Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Importance Of Tests


foxdog

Recommended Posts

foxdog Newbie

My naturopathic doctor discovered my gluten allergy through a four week allergy elimination diet. I didn't eat corn, soy, wheat, dairy, eggs, for four weeks. When I added these back in to my diet, I had a very bad reaction to wheat.

I've been strictly gluten-free for one year, and somewhat gluten-free for the two years prior to that.

In that time my vision problems, fatigue, endometriosis like problems, ovarian cysts, migranes, joint pain, has gone away, and I've lost a lot of weight. In short, I feel great, better than I ever have.

Should I even bother with the expensive diagnostic tests?

What are the benefits to having a test?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lob6796 Contributor
My naturopathic doctor discovered my gluten allergy through a four week allergy elimination diet. I didn't eat corn, soy, wheat, dairy, eggs, for four weeks. When I added these back in to my diet, I had a very bad reaction to wheat.

I've been strictly gluten-free for one year, and somewhat gluten-free for the two years prior to that.

In that time my vision problems, fatigue, endometriosis like problems, ovarian cysts, migranes, joint pain, has gone away, and I've lost a lot of weight. In short, I feel great, better than I ever have.

Should I even bother with the expensive diagnostic tests?

What are the benefits to having a test?

Unless you need the test to give yourself piece of mind, I wouldn't even bother. You have the evidence you need to keep being gluten free, so just stick with it. In the future you can tell doctors that you have either celiac or a gluten intolerance proven by an elimination diet. That should be good enough for their purposes. To be tested for celiac you would have to go back on gluten for quite some time, given that you have been gluten free for so long. They could order you to be on gluten for up to 6 months before they would feel the tests to be accurate. I personally wouldn't want to go back to feeling so crummy and lose all that I had worked towards.

mftnchn Explorer

There is no benefit for you at this point, because you will have to go back to eating gluten, perhaps for months, for the tests to be positive.

Enterolab, which does not diagnose celiac, only gluten sensitivity may work for up to a year after you stop eating gluten. But at this point it is really hard to say if anything will show up for you.

I think you do what you know is right for yourself.

My suggestion: if you have first degree relatives with symptoms, encourage them to do testing before going gluten free. With a confirmed celiac in the family, if others have symptoms, doctors may take this more seriously. I.E. other may benefit.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - MogwaiStripe posted a topic in Dermatitis Herpetiformis
      0

      Dermatitis Herpetiformis Cleared up With EpiPen, etc.

    2. - Dr. Gunn replied to MicG's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      Test interpretations

    3. - trents replied to MicG's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      Test interpretations

    4. - Dr. Gunn replied to MicG's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      Test interpretations

    5. - Aretaeus Cappadocia commented on Scott Adams's article in Spring 2026 Issue
      1

      How Social Media Algorithms Are Fueling Gluten Anxiety: TikTok, Reddit, and Instagram Trends

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,659
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Dr. Gunn
    Newest Member
    Dr. Gunn
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • MogwaiStripe
      I had to rush to the hospital last week due to anaphylactic shock from taking a dose of an antibiotic. Received EpiPen, steroids, antihistamines, zofran (all injected/IV). When I woke up the next day, ALL of the rashes I've had that started since going gluten free were cleared up. EVEN THE dermatitis herpetiformis was gone. Has anyone else experienced this or happen to know why that would happen? The meds they gave me were all meds that I've taken to try to resolve the rashes, but they never worked in pill form. I'm wondering if it the addition of the epi that helped, it if injected steroids and antihistamines were what did the job.
    • Dr. Gunn
      Exactly! Negative genetics can rule out celiac disease with close to 100% certainty. It takes tTg antibody testing and biopsy confirm the diagnosis in a genetically susceptible individual. 
    • trents
      What Dr. Gunn states is essentially true. It is a rule out measure. But be aware that to possess either of the two primary genes that have been identified with celiac disease (or both) doesn't necessarily mean that you have or will develop celiac disease. Almost 40% of the general population carries one or both but only about 1% of the general population will develop active celiac disease. It remains latent until triggered by some stress event which may or may not occur. So, there is a genetic component to celiac disease but there is also an epigenetic component. 
    • Dr. Gunn
      Have you had celiac genetic risk testing? A celiac genetic test is accurate with or without gluten in your diet. If you don't carry the celiac risk genes you can effectively rule out celiac disease for life. 
    • Scott Adams
      Based on those results alone, it’s not possible to say you have celiac disease. The test that is usually most specific for celiac, tTG-IgA, is negative in your results, and the endomysial antibody (EMA) is also negative, which generally argues against active celiac disease. However, your deamidated gliadin IgA is elevated, and your total IgA level is also high, which can sometimes affect how the other antibody tests behave. Another important factor is that you were reducing gluten before the test, which can lower antibody levels and make the results less reliable. Because of that, many doctors recommend a gluten challenge (eating gluten regularly for several weeks) before repeating blood tests or considering an endoscopy if symptoms and labs raise concern. It would be best to review these results with a gastroenterologist, who can interpret them in context and decide whether further testing is needed.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.