• Ads by Google:
     




    Get email alerts Celiac.com E-Newsletter

    Ads by Google:



       Get email alertsCeliac.com E-Newsletter

  • Announcements

    • admin

      Frequently Asked Questions About Celiac Disease   09/30/2015

      This Celiac.com FAQ on celiac disease will guide you to all of the basic information you will need to know about the disease, its diagnosis, testing methods, a gluten-free diet, etc.   Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts   What are the major symptoms of celiac disease? Celiac Disease Symptoms What testing is available for celiac disease? - list blood tests, endo with biopsy, genetic test and enterolab (not diagnostic) Celiac Disease Screening Interpretation of Celiac Disease Blood Test Results Can I be tested even though I am eating gluten free? How long must gluten be taken for the serological tests to be meaningful? The Gluten-Free Diet 101 - A Beginner's Guide to Going Gluten-Free Is celiac inherited? Should my children be tested? Ten Facts About Celiac Disease Genetic Testing Is there a link between celiac and other autoimmune diseases? Celiac Disease Research: Associated Diseases and Disorders Is there a list of gluten foods to avoid? Unsafe Gluten-Free Food List (Unsafe Ingredients) Is there a list of gluten free foods? Safe Gluten-Free Food List (Safe Ingredients) Gluten-Free Alcoholic Beverages Distilled Spirits (Grain Alcohols) and Vinegar: Are they Gluten-Free? Where does gluten hide? Additional Things to Beware of to Maintain a 100% Gluten-Free Diet What if my doctor won't listen to me? An Open Letter to Skeptical Health Care Practitioners Gluten-Free recipes: Gluten-Free Recipes Where can I buy gluten-free stuff? Support this site by shopping at The Celiac.com Store.

Not A Newby, Yet Still Very Confused!
0

19 posts in this topic

Lately I've been reading a lot of posts stating that people absolutely, one hundred percent, do not have Celiac. They have non-celiac gluten intolerance. They know this because they've been tested for celiac in every way possible, all of which came up negative, but they feel better with no gluten. There is no set of symptoms specific to celiac vs non-celiac gluten intolerance, so you can't tell by what symptoms you have.

However, I myself have been tested in every way there is for Celiac. All came up negative. However, I get dermatitis herpetiformis when I've been glutened. Last I knew, DH equals Celiac-period. Am I wrong about this? Is the common wisdom about non-celiac gluten intolerance changing?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:
Ads by Google:


I think what is happening, bunnie, since Dr. Fasano finally came out with his pronouncement that there is such a thing as non-celiac gluten intolerance, that there is the automatic assumption by doctors that if their inaccurate tests say there is no celiac, then the patient is non-celiac gluten intolerant. Now we all know there are false negatives on the tests, and that you can be celiac when they are all negative, but the doctors won't give you a diagnosis without their tests being passed (well, there are some enlightened ones in whom the lightbulb goes on - mom and siblings have celiac, but all tests negative, mega symptoms, hey perhaps we missed it or there's not sufficient damage yet :o) So yes, DH does indeed mean celiac but it's amazing how many don't know this and would take the other test results as proof :blink:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, that's a very interesting question. It would also be interesting to know if there are celiacs who don't get intestinal damage but only DH.

There probably is plenty of official documentation about the link between DH and celiac online.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

However, I myself have been tested in every way there is for Celiac. All came up negative. However, I get dermatitis herpetiformis when I've been glutened. Last I knew, DH equals Celiac-period. Am I wrong about this? Is the common wisdom about non-celiac gluten intolerance changing?

Did you ever have a Biopsy for DH while it was flared up??

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, that's a very interesting question. It would also be interesting to know if there are celiacs who don't get intestinal damage but only DH.

There probably is plenty of official documentation about the link between DH and celiac online.

This is kind of an oxymoron (not trying to be rude, it is the only word I can think of!). It's not possible to have celiac without intestinal damage. You can have celiac without gastrointestinal SYMPTOMS, but there's still going to be damage.

My confusion was with the idea that Celiac can be ruled out completely. I thought it was understood that Celiac tests are fallible, and not entirely trustworthy. Lord knows there's enough people on here who've been tested up one side and down the other, and then later either come up with the DH rash or a repeated test that came up positive.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:


Yeah, that's a very interesting question. It would also be interesting to know if there are celiacs who don't get intestinal damage but only DH.

