Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-m):

  • You've found your Celiac Tribe! Join our like-minded, private community and share your story, get encouragement and connect with others.


    • Sign In
    • Sign Up

Celiac based on circumstantial evidence

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

After two years of being sick, my gastroenterologist diagnosed me with celiac yesterday, but I'm skeptical.  As far as I'm aware, I only had three tests specific to celiac.  

Blood test results: 

Transglutaminase IgA Abs

19.3 U/mL

Biopsy results were normal (no idea of how many samples he took)
Prometheus genetic test: DQ2 Heterozygous 10X 

He feels I'm in the early stages of celiac, hence no intestinal damage but I would think 2 years of active symptoms would be enough to impact the intestines.  However, I know intestinal damage can also be patchy or mild in some people, right?  

I have a follow up in a month.  What should I ask him?  I don't want to get caught in a wild goose chase if this isn't celiac.  I've been on a gluten free diet since my scopes 2 months ago and was feeling better until a couple weeks ago when most of my symptoms returned.  I don't know if I was glutened or if I just got lucky for a month and had a reprieve from the worst of the symptoms.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now