Jump to content
  • You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Test Results Back - Can Someone Interpret?


KristenInWA

Recommended Posts

KristenInWA Newbie

Hi everyone,

I finally got my 'celiac package' back (YAY!) from my doctor's office, and this is what it's showing:

Anti endomysial, IgA: Negative

Anti Gliadin, IgA: 4

Anti Gliadin, IgG: 65

Anti tTransglutaminase, IgA: 2

The results say that my anti-gliadin IgG is 'low positive' with a reference between 61 and 90 for low positive.

I've been lowish carb for about a year now, and have not been eating bread in particular.

Based on this information as I had mentioned in a separate post, the doctor recommended I eat wheat products every day for two weeks and come back in to get a re-draw. I started yesterday and am feeling gross - bloated, gassy and generally icky.

Any information you have on what this means would be wonderful.

Thanks :) Kristen


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lizard00 Enthusiast

If you have been gluten lite, which it sounds as though you have, it can most definitely affect your test results. And to be honest, two weeks is probably not going to be enough. Your tests do indicate something's going on, so it seems as though you are on the right track.

nora-n Rookie

Yes, two weeks is probably not enough. I was gluten light for six months and five weeks of much gluten did not give a positive biopsy. Should have been more like 6 weeks to three months, in my case maybe three months or more.

I have not seen anywhere in the literature that gluten challenges have lsated only two weeks. I have seen 6 weeks and three months and six months, even up to six years.

(they put some diagnosed celiacs back on gluten and tested them repeatedly and it took from six weeks to six years, all of them went positive I think. In the old days they used to tink celiac was a childhood thing and that they outgrew it)

CSU Grad Newbie

Yes, two weeks is probably not enough. I was gluten light for six months and five weeks of much gluten did not give a positive biopsy. Should have been more like 6 weeks to three months, in my case maybe three months or more.

I have not seen anywhere in the literature that gluten challenges have lsated only two weeks. I have seen 6 weeks and three months and six months, even up to six years.

(they put some diagnosed celiacs back on gluten and tested them repeatedly and it took from six weeks to six years, all of them went positive I think. In the old days they used to tink celiac was a childhood thing and that they outgrew it)

Also, be advised that it depends very heavily on what you call "wheat". Eating junky white bread will get you far less "wheat" in your diet than something with a normal concentration of wheat gluten in it. So, "eating wheat" is really a vague term, and your doctor should have been much more specific, if he/she really understands whats going on here...

My advice would be, if you really want/need "proof" of your ailment, then get a DNA test done also, and stop piddling around with serology antibody tests, which, because of their average sensitivity and specificity, are not very accurate. Of course, your biopsy antibody tests will be more accurate than the basic serology, but invasive...and less accurate than a DNA test combined with your already existing symptoms and antibody results.

If you don't need a "diagnosis" for medical or insurance reasons, then just follow the gluten free diet; you already know you need to.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to ThomasA55's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      5

      Iron loss and potential celiac.

    2. - ThomasA55 replied to ThomasA55's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      5

      Iron loss and potential celiac.

    3. - trents replied to ThomasA55's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      5

      Iron loss and potential celiac.

    4. - trents replied to ThomasA55's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      5

      Iron loss and potential celiac.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,086
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    Joseph01
    Newest Member
    Joseph01
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Yes, it does. And joint pain is another celiac symptom that is now well-recognized. 
    • ThomasA55
      Does my iron loss sound like celiac to you?
    • trents
      Being as how you are largely asymptomatic, I would certainly advise undertaking a gluten challenge in order to get formal testing for celiac disease. We have many forum participants who become violently ill when they undertake a gluten challenge and they therefore can't carry through with it. That doesn't seem to be the case with you. The reason I think it is important for you to get tested is that many or most people who don't have a formal diagnosis find it difficult to be consistent with the gluten-free diet. They find ways to rationalize that their symptoms are due to something other than celiac disease . . . especially when it becomes socially limiting.  The other factor here is by being inconsistent with the gluten free diet, assuming you do have celiac disease, you are likely causing slow, incremental damage to your gut, even though you are largely asymptomatic. It can take years for that damage to get to the point where it results in spinoff health problems. Concerning genetic testing, it can't be used for diagnosis, at least not definitively. Somewhere between 30 and 40% of the general population will have one or both of the two genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease. Yet, only about 1% of the general population will develop active celiac disease. But the genetic testing can be used as a rule out for celiac disease if you don't have either gene. But even so, that doesn't eliminate the possibility of having NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).
    • ThomasA55
    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @ThomasA55! Before I give my opinion on your question about whether or not you should undergo a gluten challenge, I would like to know how you react when you get a good dose of gluten? Are you largely asymptomatic or do you experience significant illness such as nausea and diarrhea? You mentioned intermittent joint pain before you began experimenting with a low gluten diet. Anything else?
×
×
  • Create New...