According to my Dermatologist that diagnosed me with DH, one can have DH without Gut issues... Tons of info out there to back it up.. I went gluten-free, my gut and many other issues related to Celiac went away... Other issues did show up as time passed.. btw, My blood lab came back Pos too..

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you ever have a Biopsy for DH while it was flared up??

No, oddly enough I never got the rash until at least 6 months after I went gluten free. We had purchased what I thought was a safe rotisserie chicken from our local grocery club, and boy did I get sick. Rash lasted for three weeks. I actually called my doctor to tell him, and he told me it was the Celiac and not to get it tested, because then I would have an offical diagnosis and it worried him that it might affect my health/life insurance possibilities down the road. I have no idea whether or not that is the case, but I trusted him, and said ok. I personally don't care if I'm doctor diagnosed, I don't need that to keep myself gluten free. I suppose it's remotely possible that what I get is a non-Celiac, non-DH skin rash that matches all descriptions of DH that I've read, but I don't really subscribe to that theory. Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck.....

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




My understanding, from the sum total of what I have read so I don't have a citation, is that it is possible to have the three forms of celiac (intestinal, neurological, skin) individually (in isolation) or in any combination. So a DH person may not have any intestinal damage. (That is just the way I understand it - this is not gospel.)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is kind of an oxymoron (not trying to be rude, it is the only word I can think of!). It's not possible to have celiac without intestinal damage. You can have celiac without gastrointestinal SYMPTOMS, but there's still going to be damage.

My confusion was with the idea that Celiac can be ruled out completely. I thought it was understood that Celiac tests are fallible, and not entirely trustworthy. Lord knows there's enough people on here who've been tested up one side and down the other, and then later either come up with the DH rash or a repeated test that came up positive.

I wonder what makes it so some people get intestinal damage symptoms and others don't feel a thing.

I think that the DH only shows up later after all the false negative tests is the fact that they've been glutened after a long period of being gluten-free, so the body is less used to the gluten and the immunity attacks harder. What didn't show up before shows up later because the reactions get worse.. something like that. I hope I understood the issue right. My IQ has been off balance recently :-(

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dani nero,

So your IQ has been off a bit lately, huh? That made me laugh...in empathy I assure you. I had minor GI symptoms but major itching, joint pain (especially hips), depression, debilitating fatigue.... all the rest of the non GI stuff. Diagnosed 2 months ago by bloodwork. The occasional big D with urgency stopped within a couple of weeks. However, we are sure that my intestinal villi are damaged enough that malabsorption is an issue. I have multiple vitamin and mineral deficiencies that are being treated, so yes you can certainly have damage without GI symptoms bad enough to mention to Dr. About six weeks ago I was dx'd with Hashimoto's too. ( the autoimmune type of hypothyroidism.). I would say that this is fairly common in celiacs.

I really feel for you. I don't have any words of wisdom except to say you are fortunate to have found the most well informed, compassionate bunch of folks right here. Keep coming, keep posting and take it one day at a time. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




Oh and just to clarify my DH symptoms have been around as long as the other issues. I am some real improvement with the all over itching. Scalp and bottom are itch free pretty much.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder what makes it so some people get intestinal damage symptoms and others don't feel a thing.

http://www.celiac.nih.gov/Dermatitis.aspx

DH affects 15 to 25 percent of people with celiac disease, and these people typically have no digestive symptoms of the disease.

How does a disorder that damages the intestines show up on the skin? When a person with celiac disease consumes gluten, the mucosal immune system in the intestine responds by producing a type of antibody called immunoglobulin A (IgA), explains John Zone, M.D., chairman of the Department of Dermatology at the University of Utah School of Medicine. As IgA enters the bloodstream, it can collect in small blood vessels under the skin, triggering further immune reactions that result in the blistering rash of DH.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the NCGI label is interesting.

It gives docs "permission" to dx you with something for which there's no test for but symptoms match.

I wonder what will happen when there's a test??

I found a study that shows people with DH have some additional antibodies, in addition to IgA in the skin that makes us super fantastical special. So we are a subset of celiac disease, like there are neuro celiac disease patients, gastro celiac disease patients, etc. it doesn't mean we can't be all of the other stuff too-but we do have some particular antibodies that are found in DH only.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read that same study Prickly & you explained it well. I'm not even going hunting for that study tonight but just backing up what you said.

