Jump to content
  • You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Got My Blood Test Back - Doctor Wasn't Very Clear


joshf

Recommended Posts

joshf Newbie

Hello,

I went to my doctor last week as I have been having stomach problems the past few months. He did a blood test and after getting the results he said I may have Celiacs but should have a biopsy to be sure.

My blood test results had the following Abnormal:

Gliadin IGG, ABS = 31 HI

and

ANA W/REFLEX TO IFA is Positive

Based on these results is it very likely I have Celiacs, 50/50, or like 10% chance? I'm not exactly sure how to interpret this and the nurse that gave me the results over the phone would not really answer my questions (she just kept saying wait for the biopsy results).

Thanks.

Josh


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient

Welcome to the board, Josh.

It is really hard to give a 'guess' as to what your odds are of having a positive biopsy, and thaat would be all it would be - a guess. Some people have positive bloods and negative biopsy, for others it is the reverse. The biopsy is said to trump the blood work results. However, once your testing is finished, even if the biopsy results are negative, you should give the diet a try because many people who do not test positive for celiac are helped by the diet.

Come back when you get your biopsy results and we will help you. Of course, feel free to ask other questions too. :)

joshf Newbie

Hi,

Thanks for the quick response.

I know there are errors with testing and nothing is certain, but i'm just trying to get an idea.

I'm not sure if it looks like celiacs or if its a hunch?

ie: with a pregnancy test, I know its not certain, but if it says your pregnant you are likely pregnant. But if you have a high temperature, and the doctor says to test for strep its still pretty unlikely you have strep - just the next step in testing. Thats sort of where I am with these test results. Is the doctor just guessing the next step but its still unlikely or do the blood test point to celiacs and the biopsy is simply to confirm?

Thanks.

Josh

Welcome to the board, Josh.

It is really hard to give a 'guess' as to what your odds are of having a positive biopsy, and thaat would be all it would be - a guess. Some people have positive bloods and negative biopsy, for others it is the reverse. The biopsy is said to trump the blood work results. However, once your testing is finished, even if the biopsy results are negative, you should give the diet a try because many people who do not test positive for celiac are helped by the diet.

Come back when you get your biopsy results and we will help you. Of course, feel free to ask other questions too. :)

mushroom Proficient

...do the blood test point to celiacs and the biopsy is simply to confirm?

This is the most common current medical thinking on the subject.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

It looks like your blood test was positive. False negatives are common but false positives are very uncommon if not nonexistant. You do have a chance of a false negative with the biopsy so if you are choosing to have it done wait until after the procedure is done and than start the diet. You don't have to wait for the results.

Skylark Collaborator

Doctors don't usually test IgG unless you are low IgA, which is a risk factor for celiac. ANA is not a celiac test but it means you have autoimmunity, which is another risk factor for celiac.

An immune reaction to gliadin is a good reason to try the diet even if your biopsy comes back negative. You are almost certainly gluten intolerant, which can give a lot of GI trouble much like celiac.

joshf Newbie

Thank you all for your responses. It is greatly appreciated. What is the difference between gluton intolerant and celiacs?

Doctors don't usually test IgG unless you are low IgA, which is a risk factor for celiac. ANA is not a celiac test but it means you have autoimmunity, which is another risk factor for celiac.

An immune reaction to gliadin is a good reason to try the diet even if your biopsy comes back negative. You are almost certainly gluten intolerant, which can give a lot of GI trouble much like celiac.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient

Thank you all for your responses. It is greatly appreciated. What is the difference between gluton intolerant and celiacs?

It goes something like this, Josh: All celiacs are gluten intolerant. Not all gluten intolerants are celiac. That is the long and the short of it.

The subject has been and is being debated endlessly, both here and amongst the medical community, and researchers, but we don't really know too much more than that now. In order to be celiac you must have damage to the small intestine, but some who are intolerant get no GI symptoms at all and no GI damage, but are struck with neurological symptoms or a host of other autoimmune diseases, some of which can occur with or without celiac. It's what makes diagnosis so difficult because so many doctors believe that if you don't have diagnosable celiac disease you are not gluten intolerant :unsure::rolleyes:

joshf Newbie

got my biopsy results back and they came out negative...my doctor still isn't being clear and has told me to see a specialist, who has a three month wait.

So negative biopsy but positve ANA and Gliadin IGG, ABS = 31 HI - my understanding is this is an intolerance to gluten. Is that correct?

