• Ads by Google:
     




    Get email alerts Subscribe to Celiac.com's FREE weekly eNewsletter

    Ads by Google:



       Get email alertsSubscribe to Celiac.com's FREE weekly eNewsletter

  • Announcements

    • admin

      Frequently Asked Questions About Celiac Disease   09/30/2015

      This Celiac.com FAQ on celiac disease will guide you to all of the basic information you will need to know about the disease, its diagnosis, testing methods, a gluten-free diet, etc.   Subscribe to Celiac.com's FREE weekly eNewsletter   What are the major symptoms of celiac disease? Celiac Disease Symptoms What testing is available for celiac disease? - list blood tests, endo with biopsy, genetic test and enterolab (not diagnostic) Celiac Disease Screening Interpretation of Celiac Disease Blood Test Results Can I be tested even though I am eating gluten free? How long must gluten be taken for the serological tests to be meaningful? The Gluten-Free Diet 101 - A Beginner's Guide to Going Gluten-Free Is celiac inherited? Should my children be tested? Ten Facts About Celiac Disease Genetic Testing Is there a link between celiac and other autoimmune diseases? Celiac Disease Research: Associated Diseases and Disorders Is there a list of gluten foods to avoid? Unsafe Gluten-Free Food List (Unsafe Ingredients) Is there a list of gluten free foods? Safe Gluten-Free Food List (Safe Ingredients) Gluten-Free Alcoholic Beverages Distilled Spirits (Grain Alcohols) and Vinegar: Are they Gluten-Free? Where does gluten hide? Additional Things to Beware of to Maintain a 100% Gluten-Free Diet What if my doctor won't listen to me? An Open Letter to Skeptical Health Care Practitioners Gluten-Free recipes: Gluten-Free Recipes

My Biopsy Word For Word
0

Rate this topic

73 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

This is what was found in my biopsy.

"Sections consist of a single fragments of heavily denuded duodenal mucosa with an abnormal architexture comprising mild to moderate villous atrophy associated with crypt hyperplasia. There is a significant generalized increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes associated with degenerative changes with in the remaining surface epithelium. Within the lamina propria there is a mild increase in mixed inflammatory cells. parasite are not seen. The appearances are those of a moderate variable villous abnormality without diagnostic histology. A differential diagnosis include celiac disease, other protein allergies, infectious gastroenteritis and nonspecific chronic duodenitis. The appearance is consistent with but not diagnostic of partially treated cealiac disease."

So what is that saying? Yes to celiac or it may be one of many other things?

Did yours say anything like this?

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:
Ads by Google:


I would interpret this as: "showing some initial, overall inflammation, but not yet severe enough to point to one specific cause. Are you gluten-free? How do you feel?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would interpret this as: "showing some initial, overall inflammation, but not yet severe enough to point to one specific cause. Are you gluten-free? How do you feel?

Yes I want gluten free after this biopsy result as the Gi Dr said it was most likely celiac. But after that my blood work

came back negative for antibodies so now she is not sure and is freaking me out. She just keeps saying hmmm not sure let's catch up again in two weeks bla bla bla. I stI'll don't have the genetic test results yet but hopefully they come Monday.

Yes I'm gluten free and felt great for the first 2 weeks. Symptoms started to go. My post nasal drip has stopped and that I've had from childhood. Even had two operations to fix it but neither worked. Even my throat just feels more open if that makes sense. But this week I am feeling very tired, lethargic, slight anxiety and some muscle weakness. Is that just gluten withdrawal?

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I should add that I'm questioning all this because my GI Dr has suggested that (as I am gay) that I may have hiv as that can cause celiac like things. Now unless hiv has become air born in the last few years it's not possible but she has made me panic now. What if!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of us can have false negatives on blood work. The biopsy results do suggest celiac so glad to hear you are giving the diet a shot. We do have ups and downs usually in the beginning as we get used to the new lifestyle. Hopefully the diet will take care of your problems but being on the diet will not mask testing for other stuff if that should be needed. I hope you continue to improve.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:


I started getting headaches, as well as being very tired in the afternoon after about 3 weeks of eating gluten-free. I think that lasted about 2 weeks. However, you should probably double-check what you're eating, and possibly food prep areas, etc. to rule out being glutened. If you have improvement in a few issues, it sounds like that's your answer -- along with the biopsy results. Do you have your blood test results? If not, you should get those and post them here also. It's possible you only had partial tests. From what I've seen on here, it's not uncommon for only 1 or 2 of the full panel of tests to be positive; and sometimes not even that. It's not an exact science... so don't panic.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I should add that I'm questioning all this because my GI Dr has suggested that (as I am gay) that I may have hiv as that can cause celiac like things. Now unless hiv has become air born in the last few years it's not possible but she has made me panic now. What if!

