• Ads by Google:
     




    Get email alerts Celiac.com E-Newsletter

    Ads by Google:



       Get email alertsCeliac.com E-Newsletter

  • Announcements

    • admin

      Frequently Asked Questions About Celiac Disease   09/30/2015

      This Celiac.com FAQ on celiac disease will guide you to all of the basic information you will need to know about the disease, its diagnosis, testing methods, a gluten-free diet, etc.   Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts   What are the major symptoms of celiac disease? Celiac Disease Symptoms What testing is available for celiac disease? - list blood tests, endo with biopsy, genetic test and enterolab (not diagnostic) Celiac Disease Screening Interpretation of Celiac Disease Blood Test Results Can I be tested even though I am eating gluten free? How long must gluten be taken for the serological tests to be meaningful? The Gluten-Free Diet 101 - A Beginner's Guide to Going Gluten-Free Is celiac inherited? Should my children be tested? Ten Facts About Celiac Disease Genetic Testing Is there a link between celiac and other autoimmune diseases? Celiac Disease Research: Associated Diseases and Disorders Is there a list of gluten foods to avoid? Unsafe Gluten-Free Food List (Unsafe Ingredients) Is there a list of gluten free foods? Safe Gluten-Free Food List (Safe Ingredients) Gluten-Free Alcoholic Beverages Distilled Spirits (Grain Alcohols) and Vinegar: Are they Gluten-Free? Where does gluten hide? Additional Things to Beware of to Maintain a 100% Gluten-Free Diet What if my doctor won't listen to me? An Open Letter to Skeptical Health Care Practitioners Gluten-Free recipes: Gluten-Free Recipes Where can I buy gluten-free stuff? Support this site by shopping at The Celiac.com Store.

FDA to Issue Gluten-Free Allergy Labeling Rule in 2012 - Celiac.com
0

8 posts in this topic

Celiac.com

FDA to Issue Gluten-Free Allergy Labeling Rule in 2012

Celiac.com

Celiac.com 04/26/2012 - A recent statement by the FDA announces that the agency is gathering data to respond to calls for an "alternative approach" to determining a specific gluten threshold level other than the proposed level of under 20 parts per ...

and more »

View the full article

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:
Ads by Google:


Not to revive a dead topic, but I've been hunting through threads- does anyone know the status of this? The FDA web didn't seem to explain this to me very well (I did dig around- found some stuff but nothing substantial).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will believe it when it actually happens.

In 2004, FALCPA said, in part:

SEC. 206. GLUTEN LABELING. Deadlines. Regulations. 21 USC 343 note.

Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation with appropriate experts and stakeholders, shall issue a proposed rule to define, and permit use of, the term "gluten-free" on the labeling of foods. Not later than 4 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue a final rule to define, and permit use of, the term ``gluten-free'' on the labeling of foods.

Um, the dates in question were 2006 for the proposal, and 2008 for the final rule. Still waiting. Yawn.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This article was from April.....

:rolleyes:

If you read it again, it says FDA intends to issue rules by the end of fiscal year 2012. The fiscal year for the Federal government of the U.S. does not match the calendar year. It runs from Oct 1 of one year to Sept 30 of the year it is named for, so Fiscal Year 2012 ran from Oct 1, 2011, to Sept 30, 2012.

However, when I clicked on the pdf link, "FDA," it looks to be a copy of the Dept of Health and Human Services Fiscal year 2013 on the page header. It says Food and Drug Administration page 138, Gluten Allergy Labeling. summary: Conducted safety assessment of gluten exposure in individuals with celiac, and published a Federal Register notice in August 2011, reopening the comment period for the proposed rule. But it says they intended to finish and issue the rule, by the end of Fiscal year 2012.

http://americanceliac.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/FDA-CJ-gluten-free-.pdf?utm_source=Copy+of+February+2012&utm_campaign=24+Feb+12&utm_medium=email

So they intended to have finished this process, 2 and half months ago.

LOL. :unsure:

I think they are still in the process of "discovering" that there are more than 40,000 celiacs in the United States, and this continues to surprise them.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know it was from April, but I wasn't able to find anything in the forum (or many other places, except what was already linked) on this topic since. I did look. And the FY2012 deadline was why I was wondering if anyone had any news- seems like there would at least have been UPDATES since April if they're behind their deadline (which always happens with such things, I know).

On a semi-cursory search, there also seems to be an alarming lack of really good research being used in the FDA's decision-making process. Studies seem to often have very small n's, high attrition (of course, when you think about it), and a lot of them are not only not double-blind, but also not single-blind (which is mind-boggling). Someone please correct me and link if I am wrong; this is the primary document I'm drawing that conclusion from. However, it's kind of alone the lines of common issues with medical research at large, unfortunately, so I can believe a lot of the research in the decision-making process is like this.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:


The reason you haven't seen anything lately is that it was not approved and it was set aside. That is what Takala and Peter were trying to say.