So basically I can eat gluten, but may get a stomach ache? Is there anything else I should be doing?

ravenwoodglass Mentor

got my biopsy results back and they came out negative...my doctor still isn't being clear and has told me to see a specialist, who has a three month wait.

So negative biopsy but positve ANA and Gliadin IGG, ABS = 31 HI - my understanding is this is an intolerance to gluten. Is that correct?

So basically I can eat gluten, but may get a stomach ache? Is there anything else I should be doing?

Biopsies can have false negatives. You have postive blood work. That means your body is making antibodies to gluten. Eventually, if not already, your brain, liver, gallbladder and other organs can be impacted. Antibodies are an equal opportunity destroyer and there is no way of knowing what system will be attacked. You need to be gluten free unless you someday want a signature like mine. It is easiest to go with whole unprocessed foods as much as you can. We are here to help you in any way needed.

The positive ANA should be looked into also. There are a number of different things that could cause a positive in that test.

You could also find that after three months on the diet that test has returned to normal levels but not certain about that.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to ThomasA55's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Iron loss and potential celiac.

    2. - trents replied to ThomasA55's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Iron loss and potential celiac.

    3. - Joseph01 replied to bethmon's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      14

      We Keep Getting Glutened With Vegetable Oil

    4. - ThomasA55 posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Iron loss and potential celiac.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,086
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    Joseph01
    Newest Member
    Joseph01
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Being as how you are largely asymptomatic, I would certainly advise undertaking a gluten challenge in order to get formal testing for celiac disease. We have many forum participants who become violently ill when they undertake a gluten challenge and they therefore can't carry through with it. That doesn't seem to be the case with you. The reason I think it is important for you to get tested is that many or most people who don't have a formal diagnosis find it difficult to be consistent with the gluten-free diet. They find ways to rationalize that their symptoms are due to something other than celiac disease . . . especially when it becomes socially limiting.  The other factor here is by being inconsistent with the gluten free diet, assuming you do have celiac disease, you are likely causing slow, incremental damage to your gut, even though you are largely asymptomatic. It can take years for that damage to get to the point where it results in spinoff health problems. Concerning genetic testing, it can't be used for diagnosis, at least not definitively. Somewhere between 30 and 40% of the general population will have one or both of the two genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease. Yet, only about 1% of the general population will develop active celiac disease. But the genetic testing can be used as a rule out for celiac disease if you don't have either gene. But even so, that doesn't eliminate the possibility of having NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).
    • ThomasA55
    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @ThomasA55! Before I give my opinion on your question about whether or not you should undergo a gluten challenge, I would like to know how you react when you get a good dose of gluten? Are you largely asymptomatic or do you experience significant illness such as nausea and diarrhea? You mentioned intermittent joint pain before you began experimenting with a low gluten diet. Anything else?
    • Joseph01
      This is way past due for your post.  I have Celiac and have been recovering for more than a year.  Doing well.  Used Essential oil to day to fry some chicken.  Read the label all good.  Then ate some chicken.  Here comes the gluten reaction.  I haven't had a gluten reaction since year.  I am angry.   I have been so careful with this crap and don't wan't any set backs!!!!! Good luck to you with your post.   Celiac is HELL!
    • ThomasA55
      Hey everyone. I'm a young adult who had very high iron in 2024. 64% saturation 160 ferritin. In 2025 I had far lower iron. 26% saturation and 130 ferritin. I know this is still in range but it seems to be a large drop. That combined with the fact that I developed some intermittent joint pain between the two years makes me wonder if I could be celiac. My dietary intake of iron was pretty steady (mostly in the form of red meat). I did carnivore (therby eliminating gluten) for a bit after the second test and felt improvements in my joints and digestion. I still consume gluten occasionally socially, for religious reasons, and through cross contamination/food sharing. For these reasons, I would need to know if I had it, because although my lifestyle is low gluten its not at the strict level it should be if it turned out I was celiac. I will get a gene test first and hope I don't have DQ2.5,DQ2.2, or DQ8, but if I had any combination of those do you guys think I need proper screening through a gluten challenge / blood test? Other context. From 2024-2025, my b12 stayed about the same in the mid 600s folate went up slightly, but I heard it takes longer for celiac to affect the absorption of these. ANA negative, CRP low, ESR low.  I don't know how much noise exists around the saturation and ferritin, but it caught my eye and Celiac seemed like a possibility. I'm under no illusion that it is probable that I have celiac, only that it may be worth screening given my overall profile.   
×
×
  • Create New...