-
Welcome to Celiac.com!
You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.
-
Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
-
Get Celiac.com Updates:Support Our Content
Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'first-degree'.
-
Celiac.com 01/29/2025 - Celiac disease is a chronic autoimmune condition triggered by gluten consumption. It is known that close family members of individuals with celiac disease face a higher risk of developing the condition themselves. To better understand this risk, researchers conducted a comprehensive review and analysis of existing studies to estimate the prevalence of celiac disease among first-degree relatives and explore the symptoms they experience. The results highlight significant patterns and offer critical insights for early detection and management strategies. Study Scope and Methodology The analysis included 34 studies encompassing over 10,000 first-degree relatives of individuals diagnosed with celiac disease. First-degree relatives are defined as parents, children, and siblings. These studies used anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody tests to screen for celiac disease and confirmed diagnoses through intestinal biopsies when necessary. The researchers compiled data from multiple regions to determine both the overall prevalence of the disease and its symptoms among these close relatives. The data was further analyzed to assess differences in prevalence between various family roles, geographical regions, and the presence of symptoms. Prevalence of Celiac Disease Among First-Degree Relatives The study found that first-degree relatives of individuals with celiac disease face a significantly elevated risk of developing the condition compared to the general population. Approximately 11% of these relatives tested positive for celiac disease antibodies, and 7% had biopsy-confirmed celiac disease. Family roles played a key part in determining risk levels: Daughters had the highest prevalence rate, with 1 in 4 (23%) affected. Sisters were the second most impacted group, with a 14% prevalence rate. Brothers and sons showed lower but notable prevalence rates of 9% and 6%, respectively. Parents, particularly fathers, showed the lowest prevalence rates, around 5%. These findings emphasize the importance of targeted screening for close female relatives, particularly daughters and sisters, who appear to be at the greatest risk. Regional Differences in Prevalence The prevalence of celiac disease among first-degree relatives varied widely across different countries and regions. Some of the highest antibody prevalence rates were observed in Hungary (24%) and Cuba (19%). Similarly, Serbia (16%) and the United States (15%) reported the highest rates of biopsy-confirmed celiac disease. This variation may be influenced by genetic factors, dietary patterns, healthcare access, and cultural awareness of celiac disease. Regions with higher awareness and diagnostic capabilities are more likely to report higher prevalence rates. Symptoms and Asymptomatic Cases The study also examined the symptoms experienced by first-degree relatives with celiac disease. The majority of cases presented with gastrointestinal symptoms: Abdominal pain was the most commonly reported symptom, affecting 42% of cases. Bloating (39%) and flatulence (38%) were also frequent complaints. Interestingly, a substantial portion of relatives with celiac disease (34%) reported no symptoms at all. This underscores the silent nature of the disease in many individuals, making routine screening even more essential for early detection. Non-gastrointestinal symptoms were also noted, with pallor being the most frequent (54%), possibly indicating anemia or nutrient deficiencies. Implications for Screening and Management Given that approximately 1 in 14 first-degree relatives of celiac disease patients has the condition, routine screening of this population could play a critical role in early detection. Early diagnosis allows for timely dietary interventions, reducing the risk of long-term complications such as nutrient deficiencies, osteoporosis, and other autoimmune conditions. Daughters and sisters, who exhibit the highest risk, should be prioritized in screening programs. Additionally, healthcare providers should consider screening asymptomatic relatives, as they may unknowingly harbor the disease and its associated risks. Why This Study Matters for Families Affected by Celiac Disease This research underscores the genetic connection in celiac disease and highlights the need for vigilance among family members of diagnosed individuals. It provides a clearer picture of which relatives are most at risk and the range of symptoms they might experience—or not experience at all. For families managing celiac disease, these findings emphasize the importance of open communication with healthcare providers about familial risk and the value of proactive screening. Early detection in first-degree relatives can help prevent unnecessary suffering and improve quality of life through timely dietary changes and medical support. In conclusion, this study sheds light on the significant prevalence of celiac disease among close family members and calls for a more comprehensive approach to screening and education. By identifying high-risk individuals early, healthcare systems can better support those affected by this lifelong condition. Read more at: journals.lww.com Watch the video version of this article:
- 1 comment
-
- celiac disease
- first-degree
- (and 8 more)
-
Celiac.com 11/28/2022 - First-degree relatives of people with celiac disease have much higher celiac disease rates than the general population, but there isn't much data on the clinical characteristics of the relatives as a group. To get a better idea of the exact level of risk, a team of Canadian researchers recently carried out a retrospective review of patients who visited a pediatric celiac disease clinic. The researchers conducted a retrospective review of 227 patients (144 girls and 83 boys) who were diagnosed with biopsy-proven celiac disease between 1996 and 2014, with an average age of 8 years old at diagnosis. All patients were screened using tissue transglutaminase (tTG-IgA) tests with normal IgA immunoglobulin level for their age. Out of the 227 celiac patients, 49 (21.6%) were initially screened because a first-degree relative had celiac disease, and out of this group 24 (49%) were symptomatic, while 25 (51%) were asymptomatic. The 49 first-degree relatives had equally severe Marsh biopsy scores whether they were symptomatic or asymptomatic, and compared to the 178 patients who were screened for other reasons 149 (83.7%) were symptomatic, and 29 (16.3%) were asymptomatic. Interestingly their was no significant difference between the different patient groups' biopsy Marsh scores or tTG-IgA levels at screening. According to the researchers: "Although 51% of patients screened due to an affected first-degree relative were asymptomatic, their disease histology was as severe as those screened for symptoms suggestive of celiac disease. These findings support current recommendations to screen all first-degree relatives of patients with celiac disease regardless of clinical symptoms." The findings support current recommendations to screen all first-degree relatives of patients with celiac disease, even in the absence of clinical symptoms. If you have an unscreened first-degree relative, a mother, father, brother, sister, son or daughter, it's a good idea for them to get screened, especially if they have symptoms, but even if they don't, as "silent " celiac disease can be an issue for many of these folks. Read more in the Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition and at medscape.com. The research team included Michelle J Gould; Jenna Dowhaniuk; Jorge Arredondo; Paul Azzopardi; Tina Hu; Heather Mileski; Andrea Carpenter; Nikhil Pai; and Herbert Brill. They are variously affiliated with the Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; the Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Department of Paediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; the Department of Pathology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; the Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; the Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; the Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; the Department of Pediatrics, William Osler Health System, Brampton, ON, Canada; and McMaster Children’s Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
- 6 comments
-
- celiac
- celiac disease
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Celiac.com 06/20/2022 - Doctors currently recommend that first-degree relatives of those with celiac disease also get screened for the disease, but it's been unclear how often doctors should screen, or at what age. A team of researchers recently set out to detect variables influencing the risk of celiac disease development so they can develop and validate clinical prediction models in order to provide individualized screening advice. The research team included Caroline R. Meijer; Renata Auricchio; Hein Putter; Gemma Castillejo; Paula Crespo; Judit Gyimesi; Corina Hartman; Sanja Kolacek; Sibylle Koletzko; Ilma Korponay-Szabo; Eva Martinez Ojinaga; Isabel Polanco; Carmen Ribes-Koninckx; Raanan Shamir; Hania Szajewska; Riccardo Troncone; Vincenzo Villanacci; Katharina Werkstetter; and M. Luisa Mearin. The team analyzed ten years of follow-up data from the PreventCD-birth cohort, which enrolled nearly a thousand genetically predisposed children with celiac-affected first-degree relatives. The researchers combined significant variables for celiac risk to establish a risk score, and performed landmark analyses at different ages to create prediction models using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, backward elimination, and Harrell’s c-index for discrimination. They used data from the independent NeoCel cohort to validate their findings. Their results show that the children with celiac-affected first-degree relatives develop celiac disease early in life, and that the main risk factors are gender, age and HLA-DQ genetic markers, which are all important for sound screening advice. According to the researchers children with celiac-affected first-degree relatives should be screened early in life, which should also include HLA-DQ2/8–typing. Anyone genetically predisposed to celiac disease should get more personalized screening advice using the team's Prediction application. Read more in Gastroenterology
-
- celiac disease
- children
-
(and 6 more)
Tagged with:
-
