• Ads by Google:
     




    Get email alerts Celiac.com E-Newsletter

    Ads by Google:



       Get email alertsCeliac.com E-Newsletter

  • Announcements

    • admin

      Frequently Asked Questions About Celiac Disease   09/30/2015

      This Celiac.com FAQ on celiac disease will guide you to all of the basic information you will need to know about the disease, its diagnosis, testing methods, a gluten-free diet, etc.   Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts What are the major symptoms of celiac disease? Celiac Disease Symptoms What testing is available for celiac disease? - list blood tests, endo with biopsy, genetic test and enterolab (not diagnostic) Celiac Disease Screening Interpretation of Celiac Disease Blood Test Results Can I be tested even though I am eating gluten free? How long must gluten be taken for the serological tests to be meaningful? The Gluten-Free Diet 101 - A Beginner's Guide to Going Gluten-Free Is celiac inherited? Should my children be tested? Ten Facts About Celiac Disease Genetic Testing Is there a link between celiac and other autoimmune diseases? Celiac Disease Research: Associated Diseases and Disorders Is there a list of gluten foods to avoid? Unsafe Gluten-Free Food List (Unsafe Ingredients) Is there a list of gluten free foods? Safe Gluten-Free Food List (Safe Ingredients) Gluten-Free Alcoholic Beverages Distilled Spirits (Grain Alcohols) and Vinegar: Are they Gluten-Free? Where does gluten hide? Additional Things to Beware of to Maintain a 100% Gluten-Free Diet Free recipes: Gluten-Free Recipes Where can I buy gluten-free stuff? Support this site by shopping at The Celiac.com Store.

Kids' Test Results
0

9 posts in this topic

I was diagnosed with Celiac about 3 weeks ago and was told to have my children tested. Two of my kids have symptoms, two do not. Their pediatrician tested their IgA level (she said this one was the most used to test). We did not test my 7 month old. The range was less than 20 for normal. My oldest was 11, and the other two were 3. I know they were less than 20, but doesn't it show something since their results weren't 0? Does it mean their bodies are producing some antibodies? I'm confused by this because the ped said they were fine. We would just retest at their yearly PE's. (I hope my question makes sense :-) ).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:
Ads by Google:


1-19 is normal for someone (if i've got the scale right), 20-30 is considered a low positive, and anything above 31 a high positive.

It is normal for a body to produce a low amount of antibodies to my understanding.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1-19 is normal for someone (if i've got the scale right), 20-30 is considered a low positive, and anything above 31 a high positive.

It is normal for a body to produce a low amount of antibodies to my understanding.

Ok, I'm glad to know it's normal to produce some antibodies. Thanks :-)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I'm glad to know it's normal to produce some antibodies. Thanks :-)

Indeed. The body produces, to my understanding, a certain amount of antibodies and whatnot (believe it or not, this also includes cancer cells in their 'dorment' form or so i've heard). It is when you start producing more than normal (or less for that matter) that it becomes concerning :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a little understanding of antibody tests.

To begin with, an antibody test is NOT a simple number of antibodies in the blood. It is not as simple as reading little dots and counting them like one antibody, two antibody, three antibody. The number you are seeing is a dilution titre to a reactivity staining pattern, the gliadin peptides are diluted by a machine (ELISA). The number references how many dilutions it took for the reaction to completely fade, through certain laboratory methods a "positive reaction" is chosen at a certain number. What this means is that your children's reactions were negative, requiring a less than positive dilution titre to vanish the pattern, the number under negative is irrelevant and does not mean you have some antibodies in your blood. That being said, having some antibodies is normal as well.

This is why a slightly over positive blood test means nothing, it requires a certain positive reaction to indicate that there is an autoimmune response strong enough to warrant concern over damage to the affecting organs. This is the cause of why many A.I patients will have false positive autoantibody tests in other areas, the cross reactivity will cause a false positive staining reactivity pattern.

You will notice that Antinuclear can have a positive staining pattern but under 40 dilutions is negative, just like the endomysial which can be reported as a positive reaction yet titred at 5 and under is negative. This is because those levels do not correlate with damage and risks or further indicate potential for a progressive autoimmune attack.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ads by Google:


Tests can vary too. We had my son tested for same reason. He had NO visible symptoms... Which really just men's none that were obvious to us ( because we live with him and we just thought he was doing 'normal' stuff. The ped tested him and his reading was 25. A month and a half later, the ped GI tested him at it was up to 67. Biopsy revealed about 3 years worth of damage to intestines. After 1 week of diet, we could see a Difference in personality. He even gained some weight ( he was already a healthy weight though) and gained 3 cm ( apparently a big deal at his age) in less than three months.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The tests are negative but you might want to retest them every few years if they continue to eat gluten. Celiac can manifest at any time, especially after a trauma or serious illness (like mono) so you'll probably want to keep an eye out for symptoms.