Don't let the doctor panic you. Sometimes doctors just like to scare the heck out of us. If she thinks that she should order a test for HIV to rule it out in her mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:


Yes I'm gluten free and felt great for the first 2 weeks. Symptoms started to go. My post nasal drip has stopped and that I've had from childhood. Even had two operations to fix it but neither worked. Even my throat just feels more open if that makes sense. But this week I am feeling very tired, lethargic, slight anxiety and some muscle weakness. Is that just gluten withdrawal?

Thanks

I've been gluten-free for just a few weeks and had terrible withdrawl with a headache that lasted well over a week (now it's just sporadic), a bunch of fatigue, and I was so so grumpy that even I couldn't stand myself. The withdrawl is starting to get better for me now, so hang in there! ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your biopsy sounds like a description of celiac disease.

Were your blood tests taken after you went gluten free? Even a few days can alter the results.

My son had negative blood test on the most common tests (TTG Ig A and DGP IgA) but he had a positive endoscopy and clearly has celiac disease.

Sometimes the blood tests can be negative and you can still have celiac disease.

Feeling slightly worse after going gluten free can just be a sign of withdrawal. Keep going, you will feel better soon.

Cara

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:


Well I had an hiv test and it's negative. So it really is celiac :-)

And I'm going to have words with DR GI for terrifying me so casually. Lol

So I'm a member :-) odd that I should be so happy but I am.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I had an hiv test and it's negative. So it really is celiac :-)

And I'm going to have words with DR GI for terrifying me so casually. Lol

So I'm a member :-) odd that I should be so happy but I am.

What a relief! Welcome to the community :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I had an hiv test and it's negative. So it really is celiac :-)

And I'm going to have words with DR GI for terrifying me so casually. Lol

So I'm a member :-) odd that I should be so happy but I am.

Welcome to the board! And this is a great place for you to get started:

http://www.celiac.com/gluten-free/topic/91878-newbie-info-101/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that not terribly insulting? Is it also not illegal to insinuate that you could have HIV just because you are gay??? I am fairly sure that even if it isn't illegal it is not the done thing!

That result would have me thinking celiac straight away!

I should add that I'm questioning all this because my GI Dr has suggested that (as I am gay) that I may have hiv as that can cause celiac like things. Now unless hiv has become air born in the last few years it's not possible but she has made me panic now. What if!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:


When it rains it pours! Just got my genetic test back. I have both the main genes and 7 subsets. Hooray I won the genetic lottery lol!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess that's what you call fate!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

but seriously, a very big big thank you to everyone on this forum who answered my posts and provided help.

Thank you all :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The issue here is that they did a biopsy with a negative TTG. Usually one stops at a negative blood test unless one has convincing symptoms of celiac and/or a strong family history. This is why your doc is a bit unsure of how to interpret these results. That being said, in a otherwise healthy person with no recent gastrointestinal infection the pathology report is in keeping with celiac, though not conclusive. Did you have any soft markers of celiac on your bloodwork (anemia, low ferritin or folate, abnormal liver enzymes)? The real challenge here is that there is no way for you to use bloodwork as a measure of compliance to a gluten free diet (a negative test in a seropositive celiac on a gluten free diet will be negative after a few months)... There is an option of repeat biopsy after being gluten free but even then they might just inadvertently pick a healthy patch of bowel and you will erroneously conclude you have celiac. I suggest geneticist screening for HLA-DQ2 and DQ8. If you don't have these markers then it virtually eliminates the diagnosis. Unfortunately having these means you only MAY have it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The issue here is that they did a biopsy with a negative TTG. Usually one stops at a negative blood test unless one has convincing symptoms of celiac and/or a strong family history. This is why your doc is a bit unsure of how to interpret these results. That being said, in a otherwise healthy person with no recent gastrointestinal infection the pathology report is in keeping with celiac, though not conclusive. Did you have any soft markers of celiac on your bloodwork (anemia, low ferritin or folate, abnormal liver enzymes)? The real challenge here is that there is no way for you to use bloodwork as a measure of compliance to a gluten free diet (a negative test in a seropositive celiac on a gluten free diet will be negative after a few months)... There is an option of repeat biopsy after being gluten free but even then they might just inadvertently pick a healthy patch of bowel and you will erroneously conclude you have celiac. I suggest geneticist screening for HLA-DQ2 and DQ8. If you don't have these markers then it virtually eliminates the diagnosis. Unfortunately having these means you only MAY have it.