Celiac.com 04/27/2020 - Recent studies on celiac disease have reported changes in the gut microbiome. Researchers don't currently know if the change in the microbial makeup is the cause or a result of the disease, especially in cases of adult onset celiac disease. A team of researchers recently set out to compare of small gut and whole gut microbiota of first-degree relatives with adult celiac disease patients and controls. The research team included Rahul Bodkhe, Sudarshan A. Shetty, Dhiraj P. Dhotre, Anil K. Verma, Khushbo Bhatia, Asha Mishra, Gurvinder Kaur, Pranav Pande, Dhinoth K. Bangarusamy, Beena P. Santosh, Rajadurai C. Perumal, Vineet Ahuja, Yogesh S. Shouche, and Govind K. Makharia. They are variously affiliated with the National Centre for Microbial Resource, National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, India; the Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; the Department of Transplant Immunology and Immunogenetics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; and AgriGenome Labs Pvt. Ltd., Kerala, India. First-degree relatives of celiac patients might offer researchers a chance to study gut microbiome in pre-disease state, since they are genetically prone toward celiac disease. 16S rRNA gene sequencing showed that ecosystem diversity was similar for the disease condition in celiacs, the pre-disease condition in first-degree relatives, and for control subjects. They did note differences in levels of amplicon sequence variant (ASV), indicating changes in specific ASVs between pre-disease and diseased condition. Duodenal biopsies showed greater differences in ASVs compared to fecal samples, which suggests more widespread disturbance to the microbiota in the diseased area. The duodenal microbiota of first-degree relatives was marked by large quantities of ASVs of the genera Parvimonas, Granulicatella, Gemella, Bifidobacterium, Anaerostipes, and Actinomyces. The duodenal microbiota of people with celiac disease contained more ASVs from genera Megasphaera and Helicobacter compared to the microbiota of first-degree relatives. Compared to control group microbiota, the fecal microbiota of both celiacs and first-degree relatives had lower amounts of ASVs classified as Akkermansia and Dorea. Moreover, functional metagenome projections showed reduced gluten degradation by celiac fecal microbiota as compared with first-degree relatives and control subjects. The data show clear differences in ASVs and suggests that celiac fecal microbiota have an impair ability to break down gluten compared to the fecal microbiota of first-degree relatives. More research is needed to examine strain levels and active functional microbiota profiles, in celiacs and first-degree relatives, in order to clarify role of gut microbiome in celiac disease development. Read more in Frontiers of Microbiology, 08 February 2019
-
Celiac.com 01/25/2016 - The latest research says that most fail to recommend celiac screening for first degree relatives, although some doctors are better than others. In a recent study, researchers tried to get an idea of just how frequently celiac disease patients receive a physician-issued recommendation for first-degree relative screening. The research team included Abhik Roy, Colin Smith, Constantine Daskalakis, Kristin Voorhees, Stephanie Moleski, Anthony J DiMarino, David Kastenberg. They are variously associated with the Division of Biostatistics, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, the Department of Medicine at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, and the National Foundation for Celiac Awareness in Pennsylvania. For their study, the research team conducted a 12-question survey assessing whether celiac disease patients receive a physician recommendation to screen first-degree relatives for celiac disease, and the impact of such a recommendation, was validated with outpatients in a university gastroenterology practice, called "University"patients. The 12-question survey was then distributed online to members of the National Foundation for Celiac Awareness (NFCA). The team then collected results over 3 months, and used univariate analysis to compare cohort means, and to assess the association between demographic and diagnostic factors and first-degree relative screening recommendations. A total of 87 University patients participated in the validation phase. Test-retest reliability of 4 key survey questions was high, with a Kappa coefficient >0.80. The team based its main analyses on data from 677 NFCA and 82 University respondents. Most respondents were female, with an average age of 45 years. Nearly 80% of University patients received recommendation for celiac disease screening for first-degree relatives, compared with just 44% of the NFCA respondents (p < 0.001). Of patients who did receive a screening recommendation, from either group, 98% percent discussed the recommendation with family members, leading to celiac disease screening in 71% of University patients, and 79% of NFCA respondents, and to a celiac disease diagnosis in 18% of University patients, and 27% of NFCA respondents. Physicians commonly fail to mention to their celiac disease patients the importance of screening first-degree family members. Because such screening is so effective, the researchers are suggesting that making such screening recommendations may increase the diagnosis of celiac disease in high risk individuals. Source: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research, Vol 4, No 12 (2015)
-
