Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Am I Or Not?

ane323

By ane323
in Coping with Celiac Disease

Recommended Posts

ane323 Newbie
ane323
Posted

In Nov of 2004 I was told that I was Gluten Intol. Then 2 months later I become preg. So I start the gluten-free diet, as miserable as it was I for the most part stayed gluten-free. After my son was born in Aug of 2005 I slowly started eating gluten again and was fine. I went and got another blood test done and it came back neg. (The first test had one post and one neg antibody or something like that, the second time both came back negative) Well now slowly my symptoms are comming back.

I went back to the doctor, a different one because mine was overbooked. ( All I really was looking for was a refferal to a GI specialist) He pretty much told me that eating gluten wouldn't kill me. It would just cause me to go to the bathroom. And that if I wanted to eat it go ahead. Well that bothered me. I felt like a complete idiot. I called back and got my referral and go in two weeks. I think the only way for me to quit eating it is for someone (a doctor) to tell me how serious it is. I also kind of want a test to show me how much dammage has been done if any has been done. Is that a colonoscopy? Please tell me I am not the only one out there who has gotten these mixed signals from doctors.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


tiredofdoctors Enthusiast
tiredofdoctors
Posted

Hi there -- welcome to the forum . . .

Just wait -- you'll get PLENTY of answers that say you're not the only one with mixed answers from physicians! Practically everyone on this forum has gotten bad information at one time or another. There are blood tests which can be done: IgG Antigliadin antibodies, IgA Antigliadin antibodies, Antitransglultaminase antibodies and Antiendomysial antibodies. The last TWO listed are the ones which are much more indicative of Celiac disease. An endoscopy with multiple samples of the small intestinal villi is the "final" definitive answer. A good GI doctor will perform all of these. There are also tests through, I believe Enterolab, but I haven't had experience with them . . . there are many on the forum who can help you with that.

I do not have Celiac disease; I am, however, gluten intolerant. I have had "outrageously high" antigliadin antibodies according to my neurologists. The manifestation of my gluten intolerance has affected the cerebellum of my brain. By the way, your doctor is wrong . . . gluten intolerance CAN kill you. Ask my neurologists.

There is a book by Peter Green, MD -- it is called "Celiac Disease: The Hidden Epidemic". It is a very good book, and I would recommend it -- especially prior to going to the GI doc.

There is a thread on this forum -- under "coping" which gives us a place to vent and to tell our stories; one of the participants is a writer and is going to write a composition of these stories. You might want to look -- it is eye-opening. I think that the average is 6 doctors before you get a correct diagnosis. I might be wrong about that, and there are people on the forum who are much more knowledgeable than me.

You're probably at the beginning stages of frustration with doctors. I think all of us have gotten used to it. You'll get by, though, and you'll get to the correct diagnosis -- just hang in there! . . . . Lynne

ane323 Newbie
ane323
Posted
  • Author

What is the difference between Celiac disease and being gluten intolerent?

tiffjake Enthusiast
tiffjake
Posted
Hi there -- welcome to the forum . . .

Just wait -- you'll get PLENTY of answers that say you're not the only one with mixed answers from physicians! Practically everyone on this forum has gotten bad information at one time or another.

Yes there are! After going to through all of my testing (which was kinda back and forth because we weren't looking for Celiac) and getting a diagnosis, my doc STILL told me that it is ok to eat gluten every now and then.....but let me tell you, it is NOT ok with me. I have gotten SO sick now that my tolerance level is so low. I refuse!

And, to answer your question about gluten intolerance and Celiac....I have read that they are both, and I have also read that Celiac means a confirmed biopsy (small intestine endoscopy). I have my diagnosis without the endoscopy because my intestines shut down after eating a bowl of pasta (to celebrate my inconclusive blood work). I opted out of the endoscopy because my hubby is overseas and I didn't want to go through that alone. The doc warned me that I wouldn't be able to do it later because I would start healing, in the gut, and that is fine with me!

