Jump to content
  • You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Weak Positive Result Now False?


JoyfulGF

Recommended Posts

JoyfulGF Apprentice

My really great Doc called me today and said that the lab which did my bloodwork contacted his office and let him know that the test was too sensitive and because my results were a very weak positive that it leads the lab to believe that my results are now actually a false positive. What in the world? I do not understand that one bit! How can a test be done like that and it be too sensitive? I changed my diet and I will testify that something is off in my body, and now it's coming into order because of this diet change. I know wheat bothers me, it's evident when I've consumed gluten. My husband knows, people around me know that I feel better, I look wayyyy better, and my body is telling me I'm better. Dr actually believes me and thinks that I shouldn't change back because of what I've told him. I'll try calling him tomorrow afternoon (he gave me his home phone if I want to call his house) and discuss it with him.

What do you think about this? Is it rather odd that tests can be a false positive and too sensitive?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Skylark Collaborator

Interesting. Labs sometimes re-evaluate the range they have defined as "normal", or I guess it's possible they discovered some sort of systematic error. You are super-lucky that your result was positive and it led you to go off gluten. I'm really glad to hear that you are starting to feel better. Maybe that little miracle you're hoping for will be around the corner. :)

Bubba's Mom Enthusiast

My really great Doc called me today and said that the lab which did my bloodwork contacted his office and let him know that the test was too sensitive and because my results were a very weak positive that it leads the lab to believe that my results are now actually a false positive. What in the world? I do not understand that one bit! How can a test be done like that and it be too sensitive? I changed my diet and I will testify that something is off in my body, and now it's coming into order because of this diet change. I know wheat bothers me, it's evident when I've consumed gluten. My husband knows, people around me know that I feel better, I look wayyyy better, and my body is telling me I'm better. Dr actually believes me and thinks that I shouldn't change back because of what I've told him. I'll try calling him tomorrow afternoon (he gave me his home phone if I want to call his house) and discuss it with him.

What do you think about this? Is it rather odd that tests can be a false positive and too sensitive?

How confusing! :o If it were me..I'd stay gluten-free. You mention you've had a positive response to the gluten-free diet? Stay the course. :D

JoyfulGF Apprentice

Interesting. Labs sometimes re-evaluate the range they have defined as "normal", or I guess it's possible they discovered some sort of systematic error. You are super-lucky that your result was positive and it led you to go off gluten. I'm really glad to hear that you are starting to feel better. Maybe that little miracle you're hoping for will be around the corner. :)

About labs re-evaluating the range....why aren't all labs the same and why don't they stick to the same every time?

I'm so glad that it was a weak positive when it was, I would be so confused...We're praying for that little one! My husband is in India right now and will be home in a week, my period was due today and she didn't show! :) :) :)

JoyfulGF Apprentice

How confusing! :o If it were me..I'd stay gluten-free. You mention you've had a positive response to the gluten-free diet? Stay the course. :D

So confusing! I am definitely going to stay gluten-free, no doubt about it....I would be stupid not to. Thanks for the encouragement!

Skylark Collaborator

About labs re-evaluating the range....why aren't all labs the same and why don't they stick to the same every time?

I'm not sure how to explain in lay terms. :unsure: Immunologic tests are not absolute measurements like serum sodium. The lab has to set its own ranges based on a group of normal people. (This is why TTG can be so different from lab to lab.) If the lab changes procedures, gets new suppliers for reagents, buys new instruments, or if new information becomes available about the test they will adjust the "normal" range. They must have decided that under current test conditions they were getting too many false positives.

Problem is, if they raise the "normal" range they lose sensitivity and their false negative rate goes up. You are in that group of people, where you are on the border and under the new range you would be a false negative.

I hope that makes sense? I'm having a lot of brain fog today and it's a little hard to organize my thoughts and write.

Did you and your doctor discuss getting a biopsy before you went gluten-free?

JoyfulGF Apprentice

I'm not sure how to explain in lay terms. :unsure: Immunologic tests are not absolute measurements like serum sodium. The lab has to set its own ranges based on a group of normal people. (This is why TTG can be so different from lab to lab.) If the lab changes procedures, gets new suppliers for reagents, buys new instruments, or if new information becomes available about the test they will adjust the "normal" range. They must have decided that under current test conditions they were getting too many false positives.

Problem is, if they raise the "normal" range they lose sensitivity and their false negative rate goes up. You are in that group of people, where you are on the border and under the new range you would be a false negative.

I hope that makes sense? I'm having a lot of brain fog today and it's a little hard to organize my thoughts and write.

Did you and your doctor discuss getting a biopsy before you went gluten-free?

That does make sense, it's just a little whacked if you ask me because, like you said, they lose sensitivity and their false negative rate goes up.

I never talked to my doc about doing a biopsy...don't really want to just because it seems like this is what the problem is and I don't need a biopsy to let me know I can feel better with a gluten free diet.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Skylark Collaborator

That does make sense, it's just a little whacked if you ask me because, like you said, they lose sensitivity and their false negative rate goes up.