Celiac.com 07/27/2015 - First-degree relatives of individuals with celiac disease are at increased risk for this disorder, but little is known about their risk for other autoimmune diseases. A research team recently set out to assess the risk of non-celiac autoimmune disease in first-degree relatives and spouses of people with celiac disease. The research team included Louise Emilsson, Cisca Wijmenga, Joseph A. Murray, and Jonas F. Ludvigsson. They are variously affiliated with the Primary Care Research Unit, Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter, Värmland County, Sweden, the Department of Health Management and Health Economy, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, the Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and with the Department of Pediatrics, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden. The team found individuals with celiac disease by searching computerized duodenal and jejunal biopsies, collected from 1969 through 2008, at 28 pathology departments in Sweden. The team found 29,096 patients with celiac disease based on biopsy reports of villous atrophy of Marsh grade 3 or higher and matched individuals with celiac disease with up to 5 of 144,522 non-celiac control patients based on sex, age, county, and calendar year. Through Swedish health care registries, the team identified all first-degree relatives (fathers, mothers, siblings, and offspring) and spouses of 84,648 individuals with celiac disease, and 430,942 control subjects. The team used Cox regression analysis to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for non-celiac autoimmune disease, such as Crohn’s disease, type 1 diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, sarcoidosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or ulcerative colitis, within these groups. Cox analysis showed that during the follow-up period averaging just under 11 years, nearly 3333, or 4%, of the first-degree relatives of patients with celiac disease, and 12,860 relatives of controls (3.0%), had an autoimmune disease other than celiac disease. First-degree relatives of people with celiac disease had an increased risk of non-celiac autoimmune disease, compared with controls (HR, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.23–1.33), as did spouses (HR, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.06–1.35). Risk estimates for non-celiac autoimmune disease did not differ between first-degree relatives and spouses of individuals with celiac disease (interaction test: P = .11). Hazard Ratios for non-celiac autoimmune disease were highest in the first 2 years of follow-up evaluation. First-degree relatives and spouses of individuals with celiac disease have a significantly higher risk of non-celiac autoimmune disease. In addition to genetic factors, environmental factors and better awareness, testing and diagnosis might influence rates of autoimmune disorders in first-degree relatives of individuals with celiac disease. Source: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2015.01.026
-
- autoimmune
- celiac
-
(and 6 more)
Tagged with:
-
Dig Dis Sci 1999;44:2344-2349. Celiac.com 04/10/2000 - Dr. Carme Farre, of Hospital Sant Joan de Deu, in Barcelona, Spain, and his multi-center colleagues, report in the November issue of Digestive Diseases and Sciences that both serologic markers and the human lymphocyte antigen class II extended DQ2 (HLA-DQ2) haplotype are useful markers for screening first-degree relatives of patients with celiac disease for the disorder. These markers are more reliable predictors of celiac disease than other clinical features, which are absent from one third of relatives of people with celiac disease. The researchers examined the usefulness of serologic markers, HLA-DQ2 haplotype, and clinical features common to celiac disease in the diagnosis of the disorder in 675 first-degree relatives of celiac disease patients. The diagnosis was confirmed by intestinal biopsy. Their results showed that 5.5% of the subjects were diagnosed with celiac disease, which is significantly higher than what was observed in the general public in a previous study. Serum IgA-class anti-endomysium antibodies (IgA-AEA) and IgA-class anti-gliadin antibodies (IgA-AGA) were observed in 5.8% and 1.9% of the relatives, respectively. According to the researchers: Our results show that IgA-AEA is the most useful marker, since all but one IgA-AEA-positive relative showed histological findings of [celiac disease]. Further, the measurement of IgA-AGA would have missed 66% of the affected relatives. The researchers also concluded that the HLA-DQ2 haplotype also appeared to be a more useful indicator to determine which first-degree relatives had an increased genetic susceptibility to celiac disease, because the marker was detected in 93% of first-degree relatives found to have celiac disease, and 18% of those without it. The four most common clinical symptoms for celiac disease, diarrhea, anemia, food intolerance and growth retardation, were not found in one third of the relatives of patients with celiac disease. The researchers conclude: Although the definitive diagnosis of [celiac disease] relies upon the intestinal biopsy, it should be preceded by a noninvasive, inexpensive and easy-to-perform screening technique. Their findings indicate that using blood serum IgA-AEA measurements is a useful screening tool for noninvasive screening, and HLA-DQ2 assessment may delineate a very high risk population with a particular genetic susceptibility to [celiac disease].
