• Ads by Google:
     




    Get email alerts Subscribe to Celiac.com's FREE weekly eNewsletter

    Ads by Google:



       Get email alertsSubscribe to Celiac.com's FREE weekly eNewsletter

  • Announcements

    • admin

      Frequently Asked Questions About Celiac Disease   09/30/2015

      This Celiac.com FAQ on celiac disease will guide you to all of the basic information you will need to know about the disease, its diagnosis, testing methods, a gluten-free diet, etc.   Subscribe to Celiac.com's FREE weekly eNewsletter   What are the major symptoms of celiac disease? Celiac Disease Symptoms What testing is available for celiac disease? - list blood tests, endo with biopsy, genetic test and enterolab (not diagnostic) Celiac Disease Screening Interpretation of Celiac Disease Blood Test Results Can I be tested even though I am eating gluten free? How long must gluten be taken for the serological tests to be meaningful? The Gluten-Free Diet 101 - A Beginner's Guide to Going Gluten-Free Is celiac inherited? Should my children be tested? Ten Facts About Celiac Disease Genetic Testing Is there a link between celiac and other autoimmune diseases? Celiac Disease Research: Associated Diseases and Disorders Is there a list of gluten foods to avoid? Unsafe Gluten-Free Food List (Unsafe Ingredients) Is there a list of gluten free foods? Safe Gluten-Free Food List (Safe Ingredients) Gluten-Free Alcoholic Beverages Distilled Spirits (Grain Alcohols) and Vinegar: Are they Gluten-Free? Where does gluten hide? Additional Things to Beware of to Maintain a 100% Gluten-Free Diet What if my doctor won't listen to me? An Open Letter to Skeptical Health Care Practitioners Gluten-Free recipes: Gluten-Free Recipes

Lab Results-Confused
0

Rate this topic

9 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

I got my lab results emailed to me today from my biopsy but I'm not quite sure what they mean. Clearly, there is damage but I'm wondering whether it confirms the drs guess of mild celiac based on my blood results of 83 on the ttg or whether the damage is more severe. Any thoughts?

FINAL DIAGNOSIS DUODENUM BIOPSY: FLATTENED MUCOSA WITH CHRONIC INFLAMMATION (SEE

MICROSCOPIC).

PATHOLOGIST: Mullen MD, Dennis L. Electronically Signed: 08/29/2011

SOURCE A) a. duodenum

PRE-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS celiac disease

GROSS APPEARANCE Received in a container labeled with the patient's name and "duodenum" are

0.3 and 0.4 cm soft tissue fragments, AE/(2).

MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION This flattened mucosa includes only a few blunt villi. The lamina propria

shows a mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate. The differential diagnosis

includes celiac disease, peptic ulcer disease, and nonspecific duodenitis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:
Ads by Google:


I'm not a dr. or expert, but it sounds like the radiologist is saying that you have severe damage to you villi. He only found a few blunt villi on the specimens your GI took. The radiologist diagnosed you with celiac disease (not mild), and peptic ulcer disease, which will undoubtedly improve with a totally gluten-free diet. Thanks for posting, I'm going to ask my gastro for my radiologist report, even though it's been over a year since I had it.

The good news and bad news is that you have celiac disease. Wish you well and hope all of your first degree relatives get tested.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not a dr. or expert, but it sounds like the radiologist is saying that you have severe damage to you villi. He only found a few blunt villi on the specimens your GI took. The radiologist diagnosed you with celiac disease (not mild), and peptic ulcer disease, which will undoubtedly improve with a totally gluten-free diet. Thanks for posting, I'm going to ask my gastro for my radiologist report, even though it's been over a year since I had it.

The good news and bad news is that you have celiac disease. Wish you well and hope all of your first degree relatives get tested.

Thank you, that's extremely helpful. It sounded both like it was severe and also like it was mild in that the only damage was a few blunted villi so more experienced interpretations are helpful. I'm okay with having celiac (and honestly, I was kind of hoping for a very clear biopsy to avoid any ambivilence). Where do you get the peptic ulcer from?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know, Marilyn. The way I read it, it is a bit of a mixed bag. I looked up 'differential diagnosis' to confirm in my mind what it means:

Differential diagnosis: The process of weighing the probability of one disease versus that of other diseases possibly accounting for a patient's illness. The differential diagnosis of rhinitis (a runny nose) includes allergic rhinitis (hayfever), the abuse of nasal decongestants and, of course, the common cold.

So the differential diagnosis is weighing what disease process is actually causing the symptoms found. He talks about flattened mucosa; it's not clear if he's including the villi in the mucosa, and when he says ' only a few blunt villi', does he mean that's all he found or that's all that's left?? So I read that he is trying to determine which of the three caused the symptoms: The differential diagnosis includes celiac disease, peptic ulcer disease, and nonspecific duodenitis.

