Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Can You Help Me Decipher Test #'s?


Jane-MomfromMN

Recommended Posts

Jane-MomfromMN Newbie

Hi-

I was on yesterday asking about my 17-month-old daughter who tested positive for Celiac. Someone asked me if I knew the numbers of her tests. They asked if I had a "full" Celiac screen done. I am not sure what they did if it was a "full" screen or not? Anyway, here is what I have for the test results.

Test Name: Celiac Disease Panel

Gliadin Antibody (IGA)= 30H

Immunoglobulin A= 51

Can you tell me what this means and if I need to ask anything at her GI appt? Did I get a "full" Celiac screen? I just don't want to go through another Dr.'s appt with my daughter and have them tell me she is okay. That's what happened in the past, until I begged for them to do more tests and they finally told me she tested positive for Celiac. I just want to make sure that they do everything they can for her and I do not have to pay 6-8 co-pays before they finally get things right.

Thank you!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



zarfkitty Explorer

Hi Jane,

It looks like only IgA for anti-gliadin and total serum IgA were run. The full panel is:

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgA

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgG

Anti-Endomysial (EMA) IgA

Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA

Total Serum IgA

Also, what are the reference ranges for the tests that were run? (The reference range says what a healthy person's number should be lower than.)

If the anti-gliandin is positive, you have enough information to suspect celiac, though. Something's definitely up with gluten if that antibody is too high. Some people are negative for anti-gliandin IgA which is why the full panel is so important. I can't remember from your other post if you are going ahead with the biopsy or not? Some doctors will let raised antibodies and positive dietary response stand alone for a diagnosis.

I'm new to all this, too. This forum is a wonderful place to get help!!

Jane-MomfromMN Newbie

Thank you Thank you for your reply!

The paper they gave me says:

Gliadin Antibody (IGA)

<11 Negative

11-17 Equivocal

>17 Positive

My daughter's score 30.

More ?'s

Anyone know what Immunoglobulin A is? My daugher's number= 51

Jane-MomfromMN Newbie

Oh, oops... we are going to have the biopsy done. She has an appt with a GI specialist but it's aout 3 wks away. We have been waiting for about 2 1/2 mts to see him so I figured I could see if I could get some answers on here. This is all new to me too. I was shocked when they told me Celiac. I am told it is hereditary. Now I am wondering who else in my family might have it.

zarfkitty Explorer

Immunoglobulin A = IgA. IgA is a particular kind of antibody that the immune system uses. Celiac people make IgA against gliandin (part of the gluten molecule) but you normally make IgA against lots of things. It's important to test the total number when testing for a specific kind so you can catch it if the patient has IgA deficiency. If the patient has deficiency, the anti-gliandin IgA wouldn't show up at all and give a false negative.

So it's good that they tested it. Did they give you the reference range on that one?

Keep her on gluten until that biopsy. If you take her off, she could heal before the appointment and not be diagnosed.

happygirl Collaborator

It was me who asked :)

Definitely have the full celiac blood panel run before she goes gluten-free (if she does.)

Print out the above list from the Columbia Celiac Center's webpage, bring to your doctor, and tell them you want them all run. If you are going through the process of being tested, its important to have all the information (not just 'part' of it). This is one of the leading Celiac researchers, experts, physicians, etc.

Open Original Shared Link

"Serologic panel

Of the commercially available serologic tests that aid in the diagnosis of celiac disease, no one test is ideal. Using multiple serologies increases the diagnostic yield. Therefore, in the United States, screening in patients with possible celiac disease should consist of a panel of the following serologic tests:

Anti-gliadin antibodies (AGA) both IgA and IgG

Anti-endomysial antibodies (EMA) - IgA

Anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (tTG) - IgA

Total IgA level.

The reason for the use of the panel to detect celiac disease is several fold. They include selective IgA deficiency (SIgA deficiency), lack of concordance of endomysial antibody and tTG, and the occurrence of seronegative celiac disease. "

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - knitty kitty replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      Gluten Free Sugar or Starch known to increase gas?

    2. - xxnonamexx replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      Gluten Free Sugar or Starch known to increase gas?

