Do You Have Celiac Disease and Have Questions Or Need Help?
Join Celiac.com's forum / message board and get your questions answered! Our forum has nearly 1 MILLION POSTS, and over 62,000 MEMBERS just waiting to help you with any questions about celiac disease and the gluten-free diet. We'll see you there!
Follow / Share
|Get Email Alerts|
- Safe Gluten-Free Food List (Safe Ingredients)
- Unsafe Gluten-Free Food List (Unsafe Ingredients)
- Gluten-Free Alcoholic Beverages
- Celiac Disease Symptoms
- The Gluten-Free Diet 101 - A Beginner's Guide to Going Gluten-Free
- Interpretation of Celiac Disease Blood Test Results
- Is Buckwheat Flour Really Gluten-Free?
Can High Definition Endoscopy Increase Celiac Disease Detection?
Jefferson Adams is a freelance writer living in San Francisco. His poems, essays and photographs have appeared in Antioch Review, Blue Mesa Review, CALIBAN, Hayden's Ferry Review, Huffington Post, the Mississippi Review, and Slate among others.
He is a member of both the National Writers Union, the International Federation of Journalists, and covers San Francisco Health News for Examiner.com.View all articles by Jefferson Adams
Celiac.com 05/02/2016 - Even with endoscopies, physicians can still miss some cases of celiac disease. A team of researchers recently set out to determine if I-Scan, or virtual chromo-endoscopy, could improve sensitivity of endoscopy to detect markers of villous atrophy in patients with celiac disease.
The research team included Hugo A. Penny, Peter D. Mooney, Mitchell Burden, Nisha Patel, Alexander J. Johnston, Simon H. Wong, Julian Teare, and David S. Sanders. They are variously affiliated with Royal Hallamshire Hospital in Sheffield, UK, and with St Mary's Hospital in London, UK.
For their study, the team assessed patients from two UK hospitals in 3 groups.
- For Group 1, they used standard high definition, white light endoscopy (WLE).
- For Group 2, they used WLE plus I-Scan.
- For Group 3, they used a non-high definition control group.
They recruited an initial group of 758 patients. That group was 62% female, with an average age of 52. They recorded the presence of endoscopic markers, and took at least 4 duodenal biopsies from all patients. They also made concurrent blood tests, and compared observations with patient histology. The patient breakdown was as follows: Group 1: 230; Group 2: 228; Group 3: 300.
The team made 135 new diagnoses of celiac disease, with 21 cases in Group 1, 24 in Group 2, and 89 in Group 3. The sensitivity for detection of endoscopic markers of villous atrophy was significantly higher in both Group 1 at 85.7% and Group 2 at 75%, compared to non-high definition controls at 41.6%.
There was no significant difference between high definition only and I-Scan groups.
In non-high definition endoscopy, they found that missed diagnosis was mainly due to lesser degrees of villous atrophy (p = 0.019) and low tTG titre (p = 0.007).
From their data, the team concluded that high definition endoscopy with or without I-Scan increases the detection of celiac disease during routine endoscopy.
Celiac.com welcomes your comments below (registration is NOT required).
New Guidelines Urged for Diagnosis of Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity
People with Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) suffer intestinal and non-intestinal symptoms when they consume gluten-containing food, but they do not have either celiac disease or wheat allergy.... [READ MORE]
Asymptomatic Children Might Not Need Biopsy for Celiac Diagnosis
Doctors might not need a biopsy to accurately diagnose celiac disease in asymptomatic children who have elevated anti-tTG, according to the latest study.... [READ MORE]
Increased Detection of Celiac Disease with Measurement of Deamidated Gliadin Peptide Antibody Before Endoscopy
Celiac disease is frequently mis-diagnosed.... [READ MORE]
30-Year Study Shows Duodenal Screening Biopsies Help Detect Adult Celiac Disease
Data from blood studies suggest that about 1% or so of North Americans have celiac disease.... [READ MORE]