Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Test Results


Lillyth

Recommended Posts

Lillyth Explorer

I got my tTG test results back - they say I'm negative, but I've been gluten free.

She (the doc) only did the tTG because she said the celiac would show up on that one, regardless of my consumption of gluten.

She also reiterated that the rash I have does not look like DH - if I had that it would be in little red clumps (which it was before I went off gluten), and that if I had DH it would be on my elbows.

"Good News!" she said, "It doesn't look like you have celiac."

That doesn't sound so good to me, because if it's not celiac, then I need to figure out what else out there could possibly give me all the symptoms of it - weight gain, distended tummy, excessive gas & bowel activity, extreme fatigue, and major break-outs on my back any time I use shampoo or conditiner with wheat in them.

I guess my questions are 1) do I need to be consuming gluten for the tTG to come back positive, and 2) if I don't have celiac, what the hell IS wrong with me?

TYIA

Lil


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lillyth Explorer

Someone, anyone?!?! :unsure:

I looked on the site for info but couldn't find any.

Anyone, Bueller, Bueller? :D

lonewolf Collaborator

If you've been gluten-free, your tests will come back negative. I've been wheat-free and mostly gluten-free for 10 years, and my doctor still thought I should have the whole celiac panel. At least she took me seriously, but she obviously didn't know what she was doing. I know nothing about DH - sorry I can't help you there.

It sounds like you already know you have a problem with gluten - your symptoms sound pretty convincing. Do you need a diagnosis for peace of mind? I thought I did, but figured out there was no way I was going to get it, so I just need to take care of myself.

Canadian Karen Community Regular

Don't forget that even if you do not get the "official" diagnosis of celiac, you may very well likely be gluten intolerant at the very least. I think this is the "tip of the iceberg" they keep talking about, the tip that is showing is the actual celiac cases being diagnosed, but the whole huge iceberg underneath the water is all the rest of society that has a problem with gluten or not diagnosed celiac yet......

I still think the best test is the gluten free diet. If you have a positive response to the gluten-free diet, then you have your answer regardless of what the tests say......

Hugs.

Karen

LaurieAnn13 Newbie

I would agree, if you seem to be benefiting from the gluten-free diet then stay with it. Your body is your best indicator. A problem I've run into is how some doctors really aren't that educated when it comes to celiac disease. After all, look at EVERYTHING that can go wrong with the human body...doctors are only human, they can't know everything about everything! I've had doctors tell me that I don't need to completely cut it out of my diet and if I take a prescription that contains gluten, it's not really a big deal. Well, we all know that is not true! Also, celiac is such an "individual disease." I have had friends diagnosed with no other symptoms than blisters on their hands, or because they were told they had ADD and decided to seach out another explanation than accept that diagnosis. One of my many symptoms was a skin condition that no dermatologist could diagnose. I always got these big, circular, deep sores on my skin that would not go away for weeks, if not months at a time! Well, guess what...when I started the gluten-free diet, the sores went away! Unfortunately, I still have many scars from it that may never go away, but at least the sores did!! So if you have a rash that disappears with this diet, I say keep it up... Especially because no matter how knowledgable your physician is, medicine is in and of itself imperfect.

Good luck!

Lillyth Explorer
If you've been gluten-free, your tests will come back negative. I've been wheat-free and mostly gluten-free for 10 years, and my doctor still thought I should have the whole celiac panel. At least she took me seriously, but she obviously didn't know what she was doing. I know nothing about DH - sorry I can't help you there.

It sounds like you already know you have a problem with gluten - your symptoms sound pretty convincing. Do you need a diagnosis for peace of mind? I thought I did, but figured out there was no way I was going to get it, so I just need to take care of myself.

The main reason I want the DX is for tax reasons (I am a Realtor, which means I am an "independent contractor", therefore I itemize everything already.) As you all now, gluten-free foods are expensive, and living in a major city with a son who goes to private school, well, you get the financial idea. I know I can (as an independent contractor) write off anything as long as I have a prescription for it. (Which was the whole idea behind the DX in the first place).

