Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Long To Eat Gluten Before Testing


beachbirdie

Recommended Posts

beachbirdie Contributor

When my doctor did a celiac panel a few weeks ago, I had been eating wheat for only a month or so. Is that long enough to give a good result?

I just found out I have a DQ2.2, which is "low risk" for celiac, and my celiac panel showed low enough levels of antibodies to be considered negative. Doc didn't test for DQ1, though I have much northern European heritage (Irish/German)

Just wondering about the time frame.

thanks.

beachbirdie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cahill Collaborator

When my doctor did a celiac panel a few weeks ago, I had been eating wheat for only a month or so. Is that long enough to give a good result?

I just found out I have a DQ2.2, which is "low risk" for celiac, and my celiac panel showed low enough levels of antibodies to be considered negative. Doc didn't test for DQ1, though I have much northern European heritage (Irish/German)

Just wondering about the time frame.

thanks.

beachbirdie

My understanding is that 3 to 4 months of eating the equivalent of 3 to 4 slices of bread a day is needed for a gluten challenge.

Even then some of us test "negative" for celiac's.

This is why it is so very important to be tested before going gluten free. But of course doctors don't tell us that <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GFinDC Veteran

When my doctor did a celiac panel a few weeks ago, I had been eating wheat for only a month or so. Is that long enough to give a good result?

I just found out I have a DQ2.2, which is "low risk" for celiac, and my celiac panel showed low enough levels of antibodies to be considered negative. Doc didn't test for DQ1, though I have much northern European heritage (Irish/German)

Just wondering about the time frame.

thanks.

beachbirdie

I have Irish/German ancestry too, what more evidence do you need? :)

Kidding. I have read something like 6 weeks to three months of eating gluten, but the usual preference seems to be 3 months minimum. And there is still a chance of false negatives. You might want to read up on Enterolabs site. Dr. Fine has paper there suggesting that the blood tests are insensitive because they test the blood for antibodies, while most of the antibodies are actually inside the intestine. Testing the wrong area in other words. Sounds reasonable to me. I haven't tried Enterolab testing myself, but I think his ideas on that part of it sound right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hawthorn Rookie

My doctor told me two weeks would be enough, after a year of being gluten free (or at the very least gluten light since I wasn't very aware of CC)

My bloods came back neg.

On the uk coeliac charity site, they recommend one gluten containing meal every day for six weeks so it seems that ideas on this varies greatly (as if all of this wasn't confusing enough right? )

Good luck :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
love2travel Mentor

My doctors and dietitian all told me I absolutely must be eating the equivalent of four pieces of bread (at least) per day for three months (I had been off gluten for five months) for accurate results. As I did not have GI symptoms and love consuming gluten I was only too happy to oblige! :P But many would not be and I do not blame them one little bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beachbirdie Contributor

I have Irish/German ancestry too, what more evidence do you need? :)

Kidding. I have read something like 6 weeks to three months of eating gluten, but the usual preference seems to be 3 months minimum. And there is still a chance of false negatives. You might want to read up on Enterolabs site. Dr. Fine has paper there suggesting that the blood tests are insensitive because they test the blood for antibodies, while most of the antibodies are actually inside the intestine. Testing the wrong area in other words. Sounds reasonable to me. I haven't tried Enterolab testing myself, but I think his ideas on that part of it sound right.

:D LOL! I just mention the Irish/German thing because so many say there is a strong connection of celiac and northern European. More reading last night tells me my husband and I probably gave our kids a double gene whammy, two of them have strong reactions to gluten and my husband's Latin heritage probably contributed another gene. :huh:

I'm convinced now that with the one gene that I know about, my other autoimmune disease (Hashimoto's thyroiditis) and our symptoms, we don't need to pursue a diagnosis any further. We need to be gluten-free.

Thanks for your answer!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beachbirdie Contributor

Many thanks to all of you for your replies!

beachbirdie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GFinDC Veteran

:D LOL! I just mention the Irish/German thing because so many say there is a strong connection of celiac and northern European. More reading last night tells me my husband and I probably gave our kids a double gene whammy, two of them have strong reactions to gluten and my husband's Latin heritage probably contributed another gene. :huh:

I'm convinced now that with the one gene that I know about, my other autoimmune disease (Hashimoto's thyroiditis) and our symptoms, we don't need to pursue a diagnosis any further. We need to be gluten-free.

Thanks for your answer!

Oh yeah, Hashimoto's thyroiditis is strongly linked with celiac disease. There are plenty of threads on here by people with Hashimoto's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Bayb replied to Bayb's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Trying to read my lab results

    2. - Aussienae replied to Aussienae's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      65

      Constant low back, abdominal and pelvic pain!

    3. - trents replied to mishyj's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Why?

    4. - trents replied to mishyj's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Why?

    5. - mishyj replied to mishyj's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Why?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,222
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Smith-Ronald
    Newest Member
    Smith-Ronald
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Bayb
      Hi Scott, yes I have had symptoms for years and this is the second GI I have seen and he could not believe I have never been tested. He called later today and I am scheduled for an endoscopy. Is there a way to tell how severe my potential celiac is from the results above? What are the chances I will have the biopsy and come back negative and we have to keep searching for a cause? 
    • Aussienae
      I agree christina, there is definitely many contributing factors! I have the pain today, my pelvis, hips and thighs ache! No idea why. But i have been sitting at work for 3 days so im thinking its my back. This disease is very mysterious (and frustrating) but not always to blame for every pain. 
    • trents
      "her stool study showed she had extreme reactions to everything achievement on it long course of microbials to treat that." The wording of this part of the sentence does not make any sense at all. I don't mean to insult you, but is English your first language? This part of the sentence sounds like it was generated by translation software.
    • trents
      What kind of stool test was done? Can you be more specific? 
    • mishyj
      Perhaps I should also have said that in addition to showing a very high response to gluten, her stool study showed that she had extreme reactions to everything achievement on it long course of microbials to treat that.
×
×
  • Create New...