- 1 comment
-
- celiac
- celiac disease
-
(and 8 more)
Tagged with:
-
Celiac.com 03/03/2014 - Spotting celiac disease early is important for optimal patient outcome. However, serological markers of celiac disease aren't much good for spotting mild histopathological lesions in adults at risk for celiac. A team of researchers recently set out to assess the usefulness of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQ2/8 genotyping, followed by duodenal biopsy for the detection of celiac disease in adult first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with celiac disease. The research team included L. Vaquero, A. Caminero, A. Nuñez, M. Hernando, C. Iglesias, J. Casqueiro, and S. Vivas. They are variously affiliated with the Gastroenterology Unit, the Pathology Department, and the Pediatric Department of the University Hospital of León, Altos de Nava, with the Institute of Molecular Biology (INBIOMIC), the Microbiology Department and the Institute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED) at the University of León, all in León, Spain. For their study, the team looked at ninety-two adult DQ2/8 positive FDRs. They offered duodenal biopsy irrespective of the serology result or associated symptoms. They then noted clinical features, associated autoimmune diseases and biochemical parameters. The team conducted duodenal biopsies on sixty-seven FDRs, averaging 34 years of age. Thirty-two of those patients (48%) showed histopathological changes, which broke down as follows: twelve patients Marsh I (18%), one Marsh II (1.5%), four Marsh IIIA (6%), five Marsh IIIB (7.5%) and ten Marsh IIIC (15%). Seventeen of the sixty-seven patients (25%) showed positive serological markers, with only one showing Marsh I and the remainder presenting some degree of duodenal atrophy (Marsh III). Thirty-three of the sixty-seven patients (54%) suffered gastrointestinal symptoms, with dyspepsia being the most common complaint. The distribution of symptoms, anaemia and autoimmune disease was not changed by a patient's duodenal histopathological stage. Overall, in first-degree relatives, current blood-based screening would diagnose 50% of the cases that displayed any celiac disease characteristic, and miss 6% of the cases with mucosal atrophy. From these results, the team concludes that adult first-degree relatives of patients with celiac disease can benefit from a screening strategy on the basis of HLA-DQ genotyping, followed by a duodenal biopsy. FDRs with gastrointestinal and other symptoms may see improvement on a gluten-free diet. Source: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Mar;26(3):263-7. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000020.
-
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003 Jul;38(7):727-31. Effectiveness of the sorbitol H2 breath test in detecting histological damage among relatives of coeliacs. Tursi A, Brandimarte G, Giorgetti GM, Inchingolo celiac disease. Dept. of Emergency, L. Bonomo Hospital, Andria (BA), Italy. Celiac.com 08/07/2003 - An Italian study conducted by Dr. L. Bonomo and colleagues and published in the July 2003 edition of Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology concludes that A significant proportion of coeliacs may be missed if relatives are screened by serology only, while the efficacy of sorbitol H2-BT in screening relatives is confirmed. This study confirms that neither a breath test nor serology can replace intestinal biopsy, which remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of celiac disease, thus confirming the continued importance of performing biopsies for diagnosing celiac disease. The studys goal was to determine the diagnostic capabilities of serological tests (antigliadin (AGA), antiendomysium (EMA) and anti-tissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG)) and sorbitol H2 breath test (H2-BT) in the detection of celiac disease in first-degree relatives. The study screened 111 first-degree relatives of 37 celiac families using both test methods to determine candidates for small-bowel biopsy. First-degree relatives with abnormal test results underwent a small-bowel biopsy, as did those with negative serological and H2 breath test results who had clinical complaints or suspected that they may have celiac disease. The biopsy results were expressed using the Marsh classification system, and celiac disease was diagnosed in 49 of the 111 screened relatives of celiacs, or in 44.14%. A breakdown of the results is as follows: 5 showed Marsh IIIc, 8 Marsh IIIb, 16 Marsh IIIa, 13 Marsh II and 7 Marsh I lesions. 19 relatives showed the classical form of celiac disease, 20 showed the sub-clinical form, and 10 showed the silent form. The serological test results indicated an overall positivity of only 36.73%, with strong positive results only in those with severe intestinal damage and Marsh IIIb-c lesions. The sorbitol H2-BT breath test results showed an overall positivity of 83.67%, and showed strong positivity in patients with slight histological damage (Marsh I-IIIa).
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):