Here's a thread from Oct about a petition to try to get a vote/resolution on the bill.

http://www.celiac.com/gluten-free/topic/97190-petition-for-gluten-free-labeling-on-white-house-website-celiaccom/page__st__15__hl__+fda#entry833685

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




If I am remembering correctly, they (FDA) outsourced the first commentary period on the rule change to a private company, it was not done on the FDA website, and the comment acceptance time period was short, and they did not want to be bothered unless the person was officially diagnosed as celiac, which, for technical reasons beyond our control, knocks some of us out of their persons of interest, because, as I said above, they're still surprised by the concept that there just may be more than 40,000 celiacs in the United States. If you are "just" gluten intolerant, you are in a less respected category to certain interests (except to the celiac and gluten intolerant researchers, whom have been trying to correct this misconception that you don't really exist with a real medical condition). This may be why you are not finding the answers to any customer/consumer/patient input surveys on the FDA website. This means.... I have no idea what the FDA did after they contracted out those surveys! They did send the former chemical industry FDA official to speak to some celiac groups working on the labeling, sort of like sending the ambassador to the next galaxy, we come in peace, just don't expect anything.

This contains a list of FDA Guidance of Regulatory Information, including the Gluten Category, in Topic - Specific Labeling Information

http://www.fda.gov/Food/LabelingNutrition/FoodLabelingGuidanceRegulatoryInformation/Topic-SpecificLabelingInformation/default.htm#gluten

Gluten-Free

There may be more information on their website, but this was the obvious list.

The press release from Aug 2, 2011, includes this:

_______

“Before finalizing our gluten-free definition, we want up-to-date input from affected consumers, the food industry, and others to help assure that the label strikes the right balance,” said Michael Taylor, deputy commissioner for foods. “We must take into account the need to protect individuals with celiac disease from adverse health consequences while ensuring that food manufacturers can meet the needs of consumers by producing a wide variety of gluten-free foods.”

_______

Then there has been a bit of push-back from certain lobbying groups on this, of course, all jockeying for Federal dollars for medical research, for the Farm Bill, for the export industry, etc. But I think they (FDA) are watching the expanding sales in the food industry of "gluten free foods" and seeing if it becomes a large enough industry faction to be forced to actually issue a voluntary labeling rule. If they set up their rule- needs criteria (accidentally) as to automatically weed out a lot of celiacs and gluten intolerants, or if they are behind in reading what the medical researchers claim, and what food sales seem to indicate is a real, growing amount of gluten free people, then they can be less motivated to be in any sort of hurry.

I have read an article recently in some business journal that I must not have bookmarked, I'm still looking for it, it was pretty funny. The author noted that gluten free foods were selling at an increasing rate, (maybe they based it on this story here, by Jefferson Adams,

http://www.celiac.com/articles/23103/1/Gluten-free-Market-to-Top-66-Billion-by-2017/Page1.html "Gluten Free Market to top $6.6 billion by 2017" ) but complained that the items were being purchased by people who were not diagnosed celiac, so it must be a waste. It had numbers it claimed were the number of undiagnosed purchasing gluten free food, I would love to see where they got that figure from. :ph34r: To me, this says the opposite, that there must be a large proportion of people out there who are not diagnosed with anything, but are self selecting foods that agree with them, in spite of what some magazine thinks about their shopping habits.

Now, HERE is a food reaction that is taken seriously, it's gone from about .4% of children reacting to 1.4% from 1997 to 2008. It is claimed that 1.3% of adults have the same problem, yet you would never see a serious "science" writer telling someone with a peanut allergy that they were just neurotic attention seekers making it up, or on a fad diet.

http://www.webmd.com/allergies/news/20100514/peanut-allergies-in-kids-on-the-rise

We likely have a lot more people with a "gluten problem," but because exposure doesn't kill you quickly, it isn't getting respected in the media. Yet.

:rolleyes:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      107,332
    • Total Posts
      935,528
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      64,994
    • Most Online
      3,093