So is he meaning to diagnose all three conditions or differentiate between them? given that the final diagnosis is given as:

FINAL DIAGNOSIS DUODENUM BIOPSY: FLATTENED MUCOSA WITH CHRONIC INFLAMMATION

I am as confused as the poster. :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:


I read it as saying mild damage. Inflammation, flattening, but only a few villi are blunted. Notice there is no crypting mentioned, which is the hallmark of severe celiac. Also, if the damage were severe, the pathologist would have firmly diagnosed celiac rather than saying it's possibly peptic ulcer disease or duodenitis.

I believe it confirms your doctors hunch of celiac disease that's not gotten too severe yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Either way, it is a very poorly written report to create so much confusion :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:


Either way, it is a very poorly written report to create so much confusion :P

True. That fellow needed to take a couple English classes along with his pre-med. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't seem to complicated to me. It's been my experience that radiologists, pathologists, etc only report what they see, they don't diagnose. So...

FINAL DIAGNOSIS DUODENUM BIOPSY: FLATTENED MUCOSA WITH CHRONIC INFLAMMATION (SEE

MICROSCOPIC).

This is not a diagnosis in the normal sense. This is a description of the damage to your intestine.

PATHOLOGIST: Mullen MD, Dennis L. Electronically Signed: 08/29/2011

SOURCE A) a. duodenum

Seems straightforward. This was a duodenal endoscopy.

PRE-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS celiac disease

This is what your doctor suspected you had, your diagnosis before the endoscopy.

MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION This flattened mucosa includes only a few blunt villi. The lamina propria

shows a mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate. The differential diagnosis

includes celiac disease, peptic ulcer disease, and nonspecific duodenitis.

This is the important part. As others have said, there's flattened mucosa but only a few blunted intestinal villi, etc. Then, the pathologist lists the diseases that can cause that damage.

Since you went for the endoscopy to confirm Celiac, and have results consistent with Celiac, this is almost certainly a positive result. You should call the doctor who sent you for the endoscopy to get his/her feedback and to make sure you've ruled out peptic ulcers as a causative agent.

It's sometimes easier to think of a result like this as not really designed for you to read. It's really intended for your doctor which is why it seems unclear. Call your doctor to discuss, and stop eating gluten if you haven't already.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      108,156
    • Total Posts
      939,968
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      66,140
    • Most Online
      3,093

    Newest Member
    lnhg67
    Joined
  • Popular Now

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you! I have been considering lactose, though I'm reluctant to remove more things from her diet. She has not had the classic lactose intolerance symptoms of diarrhea, gas, or bloating, though I know she could still have trouble with it. I did not call the manufacturer about the medication but it is listed as safe on glutenfreedrugs.com. It was prescribed by a pediatric GI who specializes in celiac. The first question my daughter had for the doctor was whether the medication is gluten-free, and she told us it was.   
    • cyclinglady, I think Joseph is hoping to exclude celiac disease.   I feel for him, as I also had a hard time accepting my daughter's celiac.      I had this gene test done hoping our GI doctor made a terrible mistake.   But now I have triple prove that my daughter really does have it! I agree with you and others, that if biopsy confirmed celiac disease, you do have celiac disease. (But on occasion, doctors can be wrong, right?) However, I have a distant relative (not related by blood) who thought she had celiac diease for 10 years (no biopsy done), lived a strict gluten free life style, but still suffered from health issues, ended up in the mayo clinic, and found out that she did not have celiac.    She did not have the celiac gene.
    • Our doctor ordered the Prometheus Celiac Plus test for us.   It is some sort of in depth celiac blood test.   This test report showed  which celiac gene my daughter has.   I think you can ask your GI for a celiac blood test with EMA.   When I asked for the EMA test, we got this Celiac plus results back.   I believe Prometheus is the name of the lab. Our insurance paid for this test.   If your insurance won't pay for it, I know there is a lab in Colorado that offer this test for a few hundred bucks.   You have to google for it.   I forgot their name.
    • Why?  Some 35% of the population carries the genes that could develop into celiac disease.  But only a few actually develop it.  It is used to exclude celiac disease and not to diagnose it.  There are some outlier genes too that have been discovered recently, so the gene test is not perfect.   My daughter has tested negative on the antibodies test.  She will have to get retested in the future. But we will not get the gene test.  It may impact her ability to get life insurance or maybe even health!  Just something to consider.  
    • It will turn around, but it probably is going to take more time.  Yes, adhering to the gluten-free diet is critical,  but what doctors fail to tell you is that is can take time for antibodies to decrease.  For some it is a few weeks and for others months to years.   It sounds like you are doing everything right.  Remember, her gut is damaged and eating anything can hurt to digest.  You might consider taking her off dairy for a few weeks until you see improvement.  Then add back in starting with products with the least amount of lactose (e.g. yogurt). Many celiacs are temporarily lactose intolerant.  It might help with the nausea.   When I accidentally get exposed to gluten, I stick with soups and stews, even cooked fruit, like applesauce because it hurts to eat!   Are you sure the medication she is taking is gluten free?  Did you call and confirm with the manufacturer?  Did she have nausea befor she was diagnised?  The side effect of this medication is nausea.  Did the GI prescribe?   Hang in there!  
  • Upcoming Events