EpicMoma

10 hours ago, Scott Adams said:

The Mayo Clinic is not "big pharma," and certain unregulated supplements can have negative side effects, and many have been known to cause injury. It's important to mention that this particular one does have risks associated with it.

 I get that it's important to mention the risks. What I also know is there have not been enough testing  to know exactly what the risks are. Some people attack Kratom because it's an unknown. I have been using it for three years now. I can honestly say I am not addicted. I do not go through withdrawals if I don't take it. The only side effects I have had are due to my own error. If I take to much, it can make me nauseated. You can have bad side effects from taking to much Tylenol. Such as liver damage. 

8 hours ago, Scott Adams said:

The problem with Kratom is that it is linked to liver damage, so the risks of using it far outweigh the benefits. This is from the Mayo Clinic:

https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/consumer-health/in-depth/kratom/art-20402171 

I truel.ly do not believe it Big pharma does not want people taking something that makes them lose money. I need more studies to show me actual evidence.

I have been using Kratom for a couple years to help with symptoms. It is the only thing that helps me. Without Kratom, I will literally spend my day running back and forth to the restroom.