Jump to content
  • You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Any Antibody In Blood Test Mean Sensitivity?


olymatt

Recommended Posts

olymatt Newbie

My blood test came back with the following:

TTG Antibody, IGA: <3 (positive being > 8)

IGA Serum: 201 (81-463 normal range)

Quest skipped the EMA Screen and IGG since the above results came back normal.

My question is, does any value greater than 0 for IGA mean a sensitivity? Or does everybody have some normally, and this should be ignored? Is there anything I am misunderstanding?

Thank You,

Matthew


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

I wish labs wouldn't just 'skip' tests but oh well I guess they have their reasons. I can't really answer your question with any certainty especially with the known high rate of false negatives. I would suggest though that you give the diet a good strict try after you are done with testing. No matter what the test results are a trial of the diet should be done if symptoms suggest gluten intolerance or celiac.

olymatt Newbie

I wish labs wouldn't just 'skip' tests but oh well I guess they have their reasons. I can't really answer your question with any certainty especially with the known high rate of false negatives. I would suggest though that you give the diet a good strict try after you are done with testing. No matter what the test results are a trial of the diet should be done if symptoms suggest gluten intolerance or celiac.

But do you know if the lower level of IGA ( the < 3) would suggest a sensitivity? I mean, would I expect to find a 0 if I had no sensitivity at all?

SGWhiskers Collaborator

My blood test came back with the following:

TTG Antibody, IGA: <3 (positive being > 8)

IGA Serum: 201 (81-463 normal range)

Quest skipped the EMA Screen and IGG since the above results came back normal.

My question is, does any value greater than 0 for IGA mean a sensitivity? Or does everybody have some normally, and this should be ignored? Is there anything I am misunderstanding?

Thank You,

Matthew

I'm unsure what a test result of greater than 3 means. Did you make a typo that should have said less than 3? According to your test range, any result less than 8 would be negative. If you have a 3, that means you are negative and does not mean you have a little sensitivity.

With that said, there are a huge number of posters on this site who have found relief from the gluten-free diet dispite negative blood work. Even though your results are negative, I highly suggest you try a strict 3 month trial on the diet. You can continue to look for other reasons for your symptoms with your doctor, but you may find that the gluten-free diet works.

Medicine has learned a lot about celiac disease, but there is still more to learn. Right now, only a few genes are tested for celiac disease. Within the past year, scientists identified about another dozen that trigger celiac. There are people who have negative blood work, but positive endoscopies. The people who test negative for celiac, but respond well to the gluten-free diet are considered gluten intolerant. It is possible that this is celiac disease that medicine has not learned how to identify yet. It is also possible that this is another similar disease. Either way, if you have enough symptoms to have led you to celiac testing, don't stop the investigation of your illness just because of a negative test result. The 3 month gluten-free trial should be your next step along with exploring other causes for your symptoms with your doctor.

Hope you are feeling better soon.

Skylark Collaborator

My blood test came back with the following:

TTG Antibody, IGA: <3 (positive being > 8)

IGA Serum: 201 (81-463 normal range)

Quest skipped the EMA Screen and IGG since the above results came back normal.

My question is, does any value greater than 0 for IGA mean a sensitivity? Or does everybody have some normally, and this should be ignored? Is there anything I am misunderstanding?

Thank You,

Matthew

The second test that has you confused is for total IgA. It determines whether you make normal amounts of IgA so the TTG test is valid. Low IgA is also a risk factor for celiac. You have a completely normal result there. That is why Quest skipped the IgG test.

On the TTG, <3 is simply a negative result. These types of tests tend to have a little background noise so zero readings are somewhat uncommon.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to ThomasA55's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Iron loss and potential celiac.

    2. - trents replied to ThomasA55's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Iron loss and potential celiac.

    3. - Joseph01 replied to bethmon's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      14

      We Keep Getting Glutened With Vegetable Oil

    4. - ThomasA55 posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Iron loss and potential celiac.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,086
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    Joseph01
    Newest Member
    Joseph01
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Being as how you are largely asymptomatic, I would certainly advise undertaking a gluten challenge in order to get formal testing for celiac disease. We have many forum participants who become violently ill when they undertake a gluten challenge and they therefore can't carry through with it. That doesn't seem to be the case with you. The reason I think it is important for you to get tested is that many or most people who don't have a formal diagnosis find it difficult to be consistent with the gluten-free diet. They find ways to rationalize that their symptoms are due to something other than celiac disease . . . especially when it becomes socially limiting.  The other factor here is by being inconsistent with the gluten free diet, assuming you do have celiac disease, you are likely causing slow, incremental damage to your gut, even though you are largely asymptomatic. It can take years for that damage to get to the point where it results in spinoff health problems. Concerning genetic testing, it can't be used for diagnosis, at least not definitively. Somewhere between 30 and 40% of the general population will have one or both of the two genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease. Yet, only about 1% of the general population will develop active celiac disease. But the genetic testing can be used as a rule out for celiac disease if you don't have either gene. But even so, that doesn't eliminate the possibility of having NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).
    • ThomasA55
    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @ThomasA55! Before I give my opinion on your question about whether or not you should undergo a gluten challenge, I would like to know how you react when you get a good dose of gluten? Are you largely asymptomatic or do you experience significant illness such as nausea and diarrhea? You mentioned intermittent joint pain before you began experimenting with a low gluten diet. Anything else?
    • Joseph01
      This is way past due for your post.  I have Celiac and have been recovering for more than a year.  Doing well.  Used Essential oil to day to fry some chicken.  Read the label all good.  Then ate some chicken.  Here comes the gluten reaction.  I haven't had a gluten reaction since year.  I am angry.   I have been so careful with this crap and don't wan't any set backs!!!!! Good luck to you with your post.   Celiac is HELL!
    • ThomasA55
      Hey everyone. I'm a young adult who had very high iron in 2024. 64% saturation 160 ferritin. In 2025 I had far lower iron. 26% saturation and 130 ferritin. I know this is still in range but it seems to be a large drop. That combined with the fact that I developed some intermittent joint pain between the two years makes me wonder if I could be celiac. My dietary intake of iron was pretty steady (mostly in the form of red meat). I did carnivore (therby eliminating gluten) for a bit after the second test and felt improvements in my joints and digestion. I still consume gluten occasionally socially, for religious reasons, and through cross contamination/food sharing. For these reasons, I would need to know if I had it, because although my lifestyle is low gluten its not at the strict level it should be if it turned out I was celiac. I will get a gene test first and hope I don't have DQ2.5,DQ2.2, or DQ8, but if I had any combination of those do you guys think I need proper screening through a gluten challenge / blood test? Other context. From 2024-2025, my b12 stayed about the same in the mid 600s folate went up slightly, but I heard it takes longer for celiac to affect the absorption of these. ANA negative, CRP low, ESR low.  I don't know how much noise exists around the saturation and ferritin, but it caught my eye and Celiac seemed like a possibility. I'm under no illusion that it is probable that I have celiac, only that it may be worth screening given my overall profile.   
×
×
  • Create New...