better now.  Like CyclingLady, I "eat to my meter" and don't take medication.  I hope this helps us on our journey to wellness.
    • Well first things first, I always read your posts with interest, you have gone the extra mile for answers, put the intellectual work in and crucially kept a rational and grounded perspective throughout and if anyone deserves them you do.  Sadly of course I don't have any,  so I'll simply send my sincere best wishes across the Atlantic.  I really do hope you find your answer.  On this: I tested negative for celiac and my endoscopy didn't show villi blunting. I do however definitely react to gluten in all sorts of ways. So I'm in the nebulous NCGS group, a condition that most of the world seems uncertain even exists or if so questions its relation to gluten.  I wanted certainty and answers and I never really got them. I've come to accept that it's an imperfect world and this is still in medical terms an imperfectly understood area. I've had to park the question of whether I had celiac but it wasn't picked up (there were some flaws in the diagnostic process) or early onset celiac or NCGS or its really fodmaps and I'm working on a false correlation or it's NCIS, no, CSI New York, etc etc. In the end I was exhausted, sick of feeling ill and had proved to my own satisfaction that gluten was a problem and I decided to leave it at that. It's not ideal by any means, but, hey, whaddya gonna do?  There are things I know about my own condition that I can't necessarily demonstrate or have validated by a test. It is, by definition, anecdotal at best, but I'll offer it in any case. One of them would be the recovery on the gluten free diet. This was very much a matter of time. I did have some very quick responses, within a few days for instance for an improvement in brain fog, anxiety etc. Some of the weirder neuro symptoms seemed to take much longer and although the endoscopy was negative for villi damage I can't help thinking that malabsorbtion may be an explanation for the time some of these longer term issues took to resolve.  Weirdly some of those neuro symptoms, say the muscle twinges, that took a long time to resolve now seem to trigger occasionally I think in response to minute cross contamination issues. I have no idea what this means, maybe they require the least amount of gluten present to present so they were amongst the last to stop? I know just a few days ago I was noticing an errant muscle repeatedly twitching and I started thinking about the bbq I'd just risked using... None of which of course proves anything or gets you further down the road. I do think however that this: is a good idea and I'd encourage you to push that limit back from the end of summer to a date at least 6 months and perhaps longer away (I'm thinking 12). The gluten free diet is a pain in the arse but it's healthy (or it is if you make it so) and aside from a slight increase in expense it's increasingly straightforward to follow. Go gluten free, apply just the same rigour in pursuing the diet that you have in looking for answers. Do the food journal. Do the whole foods for 3 months, cross contamination procedure with pans, check toothpaste etc.  In short, proceed as if you'd had a positive celiac diagnosis and try to eliminate all doubts. For X many months, live as if gluten free isn't a choice, but a necessity.  It makes it easier believe it or not. Give the diet sufficient time and you will be running perhaps your last test by yourself, for me that was the most significant test of all.  Oh and on this: I learnt, at great personal cost in terms of the sheer misery I went through that my view of health professionals was juvenile and unhelpful. The unquestioning belief that as children we invest in doctors, nurses etc can translate into an over investment of trust to a level which would not be the case in any other comparable scenario. You go to them at your weakest moments, in search of validation, comfort, solutions etc. and if you have a bad experience the first impulse is to blame yourself or question your own experience. Well I'm way past that now. Just like any other walk of life there are good, bad and lot's of indifferent people working within. I've had some great experiences but I've also had some awful ones and indeed just a few days ago I had one so bad that for the first time in my life, I lodged a complaint. Please understand as a British person this is very unusual indeed  It was a horrendous meeting and I was treated in such an appalling way that if I related it here you may not believe me. A couple of years ago it would've destroyed me. Now I just shrugged it off, then realised that if I allowed that behaviour to pass unquestioned I'd be doing a disservice to the next person who had to suffer that kind of treatment. You've shown on here your an intelligent person with a fully justified and admirable engagement in looking for answers. If your doctors aren't picking up on that the fault lies with them. tldr **** them. Best wishes from the sunny UK  Matt  
    • I think the gripe with this sort of article is that it's not telling the right story. When you write anything, you have a choice about whose story you tell and the consequences of it.  While such articles are factual in the sense that objectively, a GFD is worse than a similar regular one, the focus of these articles undermines the struggles of those who must be gluten-free while also not really giving any information that is likely to result in changed behaviour. All this sort of article does is justify the anti-gluten-free circlejerk. I think many of the journalists here think they're on the side of people with celiac disease because they're underlining that the fad diet is dumb/pointless/harmful/whatever. While this may be true, the message the reader remembers is this: the GFD is frivolous. It doesn't matter if there's a line in the article that says something about how the GFD is a medical necessity for those with celiac disease. People don't remember the asterisk in the article. All they remember is that the GFD is for idiots.  What would be valuable and useful is discussing celiac disease - symptoms, longterm consequences etc. and how strict those with celiac disease must be with the GFD in the context of this research. This will do a better job of convincing people that the fad diet is dumb, but do so in a responsible way that doesn't undermine the real problems faced by those with celiac disease or other medical conditions. Plus, the increased awareness might make someone realize that they should get tested.
  • Upcoming Events