Funny thing is I tried to tell the doc I saw (not my usual one) that my being gluten-free would effect the blood tests, which was why I wanted the test for DH in the first place. Surprisingly, (can you detect the sarcasm), the test came back negative.

I have regular conversations with my chiropractor (who sees me WAY more than my medical doc), and he says that just cutting out the wheat (not even ALL gluten), my body was 10x stronger within a week. (He also poked my tummy when I pointed out the distention, and he kept poking it, saying "what a trip", I've never felt anything like that" - meaning a taught tummy a good 6 inches out from my ribs). His basic thought is why go through the testing hassle when I know I have this medical condition - not to mention my IMMEDIATE body reaction to going off gluten. (Not that I necessarily feel that great immediately, but that my body is so much stronger when he tests it).

I have much more to say, but I am tired now - I will respond more tomorrow.

Thnaks for all the responses & for listening (reading) :D

Lil

tiredofdoctors Enthusiast

I say, if it works, keep with it. If you just have elevated antigliadin antibodies, you STILL have gluten intolerance. As Karen said, it is the tip of the iceberg. I had no idea that I had elevated antigliadin antibodies -- until I walked like I had MS and I kept falling. Had every test known to man and G-d performed on me until they realized that the gluten was destroying my cerebellum. I know that I'm a little "over the top" about gluten now, but I had no idea that it could do this to you. If being gluten free helps you -- stay with it. I agree, too that your levels could have gone down - if you don't expose your body to the poison, the levels are going to go down. Take care of yourself . . . . Lynne

The other thing that I thought about -- did they do a biopsy on the rash? If they didn't, even though it doesn't LOOK like the normal DH, how do they know it isn't?????


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lillyth Explorer
I say, if it works, keep with it. If you just have elevated antigliadin antibodies, you STILL have gluten intolerance. As Karen said, it is the tip of the iceberg. I had no idea that I had elevated antigliadin antibodies -- until I walked like I had MS and I kept falling. Had every test known to man and G-d performed on me until they realized that the gluten was destroying my cerebellum. I know that I'm a little "over the top" about gluten now, but I had no idea that it could do this to you. If being gluten free helps you -- stay with it. I agree, too that your levels could have gone down - if you don't expose your body to the poison, the levels are going to go down. Take care of yourself . . . . Lynne

The other thing that I thought about -- did they do a biopsy on the rash? If they didn't, even though it doesn't LOOK like the normal DH, how do they know it isn't?????

They wouldn't even do a biopsy. That was why I went in the first place. But that's Kaiser for ya - anythng to save money...

But I will be seeing my normal doc next month & I will be sure to raise high holy h--l to get the biopsy done. If I make it more expensive for them not to - meaning emotionally & energetically expensive...

I will let you all know how that goes...

Lil

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - knitty kitty replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      Gluten Free Sugar or Starch known to increase gas?

    2. - xxnonamexx replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      Gluten Free Sugar or Starch known to increase gas?

    3. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Lotte18's topic in Publications & Publicity
      17

      Prospective CRISPR research

    4. - jenniber replied to jenniber's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      21

      Disaccharide deficient, confusing biopsy results, no blood test

    5. - knitty kitty replied to lehum's topic in Super Sensitive People
      14

      4.5 years into diagnosis, eating gluten-free and still struggling: would love support, tips, & stories