My boys all tested negative but my youngest visited the bathroom 5-8 times a day and my oldest had stomach and head aches, and has a tougher time controlling his emotions, so we decided make our family gluten-free. My youngest now only has bm's 1-3 times a day and my oldest says he feels quite a bit better. If your kids have any symptoms, you might want to consider going gluten-free anyways. Wheat has been so genetically modified that it hardly resmble the stuff our great grandparents ate... it's not a natural food anymore and I doubt it's that good for anyone.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what were the total IgA for ea child, without that the testing is meaningless.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a little understanding of antibody tests.

To begin with, an antibody test is NOT a simple number of antibodies in the blood. It is not as simple as reading little dots and counting them like one antibody, two antibody, three antibody. The number you are seeing is a dilution titre to a reactivity staining pattern, the gliadin peptides are diluted by a machine (ELISA). The number references how many dilutions it took for the reaction to completely fade, through certain laboratory methods a "positive reaction" is chosen at a certain number. What this means is that your children's reactions were negative, requiring a less than positive dilution titre to vanish the pattern, the number under negative is irrelevant and does not mean you have some antibodies in your blood. That being said, having some antibodies is normal as well.

This is why a slightly over positive blood test means nothing, it requires a certain positive reaction to indicate that there is an autoimmune response strong enough to warrant concern over damage to the affecting organs. This is the cause of why many A.I patients will have false positive autoantibody tests in other areas, the cross reactivity will cause a false positive staining reactivity pattern.

You will notice that Antinuclear can have a positive staining pattern but under 40 dilutions is negative, just like the endomysial which can be reported as a positive reaction yet titred at 5 and under is negative. This is because those levels do not correlate with damage and risks or further indicate potential for a progressive autoimmune attack.

it is interesting what you wrote, thank you for explaining. however, i don't understand how you can write "those levels do not correlate with damage". just curious,,, how do you know that? how do you know that antibodies at a smaller amount aren't causing harm? (and i'm not questioning you. im genuinely wondering how you know that, so i can take this info to the pedi gi specialist!) thanks!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      106,784
    • Total Posts
      932,403
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      64,261
    • Most Online
      3,093

    Newest Member
    Deverett Newcomb
    Joined
  • Popular Now

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the gripe with this sort of article is that it's not telling the right story. When you write anything, you have a choice about whose story you tell and the consequences of it.  While such articles are factual in the sense that objectively, a GFD is worse than a similar regular one, the focus of these articles undermines the struggles of those who must be gluten-free while also not really giving any information that is likely to result in changed behaviour. All this sort of article does is justify the anti-gluten-free circlejerk. I think many of the journalists here think they're on the side of people with celiac disease because they're underlining that the fad diet is dumb/pointless/harmful/whatever. While this may be true, the message the reader remembers is this: the GFD is frivolous. It doesn't matter if there's a line in the article that says something about how the GFD is a medical necessity for those with celiac disease. People don't remember the asterisk in the article. All they remember is that the GFD is for idiots.  What would be valuable and useful is discussing celiac disease - symptoms, longterm consequences etc. and how strict those with celiac disease must be with the GFD in the context of this research. This will do a better job of convincing people that the fad diet is dumb, but do so in a responsible way that doesn't undermine the real problems faced by those with celiac disease or other medical conditions. Plus, the increased awareness might make someone realize that they should get tested.
    • I had to run go google zonulin. Never heard of that! Makes perfect sense though.. I assume every single person on earth with AI disease has leaky gut! Ya know, I drank several glasses to a bottle of merlot every night after work to "unwind" for many years before I figured out it aggravating the leaky gut! I'm SO glad I quit before it did more damage ... Seriously, metformin is awesome. I love it. Great for metabolic resistance and free at a lot of places with an RX!
    • I am on Armour too.  No metformin for me yet.  I am trying to manage on a low carb high fat diet for many reasons like having a damaged gut and being allergic to so many meds (yah know....swelling, hives, etc.).  Leaky gut.  Nope.  Better.  Zonulin seems to be increased in celiacs.  I am going to blame my gut on that!  Seriously, there seems to be a link.  
    • Dang, Ennis.  You rock!  Ironic and I must be near brain dead.  Did I mention that school is out today!!!!!!  I feel so sleep deprived!  S U M M E R! 
    • Wow you have ALOT going on! Sorry to hear about your ongoing issues. Are you super duper strict with avoiding gluten or do you think you are still getting cross contamination? I will check out that portion of the forum- THANKS a bunch for that. It is all a bit overwhelming. I saw some people post that they saw "dramatic improvement!" within 2 weeks and I'm going rreeeaaalllly? *insert sarcasm.. haha. I know I wont get that lucky. I take metformin and armour and victoza. Type 2 diabetes runs in my family too. My glucose levels were never really high and I never got the official type 2 diagnosis but ive dropped all excess weight on these meds. I hope to wean soon. Did you fix the leaky gut? That is a daunting task isn't it!    
  • Upcoming Events