As per my post above, the genetic test was positive. The specialist is now convinced that its celiac. Nothing in my blood work was out of the ordinary although a few things were towards the low end but not under. She thinks my body was finding ways to compensate over the years. I also always took multivitamins so that could play a part too.

My two sisters were tested. One positive on blood and the other negative. But the negative one has the same symptom profile as me so she is having a biopsy anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:


I suggest geneticist screening for HLA-DQ2 and DQ8. If you don't have these markers then it virtually eliminates the diagnosis. Unfortunately having these means you only MAY have it.

That is not entirely true. There is at least one member I'm aware of on here that is diagnosed celiac without those two associated genes. Ravenwoodglas. Maybe she will chime in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is not entirely true. There is at least one member I'm aware of on here that is diagnosed celiac without those two associated genes. Ravenwoodglas. Maybe she will chime in.

Thats true. My specialist told me 5% of celiacs don't have the genes and there is also a 25%ish false negative with the blood test. In her eyes if your positive to two out of 3 (biopsy, blood and genetic test) then you have it. I was positive in biopsy and genetic. Remember too all three ttests will yield different results depending on what stage of the disease you are at and whether your body is able to cope/compensate for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is not entirely true. There is at least one member I'm aware of on here that is diagnosed celiac without those two associated genes. Ravenwoodglas. Maybe she will chime in.

Well I don't have one of the two most common celiac genes, or at least the ones considered celiac associated here. However my genes are recognized as celiac associated genes in the far and middle east. Here they are considered the genes for RA.

I most definately have celiac and after years of misdiagnosis the diet resolved many, many issues that were thought to be unrelated to my extreme GI issues. I also have DH.

IMHO relying on gene testing at this point in time to rule out celiac is a big mistake. I have one adult child who was both biopsy and blood test positive but then had her genes tested and was told the other tests were a false positive and she isn't really celiac. All her issues were attributed to 'stress'.

IMHO in the end it is how we respond to the diet followed strictly that is the best and most conclusive test at this point. Until they gene test every celiac that is diagnosed for research purposes they really won't know how many genes are associated with celiac and 'gluten intolerance' (which I consider just another form of celiac). Gene testing can not firmly rule in or out celiac.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I don't have one of the two most common celiac genes, or at least the ones considered celiac associated here. However my genes are recognized as celiac associated genes in the far and middle east. Here they are considered the genes for RA.

I most definately have celiac and after years of misdiagnosis the diet resolved many, many issues that were thought to be unrelated to my extreme GI issues. I also have DH.

IMHO relying on gene testing at this point in time to rule out celiac is a big mistake. I have one adult child who was both biopsy and blood test positive but then had her genes tested and was told the other tests were a false positive and she isn't really celiac. All her issues were attributed to 'stress'.

IMHO in the end it is how we respond to the diet followed strictly that is the best and most conclusive test at this point. Until they gene test every celiac that is diagnosed for research purposes they really won't know how many genes are associated with celiac and 'gluten intolerance' (which I consider just another form of celiac). Gene testing can not firmly rule in or out celiac.

This is good to know. Thank you. I am going by current medical literature, which as we know is ever changing.

I do question the validity of diagnosing celiac based on 2/3 positive tests. That's an exceptionally unscientific way of making a diagnosis. I would be more inclined to look at your pre-test probability (the fact that immediate family history is positive and the fact that you have some symptoms to suggest celiac). In other words your chance before taking the test was pretty high already so that the biopsy results, even though inconclusive, allow a doctor to comfortably make a diagnosis. If your pre-test probability was very low (no symptoms and no family history) I would be less comfortable making a diagnosis with a negative bloodwork and inconclusive biopsy.