About wanting a doc or a test to "make" you go gluten-free, you will find it your answer if you look hard enough. Everyone has SOMETHING that pushed them into gluten-free. I had an Lame Advertisement test, the EnteroLab test, the genetic testing, found out about family history, and a VERY positive reaction to the gluten-free diet, so I don't WANT an endoscopy. But that is MY story, and I understand if you want to go with the procedure. Just be aware that many celiacs go through the endoscopy and still don't have a "definite" answer. Good Luck to you!!!!!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. Dr. Gunn
      - Dr. Gunn replied to MicG's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      Test interpretations

      Exactly! Negative genetics can rule out celiac disease with close to 100% certainty. It takes tTg antibody testing and biopsy confirm the diagnosis in a genetically susceptible individual.
    2. trents
      - trents replied to MicG's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      Test interpretations

      What Dr. Gunn states is essentially true. It is a rule out measure. But be aware that to possess either of the two primary genes that have been identified with celiac disease (or both) doesn't necessarily mean that you have or will develop celiac disease. Almost 40% of the general population carries one or both but only about 1% of the general population...
    3. Dr. Gunn
      - Dr. Gunn replied to MicG's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      Test interpretations

      Have you had celiac genetic risk testing? A celiac genetic test is accurate with or without gluten in your diet. If you don't carry the celiac risk genes you can effectively rule out celiac disease for life.
    4. Aretaeus Cappadocia
      - Aretaeus Cappadocia commented on Scott Adams's article in Spring 2026 Issue
      1

      How Social Media Algorithms Are Fueling Gluten Anxiety: TikTok, Reddit, and Instagram Trends

      Good, balanced analysis. I liked the comparison of the different platforms in this context. Fwiw, the same essay largely would work if you substitute any of many contemporary topics. As a moderator of this site, have you stepped back and considered how this site fits into this essay? Personally, I don't think I have enough visibility into the comments...
    5. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to MicG's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      Test interpretations

      Based on those results alone, it’s not possible to say you have celiac disease. The test that is usually most specific for celiac, tTG-IgA, is negative in your results, and the endomysial antibody (EMA) is also negative, which generally argues against active celiac disease. However, your deamidated gliadin IgA is elevated, and your total IgA level is also h...
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,659
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Dr. Gunn
    Newest Member
    Dr. Gunn
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Dr. Gunn
      Test interpretations

      By Dr. Gunn · Posted

      Exactly! Negative genetics can rule out celiac disease with close to 100% certainty. It takes tTg antibody testing and biopsy confirm the diagnosis in a genetically susceptible individual. 
    • trents
      Test interpretations

      By trents · Posted

      What Dr. Gunn states is essentially true. It is a rule out measure. But be aware that to possess either of the two primary genes that have been identified with celiac disease (or both) doesn't necessarily mean that you have or will develop celiac disease. Almost 40% of the general population carries one or both but only about 1% of the general population will develop active celiac disease. It remains latent until triggered by some stress event which may or may not occur. So, there is a genetic component to celiac disease but there is also an epigenetic component. 
    • Dr. Gunn
      Test interpretations

      By Dr. Gunn · Posted

      Have you had celiac genetic risk testing? A celiac genetic test is accurate with or without gluten in your diet. If you don't carry the celiac risk genes you can effectively rule out celiac disease for life. 
    • Scott Adams
      Test interpretations

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Based on those results alone, it’s not possible to say you have celiac disease. The test that is usually most specific for celiac, tTG-IgA, is negative in your results, and the endomysial antibody (EMA) is also negative, which generally argues against active celiac disease. However, your deamidated gliadin IgA is elevated, and your total IgA level is also high, which can sometimes affect how the other antibody tests behave. Another important factor is that you were reducing gluten before the test, which can lower antibody levels and make the results less reliable. Because of that, many doctors recommend a gluten challenge (eating gluten regularly for several weeks) before repeating blood tests or considering an endoscopy if symptoms and labs raise concern. It would be best to review these results with a gastroenterologist, who can interpret them in context and decide whether further testing is needed.
    • trents
      Test interpretations

      By trents · Posted

      Since you compromised the validity of the antibody testing by experimenting with gluten withdrawal ahead of the testing, you are faced with two options: 1. Reintroduce significant amounts of gluten into your diet for a period of weeks, i.e., undertake a "gluten challenge". The most recent guidelines are the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten (about the amount found in 4-6 slices of wheat-based bread) for at least two weeks leading up to the day of testing. Note: I would certainly give it more than two weeks to be sure. 2. Be willing to live with the ambiguity of not knowing whether gluten causes you problems because you have celiac disease or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). There is no test for NCGS. Celiac disease must first be ruled out and we have tests for it. Celiac disease has an autoimmune base. NCGS does not. GI symptoms overlap. In the early stages of celiac disease, other body systems may not be showing stress or damage so, symptomatically, it would be difficult to distinguish between celiac disease and NCGS. Both conditions require elimination of gluten from the diet for symptom relief. Some experts feel that NCGS can be a precursor to celiac disease.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.