    3. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Lotte18's topic in Publications & Publicity
      17

      Prospective CRISPR research

    4. - jenniber replied to jenniber's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      21

      Disaccharide deficient, confusing biopsy results, no blood test

    5. - knitty kitty replied to lehum's topic in Super Sensitive People
      14

      4.5 years into diagnosis, eating gluten-free and still struggling: would love support, tips, & stories

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,767
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    KelVas
    Newest Member
    KelVas
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Even if you don't have Celiac Disease, you can still get SIBO.   Glad to hear you're taking the vitamins and magnesium!   Are you getting sufficient Omega Three oils like flaxseed, olive oil, or Sunflower seed oil?   I didn't like coconut oil because it upset my digestive tract.   How is your Vitamin D level?
    • xxnonamexx
      I was looking at SIBO but I don't think I fall into that category. Yes I eat meat. I don't think I'm celiac I think I am just gluten intolerant but I take multivitamin, Super B Complex, Benfo with Thiam, Thiamax, Neuromag that you suggested.
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      @Lotte18, thank you for providing this page from the research proposal. Some comments, if I may (apologies for what you already know): They start by saying that previous research has shown that it's possible to modify the HLA-DQA1 gene and have that new version expressed "in humans" (not sure if they mean intact humans or just cells in culture). This is a standard form of scientific communication where you explain what is already known as it relates to what you want to do next. The HLA-DQA1 gene encodes 1/2 of a series of "locks" from my earlier metaphor. Two of the types of locks that can be made by variants of this gene are called DQ2.5 and DQ8 (either of which will confer susceptibility to celiac). DQ2.5, DQ8, and other DQ's are referred to as "heterodimers" - "dimer" means made up of exactly 2 pieces and "hetero" means that the pieces are not identical to one another (identical parts would be homodimer). HLA-DQA1 genes each make a protein that becomes one of the two parts of a series of heterodimers. Different forms of HLA-DQA1 are called "variants" or "alleles".  Next they say that they propose to use the same technology in attempt to minimize/cure celiac. The idea is reasonable science and before considering all of the caveats it certainly has merit as something to consider. As a side note, I would challenge some of their language. DQ2.5 and not-2.5 are both "variants" or "alleles" - one is not "wildtype" nor the other "mutant". Their proposal is to "modify", not "correct" the gene. This might sound picky but I have a background in genetics and this is jarring to me. The last paragraph outlines more of the roadmap for their proposal using relatively mundane steps (apheresis) and relatively advanced steps (CAR-T). There is a logic to their approach but there are severe caveats. CAR-T is kind of a nuclear option. It has shown many miracle cures in certain kinds of cancer and it is being studied for some kinds of life-threatening autoimmune disease. It also has devastating side effects. If tomorrow someone offered me a fully validated CAR-T procedure for celiac along the lines of this proposal, based on my understanding of the risks I would turn them down. Separately, I would also have concerns about the "off target" risk of the CRISPR part of the procedure. In addition to funding issues, there may be significant ethical issues that would challenge their proposal. Human clinical trial proposals go through extensive review before they are approved and one of the significant considerations is whether the risks to the patient are warranted (relative to the benefit). If a procedure has really horrible side effects but it is the only available option for a dying patient, the review board is likely to approve. However, if there is a much less harmful treatment option that delivers enough of a benefit, then there is a higher chance that the trial would not be approved. For celiacs, the availability and relative effectiveness of gluten-free diet will raise the bar for trying risky therapies in the clinic. Science and medicine constantly progress, so it's entirely possible that someday there will be a safe and effective genetic "cure" for celiac. However not anytime soon and I believe it would only come after these CAR-T procedures have become routine in the treatment of a long list of other diseases. In a world of unlimited funding for scientific research I would definitely fund this proposal. In the world of tight competition for research funding that we live in I would need to know a lot more about their proposal and the greater context of how it fits in with other research before I would give them money at this time (not that anyone is asking me).
    • jenniber
      thank you for that info too!! will keep this in mind if he ends up in the ER again! 
    • knitty kitty
      @Heavenly Flower and @lehum, How are you doing?   My favorite book is The Paleo Approach by Dr. Sarah Ballantyne, a Celiac herself.   This book explains the AutoImmune Protocol Diet (AIP diet) which is the diet I follow.  Yes, it is very strict, just meat, veggies and some fruit.  But it really works.  You cut back to just meat and veggies to let your digestive system calms and starts healing.  Then you add back foods slowly looking for intolerance symptoms.  Supplementing with B Complex vitamins, Vitamin D and minerals like Magnesium ensures you're receiving sufficient nutrients needed to heal.  Correcting any vitamin deficits is important in Celiac disease.   Hope you're doing well!  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.