I also wonder about the sensitivity of the TTG blood test. Current knowledge indicates that 99% of celiacs will have positive tests, meaning a false negative is unlikely. Can anybody speak to their ecpxperience with this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is good to know. Thank you. I am going by current medical literature, which as we know is ever changing.

I do question the validity of diagnosing celiac based on 2/3 positive tests. That's an exceptionally unscientific way of making a diagnosis. I would be more inclined to look at your pre-test probability (the fact that immediate family history is positive and the fact that you have some symptoms to suggest celiac). In other words your chance before taking the test was pretty high already so that the biopsy results, even though inconclusive, allow a doctor to comfortably make a diagnosis. If your pre-test probability was very low (no symptoms and no family history) I would be less comfortable making a diagnosis with a negative bloodwork and inconclusive biopsy.

I also wonder about the sensitivity of the TTG blood test. Current knowledge indicates that 99% of celiacs will have positive tests, meaning a false negative is unlikely. Can anybody speak to their ecpxperience with this?

I don't think one can go off of a lack of family history since so many of us are misdiagnosed or diagnosed with something else (sometimes multiple something elses). Some of us will never show up positive on blood work, up to 30%, and biopsy is iffy also. If someone is not having symptoms then I wouldn't be concerned unless they are being screened because another family member is diagnosed and the non-symptomatic person is positive. When someone is having symptoms then a trial of the diet, IMHO, is the best test there is at present when all other celiac related testing is finished.

Current medical literature in the US is sometimes lacking a bit as far as celiac goes, IMHO. Other countries seem to have a better knowledge of celiac than we do here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      108,140
    • Total Posts
      939,876
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      66,128
    • Most Online
      3,093