It's the really hard thing about looking at a population where everyone is slightly different. The TTG test does not necessarily read zero because antibodies cross-react. (This is handy when your immune system is trying to kill off a slightly different flu strain or bacteria it hasn't seen before.) On a test going 0-100, people with a TTG of 100 are obviously positive, people around 5 or 6 are obviously negative, but what about the middle? You might have a normal person who has an antibody from a bacterial infection that has nothing to do with celiac but it cross-reacts a little on the test and gives a TTG of 25. Then you have a celiac who is kind of low on TTG and gives a reading of 21 but it really is TTG antibody. You can't tell those people apart in the test. Set your cutoff at >20 and you will catch the celiac but biopsy the healthy person. Set your cutoff at >25 and you saved the healthy person an uncomfortable procedure but you missed the celiac.

See the problem? Labs work with this all the time, and they are constantly evaluating their "normal" ranges to make an imperfect test perform as well as possible. There is a fair amount of pressure from insurance (plus common sense) to limit unnecessary procedures though. That's part of why doctors run multiple tests. If you are borderline on one test but get positive on another it makes the diagnosis much stronger. Your doctor knows about this process, and also the added risk of false negatives with a higher threshold.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,084
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    Melvac
    Newest Member
    Melvac
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      Sigh. I posted this yesterday based on the Safeway website. I went back again today to their website to double check. On the page where they are selling Vanilla Bean flavor, it has a distinct Certified Gluten Free label. Other flavors on the Safeway website didn't have the gluten-free statement. Today I went into the store. None of the flavors I looked at, including Vanilla Bean, have a Gluten Free statement. Is it safe? Who knows. The ingredients are either safe or nearly safe (some have "natural flavor"). There are warnings about "contains milk and soy" but not about wheat - this implies they are safe, but again, who knows. On the other hand, every flavor I checked of their Slow Churn line of ice creams has wheat as an ingredient. 100% not safe.
    • knitty kitty
      Do keep in mind that many of the newly diagnosed have lactose intolerance.  This is because the villi lining the intestinal tract are damaged, and can no longer make the enzyme lactAse which breaks down the milk sugar lactOse.  When the villi grow back (six months to two years), they can again produce the enzyme lactAse, and lactose intolerance is resolved.  However, some people (both those with and without Celiac Disease) are genetically programmed to stop producing lactase as they age.   Do be aware that many processed foods, including ice cream, use Microbial Transglutaminase, a food additive commonly called "meat glue," used to enhance texture and flavor.  This microbial transglutaminase has the same immunogenicity as tissue transglutaminase which the body produces in response to gluten in people with Celiac Disease.  Tissue Transglutaminase (tTg IgA) is measured to diagnose Celiac Disease in blood tests.  Microbial Transglutaminase acts the same as Tissue Transglutaminase, causing increased intestinal permeability and inflammation.   New findings show that microbial transglutaminase may be able to trigger Celiac Disease and other autoimmune and neurodegenerative diseases.   Microbial Transglutaminase is not required to be listed on ingredients labels as it's considered a processing aid, not an ingredient in the U.S.  Microbial Transglutaminase has been GRAS for many years, but that GRAS standing is being questioned more and more as the immunogenicity of microbial transglutaminase is being discovered. Interesting Reading:  Microbial Transglutaminase Is a Very Frequently Used Food Additive and Is a Potential Inducer of Autoimmune/Neurodegenerative Diseases https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8537092/
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      There is a 10 year old post in this forum on Edy's and Dreyer's ice cream. The information is somewhat outdated and the thread is closed to further comment, so here is a new one. Edy's And Dreyer's Grand Vanilla Bean Ice Cream - 1.5 Quart is labeled "Gluten Free". This is a different answer than years gone by. I don't know the answer for any other flavor at this moment. On 1 May, 2026, Edy's website says: "As a general rule, the gluten in Edy's and Dreyer's® frozen dessert products is present only in the added bakery products, such as cookies, cake or brownies. We always label the eight major food allergens on our package by their common name. We recommend to always check the label for the most current information before purchasing and/or consuming a product. The exception to this rule is our Slow Churned French Silk frozen dairy dessert, which contains gluten in the natural flavors." https://www.icecream.com/us/en/brands/edys-and-dreyers/faq It seems that Edy's and Dreyer's are more celiac-friendly than they were 10 years ago. Once I found enough information to make today's buying decision, I stopped researching.
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      probably not your situation @Mimiof2, but allow me to add one more to @trents list of celiac-mimics: "olmesartan-induced sprue-like enteropathy"  
    • knitty kitty
      My dad had an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.  Fortunately, it was discovered during an exam.  The doctor could feel my dad's heart beating in his stomach/abdomen.  The aneurysm burst when the doctor first touched it in surgery.  Since he was already hooked up to the bypass machine, my dad survived ten more years.  Close call! Triple A's can press on the nerves in the spinal cord causing leg pain.  I'm wondering if bowing the head might have increased the pressure on an aneurysm and then the nerves.   https://gulfcoastsurgeons.com/understanding-abdominal-aortic-aneurysm-symptoms-and-causes/ Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Presenting as a Claudication https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4040638/
×
×
  • Create New...