Jump to content
  • You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Do We Need An Endoscopy?


Staceyshoe

Recommended Posts

Staceyshoe Apprentice

Both my boys have had digestive issues from birth (different problems though). We did genetic testing on them just to see whether celiac is a possibility. My oldest (5 y.o.) ds tested positive for THE celiac gene and subtype most likely to result in the disorder. Since he's eating gluten now, we just went in for the blood panel. He's been on gluten-free diets in the past for up to 4-6 weeks, and we didn't notice any real change. But our family recently went gluten-free for a while (my youngest was diagnosed with a severe wheat allergy), and I noticed more problems with my oldest when he started eating gluten again. Nothing major. Nothing that makes me feel I can conclude that gluten is definitely an issue. Definitely not the stereotypical picture of celiac disease.

Still waiting on the results of the blood test. If it's negative, I may do a gluten-free trial and see what happens. If it's positive, the GI wants to do an endoscopy. I'm hesitant about that test. Ds has a scope 3 years ago, and it was emotionally traumatic for him. So here are my questions:

* The blood panel is notorious for false negatives, right? So if it's positive, what is the likelihood that he doesn't have celiac? I guess I don't see the point of the scope.

* If he's creating antibodies to gluten, does it really matter whether they happen to find no damage, mild damage, or severe damage in his intestines?

* Or does it make sense to find out what's happening in there and get an official diagnosis? (This GI won't diagnose without the scope.) Part of me wants to know for sure whether he has it because the diets haven't given a clear indication and because there are other family members with blatant symptoms who don't see a need to get tested or go gluten-free. But I also don't want the scope. Wouldn't the bloodwork be fairly conclusive?

I'm so thankful this forum is here! I've already learned a lot, but I am really struggling with what our next step should be.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



shopgirl Contributor

Yes, the blood panel can show false negatives but rarely false positives. Particularly in a child who can't build up a couple decades of damage.

If he's creating antibodies, no, it doesn't matter the amount of damage. He'll heal on a careful diet.

The only thing that might make you want a scope is cooperation from his school. They may not make necessary allowances for his diet and contamination issues without a diagnosis from a doctor. And if your doctor isn't willing to give an official diagnosis without the scope, you might run into some problems. Maybe ask the school if that would be an issue?

Skylark Collaborator

I completely agree with Shopgirl. The blood panel is 98% accurate in kids.

Staceyshoe Apprentice

I completely trust the knowledge of those who have been on this board for a while. I am satisfied that, if his blood panel is positive, it means he has celiac. Do you happen to know of any links that give info about the reliability of the blood test on a child? (If dh or other family members question me if the dr doesn't give an official diagnosis, I'd like to have something to show them that it's reasonable to assume celiac based on the bloodwork.) TIA!

Skylark Collaborator

Which blood test?

divamomma Enthusiast

I would like to know the answers to these questions as well! The dr we saw the other day briefly mentioned that positve blood (TTG)in the 40-100 ranges are not positive for celiac. What???? That totally confused me.

Staceyshoe Apprentice

Which blood test?

I'm still waiting on the results, but I remember the dr mentioning that he was ordering a ttg and IgA and something to make sure ds isn't IgA deficient. There may be more also. I'll request a copy of the report so will know more after it's been processed.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Skylark Collaborator

I would like to know the answers to these questions as well! The dr we saw the other day briefly mentioned that positve blood (TTG)in the 40-100 ranges are not positive for celiac. What???? That totally confused me.

Different labs have different "normal" ranges because the test results are in arbitrary units. Something one lab calls 10 on a scale of 1-20, another lab could call 100 on a scale of 10-200. You have to have the range that lab considers normal to interpret the test. I've seen pretty big numbers from some European labs. If your TTG was above the normal range for that diagnostic lab you should have an endoscopy and be seriously considering gluten-free.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to ThomasA55's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Iron loss and potential celiac.

    2. - trents replied to ThomasA55's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Iron loss and potential celiac.

    3. - Joseph01 replied to bethmon's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      14

      We Keep Getting Glutened With Vegetable Oil

    4. - ThomasA55 posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Iron loss and potential celiac.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,086
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    Joseph01
    Newest Member
    Joseph01
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Being as how you are largely asymptomatic, I would certainly advise undertaking a gluten challenge in order to get formal testing for celiac disease. We have many forum participants who become violently ill when they undertake a gluten challenge and they therefore can't carry through with it. That doesn't seem to be the case with you. The reason I think it is important for you to get tested is that many or most people who don't have a formal diagnosis find it difficult to be consistent with the gluten-free diet. They find ways to rationalize that their symptoms are due to something other than celiac disease . . . especially when it becomes socially limiting.  The other factor here is by being inconsistent with the gluten free diet, assuming you do have celiac disease, you are likely causing slow, incremental damage to your gut, even though you are largely asymptomatic. It can take years for that damage to get to the point where it results in spinoff health problems. Concerning genetic testing, it can't be used for diagnosis, at least not definitively. Somewhere between 30 and 40% of the general population will have one or both of the two genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease. Yet, only about 1% of the general population will develop active celiac disease. But the genetic testing can be used as a rule out for celiac disease if you don't have either gene. But even so, that doesn't eliminate the possibility of having NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).
    • ThomasA55
    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @ThomasA55! Before I give my opinion on your question about whether or not you should undergo a gluten challenge, I would like to know how you react when you get a good dose of gluten? Are you largely asymptomatic or do you experience significant illness such as nausea and diarrhea? You mentioned intermittent joint pain before you began experimenting with a low gluten diet. Anything else?
    • Joseph01
      This is way past due for your post.  I have Celiac and have been recovering for more than a year.  Doing well.  Used Essential oil to day to fry some chicken.  Read the label all good.  Then ate some chicken.  Here comes the gluten reaction.  I haven't had a gluten reaction since year.  I am angry.   I have been so careful with this crap and don't wan't any set backs!!!!! Good luck to you with your post.   Celiac is HELL!
    • ThomasA55
      Hey everyone. I'm a young adult who had very high iron in 2024. 64% saturation 160 ferritin. In 2025 I had far lower iron. 26% saturation and 130 ferritin. I know this is still in range but it seems to be a large drop. That combined with the fact that I developed some intermittent joint pain between the two years makes me wonder if I could be celiac. My dietary intake of iron was pretty steady (mostly in the form of red meat). I did carnivore (therby eliminating gluten) for a bit after the second test and felt improvements in my joints and digestion. I still consume gluten occasionally socially, for religious reasons, and through cross contamination/food sharing. For these reasons, I would need to know if I had it, because although my lifestyle is low gluten its not at the strict level it should be if it turned out I was celiac. I will get a gene test first and hope I don't have DQ2.5,DQ2.2, or DQ8, but if I had any combination of those do you guys think I need proper screening through a gluten challenge / blood test? Other context. From 2024-2025, my b12 stayed about the same in the mid 600s folate went up slightly, but I heard it takes longer for celiac to affect the absorption of these. ANA negative, CRP low, ESR low.  I don't know how much noise exists around the saturation and ferritin, but it caught my eye and Celiac seemed like a possibility. I'm under no illusion that it is probable that I have celiac, only that it may be worth screening given my overall profile.   
×
×
  • Create New...