And JNbunnie, yes dh = celiac. We just went through a whole thing on that in the dh forum with documentation. Problem is there hasn't been that much research done on dh alone. There hasn't been enough on celiac --- dh is behind celiac in research. IMHO, I feel that every celiac out there or almost every celiac out there will eventually at some point in time develop dh if they do not go gluten free. And just in the short time I have been here I have read threads by quite a few celiacs who have been gluten-free for sometimes 8 yrs. suddenly come up with dh when they get accidentally glutened.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO, I feel that every celiac out there or almost every celiac out there will eventually at some point in time develop dh if they do not go gluten free. And just in the short time I have been here I have read threads by quite a few celiacs who have been gluten-free for sometimes 8 yrs. suddenly come up with dh when they get accidentally glutened.

I am glad that you have stated that the above quote is your IMHO (in my humble opinion), and not based on scientific fact.

:)

It's a topic that needs looking in too.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely Lisa, it's just a theory that I have. No scientific research, no scientific facts.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely Lisa, it's just a theory that I have. No scientific research, no scientific facts.

Who know what research will may come up with down the road. Perhaps you may be right. ;)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who know what research will may come up with down the road. Perhaps you may be right. ;)

Perhaps. I actually was thinking tonight about starting an "I Wonder" thread for everyone to put their "I wonder" things on that they've thought about regarding celiac. Might be amusing at any rate.laugh.gif

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps. I actually was thinking tonight about starting an "I Wonder" thread for everyone to put their "I wonder" things on that they've thought about regarding celiac. Might be amusing at any rate.laugh.gif

I understand your motivation. We have such good minds here who have taken the time to post with substantiated research.

See what happens. B) Amusing is good, too!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      107,339
    • Total Posts
      935,566
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      64,999
    • Most Online
      3,093

    Newest Member
    Con Smith
    Joined
  • Popular Now

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes you are correct. Interestingly my genes in the US are thought to be more associated with RA. Which is something they thought I had prediagnosis. In the Middle and far East they are more likely to be associated with celiac and they are rare genes in Caucasians which I am according to my parents known heritage. I always caution folks not to take the gene tests as absolute proof they can't have celiac because I had one child who had positive blood and biopsy, did well on the diet, then got genes tested in young adulthood and was told they could never be celiac. Of course that resulted in her abandoning the diet. I worry but hope someday doctors will realise we still have a lot to learn about the genetics of this disease. PS While I still have some deformity in my hands my joint pain resolved after a few months on the diet.
    • It seems like you really need a concrete or near concrete answer so I would say maybe you ought to get the gene testing. Then you can decide on the gluten challenge.   Thanks! I am convinced our dogs are there waiting for us. Meanwhile they are playing, running, laughing, barking & chasing. I have another favorite quote dealing with dogs: "If a dog will not come to you after having looked you in the face, you should go home & examine your conscience."  ~~~ Woodrow Wilson ~~~
    • I can't help thinking that all of this would be so much easier if the doctor I went to 10 years ago would have done testing for celiac, rather than tell me I probably should avoid gluten. He was looking to sell allergy shots and hormone treatment, he had nothing to gain from me being diagnosed celiac. I've been messing around ever since, sort-of-most-of the time being gluten free but never being strict about it. I really feel like three months of eating gluten would do my body a lot of permanent damage. I've got elevated liver enzymes for the third time since 2008 and no cause can be found which might be good, I guess. I wonder if it would be reasonable to do the HLA testing first, to decide if I really need to do the gluten challenge. If the biopsy is negative, that is. Squirmingitch, love your tag line about dogs in heaven. We lost the best dog ever last December. I sure hope all my dogs are there waiting for me!
    • Most (90%-95%) patients with celiac disease have 1 or 2 copies of HLA-DQ2 haplotype (see below), while the remainder have HLA-DQ8 haplotype. Rare exceptions to these associations have been occasionally seen. In 1 study of celiac disease, only 0.7% of patients with celiac disease lacked the HLA alleles mentioned above. Results are reported as permissive, nonpermissive, or equivocal gene pairs. From: http://www.mayomedicallaboratories.com/test-catalog/Clinical+and+Interpretive/88906  
    • This is not quite as cut & dried as it sounds. Although rare, there are diagnosed celiacs who do not have either of those genes. Ravenwoodglass, who posted above, is one of those people. I think she has double DQ9 genes? Am I right Raven?  My point is, that getting the gene testing is not an absolute determination either way.
  • Upcoming Events