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,768
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    saharper08
    Newest Member
    saharper08
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Even if you don't have Celiac Disease, you can still get SIBO.   Glad to hear you're taking the vitamins and magnesium!   Are you getting sufficient Omega Three oils like flaxseed, olive oil, or Sunflower seed oil?   I didn't like coconut oil because it upset my digestive tract.   How is your Vitamin D level?
    • xxnonamexx
      I was looking at SIBO but I don't think I fall into that category. Yes I eat meat. I don't think I'm celiac I think I am just gluten intolerant but I take multivitamin, Super B Complex, Benfo with Thiam, Thiamax, Neuromag that you suggested.
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      @Lotte18, thank you for providing this page from the research proposal. Some comments, if I may (apologies for what you already know): They start by saying that previous research has shown that it's possible to modify the HLA-DQA1 gene and have that new version expressed "in humans" (not sure if they mean intact humans or just cells in culture). This is a standard form of scientific communication where you explain what is already known as it relates to what you want to do next. The HLA-DQA1 gene encodes 1/2 of a series of "locks" from my earlier metaphor. Two of the types of locks that can be made by variants of this gene are called DQ2.5 and DQ8 (either of which will confer susceptibility to celiac). DQ2.5, DQ8, and other DQ's are referred to as "heterodimers" - "dimer" means made up of exactly 2 pieces and "hetero" means that the pieces are not identical to one another (identical parts would be homodimer). HLA-DQA1 genes each make a protein that becomes one of the two parts of a series of heterodimers. Different forms of HLA-DQA1 are called "variants" or "alleles".  Next they say that they propose to use the same technology in attempt to minimize/cure celiac. The idea is reasonable science and before considering all of the caveats it certainly has merit as something to consider. As a side note, I would challenge some of their language. DQ2.5 and not-2.5 are both "variants" or "alleles" - one is not "wildtype" nor the other "mutant". Their proposal is to "modify", not "correct" the gene. This might sound picky but I have a background in genetics and this is jarring to me. The last paragraph outlines more of the roadmap for their proposal using relatively mundane steps (apheresis) and relatively advanced steps (CAR-T). There is a logic to their approach but there are severe caveats. CAR-T is kind of a nuclear option. It has shown many miracle cures in certain kinds of cancer and it is being studied for some kinds of life-threatening autoimmune disease. It also has devastating side effects. If tomorrow someone offered me a fully validated CAR-T procedure for celiac along the lines of this proposal, based on my understanding of the risks I would turn them down. Separately, I would also have concerns about the "off target" risk of the CRISPR part of the procedure. In addition to funding issues, there may be significant ethical issues that would challenge their proposal. Human clinical trial proposals go through extensive review before they are approved and one of the significant considerations is whether the risks to the patient are warranted (relative to the benefit). If a procedure has really horrible side effects but it is the only available option for a dying patient, the review board is likely to approve. However, if there is a much less harmful treatment option that delivers enough of a benefit, then there is a higher chance that the trial would not be approved. For celiacs, the availability and relative effectiveness of gluten-free diet will raise the bar for trying risky therapies in the clinic. Science and medicine constantly progress, so it's entirely possible that someday there will be a safe and effective genetic "cure" for celiac. However not anytime soon and I believe it would only come after these CAR-T procedures have become routine in the treatment of a long list of other diseases. In a world of unlimited funding for scientific research I would definitely fund this proposal. In the world of tight competition for research funding that we live in I would need to know a lot more about their proposal and the greater context of how it fits in with other research before I would give them money at this time (not that anyone is asking me).
    • jenniber
      thank you for that info too!! will keep this in mind if he ends up in the ER again! 
    • knitty kitty
      @Heavenly Flower and @lehum, How are you doing?   My favorite book is The Paleo Approach by Dr. Sarah Ballantyne, a Celiac herself.   This book explains the AutoImmune Protocol Diet (AIP diet) which is the diet I follow.  Yes, it is very strict, just meat, veggies and some fruit.  But it really works.  You cut back to just meat and veggies to let your digestive system calms and starts healing.  Then you add back foods slowly looking for intolerance symptoms.  Supplementing with B Complex vitamins, Vitamin D and minerals like Magnesium ensures you're receiving sufficient nutrients needed to heal.  Correcting any vitamin deficits is important in Celiac disease.   Hope you're doing well!  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.