Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Is Considered A "high" Result For Ttg?


cowtowngirl

Recommended Posts

cowtowngirl Newbie

I was told on Wednesday that the two tests (EMA & TTG) came back positive, and my doctor told me twice she had never seen results so high on the TTG before.

She showed me; my result was ">200", as in "greater than 200". Is that so high that it's off the charts and they can't even give me a specific number?

Needless to say, I've been scheduled for a biopsy end of May.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor

It's great that you may be on the road to wellness. Most labs have their own ranges. To interpret your result, you will need the ranges.

Here is some information on testing:

Open Original Shared Link

ravenwoodglass Mentor

The test ranges only go so high for some reason. I have heard of others who had results 'off the chart' so to speak. If you are going to have the endo make sure that you keep eating gluten until the endo is done. Also although it is doubtful you will have a negative on the biopsy do remember that there is a chance of a false negative. No matter what the biopsy results you need to go gluten free as soon as all testing you choose to do is finished.

Tallforagirl Rookie
I was told on Wednesday that the two tests (EMA & TTG) came back positive, and my doctor told me twice she had never seen results so high on the TTG before.

She showed me; my result was ">200", as in "greater than 200". Is that so high that it's off the charts and they can't even give me a specific number?

Needless to say, I've been scheduled for a biopsy end of May.

Mine was given as ">200" too (on the scale from the laboratory that did my test, anything over 20 was positive).

I guess if it's that high, you don't need an exact number to know it's most definitely positive!

cowtowngirl Newbie

Thank you all.

Yes, once the diagnosis is confirmed (and I'm not expecting otherwise) I will be going gluten-free immediately.

In a way I hate having to continue to eat the way I have been, especially as I'm learning more about this disease and the absolute damage it can do to the body.

Ravenwoodglass; I read your signature and while some of it is foreign to me (the abbreviations and such) I was astonished. Thank you for sharing it.

Alex J Apprentice

My son's came back as >250. His biopsy was pretty strongly positive (almost flat villi in areas), but I do remember that the GI didn't take it as a given that it would be.

He also had hardly any obvious symptoms. He has diabetes and was screened by his endocrinologist because his blood glucose was extremely unpredictable, which is a result of the malabsorbtion. And his growth was bad, but it still is. He had stomach aches, but far fewer than his non celiac sister.

His last TtG came back as 1.9. Woohoo!

gfb1 Rookie
The test ranges only go so high for some reason. I have heard of others who had results 'off the chart' so to speak. If you are going to have the endo make sure that you keep eating gluten until the endo is done. Also although it is doubtful you will have a negative on the biopsy do remember that there is a chance of a false negative. No matter what the biopsy results you need to go gluten free as soon as all testing you choose to do is finished.

another good question. this has to do with the chemistry behind the particular assays. if you were to do a standard curve of all possible concentrations of known TTG (or, anything else for that matter) from zero (0) to 1 million (10^6), the graph formed between the measurement and the actual concentration would NOT be linear. in general, clinical assays are not accepted unless the R-square value of the linear regression is 0.9999. over the last 20 yrs, non-linear assays have been accepted -- but, again, at the 0.9999 level. understanding R-squared value is not as simple as considering a % false positivie or % false negatives.... and beyond the scope of my note...

however, imho (and in my 30 yrs experience doing clinical diagnostics), if a value is above or below the 'accepted' curve of the laboratory... then it is worth asking to repeat the tests. these test SHOULD be done differently (perhaps, depending on the lab, with serial dilutions of the blood sample) if the results are outside the linear portion of the std curve.

again, just my $.02.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,751
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Alison A
    Newest Member
    Alison A
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.4k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I agree with @RMJ, you have multiple positive tests so celiac disease is likely.  This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease.     
    • trents
      One small study found that 50% of celiacs react to the dairy protein "casein" like they do to gluten. It is also common for celiacs to be lactose (the sugar in milk) intolerant, though that often disappears in time as the villi heal. About 10% of celiacs react to the oat protein "avenin" like they do gluten.
    • K6315
      Thank you so much Trents (Scott?)! I have started working with a dietitian and did a deep research dive as soon as I got the diagnosis. I am aware of what you mentioned in the first two paragraphs, and was not aware of anything in the third, so I am grateful for that information, and will talk to the dietitian about that. I think I was most interested in the withdrawal process - it gives me hope that, although I have felt unwell recently, I just need to be patient (not a strong suit). I have printed the article you sent and will look at it more closely. Thanks again!
    • Sandi20
      I really like Thorne!  I've researched thier products.  Thank you so much.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @K6315! Gluten withdrawal typically lasts for a period of a few weeks. But there is a real learning curve involved in actually attaining to a gluten free dietary state. Much more is involved than just cutting out major sources of gluten such as bread and pasta. It's all the places that gluten is hidden in the food supply that is difficult to ferret out, like soy sauce and canned tomato soup, canned chili and canned pork n' beans, some "lite" pancake syrups, potato salad, flavorings, etc., etc. Gluten-containing grain products are hidden through alternate terminology and found in places you would never expect.  There is also "cross contamination" where naturally gluten free foods come into contact with gluten-containing grains during farming, transportation, storage and manufacturing processes. Then there is the issue of "cross reactivity" whereby you may be having gluten-like reaction to food proteins whose structure is similar to gluten. Chief among these are dairy, oats (even gluten-free oats), soy, corn and eggs. I am including this article that you might find helpful:   
×
×
  • Create New...