    Newest Member
    DAVOH
    Joined
  • Popular Now

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Positive biopsy and blood work?  It sure sounds like your doctor made the right diagnosis.   Let me tell you my story.  Diagnosed after going for a routine colonoscopy because I am over 50.  GI saw my chart and noted that I was anemic.  I have a genetic anemia and I was iron deficient as well.  I lived like that my entire life.  But my wise GI ordered a celiac blood panel and it was considered mildly positive.  So, he ordered an endoscopy to my colonoscopy.   I had been dairy free since I was young.  Was told that I had an allergy.  I had not any GI issues with gluten.   I was an avid baker.  I had nut issues and also mushroom, garlic/onion, and egg intolerances.  I had some pretty severe allergies to medications (anaphylactic) and some seasonal allergies along cats and horses.   I was shocked.  My husband had been gluten free for 12 years prior to my diagnosis.  There is no way both of us would have gluten issues.  But...the tests did not lie.  My iron deficiency anemia resolved within months of my going gluten free.  Two months into the diagnosis, I fractured my back doing NOTHING!  I have osteoporosis as a results of having celiac disease.   Grief is completely understandable.  Denial is a part of grieving.  But the proof will be in follow-up blood tests and how you feel.   So, now I can eat nuts (not almonds), eggs (two a day every single)  and dairy.  Yes, ice cream!  I have yet to get back garlic and mushrooms, but I can live with that.   I have Hashimoto’s too.  .  Once you have one autoimmune disorder, you can develop more.  The gluten-free diet may help, not only your celiac disease, but your UC issues as well.   Try the diet.  I think you will be pleasantly surprised!  
    • Hi Sofie! Listen to KarenG.   We both had iron deficiency anemia when we were diagnosed.  Plus, I have Thalassemia which is a genetic anemia on top of the iron deficiency anemia.   Dumping iron into your system is not the solution.  You need to be seriously gluten free.  You are probably unknowingly damaging other parts of your body....like your bones.  Two months after my diagnosis, I fractured my back doing NOTHING!  Think you are just not getting enough oxygen to your brain?  Think again!  It is probably related to celiac disease.  Celiac disease is systemic.  It is not just about villi damage.   But why am I telling a college student this?   You should be researching your autoimmune illness and ensuring that you do not develop Cancer (rare) or another autoimmune disorder like lupus, diabetes, thyroiditis, MS, Crohn’s, or one of the almost 100 other Autoimmune disorders (common).    Get your antibodies down.  Your mild anemia is the least of your problems.  Raising  your ferritin level may help a little, but healing from celiac disease will help you a lot more!    
    • Let my start by giving a brief summary of what I’ve been diagnosed with. Just over the past year I’ve been diagnosed with Celiac, EOE, lactose intolerance, soy allergy, tree nut allergy. Most recently diagnosed with Ulcerative Colitis. The Colitis came 8 months after having found out I had celiac. I have never had problems with gluten in my life. Dairy was something I had to eliminate because of the excrutiating stomach pains I would get from it. But I can have gluten any day and not have a problem.  I was diagnosed with a biopsy and followed by bloodwork. But who’s to say that dairy wasn’t the cause? I just feel like the GI was very quick to jump on the diagnoses without fully understanding my medical history, prescriptions I’ve took in the past ie long term antibiotic use, accutance, and 7 years of constant NSAID use.
    • I think she wants you to be strictly gluten free and heal.  Not give you things to patch up the damage you are causing by not getting your antibodies down and healing.   I am sure  she expected that you would take your diagnosis seriously and eat gluten-free.  4 months after your diagnosis, your antibodies would have gone down better.  But you weren't eating gluten free.  Eat gluten free. Take your supplements.  Read about the correct way to get your iron up - B12, vitamin C, don't take with calcium foods, etc  
    • Hello! I'm hoping to get some advice from y'all about iron IV infusions. First, some background: I was diagnosed with celiac disease at the beginning of June this year (2017).  I had labs done in March and my serum ferritin was 5 ng/mL. Hgb was 11.1, which isn't all that low, but is still flagged as below the normal range. I took 325 mg ferrous gluconate supplements daily for two months, and when my ferritin was rechecked, it was down to 4. The doctor ordered a celiac antibody panel and all of the levels were high. Confirmed with endoscopy at the end of May. A month later, I left for a 2-month study abroad program in France (aka the land of bread and pastries). After returning to the US at the beginning of August, I finally went gluten-free.  At the beginning of September, I returned to my University. Almost immediately, I realized I was really tired and was having a hard time making it through the day without a nap. I finally had a follow-up GI appointment around September 20th with the PA of the doctor who performed my endoscopy (not the same doctor from March). During the appointment, I asked her what we would do if my labs showed an iron-defiency. She told me that we would either do oral supplements or IV infusions, depending on whether or not she thought I'd absorb the supplements. When the lab results came in on the online patient portal, she made no comment on any of the iron-related results, just sent me a message that my antibody levels were still quite high, that I needed to keep up a strict gluten-free diet, and that we would recheck everything in six months. My ferritin was down to 3, Hgb was 10.3, iron saturation 6%, etc.  I was concerned about those results, so I called the PA's nurse and left a voicemail asking what the plan was for getting those levels up and got a portal message back from the PA saying that my hemoglobin was slightly low and will get better over time as I cut out all the gluten in my diet, but that I can start taking supplements if I want to speed up the process. I know that the Hgb still isn't that low, but it seems like the ferritin level is more serious. I went back for an appointment with the doctor who first found the iron-deficiency back in the spring and she seemed a lot more concerned. When I brought up IV iron therapy, she seemed to think it was a good idea. However, she's a primary care physician through my school's clinic, so she can't give me infusions. She called the PA with the intention of finding out whether or not she would change her mind about infusions, and had no luck. Interestingly, the PA's nurse informed her that they don't expect me to be able to absorb the supplements right away, and would consider IV infusions after I've been gluten-free for another six months.  I've done a bit of research on the IV infusions and it seems like I fit the criteria. Based on my antibody levels, I'm clearly not able to absorb iron any better than back in the spring, when the oral supplements did nothing for me. I understand that once my intestines heal more, I'll start being able to absorb iron better and should be able to boost my levels with oral supplements. However, I feel like I need a solution that will help me much sooner. I have a very demanding course load this semester and I'm constantly exhausted. I fall asleep doing homework at least twice a week. My grades are suffering, my mental health is suffering, and my relationships are being tested. I still don't have an explanation for why the PA doesn't think IV infusions are appropriate and I don't understand it. I really don't know what to do next because I'm afraid if I try to talk to the PA again, she'll get annoyed. I know that was super long, so for anyone still reading, thank you for bearing with me!! Now for the questions: 1. Do you think iron IV infusions in the near future would be a reasonable treatment for me? 2. Do you have any advice on how to make them happen? And if you have any other advice that's relevant to my situation, I'd love to hear it!   Thanks so much, Sofie
  • Upcoming Events