    Newest Member
    Daisy Charlize
    Joined
  • Popular Now

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Former lifeguard and competitive swimmer here. There could be some potential issues, but I think it's pretty unlikely. Here's why I think that: 1. The water volume in a standard 25m pool is enormous (hundreds of thousands of liters). Assuming there are people swimming in the pool, any hot spots are likely to get dissipated pretty fast, so you'd have to swallow a lot of water to get a serious gluten hit. 2. By law (at least in Canada), the water inflow and outflow rates must be such that the volume of water that makes up the pool must be replaced every 24 hours in public pools. There are always some dust bunnies, bandaids and whatnot trapped in the corners at the bottom of the pool, but the main volume you're interacting with gets replaced regularly, so no build-up. Public pools are also vacuumed on a regular basis. For cleaning agents, typically on bleach and baking soda are used in my experience. Private pools are another story and there no guarantees. 3. Most public pools prohibit food on deck due to public health regulations and/or wanting to avoid cleaning up messes. This limits potential sources of gluten to personal care products on other people's skin. Considering the volume of a pool, I'm having trouble imagining this resulting in a significant exposure, but I have also swam in packed outdoor pools that taste like sunblock, so who knows. I would definitely worry if people were eating hot dogs or shotgunning beers in the pool though (definitely a thing at backyard pool parties). 4. Pool chlorine can be either tablet based, liquid based or gas based depending on the pool. Either way, it is bleach-based (sometimes literal bleach gets dumped in smaller volume bodies like hot tubs when the chlorine is off). The pool I worked at, which was newer used liquid injection, and I would imagine this is true of most newer facilities (gas is undesirable as it can leak and kill people because it is odourless - some older pools still have this set-up though). Tablets are more common in backyard pools, and it's possible that these might contain gluten in some form (I have no idea and have never checked).  For reference, the concentration of chlorine in a swimming pool should be between 0.5-5 ppm, depending on the pool temperature and your region (lower for colder pools, higher for hot tubs).  So, I guess my opinion would be that a public pool is most likely pretty safe from a gluten perspective. Chlorine (or rather, the volatile gases resulting from the reaction of chlorine with biological waste in the pool) is an irritant though - occupational asthma rates in lifeguards and swimmers is quite high. Some people are more sensitive to this than others. My dad cannot swim anymore because he becomes ill for a week with severe upper respiratory symptoms (open water swimming is ok). I get similar, but less severe symptoms (part of the reason I don't swim anymore, sadly). Not sure what symptoms you experienced, but something to consider. http://www.ncceh.ca/documents/practice-scenario/pool-chlorination-and-closure-guidelines
    • I look back at photos from a few years ago now and can see the inflammation in my face. I spent decades with my body fighting constantly without my really being aware. Freaked me out when I realised! Few things to think about: If up to 1% of pop are celiac, at much as 6% could be NCGS - further reading here: https://www.celiac.com/gluten-free/topic/117969-non-celiac-gluten-sensitivity-a-resource/ NCGS can present in the same varied ways as celiac - Not just or even primarily gastro related. I get back pain, chest pain, skin problems, eyesight problems, anxiety, depression, balance issues, nerve tremors and twitches etc. etc Try to treat these next months as a special case. Dial your diet back and eat really basic and simple. I lived on omelettes filled with veggies, huge green salads with olive oil and cider vinegar as dressing and a very simple evening meal with maybe some meat and rice. I ate as little processed foods as I possibly could. So try and avoid sauces, anything in a box really.  Your aiming to help your body heal and to reduce the amount of ingredients going in to the basic safest foods. Eat clean and healthy and avoid any possible gluten source. Spend a bit of time learning about hidden sources of gluten too. This thread will help:  https://www.celiac.com/gluten-free/topic/91878-newbie-info-101/   Final point. You may like me eventually have to live life without gluten and without the comfort of a diagnosis that says precisely why. This is not always easy, but what you learn about your body in the next 3 months of this trial could help you to do this. Keep the diary, note your reactions and hopefully when you see the Rheum in 3 months you'll have conducted your own science experiment and have the data you need to make a good decision. Best of luck Matt  
    • Newly diagnosed, who do I tell? I'm not talking friends & family. I am normally private about health matters but I feel it seems I need to tell so many people. Does anyone have a list? Some are obvious like doctor and dentist but one came up for me the other day when my massage therapist asked if I'd had any changes in my health and I said no but halfway through the session realized that, "Duh I should have mentioned Celiac! Clearly the lotion used could be an issue." So who is on your list to tell? Here's who I have so far: Doctor(s) Dentist Restaurant Servers Massage Therapists Hair Stylist Babysitters, Petsitters or Housesitters (anyone who might bring or prepare food in my home)      
    • Hey, I am learning also...make sure you are taking a good multi-vitamin...gluten-free of course.  I have had a few "charlie horse" pains in my thighs and am taking an extra B12 tablet...If you have an ALDI grocery store nearby they have lots of gluten-free items snacks and frozen.  Vitamins will help...you are not getting enough nutrients with what you are eating.
    • I feel the same way! Newly diagnosed (gluten-free since July 1) and never had major GI symptoms mostly neurological issues and other very random stuff. So no red flags to tell me, "You just glutened yourself!" Or at least I haven't identified them yet. I'm not sure if I'm feeling better or not yet. I do have more energy but lots of anxiety and random symptoms that might be celiac related... but who knows. I'm just not sure if this is what "feeling better" is yet. I can't imagine what that is like... or will be like. And I keep reading about people "getting sick" when they are glutened but that is so vague. For me, I'm not sure I'll know if I've actually been glutened or not. I feel like I'm extremely careful but I'm not sure if I'm being over the top, or if I'm doing it right, or not enough and need to do more. I'd just like to get to a nice gluten-free baseline and note what that is like so that I can compare how I used to feel and how I might feel if glutened so that I'll know! Sorry, didn't mean to hijack your thread and provide no answers. I can just relate, that's all.
  • Upcoming Events